The Case For $3M Bitcoin Revealed in Exclusive Interview With Michael Saylor & Adam Back!
BTCPrague · 2025-06-25 · 1h 24m · View on YouTube →
I'm just going to issue billions and
billions and billions of dollars of
securities and buy billions and billions
and billions of dollars of Bitcoin and
uh right I mean that's the engineering I
give you the upside you have no downside
and I pay you a dividend while you wait
to get rich okay
which is
Bitcoin goes to a million 2 million bit
as Bitcoin goes up if I own Bitcoin in
Cuba or North Korea. I'm getting rich.
Now, the interesting thing is where is
all the money in the world? There's
hundred trillion dollars of money in the
equity capital markets. There's 3002
$300 trillion of money in the credit
markets.
But the long-term durable business is to
issue BTCbacked credit instruments and
issue billions and then tens of billions
and then hundreds of billions.
And you're not competing against other
Bitcoin treasury companies and it almost
is meant to compete with IBIT. They
can't invest in something for a hundred
years. And so the Bitcoin superpower is
Oh, you go first. We'll figure it out.
All right. It's all good with me.
[Applause]
All right. Thank you everyone. Uh very
happy to be here. Very grateful to be
with legends Adam, Michael Sailor. I
think we can all be grateful to have the
privilege to spend time and get uh the
all the knowledge of Michael and of Adam
all together. But first I would like to
express my deepest gratitude to BTC
Prague. I think they have put together
an amazing event.
Thank you so much. Thank you Matias
Martin. I think we can all say every
time there is no second best, but then
you meet Matias, you say there might be
no second best and then you meet Martin
and then there is maybe.
And so thank you so much for all of
this. And uh I would like also to thank
very much Michael and Adam. I think on a
personal level uh you have changed my
life uh and my family and I think that's
the case for a lot of people here. I
think that um you are an example of
ethics, of courage and of success over
the years and that provide a lot of hope
for everyone.
Well, I guess everyone agrees. So, thank
you very much. Um I guess uh a key topic
here today will be uh the
financialization of Bitcoin. uh and
maybe we will get into how this is also
positive for Bitcoin. What are also
potentially some risks and trade-offs to
always take in mind but first I would
like to start with Michael and to ask
how is it possible that the simplest
the the the clear model for business is
actually the most effective. I asked
just before entering the stage to the
community on X what is the number one
question I should ask and the question
always I get is what is the next
business model for Bitcoin Treasury
company. Well, the business model you
already have it and so I will leave the
floor to to Michael to explain how the
model is so robust due to its simplicity
and how you can achieve amazing results
by focusing on executing it as laser
eyes focused as possible and to deliver
the best results for shareholders.
Thanks. You know, I I said um I said in
Vegas, you know, uh a corporation is uh
the most effective wealth creation
machine that we have yet devised. And if
we think about the spread of Bitcoin as
a monetary virus and as a as an idea, um
the super spreaders uh the amplifiers of
the virus are corporations. when uh
Bitcoin hits an individual, if uh bit
Bitcoin arrives, you know, at my
proverbial dentist and the dentist
clocks a couple hundred,000 a year or
whatever, they're buying a few
hundred,000 of Bitcoin. And you know, as
I said, in the in the war to determine
the future of money, right, it's going
to be fought with money, right? Right.
Right? The future of money is going to
be fought with and won with money. So
the dentist is um he's generating a few
hundred,000 or she's generating a few
hundred,000 a year. And so over 20
years, you're going to buy $4 million of
Bitcoin.
When the dentist incorporates and
becomes a company,
the dentist is going to sell a million
dollars of stock
and they're going to buy a million
dollars of Bitcoin in a month.
And when the company recapitalizes on
Bitcoin, then your real opportunity is
to any any operating company can sell
equity or sell credit, issue credit. And
uh public companies are the best. So say
you're a public company, the superpower
you have as a public company is you can
sell equity, you can issue warrants, you
can issue bonds,
convertible bonds, junk bonds, or
preferred stock.
uh and the preferred stock can have any
rights. They it can look like equity. It
can look like convertible equity. It can
look like a bond. It can have dividends
or not. So when a company adopts the
Bitcoin standard, that dentist that
becomes a company
doesn't buy a million dollars of Bitcoin
in five years, doesn't buy a million
dollars of Bitcoin in one year. The
company issues a million dollars of
equity and buys a million dollars of
Bitcoin in one month.
But it's immediately profitable, which
means in the next month the company can
issue another million. And so a company
may very well start to issue a million
dollars a month of security of equity
and it all of a sudden has bought $10
million of Bitcoin. So now the
interesting thing is where is all the
money in the world? There's a hundred
trillion dollars of money in the equity
capital markets. There's 300230 trillion
dollars of money in the credit markets.
All of the equity capital in the world
is valued based upon future expectations
of fiat cash flows.
Every company in Nigeria is valued based
upon the expectation of Nigerian cash
flows. Every company in Brazil is based
on Brazilian cash flows. Every company
in the US cash flows. Okay? And we know
that those the value of that cash is
falling but we also know it's very
competitive. So so you have uh a long
heterogeneous uncertain like uh credit
risk there or or a equity risk we'll
call it. And then with credit all of the
creditors they're valued based upon the
future expectations of cash flows. I I I
borrow money. I don't have the money. I
promise you I'll pay it back. I'm going
to get the money over 10 years. Right?
So the existing markets are based upon
these future expectations
of business operation. We're valuing
real world assets. We're valuing future
cash flows. We're valuing equity uh or
or opportunities. And the Bitcoin
treasury company idea and the and the
most elegant business model is I have a
stack of Bitcoin, $10 million of
Bitcoin. I start issuing equity based
upon my ability uh to acquire more
Bitcoin. Then I issue credit, you know,
fixed credit, convertible credit, some
other credit, and then I use it to buy
Bitcoin. And of course, the point is
when MetaPlanet was a hotel, they might
be able to buy a million dollars of
Bitcoin a year, but when Met Planet
started uh issuing equity, it's able to
issue a billion dollars of equity in a
year. And so now they're buying not a
million, but a billion a year. But the
rate at which a company can issue equity
or credit
is exponential. But it's not like annual
it, you know, you might be doubling
every month, right? You might or you
might go into something like uh like on
October 30th we announced the 21 billion
ATM. We thought well that you know if we
do that in three years that'll be the
most successful equity program in the
history of the capital markets if we did
it in three years. And we did it in like
three months because because all you're
doing is you're swapping equity for
Bitcoin and you're swappering swapping
credit
for Bitcoin. Companies can do that.
Individuals can't do that. But when you
put three individuals together and they
cooperate, they become a company. So
really that I wouldn't be afraid of a
company. I would just say a company is
when, you know, one dude that knows
finance got together with one lawyer and
got together with one uh with one
leader, a CEO, a CFO, a general counsel,
now you have a Bitcoin treasury company.
If you put Bitcoin digital capital
behind it,
and now you can grow literally as fast
as you can issue the security and buy
the Bitcoin. And that is that is an
investment cycle which is 1,000 times
faster than you know a physical real
estate cycle or a business cycle. So
it's faster, it's homogeneous
and uh primarily the friction point is
the issuance of securities. So it's a
it's a legal and it's a regulatory
friction point. And it's different if
you're Japanese than if you're French.
You you you need Bitcoin treasury
companies in the UK that understand UK
law and one in France and one in Norway
and Sweden and Germany and they're all
going to have local advantages
because they're you know you know if
you're a Japanese company it's easier to
issue Japanese securities than American
company going to Japan. I know this.
I called Simon. And I said,"Simon, the
good news is you'll probably beat me to
issue preferred stock in the Japanese
market. You know, go for it." Right? And
so I I think that that's the the
simplicity uh in the business model is
I'm just going to issue billions and
billions and billions of dollars of
securities and buy billions and billions
and billions of dollars of Bitcoin and
I'm going to digitally transform the
equity and the credit capital markets
from 20th century analog physical cash
cashbased
to 21st century very digital
bitcoinbased and that's I think what we
see right now in the market. So Michael,
you have built the Bitcoin Treasury
Company bridge. You have said multiple
times the best thing to do is to
actually build the bridge, stand on the
bridge, show that the bridge works and
then invite us to come to the bridge and
you have done an amazing uh work on this
and thank you so much for all you do for
Bitcoin for corporations overall. Uh we
have the chance today to also have Adam
that has even contributed to build the
Bitcoin bridge itself through
innovations uh like hash at the time in
the 1990s and uh who is also extremely
present in the Bitcoin treasury company
analysis today. So Adam, how do you see
uh the evolution of Bitcoin and the
Bitcoin treasury company model and how
do you have a valuation framework for
the different bridges of Bitcoin
treasury company and how do you analyze
them? You have even created new metrics
how do you analyze the Bitcoin treasury
company business model? Well, it's
interesting to see how people are
looking at it because as with many new
things, the default is people are
skeptical. Okay, why why does that work?
Seems like magical thinking. Seems
recursive logic. That kind of feel. But
if you It's quite simple really. You can
recreate the logic for yourself, which
is to go back to Michael's dentist
example. Let's say it's a private
practice. They could use their free cash
flow to buy Bitcoin, but they realize
they can take a loan and borrow Bitcoin.
because they have now accounts, they can
maybe borrow a million dollars against
the practice which has enterprise value
and buy Bitcoin and the dentist is a
friend of yours. So, he invites you to
buy 10% ownership in his practice.
But he knows that you can't get this
favorable business loan because you're
not a business. So, he asks for a
premium and you do the calculation, you
realize it's still a good deal because
if you want to do it yourself, your
credit is less scalable. you you know
you you have a worse credit risk as an
unsecured lender and so it makes sense
and so you invest in it. So now you've
proven to yourself but a treasury
company should have a premium.
Now once it it's a public company the
market will tell you what the premium
should be and once you have a premium
you can start to use a capital markets
tools. So you can sell more shares issue
more shares and sell more shares. And if
you if you look at it when there's a
positive premium that will increase the
bitcoin per share which is the uh
northstar metric that all the treasury
companies are looking at is increasing
bitcoin per share because the
shareholders are buying shares and if
they're getting more bitcoin over time
per share that's uh you know growing
their position. So I think the next next
question people come to if you if you
get them across those hurdles is you
know well am I overpaying? is has the
market bid up this uh premium or the
MNAV the market cap divided by the net
asset value of Bitcoin too far and you
know so it's something that any investor
struggles with to think you know from a
risk perspective what could go wrong if
I get too enthusiastic and I buy a very
high MNAV and that turns out to be
something that decays over time and
normalizes lower then I'm left holding
this thing so now I think there's some
interesting factors here with treasury
companies that have reduced that risk.
One is that the treasury companies are
buying Bitcoin all the time, you know,
every month, every day. And so they're
reducing your risk over time because
what what you'll see is that uh as as a
treasury company buys Bitcoin, they're
sort of uh paying for a premium. So the
example I was giving is that you know
micro strategy or strategy now is the
most wellknown the earliest treasury
company. So I had some conversations
with you know people in the banking
sector investment banking sector and
they they were you know why does this
work? I said well look it's very simple.
Micro strategy was trading at around two
times now for for some periods and you
know what yield have they achieved? How
much have they increased Bitcoin per
share since January last year? And it
about doubled the amount of Bitcoin. It
did 73 and a half% last year and about
enough this was a month or so ago during
this first two quarters of this year
that that compounds to two times. I
think if you if you bought the stock
last year, you're now the the yield has
paid for the two two times risk premium.
And so that means from here forwards as
they continue to accumulate until
Bitcoin is fully saturated, you have no
risk, you know, almost no risk because
you're you you've you've got to the
point where you have uh paid a bitcoin
for each bitcoin inside the company and
it's still operating. It's still doing a
strategy. So that thought process
basically lends itself to a new metric
which is how quickly does a given
company pay for the premium it has and
so the premiums are different for you
know due to local market dynamics due to
the market tools they have uh whether
they're using debts or ATMs and the MNAV
they they end up in a reg in a region
and so you can see that you know it was
a way for me to start to feel
comfortable buying metal plants planet
at five times premium when I was
accustomed. I was relatively early in in
buying Micro Strategy shares because I
thought that Michael's mission here to,
you know, encourage other companies to
put their treasury reserves into Bitcoin
was a was a very uh, you know, good
cause and would help companies and, you
know, it would surprise me actually it
took so long for other companies to to
come on board despite, you know,
Michael's running a annual conference to
show them and give them a playbook. So
in any case the the question for me was
well do I feel comfortable buying
MetaPlanet at five and you know because
it's higher than than Micro Strategy had
and the answer became easier what to
think about once you thought about well
how long does it take to pay for that or
it was actually you know it's varying
over time but at one point it was five
months and so then I realized well
that's actually much lower risk than it
appears intuitively because within the
within the space of five months if they
continue, you know, if nothing disrupts
their ability to raise capital with the
mechanism they're using for that period,
then they actually get to the same one
times in after a five month period and
then it's upside after that. Now, you do
have there's a lot of, you know,
judgment in the execution strength of
the management. In in my case, I knew
Alexander and I knew somebody involved
with MetaPlanet. So I had some uh
built-in trust of the people involved in
running it and that they were you know
bitcoiners interested in bitcoin for its
for its mission and so on. Um so that
that metric I expressed as the months to
cover and actually I think it was
somebody sent me a a screenshot which I
asked where it came from and it was from
the MetaPlanet quartly presentation and
they picked it up and used it within
like a few days basically. So evidently
it they thought it was useful to explain
to their investors why you should you
should buy you know why you should
invest in MetaPlanet effectively. So I
think they found it uh they have a high
MF so it it works well for them right
anyway they they adopted it and picked
it up. So it's just a way to to look at
it but I think you do have to form an
opinion about the repeatability of the
strategy the scalability of the strategy
as the company grows. you know, if it's
twice as big, ideally, it needs to be
able to raise correspondingly twice as
much or it could slow down and um
whether it will be able to continue this
at the same pace in a bare market as a
bull market. And of course, the other
factor you're looking at is what's the
debt ratio. And you know, you can see
today that strategy has a relatively low
debt ratio. I believe it's something in
the 15% range. And you know on the
Bitcoin side of things uh the blockchain
group is actually not taking on debt at
all in a normal sense because you have a
Bitcoin basis convertible note which I
think is a very interesting
uh new variant of of debt. The reason
that that is not conventional debt is
because if it fails to reach the
conversion premium over uh the 5year
period ultimately the company could just
give back to Bitcoin sitting in rig
fence in a bank subsurfree mode
custodian and so it doesn't have the
same kind of tail risk and so they were
able to at the blockchain group to to
bring in what would be staggering
amounts of debt if you if you were to do
that in euros. So it enabled the
blockchain group to grow very quickly in
its in its early period. So yeah, that's
that's what I've been looking at um in
trying to understand and get a feel for
things. I I find that generally the best
way to understand things is is to get
your your hands on to it and you know
buy invest try to analyze form an
opinion should always have your own
opinion. Shouldn't rely on other
people's opinions. If you're investing,
you should have your own valuation. What
all your own thesis for why you think
something's valuable? And another
question I get asked sometimes is how
scalable is is the treasury company
playing which is to say if lots of
companies come in will it compress the
effect lower the mnavs and exhaust
something and you know in a way that
that's a question for Michael because he
was inviting people you know trying to
encourage them to come in you know would
that compress his his strategy right and
you know my intuition when asked this
question is actually No, it won't
because it's an enormous market.
effectively the treasury play you know
everybody buying Bitcoin personally
uh every fund manager putting Bitcoin
into a pension fund and all of the
treasury companies are basically all
participating you know so everybody
owning Bitcoin is participating along
with the treasury companies and you know
sovereign wealth funds and everybody in
this huge arbitrage between the fiat
current which is mispricing Bitcoin and
the Bitcoin denominated future which you
Hal Finny in 2009
uh famously just put out the what if
that Bitcoin should be worth $200
trillion
um you know just just based on the
monetary premium in other assets and so
that still seems very plausible maybe
it's a bit higher because we've
onboarded a lot of inflation in the
different major currencies and so you
know if you look at that it's an
enormous arbitrage that will take you
know maybe decade or decades to go
through even If the big cashrich
companies get involved, it's just an
enormous pie. And there are probably
some beneficial effects of of more
players. you know, it will provide more
liquidity, more understanding, more
certainty, standardize the model, make
it work better because people people's
risk um misunderstanding will will clear
up or like react to safety and numbers
and and copying other people, seeing
other people doing things with
confidence and um so I think that you
know and of course this activity is you
know slowly bringing forward
bitcoinization of the world. So it's
generally absorbing Bitcoin. Um yeah,
another thing interesting thing about
treasury companies buying Bitcoin is
they are very mission focused on not
selling Bitcoin. So they're taking
Bitcoin off of the spot Bitcoin markets
and storing it. And while the individual
companies stock varies depending on, you
know, it uh just market psychology or
somebody shorting it temporarily, things
like that, that doesn't result in
Bitcoin. selling it just results in the
company getting compressed temporarily
while they build up lots more Bitcoin
and then they spring back. So it seems
quite resilient as well. You know, one
one theory people might have is will the
MNAV get compressed and stay low, get
stuck there? And you can see that a good
example in MetaPlanet in February this
year, um their MNAV got to 10, which was
on the high side, and then it
immediately crashed with a limit down, a
limit system in the Japanese market
under a,000 yen. It can only move 150
yen before there's a limit stop. And so
it limit down three days in a row and it
reopened almost 50% down and that that
made the market subdued for a couple of
months. But in the meantime, you know,
the Metropanet management team continued
to operate their moving strike uh ATM
like system and changed 1,760
Bitcoin into 5,000 Bitcoin in a couple
of months. And of course that that
compressed the MNAP down to two and a
half. And at that point the investors
woke up and said, "Wow, that's cheap."
So they start buying it. Once you get
some some buying going, a lot of people
are momentum traders. They see they see
something's happening. They build it up.
And you know, now within not too many
weeks, their MNAP is back at seven. So
you can see the MNAV can get reanimated.
And the thing that causes that is the
buildup of pressure of more Bitcoin
being piled in making it, you know,
reducing the risk because it gets
cheaper and cheaper in terms of the
premium. Um, so very interesting to see
those, you know, fears be proven again
in the market over time. So get
confidence in in how this type of
instrument, this type of company can
behave in the market. So Adam, you
mentioned that we are going to a BTC
denominated world, the 200 trillion
dollars opportunity in today's dollars
and the future of as well the accretion
and the bitcoin per share and the mnav
and the premiums and so on. Many of
these maker you have been pioneering the
BTC denominated capital markets with the
KPIs, the BTC KPIs, the BTC yield, the
BTC gain uh and the torque and you have
been put putting together a lot of
metrics for the financial industry
overall to be able to value Bitcoin
treasury companies and you are also
aggressively now tapping into credit
markets and you are issuing new products
that allow to maybe challenge this form
of consensus view that the premium
should go to one over time or something
like this. Effectively with the
instruments that you are leveraging
potentially you are uh enabling the
premium to continue to stabilize or even
go up. Um so how are you uh able to uh
provide a financial engineering in a in
a best-in-class manner to tap into those
capital markets and have the best
performing preferred and have the
ability to make an announcement of
10,000 bitcoin um in a week and uh how
how are you able to do that and how this
is shaping the new wave of um adoption
for financial markets with the
instruments of Bitcoin treasury
companies.
You know, I I think our first um
challenge was to develop a set of
metrics that you could use to value uh
BTC backed equity. And because you're on
a Bitcoin standard, uh, simple USD, uh,
US dollar accounting doesn't really work
because US dollar accounting is geared
toward companies that generate their
earnings via operations. And so, you
know, we created BTC yield, which is
basically the accretion of Bitcoin per
share in a percentage. And the idea of
that is if you've got a 20% BTC yield,
you could put a multiple of it on it
like 10 and you could you could come to
a 200% premium to NAV. It's a very
simple way to get to what should the
premium to NAV be. Well, it comes down
to whether the whether the company
generates 220%
yield or 10 or 200% yield, right? And a
bond that pays 200% interest after tax
is worth a lot more than a bond that
pays 5% interest after tax. Right? So,
um the yield metric was an equity
metric. Uh BTC gain or dollar gain is an
equity metric. A BTC dollar gain is
basically the earnings equivalent for a
Bitcoin company. It's it's on a Bitcoin
standard basis. If you generated a
hund00 million of BTC dollar gain, it's
like $100 million of after tax earnings.
um it goes direct to shareholder equity.
It bypasses the P&L. But a company that
can generate a billion dollars of of BTC
dollar gain is like a company that
generates a billion dollars of earnings,
right? And you could use a P to E on
that and say, well, I'll assign a PTE of
10 or 20 or 30 or whatever times that
gain and that gives me an enterprise
value for the operation and their
ability to do it. Now the question
becomes how do you generate BTC yield
and how do you generate BTC uh dollar
gain or BTC gain and there's three
obvious ways to do it. One way is
operating cash flows. I take my
operating profit and I sweep it into BTC
and that becomes a yield and that
becomes a gain.
that is uh have $100 million of
operating cash flow and I buy Bitcoin
with it. Uh then I have $100 million of
BTC uh dollar gain without any
shareholder dilution, right? And so
that's you know that's one way to do it.
Uh you need an operating company that
generates a lot of cash to do it. The
second way to do it is is if you sell
equity at a premium to NAV, you know,
when you're selling a $100 million of
equity at a 2 MNAB, then you capture a
$50 million BTC
dollar gain. And of course, if you sell
equity at a discount to MNAB, you're
actually diluting the shareholder. So,
you would have a negative yield, a
negative gain. I think the reason that
BTC yield and BTC gains matter is it's a
very simple, transparent, instantaneous
way for an investor to see whether the
management team uh took an accretive
transaction or a dilutive transaction on
any given day. Any public company can
raise almost any amount of money if
they're willing to dilute their
shareholders. And the real trick is to
do it accreatively. So those two
metrics, you know, are important, but
now we've moved through this issue. I've
run out of cash flow. What do you do if
the BTC um if the MNAV is 10 or five or
eight? This is not a complicated
question. when you're on fire with an
MNAV of eight, you sell the equity, you
buy the Bitcoin, you know, at an MNAV of
of 10, you've got like a 90% spread,
right? So, you're generating $900
million of gains for every billion
dollars of of equity you're selling.
It's risk-free instant earnings. In
essence, that's not complicated. The
question is, what if MNAV goes to one or
it goes below one? How do you j what if
you don't have any cash flow and mnav
goes to one but you have a billion
dollars of bitcoin on the balance sheet
well if you're a closedin trust like
gayscale right or if you're an ETF uh
but especially a closedin trust you
can't do anything so you'll trade at a
discount to mnav and that's always the
thing people wanted to avoid
the special power that an operating
company has is to issue credit
instruments though. And so the way that
you actually pull yourself out of a hole
if you trade at a discount or you trade
down to normal MNAV is you start to sell
credit instruments you collateralized on
the on the assets of the company. So
that takes us to the idea of uh of BTC
credit models. If I have a billion
dollars of Bitcoin, I can sell a hund00
million of a bond or a hundred billion,
let's say, $100 million of preferred
stock that yields 10% dividend yield.
It's 10 times over collateralized. So
therefore, the BTC rating is 10. You can
now calculate the risk. The risk would
be the risk that your billion dollars of
Bitcoin trades to less than a hundred
million by the time of maturity of the
instrument.
You can calculate that statistically the
same way you calculate Black Scholes
models. You plug in the volatility, you
plug in the BTC rating, a risk pops out.
Um and uh then you can calculate a
credit spread, what we call BTC credit.
What is the what is the theoretical
credit spread above the risk-free rate
that you need to offset the risk? And of
course, the credit spread if the BTC
rating of is two is higher than if it's
10. And if Bitcoin volatility is
forecast at 50, then the the credit
spread has to be higher than if the
Bitcoin volatility is 30. So if you plug
into your model your expectation of
Bitcoin return or ARR over a decade and
you plug in your expectation of
volatility of Bitcoin and you plug in
the price of Bitcoin, you get a BTC
rating, the risk pops out, the BTC
credit model pops out. Um what we have
done is used that in order to start to
issue Bitcoin back credit instruments.
Our our idea is we want to sell
securities into a market that's uh
orthogonal to the equity market and to
the Bitcoin market or uh an uncorrelated
market. So the market for uh for US
dollar yield right amongst retirees
there are a lot of people that don't
know what Bitcoin is, don't know what uh
strategy is. They don't know anything
about our business model. But if we
offer them like we offered a a a
preferred stock that yields 10% dividend
at par, we offer you 10% dividend yield
and a qualified income distribution, a
QID or QDI qualified
um type instrument. If you make less
than $48,000 a year, you can buy the
instrument and collect 10% dividend
yield taxree in the US. Okay. Well,
that's interesting. A lot of people want
10%.
Now the issue is is it risky? Well, if
it's 5x or 10x over collateralized, then
it doesn't look that risky if you if you
think Bitcoin is a real thing. So, the
idea of giving someone extremely low
risk but high yield uh fixed income is a
is a simple idea. I think it's kind of a
killer application for Bitcoin as
collateral. What we did at Strategy is
we created a convertible preferred
called strike which gives you 40% of the
upside of the stock and an 8% dividend
at par. And then we created a senior um
preferred called Strife that gives you
10% at par that is uh cumulative. It
means the dividends if you ever miss
them they accumulate and there are
penalties. So it's and it's senior to
all the other preferred and u those two
were the two most successful preferred
stocks in the century that is the most
liquid the highest performing they all
traded up 25% when the other preferred
were trading down 5%. And of course,
they're the most successful because
anything any security backed by pure
Bitcoin is always better, right? The
options are more valuable, the equity is
more valuable, the convertible bonds are
more valuable, these preferred are more
valuable because you're plugging in an
asset which is going up 55% a year with
55 vol. And so if you plug in something
which is spinning at 55 RPM that's clock
that's that's going 55 miles an hour
there's a lot of energy in it. So we
just plug that into those instruments.
They were very successful.
We we uh floated them in the public
market on NASDAQ and we attached a shelf
registration to them. And the idea is
now we can just we can sell people we
can sell people 40% of the upside of the
stock and that might be 80% of the
upside of Bitcoin but with downside
protection and a guaranteed dividend. So
we call strike it's like a it's like a
Bitcoin fellowship. It's like you get a
living stipen you get protection and you
get to ride the upside and you can hold
it forever. And that's for the Bitcoin
curious that are afraid to get on the
roller coaster, which is Bitcoin, or the
hyper roller coaster, which is the
equity, the turbocharged Bitcoin, MSTR.
But then there's a lot of people that
don't want Bitcoin exposure. They just
want US dollar yield or euro yield or
JPY yield. And so, you know, how is
that? How many people is that? Well,
that's like every retiree in the world.
That's like that's like everybody.
There's no one that doesn't want eight
or 10% dividend yield at extremely low
risk. That's why the credit markets,
fixed income markets are bigger than the
equity markets. So what we did there is
we're just using Bitcoin to generate
that. And um if Bitcoin is going up,
it's been going up 55%. So you can
pretty much slice any amount of yield
out of 50 less than 55% and you can give
it to an investor
and uh you know I think a Bitcoin
maximalist long-term forecast is 30%.
But I I figure Bitcoin's got to yield
between 20 and 60% a year for ever.
And as long as Bitcoin is returning 20%
or more, you can always sell these
instruments offering 6 7 8 9 10% and
swap it into 20 30 40%.
Capture the difference for the equity
investors and that way the equity
outperforms Bitcoin.
The convertible you can probably and and
here's our engineering. We're basically
engineering the company for the equity
to outperform Bitcoin by 50 to 100%.
Then you've got Bitcoin. If you want
straight Bitcoin, you buy it from IBIT
or you buy the BTC and you hold it
yourself. And then we're engineering,
but you're getting you're getting all
the upside and the downside of Bitcoin,
all the volatility. Then strike the
convertible instrument is engineered to
give you 80 to 100% of the performance
of Bitcoin but with 10% of the downside.
So we want 80% of the upside, 10% of the
downside and a guaranteed dividend. So
that's for people that kind of want to
have their cake and eat it too and they
don't want the roller coaster.
And it almost is meant to compete with
IBIT. You know, if you think about it,
it's like instead of 100% of the upside,
100% of the downside, and no dividend,
what if I gave you 80 to 100% of the
upside? I don't know if it'll be exactly
100%, but the the more we lever the
equity, then the more likely the
convertible equity becomes equal to
Bitcoin performance. So, we're shooting
to get the convert to perform the same
as Bitcoin over the long term, but with
principal protection and liquidation
preference. and with the guaranteed
dividend stream. And that's that thing.
And it seems like there's a market for
people that want the upside without the
downside, right? And uh Right. I mean,
that's the engineering. I give you the
upside, you have no downside, and I pay
you a dividend while you wait to get
rich. Okay?
Which is
[Applause]
the the smart financial engineers in my
opinion agree with me. They're like,
"Oh, wow. This is a good idea." But a
lot of people haven't quite they haven't
quite figured it out yet because
because um nobody's ever issued a
perpetual uh convertible preferred
stock. They're the the last 10 preferred
stocks issued in the last four years.
The top three of the 10 were ours and
they're all perpetual and all the other
seven aren't. People don't normally sell
a perpetual dividend or a perpetual call
option because they don't have a
perpetual use of proceeds. They they
they can't invest in something for a
hundred years. And so the Bitcoin
superpower is if you believe if you're a
Bitcoin believer, you think Bitcoin is
going to outperform the S&P index
forever.
And if Bitcoin outperforms the S&P index
forever, you can sell a dividend that's
less than the S&P forever. And then you
can also sell a a convertible preferred
that outperforms, right? That that's
good forever. So, so we engineered that.
And then the idea with the the fixed is
is we're going to give someone an
infinite duration dividend yielding. and
and and the conventional thinking is
you're crazy. You should have a call
option in so you can retire it if
interest rates fall. And that's a way a
convent a conventional banker is like
they all like you should put a call
option and then you call it if if if the
interest rates fall 200 basis points.
You'll call it and you'll refinance it.
But that's the way you think if you sell
144a over-the-counter instruments with a
three-year duration to trade in the
over-thecounter market. But those are
all crippled 20th century instruments.
The way you think in the 21st century is
I'm going to put strife into the market
and I don't care how much I sell in the
first week. I'm m I I'm creating the
instrument so that I will maximize the
amount of capital I raise over the next
decade or 20 years. So we wanted uh to
create the instrument so that if if
Jerome Pal drops the interest rates 200
basis points strife trades up to 150 or
and when it trades up to 150 the cost
the the yield falls to 6%. And when the
you know so instead of 10 it falls to
six and then we're we're able to then
sell it. I'm not buying it back.
I'm selling it. Right? The whole idea is
when the interest rates fall, I will be
selling billions and billions of dollars
of that instrument via the ATM at 150 or
200.
And the small thinker thinks, oh, I have
to buy it back, refinance it, go back
and do a 144A deal with the investment
bank with a huge, huge commission to
refinance it, and then that'll be
illquid and crippled. And so I don't
want to issue a series of crippled,
illlquid securities. And by by the way,
what I'm describing
the entire preferred stock market, all
of the preferred stocks, in my opinion,
are garbage, right? to all this this
you're you're buying these garbage
instruments that are illlquid that trade
$400,000 a day that yield 6% that have
the credit of a midsize regional bank in
a state you've never been to with
mortgage portfolios you don't understand
and you're supposed to accept 6% illquid
over-the-counter
that nobody can buy you know instead of
something which yields more which is
100xes liquid that everybody can buy.
And of course, the problem is all that
corporate credit, all of that preferred,
it's all 20th century ideas on 20th
century credit models. So, what we did
is we concluded the killer app for a
Bitcoin treasury company
is to issue credit Bitcoin, you know,
Bitcoinbacked equity. That's the first
app. And yeah, you can do that for a
while, but the long-term durable
business is to issue BTCbacked credit
instruments and issue billions and then
tens of billions and then hundreds of
billions. And you're not competing
against other Bitcoin treasury
companies. You're competing against
every junk bond sold by every company
with no money, every corporate bond sold
by an investment grade company. And
guess what? We're more collateralized
than the best investment grade companies
issuing corporate bonds. We have better
collateral. So, we're competing against
corporate bonds, investment grade bonds,
junk bonds, private credit, and then
against preferred stock in that market.
And the idea is we're just going to sell
something that is more creditw worthy,
less risky, better collateralized, that
yields more, that's more liquid, that
everybody understands.
And ultimately the goal is
we're, you know, instead of a market of
a thousand preferred stocks with 500
million in the float each that are
illquid, that are garbage,
how about one preferred stock with $50
billion in the float that trades $2
billion a day that yields more that
everybody's heard of that's backed by
Bitcoin, right? And and to do that, you
just kind of adopt those metrics. And
what I just described, every Bitcoin
treasury company can copy. I invite you
to copy it. You know, I encourage you to
copy it because just like 20 BTC
companies issuing equity legitimizes
Bitcoin. and Bitcoin equity. 20
companies issuing Bitcoin backed credit
instruments will legitimize Bitcoin back
credit will accelerate the digital
transformation of all the credit markets
and create a stampede of capital out of
the 20th century defective crippled
credit instruments into the digital
credit instruments of the 21st century
and uh S&P and Moody's and Fitch they'll
all just start to cover that everybody's
view of credit risk will evolve. Uh the
retirees get 200 basis points more yield
on something which is an order of
magnitude less risky.
Bitcoin goes to a million 2 million bit.
As Bitcoin goes up, the collateral goes
up. The markets all evolve. And what
you're what I'm describing is the way
that I see the digital transformation of
the capital markets driven by these BTC
companies. Thank you so much for
all right so we have about 30 minutes
left um I will ask a last question to
Adam and then open to the Q&A so please
prepare your questions um what we are
witnessing really is Bitcoin as the
standard store of value for capital
markets Bitcoin treasury companies that
are securitizing ing Bitcoin and
providing access to various capital
pools and have you seen very well
described by Michael like the ability of
Bitcoinary companies to create new
financial instruments for various pools
of capital and of course that's a
monstrous opportunity and as you
mentioned Michael it's not a competition
we are collaborating and creating an
industry and on the same mission to uh
get Bitcoin at the core of the capital
markets And Adam here with us has been
working for a long time on digital
capital markets as well. So we would
like to get your perspective Adam on uh
potentially first uh some risks and
trade-off to take into account when it
comes to Bitcoin capital markets and how
you've built also solutions for 247 365
uh capital markets and how do you see
the evolution of the role of Bitcoin
treasury companies uh within the
transformation as well of Blockstream
within the asset management industry for
the adoption of Bitcoin And how do you
see this impact of Bitcoin treasury
companies overall into capital markets?
Yeah. So um as I might have mentioned, I
think that Bitcoin is the hurdle rate.
So that's that's effectively, you know,
the fiat currencies are suffering a lot
of inflation and Bitcoin is best
performing asset class of the last
decade. And so you know if you realize
that you don't want to invest in
anything that isn't competing with
Bitcoin very very hard to compete with
Bitcoin. So the obvious solution is to
redenominate the companies in Bitcoin,
base their treasuries on Bitcoin and you
know use the profits from their
enterprise to buy Bitcoin and use the
capital markets structures that Michael
has been describing to you to to improve
that cycle and you know play with the
arbitrage to bring forward the
bitcoinized future. Um now in terms of
risks I I described the um sort of MNAV
varying over time and you see companies
reanimating their MNAV. So they'll get
they'll get a compressed MNAV and
they'll recover from that. And so you
know um strategy's been around the
longest and I was early investor in it.
So I was actually buying it at times in
the bare market um with the first bare
market that a treasury company has been
through actually the rest the rest of
the treasury companies have been through
one and you know to my point of view it
was cheap so I was buying it and you
know as Michael's described that there's
an incentive within a company and this
is why companies do share buybacks when
if your own equity is mispriced you want
to buy it and so you know if you've got
cash reserves you can buy it in a
Bitcoin setting the more effective way
is to raise capital from these
uncorrelated preferred instruments that
Michael set up the strike strife and
stride and use that capital to buy back
your own equity if if it were to get
below one. I'm not sure that it would
necessarily because there's a lot of
people looking at the companies who
would buy it, you know, at one and a
half and and also consider that cheap.
So maybe it can't quite get there. Um,
so and I think in terms of risk, it
depends on your investing horizon. I'm
generally a value investor, a long-term
outlook. So I I tend to not like buying
not like selling things. I don't like
selling Bitcoin. Once I get into a
treasury company, I kind of want to hold
on to it and and ride the uh, you know,
their ability to accumulate Bitcoin at a
time because that improves you know,
your entry point is now historic and
they've accumulated more Bitcoin than
the MNAV when you bought it. then you're
kind of quite well insulated.
So I think you know people who create a
risk is more by trading in a very
short-term viewpoint. You know, you see
that in the Bitcoin market and I think
that same kind of risk can exist in the
treasury company market, which is if
you're prone to sell something because
the market's volatile, you um you know,
to slow down and take a longer
perspective um and realize, you know,
the the Bitcoin cycles come and go and
of course you have short-term volatility
in anything. It's, you know, there is
there is no risk-free return. So of
course you're you're taking on a risk by
doing anything. Um I do find the fact
that the the treasury companies are
accumulating Bitcoin which is sort of
de-risking behind your investment. So if
you were to let's say if let's take
MetaPlanet as an example and it's MNAV
is ranging between 5 and 10. There was
probably a point in time when it got a
bit above that right? So if you picked
it up at 12 and it generally is not
going back there, you might think, "Oh,
now I'm I'm stuck." But that's just not
not really what happens because, you
know, after a few months relative to
your entry, they will have accumulated
more Bitcoin. So it will become as if
you bought it at 10 a few months later
and then over time it it kind of decay.
So I I like the phenomena that it sort
of forgives too hot of an entry. um
makes it a sort of forgiving type of
investment. But of course you know with
any company you are trying to understand
um what you know where the risks are in
terms of trust you know the operational
capability are they good at executing
will they stay good at executing and
what mechanisms are they doing are they
repeatable are they scalable so if they
if the company gets bigger they can they
can go bigger say you instruments like
strike and stride and strife that are
drawing capital from uh debt markets
which are enormous is is positive for
scalability.
Um,
and I think, you know, in the
Bitcoin market, there are, you know,
people who are long-term investors,
value investors who just buy Bitcoin and
cold store it. And that's great, but
there are also some speculators. And so,
you know, for people who like
speculating, they like volatility.
Treasury company tends to have an
amplified volatility compared to the
underlying. And um it's an interesting
trade because you know part of what
creates volatility in the Bitcoin market
is that people find themselves all in so
or they're at their allocation risk and
so they see a lower price and they don't
they don't have any more capital so they
can't buy it or they use leverage which
then they can mischarge. So you know
there's a shortage of capital to buy
pullbacks in the Bitcoin market. And so
what what I was finding attractive um
apart from supporting the treasury
company mission as part of the overall
Bitcoin mission to Bitcoin the world is
that um you could trade a strategy
company using Bitcoin as the
denominator. So you have a basically a
Bitcoin basis trade. So if you see a
strategy company and you think it's in
that is cheap compared to its normal
range or compared to monster cover, you
can buy it with Bitcoin and when it
looks overheated or it's normalized, you
could swing it back to Bitcoin. Now
typically if you try that, you'll
realize over time probably would have
been better off to just leave it in
there because they're continuing to
acrue Bitcoin and you know you're
playing with market timing. But at least
it's Bitcoin denominated. So you'll fall
back as you're in Bitcoin. Um and also,
you know, as a kind of stubborn value
investor, I won't typically want to
realize a loss, particularly a Bitcoin
denominated loss. That's a very
upsetting phenomena.
So, you know, that's that's where the
huddle meme comes from, right? That the
guy was uh extremely drunk, but making a
very sillient point that if you sell
Bitcoin, you are short Bitcoin and
that's very dangerous. Um I I arrived at
this conclusion very early in the
Bitcoin my Bitcoin experience in 2013 or
something that you know the price of
Bitcoin is going up exponentially even
then you know it's kind of fractal right
so it's doing the same thing again and
again if you zoom out um and if
something is going up exponentially it
has very high volatility
if you were to sell the odds are stacked
against you because it's just
inexorably, you know, if you zoom out
over time going up. So, you're really
taking bad odds to sell and think you
you'll be lucky and buy back in. You
know, the market's moving against you
generally. So, I never
uh want to sell Bitcoin. And so, I think
the Yes. So, I think there's a new
market evolving here, which is to price
treasury companies in Bitcoin. And so at
Blockstream we have some Bitcoin layer 2
technology. We are participants in the
lightning phenomena. We have one of the
implementations of lightning called core
lightning. I think it was the first one
to go live with a real value in web
store that's still running today. Uh and
we have another layer 2 called liquid
which is a side chain technically and
with a side chain you can introduce new
features. So one of the features of the
side chain is you can you can uh issue
assets on it and use it as a settlement
layer or trading layer for uh limit
orders and trustless settlement and
execution and simple smart contracts
like call options and so on without an
intermediary. Um
those kind of instruments are typically
settled with the back office where
you're trusting an intermediary. So you
can you can do this and there are
wallets that support this kind of
technology including some that have
trading features in them. So there's one
called sides swap which has um it's by a
Swedish company. It has a central order
book, but you're able to trade on it,
place limit orders on it while keeping
your assets, which could be Bitcoin,
Micro Strategy shares, MetaPlanet
shares, probably soon OPG, the
blockchain group shares, and what you're
you're actually participating in is a
properly licensed regulated security
even though it's in a blockchain format.
say how that particular one is set up
but it could be done in different ways
with different legal processes is the
units are Luxembourg securitization
vehicles and you are trading units of
the securitization vehicle. Um, and you
know, you have to enroll to access that
market because it, you know, rules
differ in different countries. And
whenever you transact, you know, I could
pay for my share of a lunch bill using a
few hundreds of MetaPlanet share and
given that small action results in a
share registry update in a database. Um,
so it's, you know, it's it's real time
updated. It's regulated and yet it feels
permissionless. You can transfer it.
It's a kind of more modern digital share
certificate with a bearer-like behavior
in the sense that you have the share
certificate and you can swap it, you can
transfer it. It's very real time but it
is updating the classical share
registration database with a with a
registered owner and actually if you use
lose the keys you can go and apply to
the share registration agent and they
can you know lock the previous one for
transfer and replace the uh replace
certificate. So anyway with that market
you have um on a sight swap order book
actually bitcoin denominated pricing for
a few strategy a few treasury companies
and more over time. Now that provides
two advantages. One is if you are doing
this kind of trading,
you are typically going to sell um a
Bitcoin ETP or ETF to dollars or euros
and then you use the dollars or euros to
buy, you know, OPG, the blockchain group
or MetaPlanet and then do the reverse.
So you're taking two trades every time
and these prices are moving. So it's you
know you can slip quite a lot with that.
So, it's inefficient and also the
markets are not 24 by7. So, um you know,
if you live in Europe and you try to
trade MetaPlanet, the market opens at 2
a.m. for your perspective. It's not not
good timing. So, with these um tokenized
treasury stocks, you have a 24 by7
Bitcoin denominated market that you know
trades on a weekend. It trades in your
time zone and it's more uniformly
accessible. So you you see when you see
new treasury companies coming to market
OPG a while ago, you still see threads
on social media where people asking how
do I get to Paris stock exchange? I
can't I can't you know I called
interactive brokers or I called this or
Fidelity and it is a bit uneven and um
so this this provides kind of more
uniform access. Another one which it
seems to be even harder to get at is
H100
uh a new a new treasury company in
incorporated in Sweden on the Nordic
growth market. You know same thing again
people are trying to find where can they
buy it. Of course that's you know it
gives the local market participants
faster access to it then maybe they have
some unique advantage in their in their
home country as Michael desping
new um sort of digital capital market
technology and you know there's interest
from exchanges now who are adding
securities licensing so that they can
have they can trade securities in a
bitcoin exchange and so you have
Bitfinex announcement. So Bitfinex was
one of the first to get this kind of
licensing. I think now you see Kraken
making some announcement that they're
going to start more recently Coinbase.
And so the concept here is that you can
have uh sort of standardized Bitcoin
layer 2 uh tokens for the treasury
stocks and be able to deposit them on a
custodial exchange, trade them with high
velocity on there and withdraw them and
move them to other exchanges. You also
have the possibility because it is
tokenized to use that as collateral to
borrow. Of course, you could borrow
dollars. That's a common thing. But
because people are engaging in a bitcoin
basis trade, you actually have now a
natural and new market to borrow bitcoin
to apply leverage to that trade. So you
know if you are trading metaplanet it's
quite volatile. So using leverage on
that might be a little risky. But in any
case you could apply a low leverage
where you're basically borrowing a bit
of Bitcoin against Metaplanet to buy
more metaplanet and unwinding that on
the way back. So it's really unlocking
you know um a bitcoin basis view of a
lot of capital market structures where
uh margin trading is all dollar or euro
based margin in a traditional market
it's very clunky the markets are 24 by7
the leverage they can provide is very
variable so in some sense it can expose
you to special margin call or
liquidation risk a very very
conservative view on leverage unless you
are you
a hedge fund that can negotiate
something more custom. So we're finding
this quite interesting and opening the
doors for you saw that stalker who is
the Luxembourgation
licensed entity doing the first two
treasury stocks in this format made an
announcement of uh partnering with H100
to do some more elaborate things like a
convertible note that's tradable that
you can you know pay for the conversion
and receive the share you know with a
few clicks rather than um you know go
through the conversion paperwork and you
know wait a few days to get the uh
shares to show up in your brokerage
account. So you get this much more
accelerated
uh process which is interesting to see
as well. And you know, you're you're
literally exchanging some Bitcoin, a
tokenized convertible note, a tokenized
share in a in a sort of trustless
market, you know, a non-custodial order
book or market service. And you can
exercise a convertible node. So, you
know, that's that's not built yet, but
it's pretty easy to build with these co
tools. So, might see that pretty soon.
That's interesting as well.
All right. Thank you so much, Adam. Um I
guess something that Adam mentioned
quickly to end the panel and open for
maybe one or two questions. Um is um
Bitcoin investment and as Michael Mnt
mentioned many times the right horizon
for Bitcoin is at least four years and
the best one is forever. uh and so we
talk a lot about Bitcoin, Bitcoin
treasury companies and the opportunity
is enormous but uh we are here for the
long term and I think that the the
opportunity should be looked in the long
term and uh to be careful as well in the
market. So is there any questions? Okay,
Thank you very much.
from the blockchain group and VC
treasury and the X community and my
question goes to Adam and also Alexander
if you feel like commenting. So um the
blockchain group is the first and uh
only as far as I know as of today
company um using an issue in BTC
terminated convertible bonds and what I
noticed is that people who first hear
this um kind of struggle to wrap their
head around that. So my question is um
what are actually the incentives on both
sides for the company issuing the bond
uh and also for the um bonds subscribers
um why for example a way of should
decide to use their bitcoin that way in
comparison to other alternatives
available there.
Um yeah, so I think the incentive for
the Bitcoin basis convertible for the
investor is they hope to capture they
hope that the market price reaches the
conversion premium. So um we talked
about the blockchain group they issued
some uh a lot not fairly recently
actually that with a 30% premium above
the market that was a price you pay
because there was an embedded option
which commanded the conversion premium
and then the so that's the purchase the
purchase price of the convertible and
then there's another 30% above which was
the conversion premium so I think the
attraction for the investor is that they
could, you know, put Bitcoin into it,
hope that the conversion premium is
reached, you know, quickly or in the
long term. It's a fiveyear pro, you
know, fiveyear instrument.
And um if it if it does reach the
conversion premium, then you can convert
it and you can hold it if you want to
participate in a company's continued
treasury strategy or you can sell it and
buy back a little more Bitcoin than you
put in. And um in terms of the rest of
the structure, there is a three-year
period where the uh investor can opt to
convert, not obliged to convert. And
after that, it's a 2-year period where
the company as long as you have the
premium because you can't convert if you
have a premium. And for the last two
years, the company has the option to
convert if it's above the premium. So
now the the thing that makes that lower
risk, there's two factors. One is the
debt ratio is kind of zero because you
know if it doesn't convert you know the
risk point is at maturity if it doesn't
convert the company has to give the
money back if the money was euros and
bitcoin price was low they might have to
raise money in the markets or maybe they
do something dilutive to come up with
the money or refinance it or something
right so it wasn't tools but
nevertheless with bitcoin that that kind
of tail risk most Bitcoiners think that
bitcoin will go a lot higher in five
years so they're not focused on that
anyway. But that tail risk if it's
Bitcoin and they have the Bitcoin
independent custodian in that tail risk
situation they can just simply transfer
the Bitcoin back and cancel it. Right?
So it's a kind of money back kind of
feel. So people like money back kind of
deals, right? And then what's in it for
the company is when the investor
converts the company gets more Bitcoin.
So they've generated a bookable yields
in terms of Bitcoin per share. And in
fact the the blockchain group
uh first instance of this had an
embedded option to uh
participate in a second bond second
convertible note um with a 30% higher
price and another 30% higher conversion
premium and 1.5 times the money that you
invested in the first one you had a pro
or right to and because It happened
relatively quickly. It was um you know a
curious experience right which is that
you invested certain amount of money to
your allocation choice preference and
now suddenly you have to find 150% more
money but it's in the money so you're
going to you're going to want to do it
right so that kind of pull forward a lot
of demand and helped I think ultimately
helped the blockchain group have this
very rapid growth. Um and I think the
other thing is that because of the sort
of being Bitcoin related debt that they
had a very high nominal yield in the
beginning because they had 40 bitcoins
from private placement money in November
2024
and then they raised um 580 uh bitcoin
using this um bitcoin basis node without
embedded option only. And so if if that
was a euro debt, it would be an
enormously leveraged position because it
was a Bitcoin debt. That that felt like
a relatively safe thing to do. So
they're able to book a very rapid rate.
So please correct me if I got some
details wrong.
Um yeah, I think uh maybe a question for
microphone. You should go get it. Yeah.
Yes.
Or just go walk through the audience and
ask them questions.
Yes. uh question to Michael. So thanks
first of all for being like for making
um yeah so my question is at least in my
view there is some kind of
that um financial engineering on top of
bitcoin growth but at the same time we
see more and more centralization on the
let's say technical side of things I
would like to ask if you see this
concern and uh what can be I don't know
social economical maybe financial ways
to fight it. What I mean is like
centralization of pools uh an amount of
nodes that are getting lower and things
like that. But do you see it a threat?
And if yes, what do you think we could
do to provide it? I I don't think it's a
threat. I think the network is
decentralizing and I'm not concerned
about the pools. Um I think that the
Bitcoin mining network is decentralizing
everywhere in the world. It's far more
decentralized today than it was during
the China lockdowns when China shut down
their Bitcoin mining and the D, you
know, when China China was mining half
of it that was sort of centralized and
then it migrated the US and in the past
year or two it's migrating out of the US
and spreading everywhere in the world
and at the end of the day I don't think
the pools have that much power. I think
that the power rests with the economic
actors. It rests with the economic
nodes. It rests with political actors.
It rests with uh the Bitcoin miners. At
rest with a bunch of tech providers. Uh
there's a lot more parties that are
engaged in consensus today than there
were five years ago. And I think the
mining pools are much weaker and again
largely irrelevant. any mining pool that
wanted to drive any particular policy
could be would and could be fairly
quickly overridden by all the other
economic actors or technical actors uh
in the space right now. So, I actually
think Bitcoin is at its most robust it's
ever been in my opinion. It's and so I
think we're good. We're gonna there's
going to be there's going to be people
concerned about everything under the sun
all the time. And I think that's
healthy. It's healthy that everyone's
worried about this protocol change or
Bitcoin core, this mining pool. That's a
that's a healthy degree of skepticism,
but I wouldn't interpret that healthy
immune response for the network being
weaker today. The network is far
stronger today than at any point that I
can remember or point to.
[Applause]
All right. Um I think Adam gave already
a very good answer on the BTC
convertible note. So if you have more
questions, I'll be available later on.
Maybe there is another question to close
the discussion.
Right.
Hello. So, I prepared it because my
English is not good.
So, we've discovered that there is a
global trust law fraud connected to
legal names worldwide affecting even all
KYC processes on the exchanges. And my
friend Rico, he has a little gift for
you about this. And my question is you
often suggest also before in the talk
that you are using company structures to
protect yourself. Is it also connected
to the names? But what happens if large
private or institutional actors continue
operating directly under their personal
names?
What would you recommend to avoid
long-term legal risks as the global
structure becomes more exposed?
I'm not sure I understand the question.
Can you say it again? Okay. My question
is so on all the KYC exchanges, there is
the problem that they use the wrong
names. They change it and it's not the
legal names as if you have it in the
passports. So if you act as a company,
you don't have the problem. But when you
have big investor like institutional
investor, they use their personal u
data. So their normal name and then you
have um yeah you have the problem with
the with the tax institution and with
the tax companies because they um have
changed
but uh yeah he has some information
about interview
anyway
I I think that um
that uh Bitcoin is spreading everywhere
in the world and and you can choose to
engage with it peer-to-peer with
self-custody and bypass the exchanges. I
think you can look at Bitcoin as uh one
world of Bitcoin where it's all
individuals uh working with each other
and there are a lot of different ways
you can do that, right? I mean there
there various there are various uh
individual
strategies or techniques where you're
not working with an exchange and you're
not working with a company. I think
there's a there's a second way to view
Bitcoin which is what if 400,000
companies all trade peer-to-peer with
each other and bypass the exchanges and
the banks. I think there's a third way
to view it which is what happens if
50,000 banks start to hold it and trade
with each other peer-to-peer.
I think there's a certain way that
people are dealing with crypto exchanges
today, but that's dynamically evolving.
I think that I think that um as the
digital assets environment becomes more
flexible I think you'll see an explosion
of innovation and uh the innovation is
taking place at the country level and
it's taking place at the individual
level and whatever is the status quo
today probably won't be the same in five
years and there'll be some countries
that will uh heir on the side of more
liberty and freedom and privacy and they
will develop very good technologies and
those will probably spread everywhere
else in the world. And there'll be other
countries that heir on the side of KYC
and censorship and not privacy. And I
think it's not a Bitcoin problem. It's a
it's a na it's a nation state or
citizenship problem. If you find
yourself in a particularly hostile
nation state where they deprive you of
your of your uh privacy or your economic
liberties, then of course the answer is
you're either going to use technology
that came from another place like VPNs
and firewalls and the like or you're
going to move. But I think Bitcoin
because it's global is uh it it's it's
allowing every nation, every actor
everywhere in the world to develop uh
technology for layer 2, layer three,
layer four protocols as fast as they
can. There are things that are being
done in countries that you don't live in
that would be illegal in your country or
or not culturally acceptable. And you
will probably as a Bitcoin holder,
you're the beneficiary of someone doing
something in another place that might,
you know, if if I own Bitcoin in Cuba or
North Korea, I'm getting rich even
though it's illegal to own Bitcoin in
Korea and North and Cuba. And likewise,
a lot of good technology will flow from
the US into countries that um that
wouldn't allow it. And there'll be
technology that flows from other
countries into Europe where it may not
be allowable. And I think that's dynamic
equilibrium. There's no one answer
except for the fact that it's pretty
clear that if you're looking for the
best answer, the best answer is going to
be a decentralized
network like Bitcoin and then
decentralized layer 2 protocols like
Lightning. then they are most likely uh
to provide uh the most sovereign
resistance and sound money properties
that you could get. Uh there's no second
best idea.
So I I you know a friend of mine says um
you know uh things aren't necessarily
perfect here. That's why we call it
earth and not heaven.
And I would say with regard to this,
there's always going to be imperfections
in people's implementations of Bitcoin.
That's why it's earth. It's not heaven.
But the second best idea is much much
worse than that. And what Bitcoin gives
us is it gives us hope that if you are
stuck in a place where you have an
imperfect uh capability or imperfect
execution, somebody somewhere else in
the world is probably working on
something better and once they roll it
out, it will start to either directly or
indirectly improve your condition as a
network participant. And so I I take
that incremental approach and I don't
get demoralized or depressed if I see
there's a suboptimal thing. If there's
some exchange or some wallet that did
something I didn't like. I just accept
the fact that that we move forward
sometimes imperfectly, two steps
forward, one step back. And that's how
all human progress takes place. And if
you're too much of an idealist and you
and you demand that everything be
perfect everywhere at all the time, you
know, throughout the journey, you never
get started on the journey and you'll
never get to a better place. And I think
we're moving to a pretty good place
right now. And on the margin
you have $2 trillion dollar of economic
energy in the network today that is
imperfectly
uh distributed to some actors
but 10 years ago you had a few billion
dollars of economic energy in the
network and it's not like the network
was more functional then or all the
applications were better. So, I think
we're better off today. And now that
everybody sees the excitement, you're
about to see the best and brightest
minds everywhere in the world start to
spend uh orders of magnitude more money
on programming and innovation and layer
twos and layer 3es in order to cure all
the problems that you identify. And I I
agree there's lots of problems in the
world. I think that Bitcoin is a
movement and a technology and a protocol
that provides us with a hopeful path to
get to solutions that are better than
anybody else has proposed with any other
protocol that I am currently aware of.
Yeah.
Right. Um well, thank you very much all.
Uh before closing, I'd like to say uh we
organized at 1:30 uh p.m. shareholder
meeting of the blockchain group. So if
you'd like to learn more about uh the
BTC convertible note and so on will be
with Adam back and
so please come by and please give a last
round of applause for Mailor and Adam
back. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thanks.