Michael Saylor Responds to Bitcoin Critics
Natalie Brunell · 2026-02-23 · 1h 51m · View on YouTube →
There really is no example of a
successful technology investment where
you didn't have to weather the 45% draw
down and go through that valley of
despair. Ours is currently taking 137
days so far. But you know it might take
2 years, it might take 3 years, it might
take four years. If it took seven years,
congratulations. It's just like Apple
computer. The biggest biggest success
story of the decade.
Everyone wants to hear from him. Michael
Sailor, thank you so much for joining me
on the show. It's great to see you.
You're one of the only bulls left. It
feels like
>> I think there's a lot of bulls out
there. [laughter]
Just uh they're waiting.
>> Well, let's start right there. Bitcoin's
price is down. Sentiment is pretty
negative. The critics are saying the
thesis is breaking. What do they not
understand?
Okay, first of all, you know, it's 137
days since the last all-time high. 4 and
a half months. Half the amount of time
it takes to make a baby. 4 and a half
months. Now, we're [clears throat] off
45%, right? The all-time high is like
125. We're 67,
you know, 675
or so. So, you know, there's a famous um
video of me in 2013
uh speaking about the virtues of the
iPhone and Apple, and it went viral for
a while.
>> There's not an 8-year-old on the planet
that doesn't want an iPhone 5.
>> And uh if you go back and you look at
maybe the greatest company of our era,
Apple, and the greatest stock, a stock
that made people insanely rich, Apple
releases the iPhone in 2007. The PTOE of
Apple is 30.
The iPhone isn't a success for two
years. Around 2009
on the iPhone 3, people start to think,
and myself included, I didn't think the
iPhone, the original iPhone 1 or two
were that useful. There was no app
store. There was no cut and paste. They
were kind of toys. Around 2009, the
iPhone starts working. It's iPhone 3.
[clears throat]
By 2012, [snorts] they're around the
iPhone 4, iPhone 5. Everybody agrees
it's a cool product. Apple stock peaks.
Then it crashes between late 2012 and
May 2013.
Apple stock falls 45%.
The same 45% bitcoins fall. Uh the Apple
PTE goes to 10. The Ford PD less than
10. It's being valued like a a tired
cash cow, you know, utility company.
Like no technology, no future. People
are down on it. You know how long it
takes, Natalie, before Apple recovers to
a PTE of 30
>> from 2013
>> years.
>> Seven years.
>> In 2020, Apple returns to a PD of 30. So
it's 13-year cycle from 2007 to 2020.
The greatest company of its era, you
know, at at many times the most valuable
company, the most successful product,
the product that a billion people agree
is is something they can't live without.
Maybe the most successful product in the
history of the human race.
Takes 13 years peak to peak to trough to
peak. seven years to recover. And you
know what it took for people to give
Apple the PD of 30 again? The
endorsement of Carl Icon and Warren
Buffett.
>> Wow.
>> Two people
who probably didn't even use the iPhone
that much, if at all. You never would
have read a review from Carl Icon or
Warren Buffett on the iPhone, did you?
like are they at the top of your
technology,
you know, advocate list or technology
reviewer list. So that's an example of
how conventional markets evaluate
innovation. And and here's the irony,
right? At the point that I give that
speech, you know, I'm saying, "Hey, this
is an iPhone 5. There's not a
six-year-old that doesn't want this
iPhone 5." Um, at the point I give the
speech, there's general consensus that
the iPhone is something you can't live
without and no one's got a product
nearly as good. And yet the the
conventional market's counter trading
it.
>> Okay. So, if you got rich in the past
decade, you probably bought big tech.
You probably bought Apple. You probably
bought Google. You probably bought Meta.
Maybe you bought Amazon. Maybe you
bought Nvidia.
Maybe you bought Tesla. There's no way
you got rich without buying big tech.
Big tech has been the primary screaming
success. The stocks are up 10x, 20x,
30x, 50x. But in all cases, you find
examples of the conventional market that
underappreciates them and underestimates
them. With Apple, it was 7 years through
the wilderness. With Amazon, I remember
Amazon for something like 4 to 8 years.
conventional wisdom was Amazon's an
awful company. They'll never make any
money. They'll never amount to anything.
That you almost could have bought Amazon
anytime for a decade while conventional
investors crapped all over it. And it
wasn't until 2020 during the lockdowns
that people go, "Oh, wow. I guess we
need Amazon." Mhm.
>> And uh of course just this last week,
Amazon's revenue uh surpassed Walmart
and Amazon became the largest company in
the world by revenue. But when could you
have concluded Amazon was going to work?
2010, 2012. It was it was already
obvious there was going to be no
competitor to Amazon. No one could
possibly do what they were doing by
2012,
eight years later. You know conventional
wisdom is that the same is true with
Apple. It's like so Bitcoin at what
point do you have the fundamental
ability to comp conclude that Bitcoin is
global digital capital? Now like what's
the indisha? The president of the United
States is telling you, right? The head
of the Fed, Kevin Walsh, is telling you,
the head of the Treasury, Scott Bessett,
is telling you, the head of the SEC, the
head of the CFTC, eight other cabinet
members, you know, all the Middle
Eastern sovereign wealth funds are
telling you, Black Rockck is telling
you, right, my company is 100x its
enterprise value, right? When in the
history of the capital markets did a
company ever buy $55 billion worth of a
commodity and then loudly declare that
this is digital capital and this is the
new money of the world. Never.
>> Coin stories is proudly brought to you
by Gemini. Start your Bitcoin savings
account today. Plus, investing in
Bitcoin has never been easier thanks to
Gemini's Orange Bitcoin credit card.
I've got mine right here. Earn up to 4%
back in Bitcoin on everyday purchases
like gas, dining, groceries, and more.
No annual fee, no foreign transaction
fees, and no exchange fees on your
rewards. Head to gemini.com/natalie.
Make sure to get your copy of my new
Bitcoin 101 book, Bitcoin is for
Everyone. It explains why life has
become so unaffordable and how Bitcoin
can help you build lasting wealth and
freedom. It makes the perfect gift for
those new to Bitcoin. Just visit the
link in my show notes. Coin Stories is
also brought to you by Leedin. Need cash
but don't want to sell your Bitcoin?
Letin is the global leader in
Bitcoinbacked loans, issuing over$9
billion dollars in loans since 2018. And
they were the first to offer proof of
reserves. With Ledin, you get custody
loans, no monthly payments, and more.
Visit leadin.io/natalie
to learn more and get a quarter
percentage point off your first loan.
I'll be sharing my Letin Bitcoin loan
journey soon, so stay tuned. And
Abundant Minds. One thing I appreciate
about Abundant Mines is how
straightforward they make Bitcoin
mining. You own the machines, they host
them in the US, and the pricing is clear
upfront. It's built for people who want
exposure to mining without running
operations themselves. And the equipment
may qualify for 100% firstear bonus
depreciation. Learn why so many real
estate investors are turning to Bitcoin
mining. Head to abundant.com/natalie.
>> Okay, so is a billion enough? Is 10
billion enough? Is 50 billion enough?
Right. At what point do you have enough
fundamental insight on this? Well, I
would say you had enough to know that
Amazon was unstoppable a decade before
the world agreed. You had enough insight
to know that Apple was unstoppable
7 years before probably 10 years
actually in 2009 11 years before the
world agreed. You knew it was
unstoppable. You have enough information
to know that Bitcoin is unstoppable
right now. The world's going to
eventually come to a consensus and it'll
be the Warren Buffetts and [snorts] the
Carl icons of the world that will be
what creates that consensus. They won't
be first. They'll be last. They won't
make a huge amount of money. They'll
double or triple their money, right? and
they will enter and the PD goes from 10
to 30. They triple their money in a in a
12 month time period.
And if you're if you're able to think
for yourself and if you're able to
weather volatility,
you can 10x, 20x, 30x on your
investment. But there really is no
example of a successful technology
investment where you didn't have to
weather the 45% draw down and go through
that valley of despair. Right? Ours is
currently taking 137 days so far.
>> But you know it might take two years, it
might take three years, it might take
four years. If it took seven years,
computer. The b biggest success story of
the decade. What do you say to those out
there who feel disappointed by the bull
market that we didn't go higher than
126,000 and what is your reasoning for
why we didn't get to maybe some of those
price predictions that a lot of people
wanted?
>> I think the market is uh evolving. The
entire ecosystem is evolving in
seasoning and if you [clears throat]
look at all the dynamics, the
derivatives market is migrating from
offshore to onshore and it is maturing.
And so as derivatives in the US
regulated markets grow, that strips some
of the volatility off of Bitcoin and
some of the upside off of it. It damps
the upsides. It also damps the downside.
instead of an 80% draw down and an 80
vol you get a 40 or 50% draw down and a
50 ball. So you're seeing volatility
damped on the upside and the downside by
the seasoning of the markets. But you
also have a situation where the banking
establishment is embracing Bitcoin at a
at a progressive but um a slower rate
than people with short attention spans
would like. It'll take the banks four
years, 5 years, 6 years before they
embrace an entirely new asset class.
People would like for Bitcoin to be
recognized in four months. But
[clears throat] if the banks take four
years before they start to bank it,
extend credit on it, acknowledge it and
handle it, trade it, custody it, etc.,
then that means that what you have
>> [snorts]
>> uh at the top of the market is $2
trillion worth of uh Bitcoin,
probably$1.8 trillion held by retail
investors or offshore investors, and
they cannot access the traditional
banking system. They're in the shadow
banking system. So if you had um $1.8
trillion or or or more than a trillion
dollars worth of capital and no one
would give you a loan on it,
then how do you monetize it, right? Um,
if I posted $10 million of Apple stock
with JP Morgan or Morgan Stanley, I
could take a $5 million loan at Sofur
plus 50 basis points and I could spend
it. But but you can't even post $10
million worth of Bitcoin with JP Morgan
or Morgan Stanley right now. Therefore,
you can't take a loan. Therefore, you
have to go to a shadow banking system.
You [clears throat] have to go offshore.
So, how would you actually monetize it?
You either have to sell it, right? The
safe way is to sell it, but that damps
the upside. Uh, what else can you do?
You can, by the way, you can get loans,
a very small amount of loans from a few
crypto exchanges where they don't
rehypothecate your Bitcoin, but but, uh,
the sum of that capital is a few billion
dollars probably.
So maybe there's a few billion dollars
of Bitcoin credit that you can tap at
sulfur plus 500 basis points or sulfur
plus 400 basis points. Okay, this not
sulfur plus 40, sulfur plus 400. So it's
10 times as expensive to actually draw
down capital. And how much capital?
1,000th
of the amount of capital available for
securities portfolios. So there's a
there's
1% or less of the capital available
through the conventional banking system.
It's expensive. Okay. What else can you
do? Well, uh I guess you can convert the
Bitcoin to IBIT and just in the past six
months some banks are starting to extend
credit against IBIT and it's it's
>> a bit more expansive than Bitcoin
credit. It's a bit cheaper, but we're
only in the first 12 months and it's
still expensive and still it's like
limited in uh in its loan to value. Now,
there's a third place you can get
credit. And the third place is you go to
a crypto exchange or an OTC exchange and
they'll often times give you a loan at
4% or 3% or 5% or 2%. I've had people
offer me uh Bitcoin back credit at 1%
or 0%.
What's the catch, Natalie?
>> Right, that's the question.
>> There's always c the catch is they want
me to transfer the Bitcoin to them so
they can rehypothecate it.
>> Right. So, if you have $10 million, you
either cannot get a loan from a
legitimate bank, or you can get a small
loan at a 10% interest rate, or you can
get a 3 or 4% loan, but then it gets
rehypothecated. So, your $10 million of
Bitcoin gets sold once, gets sold twice,
gets sold three times. You might have
you might actually create 30 or $40
million worth of selling because the
Bitcoin that you posted is that you
transferred to the shadow bank or the
crypto exchange rehypothecated it three
times. Okay. So, what's holding down the
price? I think what holds down the price
of the asset is the lack of a fully
formed uh nonrehypothecating
credit system. Right? And uh there's a
limit to how much you can rehypothecate
certain other assets. Right? When you
post your home as collateral for a
mortgage, the bank doesn't turn around
and sell the house on your street 10
times. If they did, the price of houses
on your street would be lower. Right? So
I I think that uh the lack of a fully
formed banking system holds the price
back. the existence of rehypothecation
in the crypto economy uh damps the ball.
It works to both sides, right? When when
people want to get short, they might get
short 50x
>> leverage. When they want to get long,
they might get long 50x
leverage. So, right now we're in that
that uh bare market where you've got the
rehypothecation holding back the price
and uh I think at some point it reverses
itself. We'll just have to wait.
>> Well, you always say that volatility is
vitality. So do you worry that your
projections of like Bitcoin 40% ARR
could be changing and diminishing or are
your bare bull and base cases pretty
similar for the next 10 to 15 years?
>> I look out 21 years, you know, and and I
expect about 29% ARR over the next 21
years. Um I've always thought that we
would have rallies and drawdowns, right?
So I I see it as a serpentine pattern,
you know, where it's just slightly less
than 30% over time, but there'll be
periods when it will surge and there'll
be periods when it will draw down. Uh
that doesn't change. I think you know I
if you listen to people um someone will
say well you know this weekend there
might be some problem in Iran or in the
Middle East and if there is a problem in
the Middle East and if the US does
something with regard to Iran then
Bitcoin's the only thing you can sell
and then Bitcoin price may crash and
we're worried about it and I'll say well
you know if something happens in the
Middle East Bitcoin will be the only
thing you can sell it'll also be the
only thing you can high.
>> Mhm.
>> And so that just means that a lot of
people that want to trade on the weekend
are transferring capital to crypto
exchanges so that they can either buy or
sell or sell buy sell and buy Bitcoin
four times between Friday at 400 p.m.
and Monday morning at 9:30 a.m. And
yeah, if you're a trader, what does that
make this? It makes it the most
interesting asset in the world for you.
If you're an investor over four years,
what the heck difference does it make
whether or not it gets bought, sold,
bought, and sold this weekend? In fact,
here's the difference it makes. There's
capital, hot money that's flowing into
this this ecosystem, into the Bitcoin
ecosystem that otherwise would not be
allocated. Right? There's there's a
trader. Someone's got $20 billion of
capital and their choice is they can
either leave it in the bank earning
sulfur
or they can put it into the crypto
exchange system and they can buy and
sell and buy and sell and maybe they'll
make 4% this weekend.
>> Right. When Bitcoin crashes by 5%,
there's someone buying
>> while there's someone selling. So people
are like, "Oh, it fell 5%." Well,
someone someone woke up at 4:00 a.m. on
a Sunday morning to buy it at a 5%
discount. So, someone's going to
actually make more money on the weekend
than they would make holding holding
conventional money for a year. And that
capital is not flowing into New York
City real estate. It is not flowing into
gold. It is not flowing into
conventional derivatives. It's not
flowing into Nvidia stock. It's not
flowing into Apple stock. Why? because
you're not buying and you're not panic
selling and rage quitting and buying and
capitulating and you know and leaping
into the market on these volatility
waves. So, Bitcoin is most volatile
because it's most useful
and [clears throat] you know in the US
there's things like reggg t where you
can't have more than 2x leverage. Okay,
we have laws that prevent you from going
to more than 2x leverage. Well, there's
no such law, you know, in nature,
>> you know, in nature, you know, like they
don't have those laws. You see one
centipede and then you see 10,000 ants
and it's like 10,000 to one and it
doesn't seem quite fair. There's nothing
fair about nature. If you want to gang
up 10,000 to one on the centipede, you
get to do it. Just like if you want to
trade Bitcoin 50x and crossc
collateralize it to another yo-yo token
which is 10x and you want to create a
500x
machine.
You can do it. There's no one stopping
you from doing it. Is it wise?
Well, maybe 99 out of 100 times it isn't
wise. You get wiped out. But the point
is if that's the case, the people that
do stupid things get wiped out and then
in a year they won't be doing it
anymore, will they?
>> Right. Presumably the people that are
trading with 50x crossc collateralized
leverage offshore on Saturday morning in
response to a Reuters posting and
they're panic selling Bitcoin and then
they're like, "Oh, well, the world
didn't end on Sunday afternoon." Then
they're, you know, they're desperately
buying it back. Presumably, those people
have a reason to do it and they're
making money because if they weren't
making money, the free market would
separate them from their capital, right?
There's no quicker way to go bankrupt,
right? So uh Bitcoin represents the
global capital market and there are
people doing things that you can't do
that you could that you won't do
that you don't choose to do you don't
wish to do and they're doing it with
that asset and that's what's creating
the volatility but that's also creating
the gravitational or the magnetic field
which is attracting all of the energy
all the financial energy of the world's
being drawn into this space, all of the
political energy, you know, all all all
of the digital energy, it's all being
drawn into this space because of that
utility. And uh I think you just got to
make your peace with it. Either you're a
short-term and you're a trader. If
you're worried about what Bitcoin is
going to be in four days or four weeks
or four months, you're a trader. call
yourself a trader and then you better
have a trading methodology or or trading
excellence or be in the trading business
or be, you know, neutrally hedge. So, it
doesn't matter to you.
>> You're either that or you're an
investor, you got a four-year time
horizon and then it just doesn't matter.
All you know, all you'd be thinking is
uh a lot of capital is surging into the
space and a lot of attention is being
given to the space that otherwise would
not be given to the space because of
those crazy traders and let's just let
them do their thing because I'm an
investor. I'm holding for the long term.
>> Well, you know, I'm very passionate
about empowering the average individual
and Bitcoin is still primarily owned by
individuals, but I just had Lynn Alden
on and she said that retail really did
not participate in this last bull
market. Why do you think that is? And
what will bring sort of the average
retail investor into the best savings
technology?
>> I think that the that the retail
investors
that are passionate and and uh and and
committed to digital capital, to
Bitcoin, I think they found it already.
I think that I think that they've had 10
years to find it. So if you're looking
for a non-s sovereign store of value
bearer digital asset,
I think that sometime between 2010
and 2015,
you found it in one of those successive
waves and then you bought as much as you
could possibly afford to buy. Okay? And
that's fine. Um I think that if you want
to draw the next uh cohort of retail
investors,
they don't want uh a 40 v 40 arr
asset.
What they want is uh something more like
a 10v 10 arr asset or a zero v 8
ar a arr asset. So, I think that the way
that we draw the mass of of investors is
you offer them something like digital
credit like STRC where where we say,
"Well, here's 11%.
It's tax deferred.
We're stripping the ball off of it."
Like the one-year volatility of STRC is
less than the NASDAQ, is less than the
S&P index, it's less than gold. Right?
I'm going to give you an asset which is
less volatile than conventional stores
of value, but it's a but it's kind of a
it's a certain right straightforward
defined 10% or 11% and you get it
monthly. Um, and you can test this
yourself, Natalie. I would challenge you
to test it. walk down the street and
find a hundred people and say, "Uh,
would you rather have 30% a year, uh,
over the next 20 years, but you're going
to get, um, 40% draw downs and 40
volatility. It'll be three times as
volatile as the S&P index, and uh, you
know, some years you won't make any
money and some years you'll make a lot
of money, but it'll be 30%." or would
you rather have a bank account that pays
10% where you can take your money out
whenever you want but you'll just
collect 10% while you're waiting now ask
them take the survey I I would think
like if you were to say 95% of the
market wants a 10% bank account they
don't have to pay tax on and only 5%
wants the 30% a year.
>> I I think that that's optimistic like
like that's probably too pro Bitcoin. I
don't think 5%
of retail investors want to hold Bitcoin
and collect 30% a year tax deferred with
a volatility that's double or triple the
S&P like I you might find differently. I
would I would suspect it's possible that
that number is one 2%. Right? So the
great mass of the retail investors
they want something which is 2x or 3x or
4x better than a bond fund.
or they want something that looks like
the S&P but without the draw downs of
the S&P.
And so we're going to attract retail
investors to the ecosystem
when we um take the best of equity, the
best of credit and the best of uh crypto
and we put the three together. So what
does that mean? uh double equity is
doubledigit returns and tax deferred
gains. Credit is price stability,
principal protection and low volatility
and um and a very defined yield like
defined consistent cash income.
crypto, Bitcoin is digital innovation,
right? Uh transformation and two, three,
4x the productivity of the conventional
economy, right? It's massive growth.
Okay. So, right now the retail investor,
they have to choose between massive
growth and a and a roller coaster that's
pulling 9gs,
>> right?
>> That's Bitcoin, right? or they have to
take the S&P or the NASDAQ index and
accept 50 to 20 V with good years and
bad years but over time 10% AR r or
better or they have to accept um a
credit spread uh from an investment
grade bond of 70 basis points which
means they're getting four and a half%
interest and it's fully taxable as
ordinary income. So, you know, you're
you're a California resident. You're
either getting 2% on your Apple bonds
after tax,
2%.
but you feel safe
or you're getting 10 to 15% on your S&P
and NASDAQ portfolio, but you're getting
no not much of any yield and you're
you're on a a small kind of a a
conventional roller coaster.
>> Or
you buy Bitcoin and you're getting 3x
the roller coaster ride. you're getting
better performance, but you know, for
the last 137 days, people think that
you're crazy.
>> Yeah.
>> Right. And so those are your three
choices. I think that the way that we
break that log jam is we simply engineer
digital credit. That's that's why that's
been my passion for the past year. Can I
actually take a 45 V 45 AR asset which
is Bitcoin and strip 80 to 90% of the
volatility off it. Strip 80 to 90% 90%
of the risk off it. And let's give you
something four to five times over
collateralized.
Let's create a double-digit yield. Let's
do it in a way that's a return of
capital. So you get tax deferred uh or
you get you get deferred tax treatment.
So you get the benefits of equity, you
get the performance of equity, you get
the principal protection of credit or a
bond, you get a defined yield, you get
paid monthly in cash. If you want to
reinvest it, you just reinvest the
dividends back in the principal and it
becomes like a consistent 11%
tax deferred growing asset. And when
when you want to get off the roller
coaster to pay your kids' tuition or pay
a tax bill, then you just withdraw your
money or you or you sell, right? And for
that to work, you can't you can't have
the volatility and the draw downs of
equity. You can't have the volatility
the draw downs of of Bitcoin. You need
some credit instrument and you need an
issuer that's going to overcolateralize
it. and you need to actively manage that
credit instrument so as to create price
stability. And so I I think uh STRC or
digital credit in my opinion is the way
that we draw the next cohort of retail
investors into the space. And I I don't
know why we couldn't draw 10 to 100x
as many. I I would think, you know, if
if 2 to 4% or 2 to 5% of retail were
able, by the way, if you find 5% of
retail that like Bitcoin, they're not
going to allocate 100% of their capital
to it, right? They're going to allocate
some portion. So, I think if we got 2 to
4% the first go around, I think we'll
get to 20 to 40% with digital credit.
And I I think that that is a that that
is in a way one of the killer
applications of digital capital.
>> Want to accept Bitcoin and stablecoin
payments? Speed makes it simple.
Customers can pay via QR codes in app
online or POS. Speed helped stake and
shake accept Bitcoin nationwide. As COO
Dan Edwards says,
>> customers choose to pay in Bitcoin
instead of credit cards. We uh are
saving about 50% in our processing fees.
>> This led to more support from Bitcoin
users and a 10% revenue boost. Getting
started is easy. Sign up at tryp
speed.com or integrate the API in hours.
Start accepting Bitcoin today. Download
Speed at speed.app/coinstories
or the QR code on the screen and use
code coinstories 10 for 5,000 free SATs.
If you've been listening for a while,
you've probably heard us talk about
BitKey. Big Key is a private multi-IG
wallet that removes the biggest point of
failure in traditional self-custody, the
seed phrase. Things get lost, phones get
replaced, life happens, right? Big key
is designed so your Bitcoin stays secure
and recoverable without demanding
constant attention or expertise. And for
February only, Coin Stories listeners
can get BitKey for $99 using code
stories at bitkey.orld. Up next, the
Bitcoin way. There's only one way to
protect your Bitcoin from government,
politicians, and third-party risk, and
that is 100% self-custody. My friends at
the Bitcoin Way will train you how to do
this the right way, the first time, no
compromises. Go to the
bitcoinway.com/natalie
to speak with the experts about making
sure your Bitcoin is secure and private.
I hope to see all of you in Las Vegas
for Bitcoin 2026. We'll be celebrating 5
years of Women of Bitcoin with a special
evening bash. and I'll be signing copies
of Bitcoin is for Everyone at the
Bitcoin Bazaar. Use code hodddle for
discounted passes and I will see you
this April. Finally, Bitcoin IRA. With
Bitcoin IRA, you can invest in Bitcoin
247 inside a tax advantaged IRA. Choose
a traditional IRA to defer taxes or a
Roth IRA for tax-free withdrawals when
you retire. Take control of your future
with Bitcoin IRA. Head to
bitcoinirra.com/natalie
for up to a $1,000 funding bonus. Out of
all the preferreds you've issued, it
seems like you're most excited about
Stretch and you've been using it more in
order to accumulate Bitcoin. Is there a
strategy behind that?
>> Yeah, if you if you look at all the
credit instruments,
um, you know, what are we doing? We're
stripping volatility off of Bitcoin and
extracting yield and eliminating
currency risk and and eliminating
capital risk. So, uh, Bitcoin is like 45
V over the past year. With Strike, we
managed to get that down to like 38.
With uh, Stride and Strife, we got it
into the mid20s.
with stretch. We got it down into the
teens or the low teens, even for a
while, down into the single digits.
And uh and then all that volatility we
stripped off then flows into MSTR, the
common equity, which is 80. So what
we're engaged in is [clears throat]
volatility engineering. And um
if you ask if you ask the average
person, right, do you want um a bank
account that pays you 10% or do you want
a 30-year bond that pays you 12
and but you got to wait 30 years? Well,
most people just want the 10%. They
don't want like they don't want an extra
2% if the volatility doubles. Like do
you want 24 V and 12 or do you want 10%
10 V and 10? Most people just want the
truth is what they want is they want 10%
and zero V.
>> I want zero volatility, zero duration.
Give me double or triple the money
market or quadruple the money market.
So,
you can overthink this, but if you look
at all of all of our credit experiments,
and we've done, I don't know, almost 20
different fixed income deals, okay? We
we did uh senior credit, you know, with
Ebida Covenants, and that was not
scalable. So, X that off the list. Then
we did uh a Bitcoin back loan with
Silvergate, but that creates too much,
you know, collateral coverage risk and
margin call risk. So, X that off. And
then we did convertible bonds, many of
them, but they're all 144A offerings,
which means it's illegal for retail to
buy them, right? We c we can, you know,
try to put lipstick on the pig and say,
"Oh, it's 144, it's over the counters,
whatever." Let me translate it. It's a
it's an illquid market with about two or
three dozen participants and it's
illegal for you to buy it. How is it in
any sense a good idea to create a
product that's illegal for normal people
to buy?
>> That's stupid. Okay. So, X that off the
list, right? All the by all those things
are 10x 20x over collateralized. They
trade like triple junk.
Okay. So, the market's broken.
>> Right. Right? Like the market's broken.
A bond that's got $70 of collateral for
every $1 of liability trades with a
credit spread like a going out of
business junk company. It's like it's
broken. Why is it broken? The market's
broken. You can't buy it. It's over the
counter. What is over the counter? It's
like 16 people get together in a back
alley to trade with each other and
there's one dude making the market with
a bid ass spread of 300 basis points and
they meet, you know, on Friday afternoon
from 4 to 5 in the afternoon and we call
that 144a over the counter. It's it's an
illquid, broken, non-transparent,
crippled market. Okay, make that go
away. So after you've gone to all that,
now you start think about, well,
how do I take it public? Well, it makes
no sense to take a bond public. Like
selling a 5-year bond and then taking it
public as a listing makes no sense. Why?
Well, because in four years, the bond's
only got 12 months left. It's not a
perpetual instrument.
Okay? So that means that you've got this
theta decay. You've got a decay in the
value of the bond because of course at
some point it's only going to have
30-day useful life. Why would you create
a public security that eventually dies?
That's stupid, right? It's like silly.
So, you have to create a perpetual
instrument to take it public. Erggo
preferred stock. So, then we we
basically think, well, we'll create a
perpetual preferred stock. And then we
started by doing the straightforward
thing. we'll just pay a 10% dividend or
we'll pay 8% with a conversion rate. So
those were two ideas, strike and strife.
And uh they were very successful. They
were 10x more successful than all the
other preferreds.
And we learned a lot. But then what we
realized is
people don't want duration
and they don't want complexity. So how
do you value a convertible preferred
stock? It's just too complicated for
people to figure out.
>> Okay. What what is the duration of um of
a 10% preferred that yields 10% forever?
Well, you can come you can calculate the
Macaulay duration. It's a theoretical
construct. It it works out to be about
10 years when it's trading at par. So,
it's like a 10-year duration instrument.
That's the same as like a 15 18year
government bond. You following the bond
math here, Natalie? It's kind of
complicated bond math, right? If the
bond has a 10 duration, then that means
when interest rates fall 100 basis
points, the bond should trade up 10%.
How many retail investors understand
that?
>> Not many.
>> Not many. Right? Duration math on a bond
is complicated, but but let me tell you
what the problem with it is. If I have a
duration of 10 and and the forward
interest rate expectation falls 100
basis point the the principal should
trade up 10%. But when the forward
interest rate falls or goes up 50 basis
points the bond falls 5%. So that means
every time Jerome Pal is giving a speech
the theoretical value of a 10 duration
instrument is moving plus or minus 10%.
How many retail people want their assets
to fall plus or minus 10% during a Fed
press conference? You know, when the
perceived risk uh like if Bitcoin falls,
the theoretical value of the collateral
falls. So, it's another way of saying
that a long duration instrument has a
lot of volatility.
Okay? So, I'm going to give you 10%
instead of three,
but the but the per the security might
fall 20% or 10% over the next 3 months.
That's what we created, Natalie. Okay,
who wants that? But by the way, it's a
screaming home run for a credit
investor. For example, if you think that
sofur is going to fall 150 basis points
and if you believe that uh Bitcoin is
not going to zero but it's going to
trade sideways or it's going to
appreciate 10%. The theoretical credit
spread on something like STRF or STRD or
STRK the theoretical credit spread falls
to 100 basis points or 50 basis points.
Right now you're getting [snorts] 6 7 8
900 basis points. What does that mean?
That means if you actually believe in
Bitcoin and you think interest rates are
falling and the company's misunderstood,
you're going to buy that instrument at
100 bucks and it's going to trade at
250.
Not look at your eyes.
You're going to buy Strike at 80 and
it's going to trade to 160
because it's a long duration instrument.
>> Okay. What's you what's the theoretical
value of an instrument that's currently
trading with a market credit spread of
900 basis points that should be valued
with a credit spread of 300 basis points
right it should trade up to the 100 200
300 400 so who wants the long duration
credit instrument it's someone that
actually has a long view a pro Bitcoin
view
>> if if Bitcoin is really rated as
collateral by the Basel under the Basel
rules. If banks start to custody it,
right? If the credit if the credit
rating agencies rate these things, then
those long duration credit instruments
have a capital gain potential of
doubling or tripling.
>> Okay. But it's like, well, what do you
think about sofur? What do you think
about the forward yield curve? What do
you think about the credit rating
agencies? What do you think about the
future of Bitcoin? So that is an
interesting investment.
But notice how long it took me to talk
about it. Okay.
>> It's hard to understand. Yeah.
>> Now let's move to retail.
What do I want? I want to put my money
in a bank. I want them to pay me 10%. I
don't want the government to tax it.
Okay. How long was that conversation?
That was like 12 seconds.
>> Okay. Well, what if the what if interest
rates fall? It doesn't matter. What if
the credit of the company improves or
falls? Doesn't matter.
>> Well, what if Bitcoin quadruples?
Doesn't matter. What if Bitcoin gets cut
in half? Doesn't matter. What matters?
Well, I'm getting paid 4% or four three
and a half% and it's taxable and you
know, and the government keeps half. So,
I'm getting 180 basis points on my money
market or I'm getting 11.25% 25% and the
government doesn't tax it. Do I need to
know anything else? Not really. Okay.
Well, what's the risk? Well, uh, Bitcoin
might go to zero forever. Okay. So,
you've got existential risk to Bitcoin,
right? And then you have to trust this
company strategy. Okay. Well, how much
capital do they have?
Yeah. Well, we just went and raised $9
billion to support your credit
instrument. Right.
>> Right. We'll sell we will raise a
billion dollars a week if necessary.
Right. Well, what did they say? They
said they said they're targeting a h
100red bucks. What are they going to do
if it doesn't trade at 100 bucks?
They're going to raise the dividend
rate.
Have they done that? Yeah. Five times.
Okay. So, why are we focused on STRC?
Well, because at the end of the day,
there's a $300 trillion credit market,
and that $300 trillion credit market is
collecting 4 to 500 basis points, and
it's all taxable.
And in order to get to 450 or 500 basis
points, you have to accept credit risk
of a junk bond. You have to accept the
credit risk of an investment grade
company. You have to accept the
illquidity of private credit. The Blue
Owl is currently in the news right now.
They suspended redemptions and people
are freaking out over, well, what if I
can't get my money out again? So, you're
either ac accepting ill liquidity or
liquidity risk or you're accepting
credit risk or you're accepting duration
risk. I'm holding, you know, Google just
sold a 100red-year bond. You have to
wait a 100 years to get your money back.
Who bought that? Why did they buy that?
Okay. So, duration, credit, liquidity,
right? And then currency risk, right?
You might have to accept, you know, you
might get a higher yield in a certain
currency and then you're accepting the
currency risk to the dollar itself.
You're accepting all those risks in
order to get what do you get? You get a
70 basis point spread for investment
grade. You get 70 basis points more than
the US government would pay you if you
buy a bond from Microsoft or Apple. Or
you get 275 basis points if you buy a
junk bond,
right? Or you get maybe 350 basis points
if you buy private credit, which is
illquid, which is invested in a
heterogeneous portfolio of private
companies with 10,000 pages of like
complicated contracts that may or may
not work out for you. Okay? So that is
the credit market. Now ask the question,
right? You're the retail investor. Do
you want duration risk? No. Do you want
currency risk? No. Do you want credit
risk? No. Do you want Do you want to be
able to get your money back? Yeah. Do
you want volatility? No.
What do you want? Give me two to four
times more than the money market. And I
don't want to pay tax on it, right? I
want tax I want I want good tax
treatment. I want the same deferred
capital gains tax treatment that I get
from holding a long-term investment. So
give me a fair tax treatment so I can
compound my assets and my investments
over time. Give me some stability
and strip away all these other things.
So
what what that tells us is is strategy.
At the end of our journey, we realize
that there's no point in creating bond
type credit because a bond's always
going to be short-lived, inefficient,
illquid, and it's always always going to
be fully ordinary income taxable. So
it's it's tax inefficient. It's market
inefficient. No point doing it. It's not
a benefit to the investor. No, you know,
these longer duration instruments,
they're for professional investors. If
you're a credit investor with a 10-year
horizon and you have an opinion on
Bitcoin and the Federal Reserve, you
could double your money by buying one of
our longdated credit instruments. Is it
a good idea for you? Absolutely. Right.
It's a you know you can you can collect
10 12%
for a 100 years on a credit instrument
and if the credit spreads compress
you'll double or triple your money but
retirees right 75year-old retired chief
master sergeants in the air force they
don't want that right and um I guess the
last point I'll make is in this journey
we kept iterating we're like well let's
get rid of the defects of senior bonds.
Let's get rid of the defects of asset
back bonds. Let's get rid of the defects
of convertible bonds. Let's get rid of
the defects of of perpetual preferred.
And then people were like, well, you
know, can I just have the money monthly?
You know, it's like, what do they want?
They want stability. Give me a stable
price. Give me monthly cash income. Why?
Why monthly, by the way? Because we
couldn't do weekly or daily. Like if the
NASDAQ or the conventional market
supported daily or hourly, we'd be doing
that. That is uh that's an upgrade that
a crypto entrepreneur can put in. You
you can create a stable coin or a
savings a savings coin maybe like a buck
token or something like that where maybe
you'll actually stream the dividend
hourly or stream it daily, right? And
that's interesting. is just we couldn't
do it in in the container of a NASDAQ
listed preferred security
uh efficiently. So we created the most
efficient stream of fixed income. We
created the most taxefficient
stream of fixed income. We created the
simple simplest possible instrument.
And the five-year journey for the
company is
this is Bitcoin is digital capital. will
spend a thousand hours and you'll agree
with me, but you'll still have to deal
with brutal 45% draw downs and you know
for some periods everyone's going to
hate and make fun of you. Right? That's
one extreme. And the other and I'll
spend hundreds of hours to explain why
Bitcoin is economic freedom and
empowerment and financial sovereignty
and a breakthrough and digital energy
and the greatest thing in the history of
money. And after I've done that, 95% of
conventional investors still won't quite
understand it. and the Warren Buffets
and the Carl icons of the world, they
probably won't necessarily jump on that
freight train with 10 or 20 or $50
billion in their capital rate. That's
one extreme. The other extreme is,
you know, would you like a bank account
that pays you 11% that's tax deferred?
STRC.
Okay, that was a that was
that was a thousand hours. This is 10
seconds. Okay. So, you at the end of the
day here's what I realize, right?
The world doesn't want you to write
10,000 pages of history to explain
what's going on. They don't have time to
read 10. They don't have a thousand
hours to read it all. Okay? The world
doesn't want that. The world doesn't
necessarily want 150 hours of explaining
why they should get on the crypto roller
coaster and accept exhilaration,
you know, and beatdowns and everything
in the middle and endure the toxicity.
The world just wants the answer and they
don't want the answer even in 10
seconds. They want the product.
>> They want the iPhone,
right? It's like I want air
conditioning. It's like we were talking
about, you know, like how much time do
you spend thinking about the water you
drink or the cool air or the electric
light? It's like someone just gave it to
me. Do I think about it? Not at all. Do
I like it? Yeah. Give me a pill. I take
it once a day. I don't know how you
manufacture it. It makes my problem go
away. And in this case,
you know, the greatest product in the
world. It's like like if I could cast a
spell on you, Natalie, you'll be happy
and indestructible and immortal and
have, you know, omniscience and you'll
be omnipotent and all powerful and
you'll never want for anything ever
again, and everyone will love you and
agree with you. Well, how long that's
going to take? Five seconds. Okay. Well,
sign me up.
>> Just give me that. [laughter]
Just give me that. What what is STRC?
Oh, yeah. You buy it, it pays you 10 or
11. It pays you doubledigit dividend.
It's tax deferred. If you give it to
your heirs, then the basis steps up
again. And so, you can collect dividends
for 10 years without paying tax. And
then they can collect dividends for 10
years and not without paying tax. And
what do I have to worry about? Nothing.
Okay. Well, that's what you want. You
know, that's what you want from
Coca-Cola. That's what you want from
American Airlines. That's what you want
from Boeing. It's that's what you want
from Apple.
That's what you want from whatever. Just
just give me the solution. And
you know, like how many people want to
study petrochemical engineering for
10,000 hours and then set up their own
oil refinery in in their backyard. It's
like or their own nuclear reactor.
Nobody. How many people want infinite
free electricity forever? Everybody.
It's like the the value, right? The
commercialization is take the
technology, put it into a package
that is simple, that's straightforward,
give it to the public. You know, it's
like, well, okay, but we're going to
have to trust you.
Yeah. Like you had to trust Kellogg
cereal. Like you had to trust craft
ketchup. Like you have to tr trust st
you know why they called it standard oil
because it was this the oil that didn't
catch fire in the lamp or or didn't uh
clog the engine because it was
standardized.
>> It was it was uh always the same purity,
the same quality.
It's it's like what is this ketchup?
This is the ketchup where if you
actually uh put it on your food, it
doesn't give you disease. It doesn't
give you food poisoning. It's like safe,
right? And so is there a precedent for
consumers trusting companies to give
them things that they they live uh that
they love? Yeah. DuPont's uh slogan,
better living through chemistry. And
when chemistry became politically
incorrect, it became better living
through technology, right? It's like,
you know, it's like we make fun of all
that and then you're like, well, then
there's polyester and there Lycra and
there's nylon and there and you know,
and there's all the all these
petrochemical products and turns out we
built the world with them. And uh so I I
think that Bitcoin is growing up and
we're moving from the early adopters,
the hobbyists, the you remember it used
to be people like radio. They're like
ham radio operators and they have a
little antenna in their backyard and
they have a ham radio setup in their
workshop and they would study the
simophores and they would study the uh
the physics and and they would form
clubs and then they would get into their
workshop and then they would broadcast,
you know, over the radio network and
people thought that was just great.
And and then eventually you got to the
point where six-year-olds
have a mobile phone in their hand
and like no one does ham radio anymore,
right? Like that. But that's how the
industry started. And it used to be that
you had to be a you had to be very
technically astute,
>> In order to participate. And how did we
commercialize radio? Oh, we we put six
billion mobile devices into the hands of
teenagers and we gave them Tik Tok and
that's how we commercialized radio. And
we were so good at it that now we have
to actually pass laws to stop people
from using the radio. Like now now we're
upset that they spend too much time
playing with their radio.
>> And I think that Bitcoin will go through
the same transition. We'll go from
hobbyist and ideologues and technology
visionaries
to eventually the point where 8 billion
people, they just have the digital
assets, the digital capital. It's all on
their phone. And it's like, oh yeah,
well, we just move it around. But we
move it around in a savings coin, a
stable coin, a a security, a, you know,
a crypto asset. It's like,
>> yeah. Well, most people don't understand
how the internet works, but they
obviously use it every day. They don't
understand how their iPhone is put
together, but they use it. And it is
like that video you mentioned of you
holding the iPhone, saying, "Everybody's
going to want this." Um and Stretch
seems to be that product that addresses
the main market need of not wanting
volatility but wanting a stable um cash
dividend. You have a two plus year
runway for it with cash. MSTR is still
trading at a premium. You guys still are
buying Bitcoin, but yet every time I see
you on these news programs, it seems
like they're expecting Bitcoin to go to
zero and you've gone from hero to oh my
gosh, what's happening? Bitcoin's dying.
Um, do you ever feel like they're
rooting for you to fail? And how do you
deal with like that swing in in
sentiment?
>> The struggle is real. [laughter]
The struggle is real. But, you know, uh,
to be more serious, uh, when Bitcoin is
hitting all times high, all-time highs,
there's a sense of exuberance and and
all of the media terms positive and it's
glowing and people are doing high fives.
And when it draws down, there's a
glooiness to it. And then the and then
people over forecast to the negative.
I [clears throat] think that
that it's the volatility that drives the
engagement and the interest and the
speculation and and there's something to
talk about and they're talking about us.
You know what they're not talking about
is that they're not talking about, you
know, real estate on the upper east side
of Manhattan. They're not talking about
timber rates. They're not, you know,
like peop people they they talk about
all these nonvolatile assets. Well,
nonvolatile assets means there's no
news. And if there's no news, there's no
interest. you know um when um
I operated uh public company I there was
a period
when we rage quit the capital markets
when we were just so unhappy with the
way that the capital markets treated us
we just stopped participating so I don't
know how it was many years where we
would put out a press release each
quarter saying this is the results but
we didn't do a conference call we didn't
do television we didn't do interviews
like well just read the numbers, value
the company as they will. And uh in a
conventional company, you have um
information released once a quarter. So
there are four times a year, four
windows a year where there might be
information where you might trade the
stock.
>> Four days and and and and you're
expected to not surprise the market.
Which means that if you're a well-run
conventional company,
you give guidance and then you hit the
guidance plus or minus and it's really
not very interesting. And so someone
could pretty much value one of those
companies by making a decision once a
year. So once a year I decide to buy to
hold the stock and how much to hold and
then like no news is good news and
there's nothing else going on and that's
boring, not liquid, not volatile. And
then when we got into into Bitcoin, we
realized, well, we're we're holding this
asset. And guess what? You know, our
website updates every 15 seconds,
Natalie.
Okay. So, think about this cycle. We
went from updating the financial markets
with material news every 12 weeks, once
every 12 weeks to updating the financial
markets every 15 seconds.
Okay. So, yeah, you're going to have
weeks where where uh Bitcoin is going to
be down. Every time Bitcoin moves
$10,000,
[snorts]
the company makes or loses $8 billion $7
billion, right? $1,000 is $700 million.
Okay,
let me put this in perspective. It used
to be the company worked for an entire
year to make $70 million.
It's so crazy to think.
>> So every [snorts] $100, every $100
fluctuation in Bitcoin is the equivalent
of one year's work. So what we've done
is is we have plugged a a uh energy
source, a volatility generator or an
economic energy generator directly into
the balance sheet. And [clears throat]
and the Bitcoin cycle drives a news
cycle. the news cycle drives Bitcoin
trading. Everybody is obsessing. So,
you're on television and someone's
obsessing. Well, could it go lower?
Well, there's someone who's a skeptic
that's thinking, maybe I should short
the stock. I think I'm going to go and
take a $100 million out of my piggy bank
and I'm going to short and I'm going to
short it 100 million. But you know what?
They have to buy that back,
right? Unless they're lucky enough to
short a stock which goes immediately to
zero forever,
it's a it's only a question of when are
they going to have to buy a $100 million
back, right? They're going to have to
buy it back. So, you're attracting some
group of people that want to trade
short. But there's another group of
people. They're like, "Well, this is
totally overdone and Bitcoin is
definitely going to go back to where it
was." And so, I'm going to get in and
I'm going to crack my piggy bank open.
I'm going to buy $100 million. Now, if
you didn't have the volatility, the the
the short seller would have not bet a h
100red million on your company and the
long player would not have bet a h
100red million on your company. And the
market makers in the middle and the and
the options traders, they wouldn't have
traded both. And then the Susuanas of
the world, they can create derivatives.
I'm I'm going to give you a call option
to go 100 million, but only post 5
million in collateral. I'm gonna give
you a put option so you can go a hundred
million short and only post five million
in collateral. I'm going to make a
million dollars doing that. Either way,
everybody's making a financial market in
this.
Okay. So, the
used to be the Wall Street Journal. They
would only write about you if you're a
public company. They don't write about
private companies. Why? Because you
can't because every story is irrelevant.
I can't buy or sell the thing you're I'm
reading about. Why would I read about
something if I can't buy it,
>> can't
>> sell it,
>> leverage it, gamble on it, make money
off it. Right now, the word is
interesting. The classic word in the
English language for I have an interest
in that company is I own.
I have a interest in the company means I
own X% of the company. I have an
interest in the company. I've shorted
it. If if you're short the company, the
last thing you want to read is good
news. It's terrifying to you. So someone
says, "Oh, some great thing just
happened at Strategy." Okay, you got to
read it. If you have a long interest in
the company, what you want to hear is
good news. Okay, the Bitcoin price
double, right? [clears throat]
How do you make a company interesting?
Okay. Well, first of all, you take it
public. But I just that's first order
interesting because now there's a
ticker. But I just illustrated if you're
a well-run conventional public company,
you're only interesting once a year
because or once every 12 weeks because
you never say anything otherwise. So,
you know, like there's news one day out
of a hundred. 1% of the time you're
interesting if you're a conventional
company and you're not supposed to be
that interesting. [clears throat] You're
supposed to never surprise me. So the
number of companies that can surprise me
to the upside every quarter, 40 quarters
in a run in a row, Natalie, that's one
in a hundred. So 1% of the time you're
interesting and
1% of 1% of the time you're interesting
in the right direction, you know, which
is one in 10,000,
right? 1/100th of 1% of the time, will
that turn out well? Okay, that's the
conventional playbook. Now, how do you
take a company and make it interesting
every day? How about how do you make it
interesting every 15 seconds?
You take it public, then you put a lot
of Bitcoin on the balance sheet and you
let the Bitcoin vibrate, right?
Oscillate
and that makes the company
100x more interesting. No, thousandx
more interesting, maybe 10,000 times
interesting.
Now, if you go to our website, one thing
[snorts] on our website is it update.
You know, you find out we made or we
made or lost a billion dollars every few
minutes.
>> Yep.
>> Right. It's like every few minutes,
right? That's more news than we
generated in the first 20 years of the
company. Natalie,
>> you make us feel better about our
portfolios.
>> Okay. It's like whatever. $10,000, $7
billion plus or min. Okay. What's What's
a $50,000 draw? Oh, $35 billion. Okay.
Okay. So, it's a $35 billion draw down.
I guess that's going to arouse
interesting passions. But here's the
other point. If you go to the charts
tab, you can actually chart all of these
securities and all these assets versus
each other. And one of the cool metrics
we've got is is open interest divided by
market cap.
and we benchmark, you know, open
interest of MSTR versus Tesla versus
Nvidia versus um Google or Apple.
Do you care? Do you care to guess which
company has the highest open interest
versus market cap out of that entire
MAG7 group
>> strategy?
>> Our company,
>> it's not even close, Natalie. I bet
>> it's not like where 80% of the market
cap is open interest and some of these
other companies are these these are the
seven greatest companies in the world
>> 4%. 5%. Not interesting.
Not the greatest companies in the world
doing the most important thing in the
world. An order of magnitude less
interesting. If you look at average
daily trading volume, the liquidity per
market cap, who do you think's number
one?
>> Strategy.
>> We are.
>> Okay. How how did we manage to become
the most liquid, most interesting
company.
It's, you know, it's very simple. It's
like it's like back to Iron Man. You
know, that the idea of the Iron Man
super suit is really cool, but you need
the power source to actually power up
the Iron Man suit. you need an extreme
power source in the balance sheet of the
company and the power source is Bitcoin,
right? It's digital capital. So,
you know, when you go on to these
things, it's it's tough, you know,
taking your beatings during the bare
market and you just have to be cheerful
and constructive and keep pointing out,
no, actually, we're fine. It doesn't
matter. we'll be good, you know, we're
just it's all going to work out very
well, you know, and and uh you have to
explain why and then you have to keep
coming back.
And uh having said all that,
they wouldn't want to talk to you if
you're a conventional holder of
nonvolatile assets. When's the last time
you had you saw someone representing a a
real estate investment trust of mi a
diversified portfolio of Midwestern real
estate on television talking about the
bare market in real estate and how
they're going to weather the storm.
>> Couldn't name them.
>> Like you don't you can you even name
one? Can can you name a REIT?
>> No.
>> They're well managed with diversified
portfolios of nonvolatile assets. Do you
care? No. Are you interested? No. Okay.
So, so [clears throat]
it's pretty critical that you be
And the reason people want to talk,
right, the reason you draw this
toxicity, you you draw the highest
highs, the lowest lows, the greatest
extreme is because it truly is
And um and the breakthrough of the
crypto economy is to create a financial
asset which is interesting
globally
24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Because
you see, if I want to a
financial asset here, let me show you
how I it. I make it illegal for
anyone outside the US to buy. Right?
That's your first step down. Then I make
it impossible for you to uh trade except
9:30 to 4. That's the second step down.
Then I force you to go through all sorts
of AML KYC and and take three months to
set up the account. So I make it very
difficult. Fourth step down. Then third
and and then I maybe limit you and
require you of $100 million of capital
and be a qualified, you know, investor
to buy it. It's not another step down,
right?
If I just keep stepping it down, right,
I I access to maybe then I take
it off the exchange. I make it a private
instrument.
>> I make it 144A or I make it totally
private and it's and it's another
uh crippling step down. By the
way, then give it a a sixletter ticker
instead of a four-letter ticker. Hard to
remember people. Yeah. Can can you name
any publicly traded stocks with a five
or six letter ticker?
>> Metaplanet.
>> It's like it's hard, right?
>> Like one in a thousand, one in 100. It's
hard.
>> How about if I give it a QIP number?
What if it was like a KO197442?
>> So, there's a lot of ways to make
something uninteresting,
right? Make it difficult. And yet the
crypto industry went the other
direction,
right? What if everybody on earth, what
if anybody uh can trade this thing in 60
seconds by downloading an app to their
mobile phone? How do you actually give
access to the instrument
in uh in China? You know, by the way, we
had a bank holiday the other day. It's
illegal to buy or sell, you know,
publicly listed securities. It's like
what happens when the government of
whatever country just decides to
unilaterally declare 60 days to be
holiday. You can't trade on Saturday.
You can't trade on Sunday. You can't
trade on President's Day. You can't
trade on the 4th of July. You can't
trade. You can't can't can't can't can't
can't can't. Right? They're all
crippling. They all the
financial markets, right? And the point
that I made that day was on a bank
holiday,
you know, you can move any amount of
Bitcoin for 44 cents.
A billion dollars for 44 cents in a few
minutes. And so
what we have here is a digital
revolution. If you get it, you get it.
It's so obvious. It's it's money wants
to move at the speed of light 24/7 365.
You know, waterfalls don't stop on bank
holidays. Electricity, lightning doesn't
stop on bank holidays. Gravity doesn't
stop on bank holidays, right? Guns, they
don't get deactivated on certain holy
days, right? They work all the time,
right? the things that are actually
changing the world, whether it's an
iPhone or running water or electricity
or airplanes, they work regardless of,
you know, the opinion of a politician
that would like to intervene to make
them not work. Mhm.
>> The reason Bitcoin is winning, the
reason that digital capital is winning
is because things that move at the speed
of light, frictionfree 24/7, 365
globally, right, that can be programmed
by an AI that can be vibrated or
transformed
a million times a second
are going to displace in a brutal
Darwinian fashion, right? They're
slower, clumsier, [laughter]
you know, antecedants or precedents. You
know, it's like the things that came
before, right, are going to be squeezed
out of the economy and out of the
marketplace
because
because the thing that comes later is
just better.
>> Before we start to wrap up, I want to
cover a really important topic, which is
quantum. We have that saying in Bitcoin,
don't trust, verify. But a lot of people
are just not technical enough to be able
to verify is quantum actually an
existential threat. I know you guys made
an announcement recently, a strategy
with regards to quantum and the future
making sure that Bitcoin is quantum
proof. Can you kind of explain to people
why you don't see this as such a risk
that seems to be priced in at some
point?
So first of all, the consensus of the
cyber security community broadly held is
that quantum risk if it exists is more
than 10 years out. It it's not a this
decade thing. [snorts]
Whether or not there will be a quantum
threat or a quantum risk is is a
question that is yet to be decided. But
there's certainly no consensus that
there is any threat right now or that
there will be a threat materializing
anytime soon. Should a quantum risk
materialize
at that point then you're going to see
an upgrade in the software that runs the
global banking system the global
internet consumer devices
all the crypto networks the Bitcoin
network
everything digital the AI networks all
all of those networks that we rely on
today whether they're governmental or
financial or consumer or defense
related, they're going to get upgraded
with post-quantum resistant
cryptography. It won't be a surprise.
You'll see it coming. We will all see it
coming. Bitcoin software, right? Bit
Bitcoin Core version 30. Right now,
we're debating over upgrading from
version 29 to version 30. The software
does change. If you've got 30 versions
of Bitcoin core in an asset which is 17
years old, do the math in your head and
figure out how long it takes for
versions of this stuff to roll out. The
nodes will upgrade, the hardware will
upgrade, the wallets will upgrade, the
exchanges will upgrade. How will they
upgrade? Well, wait 10 years. There will
be global consensus about the best way
to deal with it. There is no global
consensus right now because there isn't
a credible threat right now. Right. So
why do I not worry about it? Well,
because everybody with anything at
stake, whether it's Google or Microsoft
or Apple or Coinbase or Black Rockck or
Strategy or the US government or the
Russian government or the EU government
or the Chinese government or JP Morgan
or Morgan Sling, they all have to deal
with the same issue. We all have digital
systems that would be that would be at
risk if there was a credible quantum
threat.
Um
when it when and if and when it
materializes
I expect that there will be some
software or hardware or both reaction to
the the crypto community is actually the
most sophisticated
cyber security community. If you look at
um the cyber security pro the security
protocols that are used to move crypto
around right they're all multifactor
authentication with hardware keys you
know etc. If you consider the security
protocols used to use used uh to move
bank wires around or used to trade
stocks, they're orders of magnitude
weaker right now.
I'm not going to elaborate on them for
obvious reasons, but anyone that's
actually engaged in a stock transaction
or bank wire transaction or a credit
card transaction or a check transaction
or any kind of consumer finance
transaction or communication transaction
knows that that the steps you go through
in order to move Bitcoin, you know, out
of coal storage or to transfer it to
someone else, especially
when you're moving it at scale are
extremely sophisticated.
So I think that the crypto security
community will be the first,
you know, to perceive the threat and to
react to the threat and they'll be
leading the way.
We we have announced a Bitcoin security
program. Uh Coinbase obviously has a
security program. In fact, a lot of the
money that I contribute early early to
the Bitcoin uh core dev to the to the
Bitcoin development process was actually
to Bitcoin security programs,
>> you know, like the MIT Bitcoin security
program. So, I think that all of us that
are large Bitcoin holders or users are
in the industry, we know the security of
the network is paramount.
But I I don't actually think that qu the
quantum, you know, narrative is the
greatest security threat to Bitcoin
right now. I don't think it has been.
People joke they've been concerned and
talking about it every two years for the
past 15 years. I actually think that
it's that there are a hundred, you know,
narratives that people discuss that
might be a security threat. You know, is
there a bandwidth problem? Is there a
nation state attack vector? You know,
does it have enough functionality? Does
it have too much functionality? Is it
evolving too quickly? Is it not evolving
fast enough? Right? Is it sufficiently
decentralized?
Etc., etc. Should we make it easier to
run on an iPhone? Should we make it not
easier to run on an iPhone? You would
the the number of debates about what's
good for Bitcoin, uh, you know, are
mind-numbing and there are many of them.
They will continue.
Quantum will be one. It used to be, you
know, there's a debate, well, you know,
the Chinese will they'll control all the
mining. Then it's like the Chinese
control the mining equipment. Oh, there
might be a back door in the mining
equipment. Oh, no, the Chinese ban
Bitcoin mining. Chinese ban Bitcoin
mining equipment. They don't, you know,
Chinese don't like Bitcoin anymore. It's
like like the debates they they vary
from there's a risk to oh no, there
isn't a risk. Oh, if there you know, why
don't the Chinese like Bitcoin, right?
and and at some point it gets silly
because it's a hundred of them. I I
would say uh at this point the reason
we're talking about quantum is because
all of the other risk did not
a decade ago people were fought the
block size wars the entire block size
war there's books written about it you
can go back and the and the narrative
was Bitcoin will fail because it doesn't
have enough bandwidth
>> okay and people fought bitterly over
this
and a few days ago, I posted a
screenshot, you know, of Clark Moody's
dashboard, and it showed that the fee
structure of Bitcoin was one sat per
vite for instantaneous performance. One
sat, one sat, one sat, one sat. In
essence,
there is no bandwidth problem in the
Bitcoin network. A decade after the
block size wars, people fought and died
over that narrative. It was a non-issue.
eventually the free market solved the
problem, right? And and and
at the end of the day, you always have
this dynamic between the the the
alarmist, the ambitious opportunist or
or the the
idealist
out there, if you want to be charitable,
the ideal idealistic intellectuals.
You could call them that. You could call
them the ambitious opportunist if you
like. They posit, you know, Bitcoin will
boil the oceans. Bitcoin will fail
because you can't self- custody. Bitcoin
will fail because of bandwidth. Bitcoin
will fail blah blah blah. And then, you
know, this follows
it pops up as we can't use nuclear
energy. It'll blow up the world. You
know, we can't have nuclear power. We're
going to boil the oceans. They're
climate alarmists. They're they're
whatever alarmist. There's 150
narratives that people spin up and every
one of them is a way to accumulate uh to
to glean interest and engagement. I I I
want influence or I want capital or I
want power. And so I had, you know, it's
very important that we vaccinate, you
know, every three-year-old on Earth at
the cost of $10,000 a vaccine shot
against, you know, yo-yo
disease, the one that I just found that
hypothetically might well be an issue.
And so please give me a hundred billion
dollars and let's declare martial law
and let's make it, you know, illegal for
parents not to do this.
because I'm here to save the world. And
so it's this God complex or intellectual
save the world context. It's been going
on for thousands of years, Natalie. It's
in the political process and the crypto
process and the Bitcoin process. So the
fact of the matter is none of the
narratives that were going to stop
Bitcoin or threaten Bitcoin ever panned
out. They all turned out to be
incorrect. The scalability,
we have to stop spam. Oh, no we didn't.
We have to create smart contracts to
create scam. No we don't. We have to
double the blocks. No we didn't. The
miners the the miners are going to go
bankrupt. No they didn't. No one will
mine Bitcoin. Yes they will. The Chinese
will stop it. Yes they did. No they
didn't. Yes they did. No they didn't.
They need to endorse it. They can't
endorse it. Right. It needs to be
private. No it doesn't. Right. All of
these things, they're all narratives. It
used too much energy. No, it didn't.
It'll it'll boil the ocean. It didn't.
Quantum will hack it. No, it won't.
Right. And what is it that people are
missing here? Well, first of all, 99 out
of a hundred of these narratives, they
benefit the ambitious opportunists
because now they become famous. You
know, Al Gore makes hundreds of millions
of dollars preaching that the climate is
going to collapse, right? And 25 years
later, it didn't happen.
Somebody gets rich. ESG worked, but it
didn't happen. But the point is, if I
wasn't preaching it, how am I getting
rich, right? So, the point is it's a
business. So, so
what you have is this economic and
political amplification of of uh
alarmist narratives because it benefits
the politician.
It benefits the entrepreneur.
It benefits uh those that have a will to
money or power, right? And I and how am
I supposed to get rich if I don't like
like we p we basically at one point we
decided that you had to stand six feet
away from each other and wear a mask and
the government needed to buy a hundred
billions of dollars of masks
you know and if you didn't wear the mask
you're going to jail and it's like
someone sold the masks right and so
there is there is a very powerful
feedback with these narratives and once
you realize that you realize that 99 out
of 100 narives atives are just a way for
someone to accumulate money and power
and you ought to be skeptical of those
narratives. And the last point, the
famous president said it. He said, "You
see 10 problems driving down the road at
you. Nine of them are going to drive
themselves into a ditch before they get
to you.
>> Right?" And so,
how do I get rich, Natalie? Well, I I
convince you that it's possible that
you're going to trip on a rock and uh
and break your leg and not be able to
work. And so I saw you trip on a rock
insurance. What's that cost? Uh that's
going to cost you 1% of your annual
income. The trip on a rock insurance.
And then I someone else comes along and
says, "Well, you know, you might, you
know, get a sneezing attack, Natalie,
and I'm gonna sell you sneezing attack
insurance. And what's that cost you?"
That's going to cost you 1%. because if
you get the sneezing attack thing, then
you won't be able to work. And so
another guy comes along and he convinces
you that, you know, there's a
hypothetical chance that your children
will have autism and so we're going to
sell you, you know, the autism vaccine,
whatever, and that'll cost you 2%. And
then someone else comes along and
they're like, well, you know, it's quite
possible that you'll be driving the car
and something will happen and you'll
wreck the car, you won't be able to work
again. So, here's like uh, you know,
vocational insurance for driving of the
car. And I come up with like a hundred
possible things
and each of them is 0.01%
likely and the collective all of them is
1% likely to happen to you. But I sell
you insurance that sucks up 100% of your
income. So if you insure for every one
of these parade of horriles, every
hypothetical
possible thing, you're bankrupt. So you
are 100% likely to be bankrupt because
you bought insurance against 100 things
that were 1% likely to happen.
And and by the way, if you had bought
insurance against none of them, a decade
would have gone by and you'd be like 1%
likely to have one of them. And you
would have just like upgraded your
iPhone software and the problem would
have gone away.
>> You know, and it's like,
but the person that's selling you the
insurance isn't going to make a billion
dollars if you just wait 10 years and
upgrade your iPhone software and it goes
away. How am I supposed to get rich on
that? like how how am I supposed to get
elected to be governor of a state if you
know if I don't spin up a narrative that
is a doom narrative. And so what the the
danger is when anything gets weaponized
by an entrepreneur, it's like I want to
raise money so I can hire a bunch of
quantum resistant developers or I want
you to sell Bitcoin and buy quantum
resistant yo-yo coin
>> or I want to be elected mayor and the
problem is that there's hypothetically
radioactive something. You know, in 10
years, the water, the drinking water
will be radioactive if we let nuclear
reactors get built somewhere in the
state 5 years from now. And that's why
you should give me all of your money so
I can be elected mayor now so I can pass
a law to pre prevent the hypothetical
problem 8700 years from now. And of
course what you see of course is when
you have enough of these issues like I
I've had lawyers I've had lawyers say
well you know you can't do that because
hypothetically in 15 years after 15
appeals like there might be you know a
quasi liability if you were to do this
and that and the other thing. I'm like
well you know we're going to go out of
business next month if we do what you
said
but but in 15 years hypothetically
there's a 0.01% 01% chance that we might
have to pay 0.01% of our money to solve
the problem. But they're like, "Oh,
well, I guess if you look at it that
way, then I guess you're right." It's
like, and that and that is pretty much
the legalistic view. And and so
politicians tend to be lawyers.
Idealistic intellectuals tend to be
thinking that way. Ambitious
opportunists think that way. You know, I
can basically point to the fall of the
British Empire. I can I can point to the
fall of a whole bunch of states. I can
point to Easter Island. I can show you
the fall of the Roman Empire, the fall
of the Carthaginian Empire.
Every great city, every great merkantel
network, every great empire, every every
great corporation,
it all starts to collapse at the point
that someone's like, "Well, you know,
out of an abundance of caution, maybe we
need to prevent this or we need to do
that." Right? And I would say this
entire quantum fear is just the latest
quantum fun because there's nothing else
to talk about. And I I can no longer
raise money by saying that I that
Bitcoin needs to be more scalable or
have smart contracts or whatever. So
this is the only way to be relevant and
get attention. And so, you know, when
this one falls, someone will say, well,
you know, like at some point, you know,
we're gonna and we're gonna upgrade to
nanobots in the head and hollow bands
and Bitcoin's not hollow nanobot ready
and we're going to need to invest a lot
of money in, you know, hollow band
nanobot chains because, you know,
otherwise your Bitcoin is going to be
worthless. And it's like, someone will
say it. I guarantee it because that's
the story of humanity since time
immemorial
and ultimately you're either going to
have a constructive optimistic view
which is you know something will happen
and we'll just take advant upgrade the
software or upgrade the networks take
advantage of the new technology and
we'll all be richer and happier and live
happily ever after. That's one view. or
something's going to happen and we're
just too stupid to figure out how to
react to it and we're just going to lose
everything. And so therefore, I should
just give all my money to this ambitious
opportunist, you know, who's preaching
that the world's going to end. Why don't
I just give all my money to them because
I'm too stupid? And it's like, it's like
it's silly, but it's predictable. And
what I would say is,
you know, the back of the hitchhiker's
guide to the galaxy, right? It's like
don't panic.
At the end of the day, lots of things
will happen in the future. The human
race will react to the things. The
people that chose to put their money at
a bank in cyberspace.
They will probably upgrade the hardware
and the software and the methodologies
that protect the bank and cyerspace when
they feel they need to. [clears throat]
And until that time,
there's a hundred other things. You're
probably better off to use that
bandwidth worrying about look both ways
when you cross the street because you
don't want to be that egghehead
intellectual that walks in front of a
truck because they're worried about the
0.01% likely quantum threat that would
be easily deflected with a iPhone
update,
>> right? Or a a 20 second click on this
and negate. You know, it's it's not even
even that difficult because Natalie,
you're not going to have a choice when
when and if there is a cyber security
threat. Your business software is
getting upgraded, your bank software is
getting upgraded, the government
software is getting upgraded, the crypto
network software is getting upgraded. I
It's almost going to be damn near
impossible. Did Did you ever make a
decision to upgrade all your systems to
Y2K friendly? Do you even recall that? I
do recall that time period and everyone
was terrified and it ended up being
nothing. So
>> it everybody in the world was terrified
the war was coming to an end and it was
nothing.
>> But you know what? Billions of people
didn't do anything. Couldn't have done
anything. Couldn't have stopped it. It
was a non-issue. And it would just be
one of 10,000 examples of nothings, you
know, that get get arrested, you know,
that that that get uh overcome by the
human race every few years.
>> Okay. So, I have an interesting question
for you. What do you think is the
strongest argument against Bitcoin right
now? And why do you reject it?
The strongest argument against Bitcoin
right now is is it's novel. It's new
and as new it's not, you know, it's only
been around for a number of years and
maybe I want to before I trust my entire
life to it. I want to see it around
longer. Right? It took uh 30 years for
people to embrace electricity. Bitcoin's
been around for 17 years.
So, so someone might very well say,
okay, well, you know, did I wait until
17 years after the airplane got
invented, right? The airplane is 1903.
How many people had flown in a passenger
jet or passenger airline by 1920?
You know, maybe it's still early and I
just want to see more people, you know,
than me try it out first and then I'll
follow it. So will it take 20 years?
Will it take 30 years? Will it take 40
years?
Uh the world's full of you know of
profound innovations that eventually
were embraced by everybody but it took
more than 17 years. And and and I think
the answer is time
right
the the early pioneers. It's like how
many years after the automobile was
invented, before the Model T Ford comes
along, and how many years before, you
know, after the Model T before everybody
had the car. It's like
>> it there's a natural process of taking
taking innovative technology uh building
it into a consumer device or an
industrial device,
right? And and then having enough of a
track record that people are willing to
bet their life
or their or their reputation on it. And
I think we're in that process of
commercialization now.
>> That's that's fair. So before your final
thoughts, um I just was curious, you
don't seem bothered at all by cost basis
and a lot of people right now are trying
to find the bottom and obviously a lot
of people are looking at the technical
charts, but you just seem unfazed.
You're just buying at any price. Um, can
you sort of address that for those
especially who are like, well, if maybe
you think it's going to go lower, why
not accumulate at a lower cost basis?
>> Well, you could think of us as dollar
cost averaging, but but but the key
point is we're using equity.
We're not taking we're not taking out a
loan. Okay? So if when we're buying
Bitcoin,
uh if we sell equity
and then we buy Bitcoin, then we bought
the Bitcoin at 100,000 a coin. If we
bought the Bitcoin at 200,000 a coin, by
selling equity, we're simply swapping.
We're doing a perpetual risk-free swap.
We're swapping equity for Bitcoin,
right? Um when should you swap equity
for Bitcoin? Whenever it's accretive,
right? If if uh Bitcoin traded up 10%
but our equity traded up 25%.
Then it's accreative. It's it's
profitable to swap the equity for the
Bitcoin. If Bitcoin then trades down
20%, are you glad you did it? Sure you
are. Because you wouldn't have had the
Bitcoin otherwise.
>> And you know, Bitcoin falls 10% or
equity falls 20%. You you see at that
point you've actually derisked the
equity, right? if um there's less risk
to the equity if you're actually putting
a stable asset underneath the equity
especially if you're doing the swaps at
a premium. So, so the only real question
is is it accretive? Like is it
profitable to the shareholders to
actually do the swap, right? There's a
level at which it's profitable to swap
preferred stock for Bitcoin. There's a
um equity, common equity for Bitcoin.
Once you when you've done that, it
doesn't really much matter. It is
irrelevant what the what the future
trajectory of is of Bitcoin. if you're
swapping common equity for Bitcoin
because there is no uh continuing
liability for the next thousand years,
right? There is there is a theoretical
um path where it was diluted to swap
preferred. So for example, if I'm paying
10% dividends on the preferred and
Bitcoin returns 5% for the next hundred
years, then swapping preferred for
Bitcoin over a 100red years will turn
out to be dilutive to the common stock
shareholders.
Right? So there there's a more
complicated calculation for swapping
digital credit for Bitcoin.
>> The calculation for swapping common
equity for Bitcoin is fairly simple.
Now, if you swap debt, if you if you
swap debt uh that comes due in 10 years
that cost you 5%
for Bitcoin, well, then you need Bitcoin
to appreciate more than 5% over 10 years
for that to not be dilutive.
>> Right? Now, if I swap Bitcoin for margin
debt, like if I simply borrow the money
uh to buy the Bitcoin at 10x leverage,
say I buy a billion dollars of Bitcoin,
post 100 million of collateral, and I do
it on an exchange. If Bitcoin trades
down 10%, you get force liquidated, you
lose your hund00 million. So, so
why is that risky? That's because you're
borrowing the money for one minute.
So the real issue is what's the duration
of the swap? Are you actually taking a
one minute flash loan to buy Bitcoin? If
so, then the price of Bitcoin that you
you paid versus where it is now matters
a lot.
>> Did you borrow the money for a decade?
Well, then it will matter in a decade.
Did you borrow the money perpetually so
you're never paying it back ever? Well,
then it's not it's not clear how
important it is, right? I mean, and so
the the ma the financial math varies.
And the very simple way to think of it
is if you swap common equity for
Bitcoin, it doesn't matter what the
price is. It just matters what the what
the uh premium or or what the relative
valuations of the swap were when you
enter in the transaction. If you swap
preferred equity for Bitcoin, it it
somewhat matters whether Bitcoin
appreciates over the course of 30 years.
But there are scenarios where Bitcoin
could appreciate less than 10% a year
for 30 years and we would pay a 10%
dividend and it's still profitable to
the common equity, right? Because there
are second order, third order, and
fourth order dynamics that people don't
Yeah.
>> quite calculate. So in fact, in fact,
um,
we have 20, 30 years to be right when
we're actually selling digital credit to
buy Bitcoin.
If you're selling corporate bonds or
convertible bonds, well, then the
duration of those instruments is much
shorter, four years, three years.
Then you have to be right quicker,
right? And then of course when you're
taking margin loans, these are one-mon
loans or one day loans or one minute
loans. So So the thing that most retail
investors don't get is the only credit
they have is margin credit, which is one
minute credit. And if they're wrong,
they're getting liquidated over the
weekend, right? Whereas the the credit
we're using, we could be wrong for 30
years. Natalie.
>> Like I I could literally like I I can
paint you scenarios where we pay 10%,
Bitcoin returns 8%, we're wrong for 30
years and it's still a good idea for the
common stock. Okay, that people
>> it would take us a few hours, a totally
different podcast and it would it would
take delving into the to the first
order, second order, third order
financial dynamics and the harmonics.
>> Wow. of the entire monetary network for
me to explain that to you.
>> But uh but the truth is,
you know, it doesn't matter what Bitcoin
does for the next hundred years if it's
common equity and we've got a 10 to 30
year time frame for us to be right if
it's digital credit,
right? And u you know, and we don't
engage in the other types of debt, so it
just doesn't matter. So that's why you
know our average price
doesn't make any real difference
>> you know uh and uh what really matters a
lot is is uh the nature of the security
swaps we're doing
there there's a difference between
selling a billion dollars of STRC
>> which is a monthly variable rate versus
selling a billion dollars of ST TRF
which is 10% at par forever
>> versus selling a billion dollars of
common equity. Right? They they have
different dynamics and the mathematics
is um more sophisticated than one can
explain in a tweet. And I guarantee you
no critic of any of this has ever
thought through the second order
consequences much less the third, fourth
and fifth order harmonics of what we're
doing. There were some people who were
very concerned that Bitcoin and the core
developers were named in the Epstein
files. People are very upset about the
Epstein files. Um, was that a concern
for you?
>> It's non-issue.
>> Why not?
>> It's just it's it's just I guess they
were getting uh tired about the quantum
FUD and they moved on to the Epstein
FUD.
>> Yeah. I mean, in the mainstream media,
they they said it was Epstein trying to
influence Bitcoin. Obviously
>> Epstein might have used Apple phones and
might have ordered something from Amazon
and he might have at some point, you
know, used Linux and he might have
funded a Democrat or Republican. And if
Epstein was involved with a Democrat or
Republican or Apple or Google or if he
ever did a Google search, it's like,
>> I'm keeping I'm keeping my Google stock.
>> You know, if I'm a Democrat, you're
still a Democrat. If you're a
Republican, you're still a Republican.
You know, he lived in America. Natalie,
shall we all leave? Like like this this
kind of contagion is is just um colorful
for engagement.
But you know, like I know people that
still live in New York even though he
lived in New York. And I know people
that are still staying in America even
though he's American. And the
Republicans and Democrats going to keep
their party affiliation. And uh and
Bitcoin is Bitcoin.
>> Well, be controlled.
>> You can audit the code.
>> Yep. Right. So it's like it's it's it's
the same reason like it doesn't matter
who Satoshi was. You don't need to know
Satoshi. Do you need to know who
Prometheus was? You know, in order to
decide not to set yourself on fire,
right? Fire. You know, Prometheus
doesn't matter. It's fire. It's chemical
reaction. You know, you can study
chemistry. You can figure it out. You
can study thermodynamics.
Bitcoin's a force of nature.
Anybody can use it. There are people
that I don't agree with that may have,
you know, used it. There are people that
I don't agree with who talk about it or
use it or who came along before me or
will come along after me. And uh it's,
you know, we're speaking the English
language. There are a lot of people that
you disagree with that also spoke the
English language. Natalie, some of them
even contributed words to the English
language. Some of them even wrote books
in the English language. Some of them
were even English.
>> And and at the end of the day, it's a
protocol just like, you know,
fraudsters, right, use Arabic numerals,
right? And uh and criminals use English
and and
every movie's got a car chase in it.
Mhm.
>> And sometimes you hope that the person
gets away and sometimes you hope they
get caught, right? And you're still
using the car,
>> And so I just think it's a distraction.
We shouldn't get worked up over these
things. We should stay laser-like
focused on the big picture. And since
this is my last question, I'll return to
laser-like focus. Bitcoin's digital
capital. It's a revolution in the
capital markets. It's a profound, you
know, once in humanity
innovation.
It allows us to tightly bind economic
energy to the human being or to the
corporation, to any entity. It's, you
know, the ability to tightly bind
economic energy to the individual is as
profound as fire, electricity, or even
the formation of fat in mammals. It's
it's a fundamental building block of
life. And it's just the basis of it. On
top of that, we can create digital
credit like STRC. We can create
something better, digital money. You can
create a bank account that pays you 8%.
No volatility, right? How many people
have that? Nobody. How many people want
it? Everybody. What's it worth
collectively? You know, conservatively,
$300 trillion.
Okay. So there's $300 trillion of credit
and everybody's got garbage credit with
no yield with awful tax treatment with
massive risk, credit risk, duration
risk, currency risk, very difficult. So
you have a world which is not served
well by the 20th century. Conventional
finance assets and finance structures
and finance ideologies and finance
protocols. You have a new world, a
digital world with digital protocols,
digital assets, digital capital, digital
credit, digital money. Is it going to
solve all the problems? No. There's
going to be a lot of problems in the
world that we're not solving with
digital money, digital credit, and
digital capital. However,
walk down the street and ask a hundred
people whether or not they'd like more
money.
every one of them is going to say, "I'd
like more money." So, there's a there's
an obvious, you know, unequivocally
utilitarian
opportunity for us here. It's
straightforward.
The money's not going to fix itself,
right? The money is not going to fix
itself. Bitcoin was capital. You're
going to have to build credit on top of
it. You're going to have to build money
on top of the credit. You're gonna have
to go and market that. You're gonna have
to get regulators to approve it. You're
gonna have to put it in a ETF container,
put it in a crypto token container, put
it in a private fund, put it in a public
fund, get the Japanese to approve it,
get the Emiratis to approve it, get the
Americans to approve it, get the
Europeans to approve it, fight with, you
know, the Chinese regulators to approve
it, the Australians to approve it, the
Canadians to approve it. Then people are
going to stare at it and say, "Yeah, it
looks too good to be true. I don't trust
it." And then you're going to have to
explain why it's trustworthy. And then
they're going to disagree with you and
they're going to keep scorning on you.
And then you're going to have to keep
coming back because that's just the way
the world is. And 30 years after this
podcast, everybody will go like, "Oh
yeah, digital money. Of course.
Of course we want that." Do you like
electricity? Yeah. Do you like cars?
Yeah. Do you like fire? Yeah. Do you
like antibiotics? Sure you do. Right. Do
you like television or radio? Yeah. How
about airplanes? Sure. Was there a time
when all of these things were in
disrepute and created incredible fear,
uncertainty, and doubt? Every one of
them.
>> Right. And this is just the latest
technology transformation. It's coming.
It's as as William Gibson said, the
future's already here. It's just not
evenly distributed.
In in 30 years, it'll be consensus. But
you know what? You won't have a job and
I won't have a job because it'll be
uninteresting because everyone will have
embraced it like water, electricity,
fire.
It's like, yeah, of course, right?
There's no opportunity once everybody
agrees with you. It's not interesting
when everybody agrees with you. They
don't interview people to ask whether or
not your company's going to be
installing running water in the new
corporate headquarters, do they now?
>> So, I I think we're very fortunate to
live in interesting times and have an
interesting opportunity
and onward and upward.
>> Well, that was very well said. I love
when you call it a protocol for
prosperity and if it's not going to
zero, it's going to a million, right?
Thank you so much, Michael. It's been
great to chat with you.
>> Anytime.
>> Thank you so much for checking out this
episode of Coin Stories. Make sure
you're subscribed to the show so you
don't miss any new episodes. If you can
turn on those notifications and leave us
a positive review. They really help the
show grow organically with new
listeners. We have a free weekly
newsletter. You can sign up at the
newsblock.substack.com.
This show is for educational and
entertainment purposes only. Nothing
should constitute as financial
investment advice and you should always
do your own research. I'm always open to
feedback and guest suggestions, so
please feel free to reach my team at
info@talkingbitcoin.com.
I'll see you next time.