SaylorCorpus

Michael Saylor Responds to Bitcoin Critics

Natalie Brunell · 2026-02-23 · 1h 51m · View on YouTube →

0:00:02

There really is no example of a

0:00:02

successful technology investment where

0:00:05

you didn't have to weather the 45% draw

0:00:07

down and go through that valley of

0:00:10

despair. Ours is currently taking 137

0:00:13

days so far. But you know it might take

0:00:15

2 years, it might take 3 years, it might

0:00:17

take four years. If it took seven years,

0:00:20

congratulations. It's just like Apple

0:00:22

computer. The biggest biggest success

0:00:23

story of the decade.

0:00:33

Everyone wants to hear from him. Michael

0:00:33

Sailor, thank you so much for joining me

0:00:35

on the show. It's great to see you.

0:00:37

You're one of the only bulls left. It

0:00:38

feels like

0:00:39

>> I think there's a lot of bulls out

0:00:41

there. [laughter]

0:00:42

Just uh they're waiting.

0:00:45

>> Well, let's start right there. Bitcoin's

0:00:46

price is down. Sentiment is pretty

0:00:48

negative. The critics are saying the

0:00:50

thesis is breaking. What do they not

0:00:52

understand?

0:00:54

Okay, first of all, you know, it's 137

0:00:59

days since the last all-time high. 4 and

0:01:03

a half months. Half the amount of time

0:01:06

it takes to make a baby. 4 and a half

0:01:09

months. Now, we're [clears throat] off

0:01:11

45%, right? The all-time high is like

0:01:14

125. We're 67,

0:01:16

you know, 675

0:01:19

or so. So, you know, there's a famous um

0:01:24

video of me in 2013

0:01:26

uh speaking about the virtues of the

0:01:29

iPhone and Apple, and it went viral for

0:01:31

a while.

0:01:32

>> There's not an 8-year-old on the planet

0:01:34

that doesn't want an iPhone 5.

0:01:36

>> And uh if you go back and you look at

0:01:38

maybe the greatest company of our era,

0:01:40

Apple, and the greatest stock, a stock

0:01:43

that made people insanely rich, Apple

0:01:46

releases the iPhone in 2007. The PTOE of

0:01:49

Apple is 30.

0:01:52

The iPhone isn't a success for two

0:01:55

years. Around 2009

0:01:57

on the iPhone 3, people start to think,

0:01:59

and myself included, I didn't think the

0:02:02

iPhone, the original iPhone 1 or two

0:02:04

were that useful. There was no app

0:02:06

store. There was no cut and paste. They

0:02:08

were kind of toys. Around 2009, the

0:02:11

iPhone starts working. It's iPhone 3.

0:02:14

[clears throat]

0:02:15

By 2012, [snorts] they're around the

0:02:18

iPhone 4, iPhone 5. Everybody agrees

0:02:21

it's a cool product. Apple stock peaks.

0:02:25

Then it crashes between late 2012 and

0:02:29

May 2013.

0:02:32

Apple stock falls 45%.

0:02:35

The same 45% bitcoins fall. Uh the Apple

0:02:39

PTE goes to 10. The Ford PD less than

0:02:42

10. It's being valued like a a tired

0:02:46

cash cow, you know, utility company.

0:02:49

Like no technology, no future. People

0:02:52

are down on it. You know how long it

0:02:55

takes, Natalie, before Apple recovers to

0:02:57

a PTE of 30

0:02:59

>> from 2013

0:03:01

>> years.

0:03:02

>> Seven years.

0:03:04

>> In 2020, Apple returns to a PD of 30. So

0:03:09

it's 13-year cycle from 2007 to 2020.

0:03:15

The greatest company of its era, you

0:03:18

know, at at many times the most valuable

0:03:20

company, the most successful product,

0:03:23

the product that a billion people agree

0:03:25

is is something they can't live without.

0:03:28

Maybe the most successful product in the

0:03:30

history of the human race.

0:03:32

Takes 13 years peak to peak to trough to

0:03:36

peak. seven years to recover. And you

0:03:40

know what it took for people to give

0:03:42

Apple the PD of 30 again? The

0:03:44

endorsement of Carl Icon and Warren

0:03:47

Buffett.

0:03:48

>> Wow.

0:03:49

>> Two people

0:03:51

who probably didn't even use the iPhone

0:03:53

that much, if at all. You never would

0:03:55

have read a review from Carl Icon or

0:03:58

Warren Buffett on the iPhone, did you?

0:04:02

like are they at the top of your

0:04:03

technology,

0:04:05

you know, advocate list or technology

0:04:08

reviewer list. So that's an example of

0:04:11

how conventional markets evaluate

0:04:14

innovation. And and here's the irony,

0:04:17

right? At the point that I give that

0:04:19

speech, you know, I'm saying, "Hey, this

0:04:20

is an iPhone 5. There's not a

0:04:23

six-year-old that doesn't want this

0:04:24

iPhone 5." Um, at the point I give the

0:04:28

speech, there's general consensus that

0:04:30

the iPhone is something you can't live

0:04:32

without and no one's got a product

0:04:34

nearly as good. And yet the the

0:04:37

conventional market's counter trading

0:04:39

>> Okay. So, if you got rich in the past

0:04:43

decade, you probably bought big tech.

0:04:46

You probably bought Apple. You probably

0:04:48

bought Google. You probably bought Meta.

0:04:50

Maybe you bought Amazon. Maybe you

0:04:52

bought Nvidia.

0:04:54

Maybe you bought Tesla. There's no way

0:04:55

you got rich without buying big tech.

0:04:57

Big tech has been the primary screaming

0:05:02

success. The stocks are up 10x, 20x,

0:05:05

30x, 50x. But in all cases, you find

0:05:09

examples of the conventional market that

0:05:12

underappreciates them and underestimates

0:05:14

them. With Apple, it was 7 years through

0:05:17

the wilderness. With Amazon, I remember

0:05:20

Amazon for something like 4 to 8 years.

0:05:23

conventional wisdom was Amazon's an

0:05:25

awful company. They'll never make any

0:05:26

money. They'll never amount to anything.

0:05:28

That you almost could have bought Amazon

0:05:30

anytime for a decade while conventional

0:05:33

investors crapped all over it. And it

0:05:36

wasn't until 2020 during the lockdowns

0:05:39

that people go, "Oh, wow. I guess we

0:05:41

need Amazon." Mhm.

0:05:43

>> And uh of course just this last week,

0:05:45

Amazon's revenue uh surpassed Walmart

0:05:48

and Amazon became the largest company in

0:05:51

the world by revenue. But when could you

0:05:54

have concluded Amazon was going to work?

0:05:57

2010, 2012. It was it was already

0:06:01

obvious there was going to be no

0:06:03

competitor to Amazon. No one could

0:06:04

possibly do what they were doing by

0:06:07

2012,

0:06:08

eight years later. You know conventional

0:06:11

wisdom is that the same is true with

0:06:13

Apple. It's like so Bitcoin at what

0:06:16

point do you have the fundamental

0:06:18

ability to comp conclude that Bitcoin is

0:06:20

global digital capital? Now like what's

0:06:24

the indisha? The president of the United

0:06:26

States is telling you, right? The head

0:06:29

of the Fed, Kevin Walsh, is telling you,

0:06:32

the head of the Treasury, Scott Bessett,

0:06:34

is telling you, the head of the SEC, the

0:06:36

head of the CFTC, eight other cabinet

0:06:38

members, you know, all the Middle

0:06:41

Eastern sovereign wealth funds are

0:06:43

telling you, Black Rockck is telling

0:06:45

you, right, my company is 100x its

0:06:48

enterprise value, right? When in the

0:06:52

history of the capital markets did a

0:06:54

company ever buy $55 billion worth of a

0:06:57

commodity and then loudly declare that

0:07:00

this is digital capital and this is the

0:07:02

new money of the world. Never.

0:07:04

>> Coin stories is proudly brought to you

0:07:06

by Gemini. Start your Bitcoin savings

0:07:08

account today. Plus, investing in

0:07:10

Bitcoin has never been easier thanks to

0:07:12

Gemini's Orange Bitcoin credit card.

0:07:15

I've got mine right here. Earn up to 4%

0:07:17

back in Bitcoin on everyday purchases

0:07:19

like gas, dining, groceries, and more.

0:07:21

No annual fee, no foreign transaction

0:07:23

fees, and no exchange fees on your

0:07:26

rewards. Head to gemini.com/natalie.

0:07:28

Make sure to get your copy of my new

0:07:30

Bitcoin 101 book, Bitcoin is for

0:07:33

Everyone. It explains why life has

0:07:34

become so unaffordable and how Bitcoin

0:07:37

can help you build lasting wealth and

0:07:39

freedom. It makes the perfect gift for

0:07:40

those new to Bitcoin. Just visit the

0:07:42

link in my show notes. Coin Stories is

0:07:44

also brought to you by Leedin. Need cash

0:07:46

but don't want to sell your Bitcoin?

0:07:48

Letin is the global leader in

0:07:50

Bitcoinbacked loans, issuing over$9

0:07:52

billion dollars in loans since 2018. And

0:07:54

they were the first to offer proof of

0:07:56

reserves. With Ledin, you get custody

0:07:58

loans, no monthly payments, and more.

0:08:01

Visit leadin.io/natalie

0:08:03

to learn more and get a quarter

0:08:04

percentage point off your first loan.

0:08:06

I'll be sharing my Letin Bitcoin loan

0:08:08

journey soon, so stay tuned. And

0:08:10

Abundant Minds. One thing I appreciate

0:08:12

about Abundant Mines is how

0:08:14

straightforward they make Bitcoin

0:08:16

mining. You own the machines, they host

0:08:18

them in the US, and the pricing is clear

0:08:20

upfront. It's built for people who want

0:08:22

exposure to mining without running

0:08:24

operations themselves. And the equipment

0:08:26

may qualify for 100% firstear bonus

0:08:29

depreciation. Learn why so many real

0:08:32

estate investors are turning to Bitcoin

0:08:34

mining. Head to abundant.com/natalie.

0:08:37

>> Okay, so is a billion enough? Is 10

0:08:40

billion enough? Is 50 billion enough?

0:08:43

Right. At what point do you have enough

0:08:46

fundamental insight on this? Well, I

0:08:48

would say you had enough to know that

0:08:51

Amazon was unstoppable a decade before

0:08:53

the world agreed. You had enough insight

0:08:55

to know that Apple was unstoppable

0:08:58

7 years before probably 10 years

0:09:02

actually in 2009 11 years before the

0:09:05

world agreed. You knew it was

0:09:06

unstoppable. You have enough information

0:09:09

to know that Bitcoin is unstoppable

0:09:11

right now. The world's going to

0:09:13

eventually come to a consensus and it'll

0:09:17

be the Warren Buffetts and [snorts] the

0:09:19

Carl icons of the world that will be

0:09:23

what creates that consensus. They won't

0:09:26

be first. They'll be last. They won't

0:09:30

make a huge amount of money. They'll

0:09:32

double or triple their money, right? and

0:09:35

they will enter and the PD goes from 10

0:09:37

to 30. They triple their money in a in a

0:09:41

12 month time period.

0:09:43

And if you're if you're able to think

0:09:46

for yourself and if you're able to

0:09:48

weather volatility,

0:09:50

you can 10x, 20x, 30x on your

0:09:53

investment. But there really is no

0:09:55

example of a successful technology

0:09:58

investment where you didn't have to

0:10:00

weather the 45% draw down and go through

0:10:04

that valley of despair. Right? Ours is

0:10:08

currently taking 137 days so far.

0:10:11

>> But you know it might take two years, it

0:10:13

might take three years, it might take

0:10:14

four years. If it took seven years,

0:10:19

computer. The b biggest success story of

0:10:21

the decade. What do you say to those out

0:10:24

there who feel disappointed by the bull

0:10:26

market that we didn't go higher than

0:10:28

126,000 and what is your reasoning for

0:10:31

why we didn't get to maybe some of those

0:10:34

price predictions that a lot of people

0:10:36

wanted?

0:10:37

>> I think the market is uh evolving. The

0:10:40

entire ecosystem is evolving in

0:10:42

seasoning and if you [clears throat]

0:10:43

look at all the dynamics, the

0:10:46

derivatives market is migrating from

0:10:48

offshore to onshore and it is maturing.

0:10:52

And so as derivatives in the US

0:10:54

regulated markets grow, that strips some

0:10:57

of the volatility off of Bitcoin and

0:10:59

some of the upside off of it. It damps

0:11:01

the upsides. It also damps the downside.

0:11:05

instead of an 80% draw down and an 80

0:11:08

vol you get a 40 or 50% draw down and a

0:11:12

50 ball. So you're seeing volatility

0:11:14

damped on the upside and the downside by

0:11:17

the seasoning of the markets. But you

0:11:20

also have a situation where the banking

0:11:23

establishment is embracing Bitcoin at a

0:11:28

at a progressive but um a slower rate

0:11:33

than people with short attention spans

0:11:35

would like. It'll take the banks four

0:11:37

years, 5 years, 6 years before they

0:11:41

embrace an entirely new asset class.

0:11:43

People would like for Bitcoin to be

0:11:45

recognized in four months. But

0:11:48

[clears throat] if the banks take four

0:11:49

years before they start to bank it,

0:11:51

extend credit on it, acknowledge it and

0:11:54

handle it, trade it, custody it, etc.,

0:11:58

then that means that what you have

0:12:01

>> [snorts]

0:12:01

>> uh at the top of the market is $2

0:12:03

trillion worth of uh Bitcoin,

0:12:07

probably$1.8 trillion held by retail

0:12:09

investors or offshore investors, and

0:12:13

they cannot access the traditional

0:12:15

banking system. They're in the shadow

0:12:16

banking system. So if you had um $1.8

0:12:20

trillion or or or more than a trillion

0:12:23

dollars worth of capital and no one

0:12:25

would give you a loan on it,

0:12:28

then how do you monetize it, right? Um,

0:12:32

if I posted $10 million of Apple stock

0:12:35

with JP Morgan or Morgan Stanley, I

0:12:39

could take a $5 million loan at Sofur

0:12:42

plus 50 basis points and I could spend

0:12:44

it. But but you can't even post $10

0:12:47

million worth of Bitcoin with JP Morgan

0:12:49

or Morgan Stanley right now. Therefore,

0:12:52

you can't take a loan. Therefore, you

0:12:55

have to go to a shadow banking system.

0:12:58

You [clears throat] have to go offshore.

0:12:59

So, how would you actually monetize it?

0:13:01

You either have to sell it, right? The

0:13:03

safe way is to sell it, but that damps

0:13:05

the upside. Uh, what else can you do?

0:13:08

You can, by the way, you can get loans,

0:13:10

a very small amount of loans from a few

0:13:13

crypto exchanges where they don't

0:13:15

rehypothecate your Bitcoin, but but, uh,

0:13:18

the sum of that capital is a few billion

0:13:20

dollars probably.

0:13:22

So maybe there's a few billion dollars

0:13:24

of Bitcoin credit that you can tap at

0:13:28

sulfur plus 500 basis points or sulfur

0:13:31

plus 400 basis points. Okay, this not

0:13:35

sulfur plus 40, sulfur plus 400. So it's

0:13:38

10 times as expensive to actually draw

0:13:42

down capital. And how much capital?

0:13:45

1,000th

0:13:47

of the amount of capital available for

0:13:49

securities portfolios. So there's a

0:13:52

there's

0:13:54

1% or less of the capital available

0:13:57

through the conventional banking system.

0:14:00

It's expensive. Okay. What else can you

0:14:03

do? Well, uh I guess you can convert the

0:14:07

Bitcoin to IBIT and just in the past six

0:14:11

months some banks are starting to extend

0:14:12

credit against IBIT and it's it's

0:14:17

>> a bit more expansive than Bitcoin

0:14:19

credit. It's a bit cheaper, but we're

0:14:22

only in the first 12 months and it's

0:14:24

still expensive and still it's like

0:14:26

limited in uh in its loan to value. Now,

0:14:31

there's a third place you can get

0:14:34

credit. And the third place is you go to

0:14:36

a crypto exchange or an OTC exchange and

0:14:40

they'll often times give you a loan at

0:14:42

4% or 3% or 5% or 2%. I've had people

0:14:47

offer me uh Bitcoin back credit at 1%

0:14:54

or 0%.

0:14:56

What's the catch, Natalie?

0:14:57

>> Right, that's the question.

0:14:59

>> There's always c the catch is they want

0:15:00

me to transfer the Bitcoin to them so

0:15:03

they can rehypothecate it.

0:15:04

>> Right. So, if you have $10 million, you

0:15:07

either cannot get a loan from a

0:15:09

legitimate bank, or you can get a small

0:15:12

loan at a 10% interest rate, or you can

0:15:18

get a 3 or 4% loan, but then it gets

0:15:20

rehypothecated. So, your $10 million of

0:15:22

Bitcoin gets sold once, gets sold twice,

0:15:27

gets sold three times. You might have

0:15:29

you might actually create 30 or $40

0:15:31

million worth of selling because the

0:15:35

Bitcoin that you posted is that you

0:15:38

transferred to the shadow bank or the

0:15:41

crypto exchange rehypothecated it three

0:15:43

times. Okay. So, what's holding down the

0:15:46

price? I think what holds down the price

0:15:49

of the asset is the lack of a fully

0:15:52

formed uh nonrehypothecating

0:15:56

credit system. Right? And uh there's a

0:15:59

limit to how much you can rehypothecate

0:16:02

certain other assets. Right? When you

0:16:04

post your home as collateral for a

0:16:07

mortgage, the bank doesn't turn around

0:16:09

and sell the house on your street 10

0:16:12

times. If they did, the price of houses

0:16:16

on your street would be lower. Right? So

0:16:18

I I think that uh the lack of a fully

0:16:21

formed banking system holds the price

0:16:24

back. the existence of rehypothecation

0:16:27

in the crypto economy uh damps the ball.

0:16:31

It works to both sides, right? When when

0:16:34

people want to get short, they might get

0:16:35

short 50x

0:16:38

>> leverage. When they want to get long,

0:16:40

they might get long 50x

0:16:42

leverage. So, right now we're in that

0:16:45

that uh bare market where you've got the

0:16:48

rehypothecation holding back the price

0:16:52

and uh I think at some point it reverses

0:16:55

itself. We'll just have to wait.

0:16:57

>> Well, you always say that volatility is

0:17:00

vitality. So do you worry that your

0:17:04

projections of like Bitcoin 40% ARR

0:17:08

could be changing and diminishing or are

0:17:11

your bare bull and base cases pretty

0:17:13

similar for the next 10 to 15 years?

0:17:16

>> I look out 21 years, you know, and and I

0:17:19

expect about 29% ARR over the next 21

0:17:23

years. Um I've always thought that we

0:17:26

would have rallies and drawdowns, right?

0:17:30

So I I see it as a serpentine pattern,

0:17:33

you know, where it's just slightly less

0:17:36

than 30% over time, but there'll be

0:17:37

periods when it will surge and there'll

0:17:40

be periods when it will draw down. Uh

0:17:42

that doesn't change. I think you know I

0:17:47

if you listen to people um someone will

0:17:50

say well you know this weekend there

0:17:52

might be some problem in Iran or in the

0:17:54

Middle East and if there is a problem in

0:17:56

the Middle East and if the US does

0:17:58

something with regard to Iran then

0:18:00

Bitcoin's the only thing you can sell

0:18:02

and then Bitcoin price may crash and

0:18:04

we're worried about it and I'll say well

0:18:08

you know if something happens in the

0:18:09

Middle East Bitcoin will be the only

0:18:11

thing you can sell it'll also be the

0:18:13

only thing you can high.

0:18:14

>> Mhm.

0:18:15

>> And so that just means that a lot of

0:18:17

people that want to trade on the weekend

0:18:19

are transferring capital to crypto

0:18:21

exchanges so that they can either buy or

0:18:23

sell or sell buy sell and buy Bitcoin

0:18:27

four times between Friday at 400 p.m.

0:18:30

and Monday morning at 9:30 a.m. And

0:18:34

yeah, if you're a trader, what does that

0:18:35

make this? It makes it the most

0:18:37

interesting asset in the world for you.

0:18:39

If you're an investor over four years,

0:18:42

what the heck difference does it make

0:18:43

whether or not it gets bought, sold,

0:18:45

bought, and sold this weekend? In fact,

0:18:47

here's the difference it makes. There's

0:18:50

capital, hot money that's flowing into

0:18:54

this this ecosystem, into the Bitcoin

0:18:56

ecosystem that otherwise would not be

0:19:00

allocated. Right? There's there's a

0:19:02

trader. Someone's got $20 billion of

0:19:05

capital and their choice is they can

0:19:09

either leave it in the bank earning

0:19:11

sulfur

0:19:13

or they can put it into the crypto

0:19:15

exchange system and they can buy and

0:19:17

sell and buy and sell and maybe they'll

0:19:19

make 4% this weekend.

0:19:21

>> Right. When Bitcoin crashes by 5%,

0:19:24

there's someone buying

0:19:26

>> while there's someone selling. So people

0:19:28

are like, "Oh, it fell 5%." Well,

0:19:30

someone someone woke up at 4:00 a.m. on

0:19:33

a Sunday morning to buy it at a 5%

0:19:37

discount. So, someone's going to

0:19:39

actually make more money on the weekend

0:19:40

than they would make holding holding

0:19:43

conventional money for a year. And that

0:19:46

capital is not flowing into New York

0:19:48

City real estate. It is not flowing into

0:19:50

gold. It is not flowing into

0:19:52

conventional derivatives. It's not

0:19:53

flowing into Nvidia stock. It's not

0:19:55

flowing into Apple stock. Why? because

0:19:57

you're not buying and you're not panic

0:19:59

selling and rage quitting and buying and

0:20:01

capitulating and you know and leaping

0:20:04

into the market on these volatility

0:20:08

waves. So, Bitcoin is most volatile

0:20:11

because it's most useful

0:20:13

and [clears throat] you know in the US

0:20:16

there's things like reggg t where you

0:20:18

can't have more than 2x leverage. Okay,

0:20:21

we have laws that prevent you from going

0:20:23

to more than 2x leverage. Well, there's

0:20:24

no such law, you know, in nature,

0:20:27

>> you know, in nature, you know, like they

0:20:29

don't have those laws. You see one

0:20:31

centipede and then you see 10,000 ants

0:20:33

and it's like 10,000 to one and it

0:20:35

doesn't seem quite fair. There's nothing

0:20:37

fair about nature. If you want to gang

0:20:39

up 10,000 to one on the centipede, you

0:20:42

get to do it. Just like if you want to

0:20:44

trade Bitcoin 50x and crossc

0:20:46

collateralize it to another yo-yo token

0:20:49

which is 10x and you want to create a

0:20:53

machine.

0:20:54

You can do it. There's no one stopping

0:20:56

you from doing it. Is it wise?

0:20:58

Well, maybe 99 out of 100 times it isn't

0:21:02

wise. You get wiped out. But the point

0:21:04

is if that's the case, the people that

0:21:06

do stupid things get wiped out and then

0:21:08

in a year they won't be doing it

0:21:10

anymore, will they?

0:21:11

>> Right. Presumably the people that are

0:21:13

trading with 50x crossc collateralized

0:21:16

leverage offshore on Saturday morning in

0:21:19

response to a Reuters posting and

0:21:23

they're panic selling Bitcoin and then

0:21:26

they're like, "Oh, well, the world

0:21:27

didn't end on Sunday afternoon." Then

0:21:29

they're, you know, they're desperately

0:21:31

buying it back. Presumably, those people

0:21:34

have a reason to do it and they're

0:21:35

making money because if they weren't

0:21:37

making money, the free market would

0:21:39

separate them from their capital, right?

0:21:42

There's no quicker way to go bankrupt,

0:21:44

right? So uh Bitcoin represents the

0:21:49

global capital market and there are

0:21:51

people doing things that you can't do

0:21:53

that you could that you won't do

0:21:57

that you don't choose to do you don't

0:21:59

wish to do and they're doing it with

0:22:01

that asset and that's what's creating

0:22:03

the volatility but that's also creating

0:22:05

the gravitational or the magnetic field

0:22:08

which is attracting all of the energy

0:22:11

all the financial energy of the world's

0:22:12

being drawn into this space, all of the

0:22:16

political energy, you know, all all all

0:22:19

of the digital energy, it's all being

0:22:22

drawn into this space because of that

0:22:25

utility. And uh I think you just got to

0:22:29

make your peace with it. Either you're a

0:22:31

short-term and you're a trader. If

0:22:34

you're worried about what Bitcoin is

0:22:35

going to be in four days or four weeks

0:22:37

or four months, you're a trader. call

0:22:39

yourself a trader and then you better

0:22:41

have a trading methodology or or trading

0:22:43

excellence or be in the trading business

0:22:46

or be, you know, neutrally hedge. So, it

0:22:48

doesn't matter to you.

0:22:50

>> You're either that or you're an

0:22:52

investor, you got a four-year time

0:22:53

horizon and then it just doesn't matter.

0:22:56

All you know, all you'd be thinking is

0:22:58

uh a lot of capital is surging into the

0:23:01

space and a lot of attention is being

0:23:02

given to the space that otherwise would

0:23:04

not be given to the space because of

0:23:06

those crazy traders and let's just let

0:23:08

them do their thing because I'm an

0:23:10

investor. I'm holding for the long term.

0:23:12

>> Well, you know, I'm very passionate

0:23:13

about empowering the average individual

0:23:16

and Bitcoin is still primarily owned by

0:23:18

individuals, but I just had Lynn Alden

0:23:19

on and she said that retail really did

0:23:21

not participate in this last bull

0:23:23

market. Why do you think that is? And

0:23:25

what will bring sort of the average

0:23:27

retail investor into the best savings

0:23:29

technology?

0:23:30

>> I think that the that the retail

0:23:32

investors

0:23:34

that are passionate and and uh and and

0:23:40

committed to digital capital, to

0:23:43

Bitcoin, I think they found it already.

0:23:46

I think that I think that they've had 10

0:23:48

years to find it. So if you're looking

0:23:51

for a non-s sovereign store of value

0:23:54

bearer digital asset,

0:23:57

I think that sometime between 2010

0:24:00

and 2015,

0:24:06

you found it in one of those successive

0:24:06

waves and then you bought as much as you

0:24:08

could possibly afford to buy. Okay? And

0:24:11

that's fine. Um I think that if you want

0:24:15

to draw the next uh cohort of retail

0:24:19

investors,

0:24:22

they don't want uh a 40 v 40 arr

0:24:27

asset.

0:24:28

What they want is uh something more like

0:24:33

a 10v 10 arr asset or a zero v 8

0:24:39

ar a arr asset. So, I think that the way

0:24:42

that we draw the mass of of investors is

0:24:48

you offer them something like digital

0:24:50

credit like STRC where where we say,

0:24:52

"Well, here's 11%.

0:24:55

It's tax deferred.

0:24:57

We're stripping the ball off of it."

0:25:00

Like the one-year volatility of STRC is

0:25:03

less than the NASDAQ, is less than the

0:25:05

S&P index, it's less than gold. Right?

0:25:09

I'm going to give you an asset which is

0:25:10

less volatile than conventional stores

0:25:13

of value, but it's a but it's kind of a

0:25:17

it's a certain right straightforward

0:25:20

defined 10% or 11% and you get it

0:25:23

monthly. Um, and you can test this

0:25:26

yourself, Natalie. I would challenge you

0:25:28

to test it. walk down the street and

0:25:30

find a hundred people and say, "Uh,

0:25:33

would you rather have 30% a year, uh,

0:25:37

over the next 20 years, but you're going

0:25:40

to get, um, 40% draw downs and 40

0:25:44

volatility. It'll be three times as

0:25:46

volatile as the S&P index, and uh, you

0:25:49

know, some years you won't make any

0:25:50

money and some years you'll make a lot

0:25:52

of money, but it'll be 30%." or would

0:25:54

you rather have a bank account that pays

0:25:56

10% where you can take your money out

0:25:58

whenever you want but you'll just

0:25:59

collect 10% while you're waiting now ask

0:26:03

them take the survey I I would think

0:26:06

like if you were to say 95% of the

0:26:09

market wants a 10% bank account they

0:26:11

don't have to pay tax on and only 5%

0:26:14

wants the 30% a year.

0:26:18

>> I I think that that's optimistic like

0:26:19

like that's probably too pro Bitcoin. I

0:26:23

don't think 5%

0:26:25

of retail investors want to hold Bitcoin

0:26:28

and collect 30% a year tax deferred with

0:26:31

a volatility that's double or triple the

0:26:33

S&P like I you might find differently. I

0:26:36

would I would suspect it's possible that

0:26:38

that number is one 2%. Right? So the

0:26:43

great mass of the retail investors

0:26:46

they want something which is 2x or 3x or

0:26:50

4x better than a bond fund.

0:26:52

or they want something that looks like

0:26:55

the S&P but without the draw downs of

0:26:58

the S&P.

0:27:00

And so we're going to attract retail

0:27:02

investors to the ecosystem

0:27:04

when we um take the best of equity, the

0:27:08

best of credit and the best of uh crypto

0:27:11

and we put the three together. So what

0:27:14

does that mean? uh double equity is

0:27:18

doubledigit returns and tax deferred

0:27:22

gains. Credit is price stability,

0:27:26

principal protection and low volatility

0:27:29

and um and a very defined yield like

0:27:35

defined consistent cash income.

0:27:39

crypto, Bitcoin is digital innovation,

0:27:45

right? Uh transformation and two, three,

0:27:49

4x the productivity of the conventional

0:27:51

economy, right? It's massive growth.

0:27:54

Okay. So, right now the retail investor,

0:27:56

they have to choose between massive

0:27:58

growth and a and a roller coaster that's

0:28:00

pulling 9gs,

0:28:03

>> right?

0:28:03

>> That's Bitcoin, right? or they have to

0:28:06

take the S&P or the NASDAQ index and

0:28:09

accept 50 to 20 V with good years and

0:28:13

bad years but over time 10% AR r or

0:28:17

better or they have to accept um a

0:28:23

credit spread uh from an investment

0:28:26

grade bond of 70 basis points which

0:28:28

means they're getting four and a half%

0:28:29

interest and it's fully taxable as

0:28:32

ordinary income. So, you know, you're

0:28:35

you're a California resident. You're

0:28:37

either getting 2% on your Apple bonds

0:28:40

after tax,

0:28:43

but you feel safe

0:28:45

or you're getting 10 to 15% on your S&P

0:28:50

and NASDAQ portfolio, but you're getting

0:28:52

no not much of any yield and you're

0:28:56

you're on a a small kind of a a

0:28:59

conventional roller coaster.

0:29:02

>> Or

0:29:04

you buy Bitcoin and you're getting 3x

0:29:08

the roller coaster ride. you're getting

0:29:10

better performance, but you know, for

0:29:13

the last 137 days, people think that

0:29:16

you're crazy.

0:29:17

>> Yeah.

0:29:18

>> Right. And so those are your three

0:29:20

choices. I think that the way that we

0:29:22

break that log jam is we simply engineer

0:29:25

digital credit. That's that's why that's

0:29:28

been my passion for the past year. Can I

0:29:31

actually take a 45 V 45 AR asset which

0:29:35

is Bitcoin and strip 80 to 90% of the

0:29:39

volatility off it. Strip 80 to 90% 90%

0:29:42

of the risk off it. And let's give you

0:29:44

something four to five times over

0:29:46

collateralized.

0:29:48

Let's create a double-digit yield. Let's

0:29:51

do it in a way that's a return of

0:29:53

capital. So you get tax deferred uh or

0:29:56

you get you get deferred tax treatment.

0:29:58

So you get the benefits of equity, you

0:30:01

get the performance of equity, you get

0:30:03

the principal protection of credit or a

0:30:06

bond, you get a defined yield, you get

0:30:09

paid monthly in cash. If you want to

0:30:12

reinvest it, you just reinvest the

0:30:15

dividends back in the principal and it

0:30:17

becomes like a consistent 11%

0:30:20

tax deferred growing asset. And when

0:30:24

when you want to get off the roller

0:30:25

coaster to pay your kids' tuition or pay

0:30:28

a tax bill, then you just withdraw your

0:30:30

money or you or you sell, right? And for

0:30:33

that to work, you can't you can't have

0:30:35

the volatility and the draw downs of

0:30:37

equity. You can't have the volatility

0:30:39

the draw downs of of Bitcoin. You need

0:30:42

some credit instrument and you need an

0:30:44

issuer that's going to overcolateralize

0:30:46

it. and you need to actively manage that

0:30:50

credit instrument so as to create price

0:30:53

stability. And so I I think uh STRC or

0:30:58

digital credit in my opinion is the way

0:31:01

that we draw the next cohort of retail

0:31:04

investors into the space. And I I don't

0:31:07

know why we couldn't draw 10 to 100x

0:31:12

as many. I I would think, you know, if

0:31:15

if 2 to 4% or 2 to 5% of retail were

0:31:18

able, by the way, if you find 5% of

0:31:21

retail that like Bitcoin, they're not

0:31:23

going to allocate 100% of their capital

0:31:25

to it, right? They're going to allocate

0:31:27

some portion. So, I think if we got 2 to

0:31:29

4% the first go around, I think we'll

0:31:31

get to 20 to 40% with digital credit.

0:31:36

And I I think that that is a that that

0:31:39

is in a way one of the killer

0:31:42

applications of digital capital.

0:31:44

>> Want to accept Bitcoin and stablecoin

0:31:47

payments? Speed makes it simple.

0:31:49

Customers can pay via QR codes in app

0:31:52

online or POS. Speed helped stake and

0:31:54

shake accept Bitcoin nationwide. As COO

0:31:57

Dan Edwards says,

0:31:58

>> customers choose to pay in Bitcoin

0:32:00

instead of credit cards. We uh are

0:32:03

saving about 50% in our processing fees.

0:32:05

>> This led to more support from Bitcoin

0:32:07

users and a 10% revenue boost. Getting

0:32:10

started is easy. Sign up at tryp

0:32:12

speed.com or integrate the API in hours.

0:32:15

Start accepting Bitcoin today. Download

0:32:17

Speed at speed.app/coinstories

0:32:20

or the QR code on the screen and use

0:32:22

code coinstories 10 for 5,000 free SATs.

0:32:25

If you've been listening for a while,

0:32:26

you've probably heard us talk about

0:32:28

BitKey. Big Key is a private multi-IG

0:32:31

wallet that removes the biggest point of

0:32:33

failure in traditional self-custody, the

0:32:35

seed phrase. Things get lost, phones get

0:32:37

replaced, life happens, right? Big key

0:32:39

is designed so your Bitcoin stays secure

0:32:42

and recoverable without demanding

0:32:44

constant attention or expertise. And for

0:32:46

February only, Coin Stories listeners

0:32:48

can get BitKey for $99 using code

0:32:51

stories at bitkey.orld. Up next, the

0:32:54

Bitcoin way. There's only one way to

0:32:56

protect your Bitcoin from government,

0:32:58

politicians, and third-party risk, and

0:33:00

that is 100% self-custody. My friends at

0:33:03

the Bitcoin Way will train you how to do

0:33:05

this the right way, the first time, no

0:33:07

compromises. Go to the

0:33:09

bitcoinway.com/natalie

0:33:10

to speak with the experts about making

0:33:12

sure your Bitcoin is secure and private.

0:33:15

I hope to see all of you in Las Vegas

0:33:16

for Bitcoin 2026. We'll be celebrating 5

0:33:20

years of Women of Bitcoin with a special

0:33:23

evening bash. and I'll be signing copies

0:33:25

of Bitcoin is for Everyone at the

0:33:27

Bitcoin Bazaar. Use code hodddle for

0:33:30

discounted passes and I will see you

0:33:32

this April. Finally, Bitcoin IRA. With

0:33:35

Bitcoin IRA, you can invest in Bitcoin

0:33:37

247 inside a tax advantaged IRA. Choose

0:33:40

a traditional IRA to defer taxes or a

0:33:43

Roth IRA for tax-free withdrawals when

0:33:45

you retire. Take control of your future

0:33:48

with Bitcoin IRA. Head to

0:33:49

bitcoinirra.com/natalie

0:33:52

for up to a $1,000 funding bonus. Out of

0:33:55

all the preferreds you've issued, it

0:33:56

seems like you're most excited about

0:33:58

Stretch and you've been using it more in

0:34:00

order to accumulate Bitcoin. Is there a

0:34:02

strategy behind that?

0:34:04

>> Yeah, if you if you look at all the

0:34:06

credit instruments,

0:34:08

um, you know, what are we doing? We're

0:34:11

stripping volatility off of Bitcoin and

0:34:13

extracting yield and eliminating

0:34:16

currency risk and and eliminating

0:34:20

capital risk. So, uh, Bitcoin is like 45

0:34:26

V over the past year. With Strike, we

0:34:30

managed to get that down to like 38.

0:34:33

With uh, Stride and Strife, we got it

0:34:35

into the mid20s.

0:34:37

with stretch. We got it down into the

0:34:39

teens or the low teens, even for a

0:34:41

while, down into the single digits.

0:34:45

And uh and then all that volatility we

0:34:49

stripped off then flows into MSTR, the

0:34:52

common equity, which is 80. So what

0:34:54

we're engaged in is [clears throat]

0:34:57

volatility engineering. And um

0:35:02

if you ask if you ask the average

0:35:05

person, right, do you want um a bank

0:35:08

account that pays you 10% or do you want

0:35:11

a 30-year bond that pays you 12

0:35:14

and but you got to wait 30 years? Well,

0:35:16

most people just want the 10%. They

0:35:18

don't want like they don't want an extra

0:35:22

2% if the volatility doubles. Like do

0:35:25

you want 24 V and 12 or do you want 10%

0:35:28

10 V and 10? Most people just want the

0:35:32

truth is what they want is they want 10%

0:35:34

and zero V.

0:35:36

>> I want zero volatility, zero duration.

0:35:40

Give me double or triple the money

0:35:42

market or quadruple the money market.

0:35:47

you can overthink this, but if you look

0:35:51

at all of all of our credit experiments,

0:35:54

and we've done, I don't know, almost 20

0:35:57

different fixed income deals, okay? We

0:36:00

we did uh senior credit, you know, with

0:36:03

Ebida Covenants, and that was not

0:36:05

scalable. So, X that off the list. Then

0:36:08

we did uh a Bitcoin back loan with

0:36:10

Silvergate, but that creates too much,

0:36:13

you know, collateral coverage risk and

0:36:15

margin call risk. So, X that off. And

0:36:18

then we did convertible bonds, many of

0:36:20

them, but they're all 144A offerings,

0:36:23

which means it's illegal for retail to

0:36:24

buy them, right? We c we can, you know,

0:36:27

try to put lipstick on the pig and say,

0:36:29

"Oh, it's 144, it's over the counters,

0:36:31

whatever." Let me translate it. It's a

0:36:33

it's an illquid market with about two or

0:36:37

three dozen participants and it's

0:36:39

illegal for you to buy it. How is it in

0:36:42

any sense a good idea to create a

0:36:45

product that's illegal for normal people

0:36:46

to buy?

0:36:48

>> That's stupid. Okay. So, X that off the

0:36:51

list, right? All the by all those things

0:36:54

are 10x 20x over collateralized. They

0:36:58

trade like triple junk.

0:37:00

Okay. So, the market's broken.

0:37:02

>> Right. Right? Like the market's broken.

0:37:05

A bond that's got $70 of collateral for

0:37:08

every $1 of liability trades with a

0:37:12

credit spread like a going out of

0:37:14

business junk company. It's like it's

0:37:16

broken. Why is it broken? The market's

0:37:19

broken. You can't buy it. It's over the

0:37:22

counter. What is over the counter? It's

0:37:24

like 16 people get together in a back

0:37:27

alley to trade with each other and

0:37:29

there's one dude making the market with

0:37:31

a bid ass spread of 300 basis points and

0:37:34

they meet, you know, on Friday afternoon

0:37:37

from 4 to 5 in the afternoon and we call

0:37:39

that 144a over the counter. It's it's an

0:37:43

illquid, broken, non-transparent,

0:37:47

crippled market. Okay, make that go

0:37:50

away. So after you've gone to all that,

0:37:52

now you start think about, well,

0:37:55

how do I take it public? Well, it makes

0:37:57

no sense to take a bond public. Like

0:38:01

selling a 5-year bond and then taking it

0:38:04

public as a listing makes no sense. Why?

0:38:08

Well, because in four years, the bond's

0:38:10

only got 12 months left. It's not a

0:38:12

perpetual instrument.

0:38:14

Okay? So that means that you've got this

0:38:18

theta decay. You've got a decay in the

0:38:20

value of the bond because of course at

0:38:22

some point it's only going to have

0:38:23

30-day useful life. Why would you create

0:38:26

a public security that eventually dies?

0:38:29

That's stupid, right? It's like silly.

0:38:32

So, you have to create a perpetual

0:38:34

instrument to take it public. Erggo

0:38:37

preferred stock. So, then we we

0:38:39

basically think, well, we'll create a

0:38:40

perpetual preferred stock. And then we

0:38:43

started by doing the straightforward

0:38:45

thing. we'll just pay a 10% dividend or

0:38:48

we'll pay 8% with a conversion rate. So

0:38:50

those were two ideas, strike and strife.

0:38:54

And uh they were very successful. They

0:38:56

were 10x more successful than all the

0:38:58

other preferreds.

0:39:00

And we learned a lot. But then what we

0:39:02

realized is

0:39:09

people don't want duration

0:39:09

and they don't want complexity. So how

0:39:11

do you value a convertible preferred

0:39:13

stock? It's just too complicated for

0:39:15

people to figure out.

0:39:17

>> Okay. What what is the duration of um of

0:39:21

a 10% preferred that yields 10% forever?

0:39:24

Well, you can come you can calculate the

0:39:26

Macaulay duration. It's a theoretical

0:39:28

construct. It it works out to be about

0:39:31

10 years when it's trading at par. So,

0:39:34

it's like a 10-year duration instrument.

0:39:36

That's the same as like a 15 18year

0:39:39

government bond. You following the bond

0:39:41

math here, Natalie? It's kind of

0:39:43

complicated bond math, right? If the

0:39:47

bond has a 10 duration, then that means

0:39:49

when interest rates fall 100 basis

0:39:51

points, the bond should trade up 10%.

0:39:54

How many retail investors understand

0:39:55

that?

0:39:56

>> Not many.

0:39:56

>> Not many. Right? Duration math on a bond

0:39:59

is complicated, but but let me tell you

0:40:01

what the problem with it is. If I have a

0:40:04

duration of 10 and and the forward

0:40:07

interest rate expectation falls 100

0:40:10

basis point the the principal should

0:40:12

trade up 10%. But when the forward

0:40:15

interest rate falls or goes up 50 basis

0:40:18

points the bond falls 5%. So that means

0:40:22

every time Jerome Pal is giving a speech

0:40:25

the theoretical value of a 10 duration

0:40:28

instrument is moving plus or minus 10%.

0:40:31

How many retail people want their assets

0:40:33

to fall plus or minus 10% during a Fed

0:40:36

press conference? You know, when the

0:40:39

perceived risk uh like if Bitcoin falls,

0:40:42

the theoretical value of the collateral

0:40:44

falls. So, it's another way of saying

0:40:46

that a long duration instrument has a

0:40:48

lot of volatility.

0:40:50

Okay? So, I'm going to give you 10%

0:40:53

instead of three,

0:40:55

but the but the per the security might

0:40:58

fall 20% or 10% over the next 3 months.

0:41:01

That's what we created, Natalie. Okay,

0:41:04

who wants that? But by the way, it's a

0:41:06

screaming home run for a credit

0:41:08

investor. For example, if you think that

0:41:10

sofur is going to fall 150 basis points

0:41:14

and if you believe that uh Bitcoin is

0:41:18

not going to zero but it's going to

0:41:20

trade sideways or it's going to

0:41:21

appreciate 10%. The theoretical credit

0:41:24

spread on something like STRF or STRD or

0:41:29

STRK the theoretical credit spread falls

0:41:32

to 100 basis points or 50 basis points.

0:41:35

Right now you're getting [snorts] 6 7 8

0:41:38

900 basis points. What does that mean?

0:41:41

That means if you actually believe in

0:41:43

Bitcoin and you think interest rates are

0:41:44

falling and the company's misunderstood,

0:41:46

you're going to buy that instrument at

0:41:48

100 bucks and it's going to trade at

0:41:51

Not look at your eyes.

0:41:54

You're going to buy Strike at 80 and

0:41:55

it's going to trade to 160

0:41:57

because it's a long duration instrument.

0:42:00

>> Okay. What's you what's the theoretical

0:42:03

value of an instrument that's currently

0:42:05

trading with a market credit spread of

0:42:06

900 basis points that should be valued

0:42:10

with a credit spread of 300 basis points

0:42:14

right it should trade up to the 100 200

0:42:17

300 400 so who wants the long duration

0:42:21

credit instrument it's someone that

0:42:23

actually has a long view a pro Bitcoin

0:42:28

>> if if Bitcoin is really rated as

0:42:30

collateral by the Basel under the Basel

0:42:32

rules. If banks start to custody it,

0:42:35

right? If the credit if the credit

0:42:37

rating agencies rate these things, then

0:42:40

those long duration credit instruments

0:42:42

have a capital gain potential of

0:42:44

doubling or tripling.

0:42:46

>> Okay. But it's like, well, what do you

0:42:49

think about sofur? What do you think

0:42:50

about the forward yield curve? What do

0:42:52

you think about the credit rating

0:42:53

agencies? What do you think about the

0:42:55

future of Bitcoin? So that is an

0:42:59

interesting investment.

0:43:01

But notice how long it took me to talk

0:43:03

about it. Okay.

0:43:05

>> It's hard to understand. Yeah.

0:43:06

>> Now let's move to retail.

0:43:09

What do I want? I want to put my money

0:43:10

in a bank. I want them to pay me 10%. I

0:43:13

don't want the government to tax it.

0:43:15

Okay. How long was that conversation?

0:43:18

That was like 12 seconds.

0:43:21

>> Okay. Well, what if the what if interest

0:43:22

rates fall? It doesn't matter. What if

0:43:24

the credit of the company improves or

0:43:27

falls? Doesn't matter.

0:43:29

>> Well, what if Bitcoin quadruples?

0:43:32

Doesn't matter. What if Bitcoin gets cut

0:43:33

in half? Doesn't matter. What matters?

0:43:37

Well, I'm getting paid 4% or four three

0:43:40

and a half% and it's taxable and you

0:43:43

know, and the government keeps half. So,

0:43:45

I'm getting 180 basis points on my money

0:43:48

market or I'm getting 11.25% 25% and the

0:43:52

government doesn't tax it. Do I need to

0:43:54

know anything else? Not really. Okay.

0:43:58

Well, what's the risk? Well, uh, Bitcoin

0:44:01

might go to zero forever. Okay. So,

0:44:03

you've got existential risk to Bitcoin,

0:44:05

right? And then you have to trust this

0:44:07

company strategy. Okay. Well, how much

0:44:09

capital do they have?

0:44:12

Yeah. Well, we just went and raised $9

0:44:13

billion to support your credit

0:44:15

instrument. Right.

0:44:17

>> Right. We'll sell we will raise a

0:44:19

billion dollars a week if necessary.

0:44:21

Right. Well, what did they say? They

0:44:23

said they said they're targeting a h

0:44:24

100red bucks. What are they going to do

0:44:25

if it doesn't trade at 100 bucks?

0:44:26

They're going to raise the dividend

0:44:27

rate.

0:44:30

Have they done that? Yeah. Five times.

0:44:32

Okay. So, why are we focused on STRC?

0:44:37

Well, because at the end of the day,

0:44:39

there's a $300 trillion credit market,

0:44:41

and that $300 trillion credit market is

0:44:44

collecting 4 to 500 basis points, and

0:44:47

it's all taxable.

0:44:49

And in order to get to 450 or 500 basis

0:44:54

points, you have to accept credit risk

0:44:56

of a junk bond. You have to accept the

0:44:58

credit risk of an investment grade

0:45:00

company. You have to accept the

0:45:02

illquidity of private credit. The Blue

0:45:05

Owl is currently in the news right now.

0:45:07

They suspended redemptions and people

0:45:09

are freaking out over, well, what if I

0:45:11

can't get my money out again? So, you're

0:45:14

either ac accepting ill liquidity or

0:45:16

liquidity risk or you're accepting

0:45:18

credit risk or you're accepting duration

0:45:20

risk. I'm holding, you know, Google just

0:45:23

sold a 100red-year bond. You have to

0:45:25

wait a 100 years to get your money back.

0:45:27

Who bought that? Why did they buy that?

0:45:30

Okay. So, duration, credit, liquidity,

0:45:36

right? And then currency risk, right?

0:45:38

You might have to accept, you know, you

0:45:40

might get a higher yield in a certain

0:45:41

currency and then you're accepting the

0:45:43

currency risk to the dollar itself.

0:45:45

You're accepting all those risks in

0:45:48

order to get what do you get? You get a

0:45:50

70 basis point spread for investment

0:45:52

grade. You get 70 basis points more than

0:45:54

the US government would pay you if you

0:45:56

buy a bond from Microsoft or Apple. Or

0:45:58

you get 275 basis points if you buy a

0:46:01

junk bond,

0:46:03

right? Or you get maybe 350 basis points

0:46:07

if you buy private credit, which is

0:46:08

illquid, which is invested in a

0:46:10

heterogeneous portfolio of private

0:46:12

companies with 10,000 pages of like

0:46:15

complicated contracts that may or may

0:46:17

not work out for you. Okay? So that is

0:46:20

the credit market. Now ask the question,

0:46:23

right? You're the retail investor. Do

0:46:26

you want duration risk? No. Do you want

0:46:29

currency risk? No. Do you want credit

0:46:32

risk? No. Do you want Do you want to be

0:46:34

able to get your money back? Yeah. Do

0:46:36

you want volatility? No.

0:46:40

What do you want? Give me two to four

0:46:43

times more than the money market. And I

0:46:45

don't want to pay tax on it, right? I

0:46:47

want tax I want I want good tax

0:46:49

treatment. I want the same deferred

0:46:52

capital gains tax treatment that I get

0:46:54

from holding a long-term investment. So

0:46:56

give me a fair tax treatment so I can

0:46:59

compound my assets and my investments

0:47:02

over time. Give me some stability

0:47:06

and strip away all these other things.

0:47:11

what what that tells us is is strategy.

0:47:14

At the end of our journey, we realize

0:47:17

that there's no point in creating bond

0:47:20

type credit because a bond's always

0:47:24

going to be short-lived, inefficient,

0:47:28

illquid, and it's always always going to

0:47:30

be fully ordinary income taxable. So

0:47:32

it's it's tax inefficient. It's market

0:47:35

inefficient. No point doing it. It's not

0:47:37

a benefit to the investor. No, you know,

0:47:40

these longer duration instruments,

0:47:42

they're for professional investors. If

0:47:45

you're a credit investor with a 10-year

0:47:47

horizon and you have an opinion on

0:47:49

Bitcoin and the Federal Reserve, you

0:47:51

could double your money by buying one of

0:47:53

our longdated credit instruments. Is it

0:47:55

a good idea for you? Absolutely. Right.

0:47:58

It's a you know you can you can collect

0:48:00

10 12%

0:48:03

for a 100 years on a credit instrument

0:48:06

and if the credit spreads compress

0:48:08

you'll double or triple your money but

0:48:12

retirees right 75year-old retired chief

0:48:16

master sergeants in the air force they

0:48:18

don't want that right and um I guess the

0:48:22

last point I'll make is in this journey

0:48:25

we kept iterating we're like well let's

0:48:27

get rid of the defects of senior bonds.

0:48:29

Let's get rid of the defects of asset

0:48:31

back bonds. Let's get rid of the defects

0:48:33

of convertible bonds. Let's get rid of

0:48:35

the defects of of perpetual preferred.

0:48:39

And then people were like, well, you

0:48:41

know, can I just have the money monthly?

0:48:43

You know, it's like, what do they want?

0:48:45

They want stability. Give me a stable

0:48:47

price. Give me monthly cash income. Why?

0:48:50

Why monthly, by the way? Because we

0:48:52

couldn't do weekly or daily. Like if the

0:48:54

NASDAQ or the conventional market

0:48:56

supported daily or hourly, we'd be doing

0:48:59

that. That is uh that's an upgrade that

0:49:02

a crypto entrepreneur can put in. You

0:49:04

you can create a stable coin or a

0:49:06

savings a savings coin maybe like a buck

0:49:09

token or something like that where maybe

0:49:11

you'll actually stream the dividend

0:49:13

hourly or stream it daily, right? And

0:49:17

that's interesting. is just we couldn't

0:49:19

do it in in the container of a NASDAQ

0:49:22

listed preferred security

0:49:25

uh efficiently. So we created the most

0:49:28

efficient stream of fixed income. We

0:49:30

created the most taxefficient

0:49:33

stream of fixed income. We created the

0:49:36

simple simplest possible instrument.

0:49:40

And the five-year journey for the

0:49:41

company is

0:49:43

this is Bitcoin is digital capital. will

0:49:46

spend a thousand hours and you'll agree

0:49:48

with me, but you'll still have to deal

0:49:49

with brutal 45% draw downs and you know

0:49:53

for some periods everyone's going to

0:49:55

hate and make fun of you. Right? That's

0:49:57

one extreme. And the other and I'll

0:49:59

spend hundreds of hours to explain why

0:50:01

Bitcoin is economic freedom and

0:50:03

empowerment and financial sovereignty

0:50:05

and a breakthrough and digital energy

0:50:07

and the greatest thing in the history of

0:50:09

money. And after I've done that, 95% of

0:50:12

conventional investors still won't quite

0:50:14

understand it. and the Warren Buffets

0:50:16

and the Carl icons of the world, they

0:50:18

probably won't necessarily jump on that

0:50:21

freight train with 10 or 20 or $50

0:50:23

billion in their capital rate. That's

0:50:24

one extreme. The other extreme is,

0:50:29

you know, would you like a bank account

0:50:31

that pays you 11% that's tax deferred?

0:50:36

STRC.

0:50:39

Okay, that was a that was

0:50:43

that was a thousand hours. This is 10

0:50:45

seconds. Okay. So, you at the end of the

0:50:49

day here's what I realize, right?

0:50:53

The world doesn't want you to write

0:50:56

10,000 pages of history to explain

0:50:59

what's going on. They don't have time to

0:51:01

read 10. They don't have a thousand

0:51:03

hours to read it all. Okay? The world

0:51:05

doesn't want that. The world doesn't

0:51:07

necessarily want 150 hours of explaining

0:51:11

why they should get on the crypto roller

0:51:13

coaster and accept exhilaration,

0:51:18

you know, and beatdowns and everything

0:51:22

in the middle and endure the toxicity.

0:51:26

The world just wants the answer and they

0:51:29

don't want the answer even in 10

0:51:31

seconds. They want the product.

0:51:32

>> They want the iPhone,

0:51:35

right? It's like I want air

0:51:36

conditioning. It's like we were talking

0:51:38

about, you know, like how much time do

0:51:41

you spend thinking about the water you

0:51:42

drink or the cool air or the electric

0:51:46

light? It's like someone just gave it to

0:51:48

me. Do I think about it? Not at all. Do

0:51:50

I like it? Yeah. Give me a pill. I take

0:51:54

it once a day. I don't know how you

0:51:55

manufacture it. It makes my problem go

0:51:57

away. And in this case,

0:52:00

you know, the greatest product in the

0:52:02

world. It's like like if I could cast a

0:52:06

spell on you, Natalie, you'll be happy

0:52:07

and indestructible and immortal and

0:52:10

have, you know, omniscience and you'll

0:52:12

be omnipotent and all powerful and

0:52:15

you'll never want for anything ever

0:52:16

again, and everyone will love you and

0:52:17

agree with you. Well, how long that's

0:52:19

going to take? Five seconds. Okay. Well,

0:52:22

sign me up.

0:52:24

>> Just give me that. [laughter]

0:52:26

Just give me that. What what is STRC?

0:52:29

Oh, yeah. You buy it, it pays you 10 or

0:52:31

11. It pays you doubledigit dividend.

0:52:34

It's tax deferred. If you give it to

0:52:36

your heirs, then the basis steps up

0:52:38

again. And so, you can collect dividends

0:52:41

for 10 years without paying tax. And

0:52:43

then they can collect dividends for 10

0:52:44

years and not without paying tax. And

0:52:47

what do I have to worry about? Nothing.

0:52:50

Okay. Well, that's what you want. You

0:52:53

know, that's what you want from

0:52:53

Coca-Cola. That's what you want from

0:52:56

American Airlines. That's what you want

0:52:58

from Boeing. It's that's what you want

0:53:00

from Apple.

0:53:02

That's what you want from whatever. Just

0:53:04

just give me the solution. And

0:53:08

you know, like how many people want to

0:53:10

study petrochemical engineering for

0:53:12

10,000 hours and then set up their own

0:53:14

oil refinery in in their backyard. It's

0:53:17

like or their own nuclear reactor.

0:53:19

Nobody. How many people want infinite

0:53:22

free electricity forever? Everybody.

0:53:26

It's like the the value, right? The

0:53:28

commercialization is take the

0:53:30

technology, put it into a package

0:53:34

that is simple, that's straightforward,

0:53:38

give it to the public. You know, it's

0:53:41

like, well, okay, but we're going to

0:53:43

have to trust you.

0:53:45

Yeah. Like you had to trust Kellogg

0:53:48

cereal. Like you had to trust craft

0:53:52

ketchup. Like you have to tr trust st

0:53:55

you know why they called it standard oil

0:53:57

because it was this the oil that didn't

0:54:01

catch fire in the lamp or or didn't uh

0:54:04

clog the engine because it was

0:54:07

standardized.

0:54:09

>> It was it was uh always the same purity,

0:54:12

the same quality.

0:54:15

It's it's like what is this ketchup?

0:54:18

This is the ketchup where if you

0:54:19

actually uh put it on your food, it

0:54:22

doesn't give you disease. It doesn't

0:54:24

give you food poisoning. It's like safe,

0:54:27

right? And so is there a precedent for

0:54:31

consumers trusting companies to give

0:54:33

them things that they they live uh that

0:54:37

they love? Yeah. DuPont's uh slogan,

0:54:41

better living through chemistry. And

0:54:43

when chemistry became politically

0:54:45

incorrect, it became better living

0:54:47

through technology, right? It's like,

0:54:50

you know, it's like we make fun of all

0:54:52

that and then you're like, well, then

0:54:53

there's polyester and there Lycra and

0:54:55

there's nylon and there and you know,

0:54:58

and there's all the all these

0:55:00

petrochemical products and turns out we

0:55:02

built the world with them. And uh so I I

0:55:07

think that Bitcoin is growing up and

0:55:10

we're moving from the early adopters,

0:55:13

the hobbyists, the you remember it used

0:55:16

to be people like radio. They're like

0:55:18

ham radio operators and they have a

0:55:20

little antenna in their backyard and

0:55:22

they have a ham radio setup in their

0:55:24

workshop and they would study the

0:55:26

simophores and they would study the uh

0:55:29

the physics and and they would form

0:55:31

clubs and then they would get into their

0:55:34

workshop and then they would broadcast,

0:55:36

you know, over the radio network and

0:55:37

people thought that was just great.

0:55:40

And and then eventually you got to the

0:55:42

point where six-year-olds

0:55:44

have a mobile phone in their hand

0:55:47

and like no one does ham radio anymore,

0:55:50

right? Like that. But that's how the

0:55:52

industry started. And it used to be that

0:55:54

you had to be a you had to be very

0:55:56

technically astute,

0:55:58

>> In order to participate. And how did we

0:56:00

commercialize radio? Oh, we we put six

0:56:03

billion mobile devices into the hands of

0:56:05

teenagers and we gave them Tik Tok and

0:56:07

that's how we commercialized radio. And

0:56:09

we were so good at it that now we have

0:56:12

to actually pass laws to stop people

0:56:14

from using the radio. Like now now we're

0:56:17

upset that they spend too much time

0:56:19

playing with their radio.

0:56:21

>> And I think that Bitcoin will go through

0:56:23

the same transition. We'll go from

0:56:26

hobbyist and ideologues and technology

0:56:29

visionaries

0:56:31

to eventually the point where 8 billion

0:56:33

people, they just have the digital

0:56:35

assets, the digital capital. It's all on

0:56:38

their phone. And it's like, oh yeah,

0:56:39

well, we just move it around. But we

0:56:40

move it around in a savings coin, a

0:56:42

stable coin, a a security, a, you know,

0:56:46

a crypto asset. It's like,

0:56:48

>> yeah. Well, most people don't understand

0:56:50

how the internet works, but they

0:56:51

obviously use it every day. They don't

0:56:53

understand how their iPhone is put

0:56:54

together, but they use it. And it is

0:56:56

like that video you mentioned of you

0:56:57

holding the iPhone, saying, "Everybody's

0:56:59

going to want this." Um and Stretch

0:57:02

seems to be that product that addresses

0:57:04

the main market need of not wanting

0:57:05

volatility but wanting a stable um cash

0:57:08

dividend. You have a two plus year

0:57:10

runway for it with cash. MSTR is still

0:57:13

trading at a premium. You guys still are

0:57:15

buying Bitcoin, but yet every time I see

0:57:17

you on these news programs, it seems

0:57:19

like they're expecting Bitcoin to go to

0:57:21

zero and you've gone from hero to oh my

0:57:25

gosh, what's happening? Bitcoin's dying.

0:57:27

Um, do you ever feel like they're

0:57:29

rooting for you to fail? And how do you

0:57:31

deal with like that swing in in

0:57:33

sentiment?

0:57:34

>> The struggle is real. [laughter]

0:57:38

The struggle is real. But, you know, uh,

0:57:40

to be more serious, uh, when Bitcoin is

0:57:43

hitting all times high, all-time highs,

0:57:45

there's a sense of exuberance and and

0:57:48

all of the media terms positive and it's

0:57:50

glowing and people are doing high fives.

0:57:54

And when it draws down, there's a

0:57:56

glooiness to it. And then the and then

0:57:59

people over forecast to the negative.

0:58:02

I [clears throat] think that

0:58:04

that it's the volatility that drives the

0:58:07

engagement and the interest and the

0:58:09

speculation and and there's something to

0:58:12

talk about and they're talking about us.

0:58:17

You know what they're not talking about

0:58:18

is that they're not talking about, you

0:58:21

know, real estate on the upper east side

0:58:23

of Manhattan. They're not talking about

0:58:26

timber rates. They're not, you know,

0:58:29

like peop people they they talk about

0:58:31

all these nonvolatile assets. Well,

0:58:33

nonvolatile assets means there's no

0:58:36

news. And if there's no news, there's no

0:58:38

interest. you know um when um

0:58:44

I operated uh public company I there was

0:58:47

a period

0:58:49

when we rage quit the capital markets

0:58:52

when we were just so unhappy with the

0:58:54

way that the capital markets treated us

0:58:56

we just stopped participating so I don't

0:58:58

know how it was many years where we

0:59:00

would put out a press release each

0:59:02

quarter saying this is the results but

0:59:04

we didn't do a conference call we didn't

0:59:06

do television we didn't do interviews

0:59:09

like well just read the numbers, value

0:59:10

the company as they will. And uh in a

0:59:14

conventional company, you have um

0:59:17

information released once a quarter. So

0:59:21

there are four times a year, four

0:59:23

windows a year where there might be

0:59:25

information where you might trade the

0:59:26

stock.

0:59:28

>> Four days and and and and you're

0:59:31

expected to not surprise the market.

0:59:34

Which means that if you're a well-run

0:59:36

conventional company,

0:59:38

you give guidance and then you hit the

0:59:41

guidance plus or minus and it's really

0:59:43

not very interesting. And so someone

0:59:45

could pretty much value one of those

0:59:47

companies by making a decision once a

0:59:50

year. So once a year I decide to buy to

0:59:53

hold the stock and how much to hold and

0:59:55

then like no news is good news and

0:59:57

there's nothing else going on and that's

0:59:58

boring, not liquid, not volatile. And

1:00:03

then when we got into into Bitcoin, we

1:00:05

realized, well, we're we're holding this

1:00:06

asset. And guess what? You know, our

1:00:08

website updates every 15 seconds,

1:00:11

Natalie.

1:00:13

Okay. So, think about this cycle. We

1:00:16

went from updating the financial markets

1:00:19

with material news every 12 weeks, once

1:00:23

every 12 weeks to updating the financial

1:00:26

markets every 15 seconds.

1:00:29

Okay. So, yeah, you're going to have

1:00:32

weeks where where uh Bitcoin is going to

1:00:37

be down. Every time Bitcoin moves

1:00:39

$10,000,

1:00:41

[snorts]

1:00:41

the company makes or loses $8 billion $7

1:00:44

billion, right? $1,000 is $700 million.

1:00:50

Okay,

1:00:52

let me put this in perspective. It used

1:00:54

to be the company worked for an entire

1:00:56

year to make $70 million.

1:00:59

It's so crazy to think.

1:01:00

>> So every [snorts] $100, every $100

1:01:03

fluctuation in Bitcoin is the equivalent

1:01:05

of one year's work. So what we've done

1:01:11

is is we have plugged a a uh energy

1:01:15

source, a volatility generator or an

1:01:17

economic energy generator directly into

1:01:20

the balance sheet. And [clears throat]

1:01:23

and the Bitcoin cycle drives a news

1:01:25

cycle. the news cycle drives Bitcoin

1:01:27

trading. Everybody is obsessing. So,

1:01:30

you're on television and someone's

1:01:32

obsessing. Well, could it go lower?

1:01:34

Well, there's someone who's a skeptic

1:01:36

that's thinking, maybe I should short

1:01:37

the stock. I think I'm going to go and

1:01:39

take a $100 million out of my piggy bank

1:01:41

and I'm going to short and I'm going to

1:01:43

short it 100 million. But you know what?

1:01:46

They have to buy that back,

1:01:49

right? Unless they're lucky enough to

1:01:51

short a stock which goes immediately to

1:01:53

zero forever,

1:01:55

it's a it's only a question of when are

1:01:57

they going to have to buy a $100 million

1:01:59

back, right? They're going to have to

1:02:01

buy it back. So, you're attracting some

1:02:04

group of people that want to trade

1:02:05

short. But there's another group of

1:02:07

people. They're like, "Well, this is

1:02:09

totally overdone and Bitcoin is

1:02:11

definitely going to go back to where it

1:02:13

was." And so, I'm going to get in and

1:02:14

I'm going to crack my piggy bank open.

1:02:16

I'm going to buy $100 million. Now, if

1:02:19

you didn't have the volatility, the the

1:02:22

the short seller would have not bet a h

1:02:24

100red million on your company and the

1:02:26

long player would not have bet a h

1:02:28

100red million on your company. And the

1:02:30

market makers in the middle and the and

1:02:32

the options traders, they wouldn't have

1:02:35

traded both. And then the Susuanas of

1:02:37

the world, they can create derivatives.

1:02:39

I'm I'm going to give you a call option

1:02:41

to go 100 million, but only post 5

1:02:44

million in collateral. I'm gonna give

1:02:45

you a put option so you can go a hundred

1:02:48

million short and only post five million

1:02:49

in collateral. I'm going to make a

1:02:51

million dollars doing that. Either way,

1:02:54

everybody's making a financial market in

1:02:58

this.

1:02:59

Okay. So, the

1:03:03

used to be the Wall Street Journal. They

1:03:05

would only write about you if you're a

1:03:06

public company. They don't write about

1:03:08

private companies. Why? Because you

1:03:11

can't because every story is irrelevant.

1:03:14

I can't buy or sell the thing you're I'm

1:03:16

reading about. Why would I read about

1:03:18

something if I can't buy it,

1:03:21

>> can't

1:03:22

>> sell it,

1:03:23

>> leverage it, gamble on it, make money

1:03:26

off it. Right now, the word is

1:03:29

interesting. The classic word in the

1:03:32

English language for I have an interest

1:03:34

in that company is I own.

1:03:38

I have a interest in the company means I

1:03:41

own X% of the company. I have an

1:03:44

interest in the company. I've shorted

1:03:45

it. If if you're short the company, the

1:03:48

last thing you want to read is good

1:03:49

news. It's terrifying to you. So someone

1:03:54

says, "Oh, some great thing just

1:03:56

happened at Strategy." Okay, you got to

1:03:57

read it. If you have a long interest in

1:04:00

the company, what you want to hear is

1:04:01

good news. Okay, the Bitcoin price

1:04:03

double, right? [clears throat]

1:04:06

How do you make a company interesting?

1:04:10

Okay. Well, first of all, you take it

1:04:13

public. But I just that's first order

1:04:17

interesting because now there's a

1:04:18

ticker. But I just illustrated if you're

1:04:21

a well-run conventional public company,

1:04:23

you're only interesting once a year

1:04:25

because or once every 12 weeks because

1:04:27

you never say anything otherwise. So,

1:04:31

you know, like there's news one day out

1:04:33

of a hundred. 1% of the time you're

1:04:36

interesting if you're a conventional

1:04:38

company and you're not supposed to be

1:04:39

that interesting. [clears throat] You're

1:04:42

supposed to never surprise me. So the

1:04:44

number of companies that can surprise me

1:04:45

to the upside every quarter, 40 quarters

1:04:47

in a run in a row, Natalie, that's one

1:04:50

in a hundred. So 1% of the time you're

1:04:53

interesting and

1:04:55

1% of 1% of the time you're interesting

1:04:59

in the right direction, you know, which

1:05:02

is one in 10,000,

1:05:05

right? 1/100th of 1% of the time, will

1:05:08

that turn out well? Okay, that's the

1:05:10

conventional playbook. Now, how do you

1:05:13

take a company and make it interesting

1:05:15

every day? How about how do you make it

1:05:18

interesting every 15 seconds?

1:05:21

You take it public, then you put a lot

1:05:24

of Bitcoin on the balance sheet and you

1:05:27

let the Bitcoin vibrate, right?

1:05:29

Oscillate

1:05:30

and that makes the company

1:05:34

100x more interesting. No, thousandx

1:05:37

more interesting, maybe 10,000 times

1:05:39

interesting.

1:05:41

Now, if you go to our website, one thing

1:05:45

[snorts] on our website is it update.

1:05:46

You know, you find out we made or we

1:05:48

made or lost a billion dollars every few

1:05:50

minutes.

1:05:51

>> Yep.

1:05:51

>> Right. It's like every few minutes,

1:05:53

right? That's more news than we

1:05:55

generated in the first 20 years of the

1:05:57

company. Natalie,

1:05:58

>> you make us feel better about our

1:05:59

portfolios.

1:06:00

>> Okay. It's like whatever. $10,000, $7

1:06:04

billion plus or min. Okay. What's What's

1:06:07

a $50,000 draw? Oh, $35 billion. Okay.

1:06:11

Okay. So, it's a $35 billion draw down.

1:06:14

I guess that's going to arouse

1:06:15

interesting passions. But here's the

1:06:19

other point. If you go to the charts

1:06:21

tab, you can actually chart all of these

1:06:25

securities and all these assets versus

1:06:27

each other. And one of the cool metrics

1:06:28

we've got is is open interest divided by

1:06:33

market cap.

1:06:35

and we benchmark, you know, open

1:06:37

interest of MSTR versus Tesla versus

1:06:40

Nvidia versus um Google or Apple.

1:06:45

Do you care? Do you care to guess which

1:06:47

company has the highest open interest

1:06:50

versus market cap out of that entire

1:06:53

MAG7 group

1:06:54

>> strategy?

1:06:55

>> Our company,

1:06:56

>> it's not even close, Natalie. I bet

1:06:58

>> it's not like where 80% of the market

1:07:00

cap is open interest and some of these

1:07:03

other companies are these these are the

1:07:05

seven greatest companies in the world

1:07:08

>> 4%. 5%. Not interesting.

1:07:12

Not the greatest companies in the world

1:07:14

doing the most important thing in the

1:07:16

world. An order of magnitude less

1:07:19

interesting. If you look at average

1:07:22

daily trading volume, the liquidity per

1:07:24

market cap, who do you think's number

1:07:27

>> Strategy.

1:07:27

>> We are.

1:07:28

>> Okay. How how did we manage to become

1:07:33

the most liquid, most interesting

1:07:35

company.

1:07:37

It's, you know, it's very simple. It's

1:07:39

like it's like back to Iron Man. You

1:07:41

know, that the idea of the Iron Man

1:07:43

super suit is really cool, but you need

1:07:45

the power source to actually power up

1:07:47

the Iron Man suit. you need an extreme

1:07:50

power source in the balance sheet of the

1:07:52

company and the power source is Bitcoin,

1:07:55

right? It's digital capital. So,

1:07:58

you know, when you go on to these

1:08:00

things, it's it's tough, you know,

1:08:02

taking your beatings during the bare

1:08:04

market and you just have to be cheerful

1:08:06

and constructive and keep pointing out,

1:08:08

no, actually, we're fine. It doesn't

1:08:09

matter. we'll be good, you know, we're

1:08:11

just it's all going to work out very

1:08:13

well, you know, and and uh you have to

1:08:17

explain why and then you have to keep

1:08:20

coming back.

1:08:22

And uh having said all that,

1:08:26

they wouldn't want to talk to you if

1:08:28

you're a conventional holder of

1:08:31

nonvolatile assets. When's the last time

1:08:34

you had you saw someone representing a a

1:08:37

real estate investment trust of mi a

1:08:39

diversified portfolio of Midwestern real

1:08:42

estate on television talking about the

1:08:46

bare market in real estate and how

1:08:48

they're going to weather the storm.

1:08:50

>> Couldn't name them.

1:08:51

>> Like you don't you can you even name

1:08:53

one? Can can you name a REIT?

1:08:55

>> No.

1:08:57

>> They're well managed with diversified

1:08:59

portfolios of nonvolatile assets. Do you

1:09:02

care? No. Are you interested? No. Okay.

1:09:05

So, so [clears throat]

1:09:08

it's pretty critical that you be

1:09:12

And the reason people want to talk,

1:09:14

right, the reason you draw this

1:09:16

toxicity, you you draw the highest

1:09:18

highs, the lowest lows, the greatest

1:09:20

extreme is because it truly is

1:09:25

And um and the breakthrough of the

1:09:28

crypto economy is to create a financial

1:09:31

asset which is interesting

1:09:34

globally

1:09:35

24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Because

1:09:39

you see, if I want to a

1:09:41

financial asset here, let me show you

1:09:42

how I it. I make it illegal for

1:09:45

anyone outside the US to buy. Right?

1:09:48

That's your first step down. Then I make

1:09:51

it impossible for you to uh trade except

1:09:55

9:30 to 4. That's the second step down.

1:09:58

Then I force you to go through all sorts

1:10:01

of AML KYC and and take three months to

1:10:04

set up the account. So I make it very

1:10:06

difficult. Fourth step down. Then third

1:10:09

and and then I maybe limit you and

1:10:12

require you of $100 million of capital

1:10:14

and be a qualified, you know, investor

1:10:17

to buy it. It's not another step down,

1:10:20

right?

1:10:21

If I just keep stepping it down, right,

1:10:24

I I access to maybe then I take

1:10:28

it off the exchange. I make it a private

1:10:30

instrument.

1:10:32

>> I make it 144A or I make it totally

1:10:35

private and it's and it's another

1:10:37

uh crippling step down. By the

1:10:39

way, then give it a a sixletter ticker

1:10:42

instead of a four-letter ticker. Hard to

1:10:44

remember people. Yeah. Can can you name

1:10:47

any publicly traded stocks with a five

1:10:48

or six letter ticker?

1:10:51

>> Metaplanet.

1:10:51

>> It's like it's hard, right?

1:10:54

>> Like one in a thousand, one in 100. It's

1:10:57

hard.

1:10:58

>> How about if I give it a QIP number?

1:11:00

What if it was like a KO197442?

1:11:08

>> So, there's a lot of ways to make

1:11:08

something uninteresting,

1:11:11

right? Make it difficult. And yet the

1:11:14

crypto industry went the other

1:11:15

direction,

1:11:17

right? What if everybody on earth, what

1:11:19

if anybody uh can trade this thing in 60

1:11:23

seconds by downloading an app to their

1:11:26

mobile phone? How do you actually give

1:11:28

access to the instrument

1:11:31

in uh in China? You know, by the way, we

1:11:34

had a bank holiday the other day. It's

1:11:36

illegal to buy or sell, you know,

1:11:38

publicly listed securities. It's like

1:11:41

what happens when the government of

1:11:43

whatever country just decides to

1:11:45

unilaterally declare 60 days to be

1:11:47

holiday. You can't trade on Saturday.

1:11:49

You can't trade on Sunday. You can't

1:11:50

trade on President's Day. You can't

1:11:52

trade on the 4th of July. You can't

1:11:54

trade. You can't can't can't can't can't

1:11:56

can't can't. Right? They're all

1:11:59

crippling. They all the

1:12:01

financial markets, right? And the point

1:12:04

that I made that day was on a bank

1:12:07

holiday,

1:12:09

you know, you can move any amount of

1:12:11

Bitcoin for 44 cents.

1:12:15

A billion dollars for 44 cents in a few

1:12:18

minutes. And so

1:12:21

what we have here is a digital

1:12:24

revolution. If you get it, you get it.

1:12:26

It's so obvious. It's it's money wants

1:12:29

to move at the speed of light 24/7 365.

1:12:33

You know, waterfalls don't stop on bank

1:12:36

holidays. Electricity, lightning doesn't

1:12:39

stop on bank holidays. Gravity doesn't

1:12:41

stop on bank holidays, right? Guns, they

1:12:45

don't get deactivated on certain holy

1:12:49

days, right? They work all the time,

1:12:51

right? the things that are actually

1:12:53

changing the world, whether it's an

1:12:55

iPhone or running water or electricity

1:12:57

or airplanes, they work regardless of,

1:13:00

you know, the opinion of a politician

1:13:03

that would like to intervene to make

1:13:05

them not work. Mhm.

1:13:06

>> The reason Bitcoin is winning, the

1:13:09

reason that digital capital is winning

1:13:11

is because things that move at the speed

1:13:13

of light, frictionfree 24/7, 365

1:13:17

globally, right, that can be programmed

1:13:20

by an AI that can be vibrated or

1:13:23

transformed

1:13:25

a million times a second

1:13:28

are going to displace in a brutal

1:13:30

Darwinian fashion, right? They're

1:13:34

slower, clumsier, [laughter]

1:13:37

you know, antecedants or precedents. You

1:13:39

know, it's like the things that came

1:13:41

before, right, are going to be squeezed

1:13:44

out of the economy and out of the

1:13:47

marketplace

1:13:49

because

1:13:50

because the thing that comes later is

1:13:52

just better.

1:13:54

>> Before we start to wrap up, I want to

1:13:56

cover a really important topic, which is

1:13:58

quantum. We have that saying in Bitcoin,

1:14:00

don't trust, verify. But a lot of people

1:14:03

are just not technical enough to be able

1:14:05

to verify is quantum actually an

1:14:08

existential threat. I know you guys made

1:14:09

an announcement recently, a strategy

1:14:11

with regards to quantum and the future

1:14:13

making sure that Bitcoin is quantum

1:14:15

proof. Can you kind of explain to people

1:14:17

why you don't see this as such a risk

1:14:20

that seems to be priced in at some

1:14:21

point?

1:14:24

So first of all, the consensus of the

1:14:26

cyber security community broadly held is

1:14:30

that quantum risk if it exists is more

1:14:34

than 10 years out. It it's not a this

1:14:37

decade thing. [snorts]

1:14:40

Whether or not there will be a quantum

1:14:42

threat or a quantum risk is is a

1:14:45

question that is yet to be decided. But

1:14:47

there's certainly no consensus that

1:14:49

there is any threat right now or that

1:14:51

there will be a threat materializing

1:14:53

anytime soon. Should a quantum risk

1:14:57

materialize

1:14:59

at that point then you're going to see

1:15:03

an upgrade in the software that runs the

1:15:06

global banking system the global

1:15:08

internet consumer devices

1:15:12

all the crypto networks the Bitcoin

1:15:14

network

1:15:16

everything digital the AI networks all

1:15:19

all of those networks that we rely on

1:15:21

today whether they're governmental or

1:15:24

financial or consumer or defense

1:15:27

related, they're going to get upgraded

1:15:28

with post-quantum resistant

1:15:31

cryptography. It won't be a surprise.

1:15:34

You'll see it coming. We will all see it

1:15:36

coming. Bitcoin software, right? Bit

1:15:40

Bitcoin Core version 30. Right now,

1:15:42

we're debating over upgrading from

1:15:44

version 29 to version 30. The software

1:15:47

does change. If you've got 30 versions

1:15:49

of Bitcoin core in an asset which is 17

1:15:52

years old, do the math in your head and

1:15:55

figure out how long it takes for

1:15:57

versions of this stuff to roll out. The

1:15:59

nodes will upgrade, the hardware will

1:16:02

upgrade, the wallets will upgrade, the

1:16:04

exchanges will upgrade. How will they

1:16:07

upgrade? Well, wait 10 years. There will

1:16:10

be global consensus about the best way

1:16:12

to deal with it. There is no global

1:16:14

consensus right now because there isn't

1:16:15

a credible threat right now. Right. So

1:16:18

why do I not worry about it? Well,

1:16:21

because everybody with anything at

1:16:24

stake, whether it's Google or Microsoft

1:16:26

or Apple or Coinbase or Black Rockck or

1:16:29

Strategy or the US government or the

1:16:31

Russian government or the EU government

1:16:33

or the Chinese government or JP Morgan

1:16:36

or Morgan Sling, they all have to deal

1:16:39

with the same issue. We all have digital

1:16:42

systems that would be that would be at

1:16:45

risk if there was a credible quantum

1:16:47

threat.

1:16:51

when it when and if and when it

1:16:54

materializes

1:16:56

I expect that there will be some

1:16:59

software or hardware or both reaction to

1:17:03

the the crypto community is actually the

1:17:06

most sophisticated

1:17:08

cyber security community. If you look at

1:17:11

um the cyber security pro the security

1:17:14

protocols that are used to move crypto

1:17:15

around right they're all multifactor

1:17:19

authentication with hardware keys you

1:17:22

know etc. If you consider the security

1:17:24

protocols used to use used uh to move

1:17:27

bank wires around or used to trade

1:17:29

stocks, they're orders of magnitude

1:17:32

weaker right now.

1:17:35

I'm not going to elaborate on them for

1:17:37

obvious reasons, but anyone that's

1:17:40

actually engaged in a stock transaction

1:17:43

or bank wire transaction or a credit

1:17:46

card transaction or a check transaction

1:17:48

or any kind of consumer finance

1:17:51

transaction or communication transaction

1:17:53

knows that that the steps you go through

1:17:57

in order to move Bitcoin, you know, out

1:18:00

of coal storage or to transfer it to

1:18:02

someone else, especially

1:18:04

when you're moving it at scale are

1:18:07

extremely sophisticated.

1:18:09

So I think that the crypto security

1:18:13

community will be the first,

1:18:16

you know, to perceive the threat and to

1:18:19

react to the threat and they'll be

1:18:21

leading the way.

1:18:23

We we have announced a Bitcoin security

1:18:26

program. Uh Coinbase obviously has a

1:18:30

security program. In fact, a lot of the

1:18:33

money that I contribute early early to

1:18:36

the Bitcoin uh core dev to the to the

1:18:40

Bitcoin development process was actually

1:18:41

to Bitcoin security programs,

1:18:44

>> you know, like the MIT Bitcoin security

1:18:47

program. So, I think that all of us that

1:18:50

are large Bitcoin holders or users are

1:18:53

in the industry, we know the security of

1:18:55

the network is paramount.

1:18:58

But I I don't actually think that qu the

1:19:00

quantum, you know, narrative is the

1:19:02

greatest security threat to Bitcoin

1:19:04

right now. I don't think it has been.

1:19:06

People joke they've been concerned and

1:19:07

talking about it every two years for the

1:19:09

past 15 years. I actually think that

1:19:11

it's that there are a hundred, you know,

1:19:15

narratives that people discuss that

1:19:17

might be a security threat. You know, is

1:19:19

there a bandwidth problem? Is there a

1:19:21

nation state attack vector? You know,

1:19:23

does it have enough functionality? Does

1:19:25

it have too much functionality? Is it

1:19:27

evolving too quickly? Is it not evolving

1:19:30

fast enough? Right? Is it sufficiently

1:19:32

decentralized?

1:19:34

Etc., etc. Should we make it easier to

1:19:36

run on an iPhone? Should we make it not

1:19:38

easier to run on an iPhone? You would

1:19:40

the the number of debates about what's

1:19:43

good for Bitcoin, uh, you know, are

1:19:46

mind-numbing and there are many of them.

1:19:49

They will continue.

1:19:51

Quantum will be one. It used to be, you

1:19:54

know, there's a debate, well, you know,

1:19:55

the Chinese will they'll control all the

1:19:57

mining. Then it's like the Chinese

1:19:58

control the mining equipment. Oh, there

1:20:00

might be a back door in the mining

1:20:01

equipment. Oh, no, the Chinese ban

1:20:03

Bitcoin mining. Chinese ban Bitcoin

1:20:05

mining equipment. They don't, you know,

1:20:07

Chinese don't like Bitcoin anymore. It's

1:20:09

like like the debates they they vary

1:20:12

from there's a risk to oh no, there

1:20:14

isn't a risk. Oh, if there you know, why

1:20:16

don't the Chinese like Bitcoin, right?

1:20:19

and and at some point it gets silly

1:20:21

because it's a hundred of them. I I

1:20:24

would say uh at this point the reason

1:20:28

we're talking about quantum is because

1:20:30

all of the other risk did not

1:20:34

a decade ago people were fought the

1:20:36

block size wars the entire block size

1:20:39

war there's books written about it you

1:20:40

can go back and the and the narrative

1:20:42

was Bitcoin will fail because it doesn't

1:20:45

have enough bandwidth

1:20:47

>> okay and people fought bitterly over

1:20:52

and a few days ago, I posted a

1:20:55

screenshot, you know, of Clark Moody's

1:20:57

dashboard, and it showed that the fee

1:20:59

structure of Bitcoin was one sat per

1:21:02

vite for instantaneous performance. One

1:21:06

sat, one sat, one sat, one sat. In

1:21:08

essence,

1:21:10

there is no bandwidth problem in the

1:21:12

Bitcoin network. A decade after the

1:21:13

block size wars, people fought and died

1:21:17

over that narrative. It was a non-issue.

1:21:21

eventually the free market solved the

1:21:23

problem, right? And and and

1:21:27

at the end of the day, you always have

1:21:29

this dynamic between the the the

1:21:34

alarmist, the ambitious opportunist or

1:21:37

or the the

1:21:41

idealist

1:21:42

out there, if you want to be charitable,

1:21:45

the ideal idealistic intellectuals.

1:21:48

You could call them that. You could call

1:21:50

them the ambitious opportunist if you

1:21:52

like. They posit, you know, Bitcoin will

1:21:55

boil the oceans. Bitcoin will fail

1:21:57

because you can't self- custody. Bitcoin

1:21:59

will fail because of bandwidth. Bitcoin

1:22:00

will fail blah blah blah. And then, you

1:22:02

know, this follows

1:22:04

it pops up as we can't use nuclear

1:22:07

energy. It'll blow up the world. You

1:22:09

know, we can't have nuclear power. We're

1:22:11

going to boil the oceans. They're

1:22:12

climate alarmists. They're they're

1:22:15

whatever alarmist. There's 150

1:22:17

narratives that people spin up and every

1:22:20

one of them is a way to accumulate uh to

1:22:23

to glean interest and engagement. I I I

1:22:27

want influence or I want capital or I

1:22:30

want power. And so I had, you know, it's

1:22:34

very important that we vaccinate, you

1:22:37

know, every three-year-old on Earth at

1:22:39

the cost of $10,000 a vaccine shot

1:22:42

against, you know, yo-yo

1:22:46

disease, the one that I just found that

1:22:49

hypothetically might well be an issue.

1:22:51

And so please give me a hundred billion

1:22:53

dollars and let's declare martial law

1:22:57

and let's make it, you know, illegal for

1:23:00

parents not to do this.

1:23:02

because I'm here to save the world. And

1:23:05

so it's this God complex or intellectual

1:23:09

save the world context. It's been going

1:23:11

on for thousands of years, Natalie. It's

1:23:14

in the political process and the crypto

1:23:16

process and the Bitcoin process. So the

1:23:18

fact of the matter is none of the

1:23:21

narratives that were going to stop

1:23:23

Bitcoin or threaten Bitcoin ever panned

1:23:25

out. They all turned out to be

1:23:26

incorrect. The scalability,

1:23:29

we have to stop spam. Oh, no we didn't.

1:23:31

We have to create smart contracts to

1:23:34

create scam. No we don't. We have to

1:23:37

double the blocks. No we didn't. The

1:23:40

miners the the miners are going to go

1:23:42

bankrupt. No they didn't. No one will

1:23:44

mine Bitcoin. Yes they will. The Chinese

1:23:47

will stop it. Yes they did. No they

1:23:50

didn't. Yes they did. No they didn't.

1:23:52

They need to endorse it. They can't

1:23:54

endorse it. Right. It needs to be

1:23:56

private. No it doesn't. Right. All of

1:23:59

these things, they're all narratives. It

1:24:01

used too much energy. No, it didn't.

1:24:03

It'll it'll boil the ocean. It didn't.

1:24:07

Quantum will hack it. No, it won't.

1:24:10

Right. And what is it that people are

1:24:13

missing here? Well, first of all, 99 out

1:24:16

of a hundred of these narratives, they

1:24:18

benefit the ambitious opportunists

1:24:20

because now they become famous. You

1:24:23

know, Al Gore makes hundreds of millions

1:24:25

of dollars preaching that the climate is

1:24:28

going to collapse, right? And 25 years

1:24:32

later, it didn't happen.

1:24:35

Somebody gets rich. ESG worked, but it

1:24:39

didn't happen. But the point is, if I

1:24:41

wasn't preaching it, how am I getting

1:24:43

rich, right? So, the point is it's a

1:24:45

business. So, so

1:24:48

what you have is this economic and

1:24:51

political amplification of of uh

1:24:55

alarmist narratives because it benefits

1:24:57

the politician.

1:24:59

It benefits the entrepreneur.

1:25:02

It benefits uh those that have a will to

1:25:05

money or power, right? And I and how am

1:25:07

I supposed to get rich if I don't like

1:25:10

like we p we basically at one point we

1:25:12

decided that you had to stand six feet

1:25:14

away from each other and wear a mask and

1:25:16

the government needed to buy a hundred

1:25:18

billions of dollars of masks

1:25:21

you know and if you didn't wear the mask

1:25:23

you're going to jail and it's like

1:25:25

someone sold the masks right and so

1:25:29

there is there is a very powerful

1:25:31

feedback with these narratives and once

1:25:33

you realize that you realize that 99 out

1:25:35

of 100 narives atives are just a way for

1:25:38

someone to accumulate money and power

1:25:40

and you ought to be skeptical of those

1:25:42

narratives. And the last point, the

1:25:45

famous president said it. He said, "You

1:25:48

see 10 problems driving down the road at

1:25:51

you. Nine of them are going to drive

1:25:54

themselves into a ditch before they get

1:25:57

to you.

1:25:58

>> Right?" And so,

1:26:02

how do I get rich, Natalie? Well, I I

1:26:04

convince you that it's possible that

1:26:06

you're going to trip on a rock and uh

1:26:09

and break your leg and not be able to

1:26:11

work. And so I saw you trip on a rock

1:26:13

insurance. What's that cost? Uh that's

1:26:15

going to cost you 1% of your annual

1:26:19

income. The trip on a rock insurance.

1:26:21

And then I someone else comes along and

1:26:23

says, "Well, you know, you might, you

1:26:25

know, get a sneezing attack, Natalie,

1:26:26

and I'm gonna sell you sneezing attack

1:26:28

insurance. And what's that cost you?"

1:26:29

That's going to cost you 1%. because if

1:26:31

you get the sneezing attack thing, then

1:26:33

you won't be able to work. And so

1:26:35

another guy comes along and he convinces

1:26:37

you that, you know, there's a

1:26:38

hypothetical chance that your children

1:26:39

will have autism and so we're going to

1:26:41

sell you, you know, the autism vaccine,

1:26:44

whatever, and that'll cost you 2%. And

1:26:46

then someone else comes along and

1:26:48

they're like, well, you know, it's quite

1:26:50

possible that you'll be driving the car

1:26:52

and something will happen and you'll

1:26:54

wreck the car, you won't be able to work

1:26:55

again. So, here's like uh, you know,

1:26:57

vocational insurance for driving of the

1:26:59

car. And I come up with like a hundred

1:27:03

possible things

1:27:05

and each of them is 0.01%

1:27:09

likely and the collective all of them is

1:27:13

1% likely to happen to you. But I sell

1:27:16

you insurance that sucks up 100% of your

1:27:18

income. So if you insure for every one

1:27:22

of these parade of horriles, every

1:27:24

hypothetical

1:27:25

possible thing, you're bankrupt. So you

1:27:29

are 100% likely to be bankrupt because

1:27:32

you bought insurance against 100 things

1:27:36

that were 1% likely to happen.

1:27:40

And and by the way, if you had bought

1:27:41

insurance against none of them, a decade

1:27:44

would have gone by and you'd be like 1%

1:27:47

likely to have one of them. And you

1:27:49

would have just like upgraded your

1:27:51

iPhone software and the problem would

1:27:53

have gone away.

1:27:54

>> You know, and it's like,

1:27:56

but the person that's selling you the

1:27:58

insurance isn't going to make a billion

1:28:00

dollars if you just wait 10 years and

1:28:02

upgrade your iPhone software and it goes

1:28:03

away. How am I supposed to get rich on

1:28:05

that? like how how am I supposed to get

1:28:08

elected to be governor of a state if you

1:28:11

know if I don't spin up a narrative that

1:28:14

is a doom narrative. And so what the the

1:28:18

danger is when anything gets weaponized

1:28:20

by an entrepreneur, it's like I want to

1:28:23

raise money so I can hire a bunch of

1:28:25

quantum resistant developers or I want

1:28:28

you to sell Bitcoin and buy quantum

1:28:30

resistant yo-yo coin

1:28:32

>> or I want to be elected mayor and the

1:28:34

problem is that there's hypothetically

1:28:36

radioactive something. You know, in 10

1:28:39

years, the water, the drinking water

1:28:41

will be radioactive if we let nuclear

1:28:43

reactors get built somewhere in the

1:28:45

state 5 years from now. And that's why

1:28:48

you should give me all of your money so

1:28:49

I can be elected mayor now so I can pass

1:28:51

a law to pre prevent the hypothetical

1:28:54

problem 8700 years from now. And of

1:28:58

course what you see of course is when

1:29:01

you have enough of these issues like I

1:29:04

I've had lawyers I've had lawyers say

1:29:07

well you know you can't do that because

1:29:08

hypothetically in 15 years after 15

1:29:11

appeals like there might be you know a

1:29:13

quasi liability if you were to do this

1:29:16

and that and the other thing. I'm like

1:29:17

well you know we're going to go out of

1:29:18

business next month if we do what you

1:29:22

but but in 15 years hypothetically

1:29:24

there's a 0.01% 01% chance that we might

1:29:26

have to pay 0.01% of our money to solve

1:29:29

the problem. But they're like, "Oh,

1:29:31

well, I guess if you look at it that

1:29:33

way, then I guess you're right." It's

1:29:34

like, and that and that is pretty much

1:29:37

the legalistic view. And and so

1:29:39

politicians tend to be lawyers.

1:29:41

Idealistic intellectuals tend to be

1:29:43

thinking that way. Ambitious

1:29:45

opportunists think that way. You know, I

1:29:48

can basically point to the fall of the

1:29:50

British Empire. I can I can point to the

1:29:53

fall of a whole bunch of states. I can

1:29:55

point to Easter Island. I can show you

1:29:56

the fall of the Roman Empire, the fall

1:29:58

of the Carthaginian Empire.

1:30:01

Every great city, every great merkantel

1:30:04

network, every great empire, every every

1:30:06

great corporation,

1:30:08

it all starts to collapse at the point

1:30:11

that someone's like, "Well, you know,

1:30:13

out of an abundance of caution, maybe we

1:30:15

need to prevent this or we need to do

1:30:18

that." Right? And I would say this

1:30:21

entire quantum fear is just the latest

1:30:24

quantum fun because there's nothing else

1:30:25

to talk about. And I I can no longer

1:30:28

raise money by saying that I that

1:30:30

Bitcoin needs to be more scalable or

1:30:32

have smart contracts or whatever. So

1:30:34

this is the only way to be relevant and

1:30:36

get attention. And so, you know, when

1:30:39

this one falls, someone will say, well,

1:30:41

you know, like at some point, you know,

1:30:43

we're gonna and we're gonna upgrade to

1:30:45

nanobots in the head and hollow bands

1:30:48

and Bitcoin's not hollow nanobot ready

1:30:51

and we're going to need to invest a lot

1:30:53

of money in, you know, hollow band

1:30:55

nanobot chains because, you know,

1:30:59

otherwise your Bitcoin is going to be

1:31:00

worthless. And it's like, someone will

1:31:02

say it. I guarantee it because that's

1:31:07

the story of humanity since time

1:31:09

immemorial

1:31:11

and ultimately you're either going to

1:31:13

have a constructive optimistic view

1:31:15

which is you know something will happen

1:31:17

and we'll just take advant upgrade the

1:31:19

software or upgrade the networks take

1:31:21

advantage of the new technology and

1:31:23

we'll all be richer and happier and live

1:31:24

happily ever after. That's one view. or

1:31:27

something's going to happen and we're

1:31:29

just too stupid to figure out how to

1:31:31

react to it and we're just going to lose

1:31:33

everything. And so therefore, I should

1:31:35

just give all my money to this ambitious

1:31:38

opportunist, you know, who's preaching

1:31:40

that the world's going to end. Why don't

1:31:42

I just give all my money to them because

1:31:46

I'm too stupid? And it's like, it's like

1:31:49

it's silly, but it's predictable. And

1:31:51

what I would say is,

1:31:54

you know, the back of the hitchhiker's

1:31:56

guide to the galaxy, right? It's like

1:31:58

don't panic.

1:32:00

At the end of the day, lots of things

1:32:02

will happen in the future. The human

1:32:04

race will react to the things. The

1:32:07

people that chose to put their money at

1:32:08

a bank in cyberspace.

1:32:11

They will probably upgrade the hardware

1:32:13

and the software and the methodologies

1:32:15

that protect the bank and cyerspace when

1:32:17

they feel they need to. [clears throat]

1:32:19

And until that time,

1:32:21

there's a hundred other things. You're

1:32:23

probably better off to use that

1:32:24

bandwidth worrying about look both ways

1:32:27

when you cross the street because you

1:32:29

don't want to be that egghehead

1:32:31

intellectual that walks in front of a

1:32:32

truck because they're worried about the

1:32:35

0.01% likely quantum threat that would

1:32:37

be easily deflected with a iPhone

1:32:41

update,

1:32:42

>> right? Or a a 20 second click on this

1:32:45

and negate. You know, it's it's not even

1:32:48

even that difficult because Natalie,

1:32:51

you're not going to have a choice when

1:32:53

when and if there is a cyber security

1:32:56

threat. Your business software is

1:32:58

getting upgraded, your bank software is

1:33:00

getting upgraded, the government

1:33:01

software is getting upgraded, the crypto

1:33:03

network software is getting upgraded. I

1:33:05

It's almost going to be damn near

1:33:07

impossible. Did Did you ever make a

1:33:09

decision to upgrade all your systems to

1:33:11

Y2K friendly? Do you even recall that? I

1:33:14

do recall that time period and everyone

1:33:16

was terrified and it ended up being

1:33:18

nothing. So

1:33:19

>> it everybody in the world was terrified

1:33:21

the war was coming to an end and it was

1:33:24

nothing.

1:33:25

>> But you know what? Billions of people

1:33:27

didn't do anything. Couldn't have done

1:33:29

anything. Couldn't have stopped it. It

1:33:32

was a non-issue. And it would just be

1:33:35

one of 10,000 examples of nothings, you

1:33:39

know, that get get arrested, you know,

1:33:42

that that that get uh overcome by the

1:33:44

human race every few years.

1:33:47

>> Okay. So, I have an interesting question

1:33:48

for you. What do you think is the

1:33:51

strongest argument against Bitcoin right

1:33:54

now? And why do you reject it?

1:34:01

The strongest argument against Bitcoin

1:34:01

right now is is it's novel. It's new

1:34:07

and as new it's not, you know, it's only

1:34:09

been around for a number of years and

1:34:11

maybe I want to before I trust my entire

1:34:14

life to it. I want to see it around

1:34:17

longer. Right? It took uh 30 years for

1:34:21

people to embrace electricity. Bitcoin's

1:34:23

been around for 17 years.

1:34:26

So, so someone might very well say,

1:34:28

okay, well, you know, did I wait until

1:34:31

17 years after the airplane got

1:34:33

invented, right? The airplane is 1903.

1:34:36

How many people had flown in a passenger

1:34:39

jet or passenger airline by 1920?

1:34:42

You know, maybe it's still early and I

1:34:45

just want to see more people, you know,

1:34:49

than me try it out first and then I'll

1:34:52

follow it. So will it take 20 years?

1:34:56

Will it take 30 years? Will it take 40

1:34:58

years?

1:35:00

Uh the world's full of you know of

1:35:02

profound innovations that eventually

1:35:04

were embraced by everybody but it took

1:35:06

more than 17 years. And and and I think

1:35:09

the answer is time

1:35:11

right

1:35:13

the the early pioneers. It's like how

1:35:15

many years after the automobile was

1:35:17

invented, before the Model T Ford comes

1:35:19

along, and how many years before, you

1:35:21

know, after the Model T before everybody

1:35:23

had the car. It's like

1:35:25

>> it there's a natural process of taking

1:35:29

taking innovative technology uh building

1:35:32

it into a consumer device or an

1:35:35

industrial device,

1:35:37

right? And and then having enough of a

1:35:39

track record that people are willing to

1:35:41

bet their life

1:35:45

or their or their reputation on it. And

1:35:47

I think we're in that process of

1:35:50

commercialization now.

1:35:52

>> That's that's fair. So before your final

1:35:54

thoughts, um I just was curious, you

1:35:57

don't seem bothered at all by cost basis

1:35:59

and a lot of people right now are trying

1:36:01

to find the bottom and obviously a lot

1:36:03

of people are looking at the technical

1:36:04

charts, but you just seem unfazed.

1:36:06

You're just buying at any price. Um, can

1:36:08

you sort of address that for those

1:36:11

especially who are like, well, if maybe

1:36:13

you think it's going to go lower, why

1:36:14

not accumulate at a lower cost basis?

1:36:18

>> Well, you could think of us as dollar

1:36:19

cost averaging, but but but the key

1:36:21

point is we're using equity.

1:36:26

We're not taking we're not taking out a

1:36:27

loan. Okay? So if when we're buying

1:36:32

Bitcoin,

1:36:34

uh if we sell equity

1:36:36

and then we buy Bitcoin, then we bought

1:36:39

the Bitcoin at 100,000 a coin. If we

1:36:42

bought the Bitcoin at 200,000 a coin, by

1:36:44

selling equity, we're simply swapping.

1:36:46

We're doing a perpetual risk-free swap.

1:36:48

We're swapping equity for Bitcoin,

1:36:51

right? Um when should you swap equity

1:36:54

for Bitcoin? Whenever it's accretive,

1:36:57

right? If if uh Bitcoin traded up 10%

1:37:00

but our equity traded up 25%.

1:37:04

Then it's accreative. It's it's

1:37:06

profitable to swap the equity for the

1:37:08

Bitcoin. If Bitcoin then trades down

1:37:11

20%, are you glad you did it? Sure you

1:37:13

are. Because you wouldn't have had the

1:37:14

Bitcoin otherwise.

1:37:16

>> And you know, Bitcoin falls 10% or

1:37:19

equity falls 20%. You you see at that

1:37:23

point you've actually derisked the

1:37:24

equity, right? if um there's less risk

1:37:28

to the equity if you're actually putting

1:37:30

a stable asset underneath the equity

1:37:33

especially if you're doing the swaps at

1:37:35

a premium. So, so the only real question

1:37:38

is is it accretive? Like is it

1:37:40

profitable to the shareholders to

1:37:42

actually do the swap, right? There's a

1:37:45

level at which it's profitable to swap

1:37:47

preferred stock for Bitcoin. There's a

1:37:53

um equity, common equity for Bitcoin.

1:37:56

Once you when you've done that, it

1:37:58

doesn't really much matter. It is

1:38:00

irrelevant what the what the future

1:38:02

trajectory of is of Bitcoin. if you're

1:38:04

swapping common equity for Bitcoin

1:38:07

because there is no uh continuing

1:38:09

liability for the next thousand years,

1:38:11

right? There is there is a theoretical

1:38:15

um path where it was diluted to swap

1:38:19

preferred. So for example, if I'm paying

1:38:20

10% dividends on the preferred and

1:38:23

Bitcoin returns 5% for the next hundred

1:38:25

years, then swapping preferred for

1:38:28

Bitcoin over a 100red years will turn

1:38:30

out to be dilutive to the common stock

1:38:32

shareholders.

1:38:33

Right? So there there's a more

1:38:37

complicated calculation for swapping

1:38:40

digital credit for Bitcoin.

1:38:42

>> The calculation for swapping common

1:38:45

equity for Bitcoin is fairly simple.

1:38:47

Now, if you swap debt, if you if you

1:38:50

swap debt uh that comes due in 10 years

1:38:53

that cost you 5%

1:38:55

for Bitcoin, well, then you need Bitcoin

1:38:58

to appreciate more than 5% over 10 years

1:39:00

for that to not be dilutive.

1:39:02

>> Right? Now, if I swap Bitcoin for margin

1:39:08

debt, like if I simply borrow the money

1:39:11

uh to buy the Bitcoin at 10x leverage,

1:39:15

say I buy a billion dollars of Bitcoin,

1:39:17

post 100 million of collateral, and I do

1:39:19

it on an exchange. If Bitcoin trades

1:39:21

down 10%, you get force liquidated, you

1:39:23

lose your hund00 million. So, so

1:39:27

why is that risky? That's because you're

1:39:29

borrowing the money for one minute.

1:39:32

So the real issue is what's the duration

1:39:35

of the swap? Are you actually taking a

1:39:37

one minute flash loan to buy Bitcoin? If

1:39:40

so, then the price of Bitcoin that you

1:39:43

you paid versus where it is now matters

1:39:46

a lot.

1:39:47

>> Did you borrow the money for a decade?

1:39:50

Well, then it will matter in a decade.

1:39:54

Did you borrow the money perpetually so

1:39:57

you're never paying it back ever? Well,

1:39:59

then it's not it's not clear how

1:40:01

important it is, right? I mean, and so

1:40:04

the the ma the financial math varies.

1:40:08

And the very simple way to think of it

1:40:09

is if you swap common equity for

1:40:12

Bitcoin, it doesn't matter what the

1:40:14

price is. It just matters what the what

1:40:16

the uh premium or or what the relative

1:40:19

valuations of the swap were when you

1:40:21

enter in the transaction. If you swap

1:40:23

preferred equity for Bitcoin, it it

1:40:26

somewhat matters whether Bitcoin

1:40:28

appreciates over the course of 30 years.

1:40:32

But there are scenarios where Bitcoin

1:40:34

could appreciate less than 10% a year

1:40:36

for 30 years and we would pay a 10%

1:40:39

dividend and it's still profitable to

1:40:40

the common equity, right? Because there

1:40:43

are second order, third order, and

1:40:45

fourth order dynamics that people don't

1:40:48

Yeah.

1:40:49

>> quite calculate. So in fact, in fact,

1:40:55

we have 20, 30 years to be right when

1:40:59

we're actually selling digital credit to

1:41:01

buy Bitcoin.

1:41:03

If you're selling corporate bonds or

1:41:06

convertible bonds, well, then the

1:41:07

duration of those instruments is much

1:41:09

shorter, four years, three years.

1:41:13

Then you have to be right quicker,

1:41:16

right? And then of course when you're

1:41:18

taking margin loans, these are one-mon

1:41:20

loans or one day loans or one minute

1:41:22

loans. So So the thing that most retail

1:41:24

investors don't get is the only credit

1:41:26

they have is margin credit, which is one

1:41:29

minute credit. And if they're wrong,

1:41:31

they're getting liquidated over the

1:41:33

weekend, right? Whereas the the credit

1:41:37

we're using, we could be wrong for 30

1:41:39

years. Natalie.

1:41:41

>> Like I I could literally like I I can

1:41:43

paint you scenarios where we pay 10%,

1:41:46

Bitcoin returns 8%, we're wrong for 30

1:41:49

years and it's still a good idea for the

1:41:51

common stock. Okay, that people

1:41:53

>> it would take us a few hours, a totally

1:41:56

different podcast and it would it would

1:41:59

take delving into the to the first

1:42:01

order, second order, third order

1:42:03

financial dynamics and the harmonics.

1:42:05

>> Wow. of the entire monetary network for

1:42:07

me to explain that to you.

1:42:10

>> But uh but the truth is,

1:42:15

you know, it doesn't matter what Bitcoin

1:42:17

does for the next hundred years if it's

1:42:18

common equity and we've got a 10 to 30

1:42:21

year time frame for us to be right if

1:42:24

it's digital credit,

1:42:26

right? And u you know, and we don't

1:42:29

engage in the other types of debt, so it

1:42:32

just doesn't matter. So that's why you

1:42:36

know our average price

1:42:38

doesn't make any real difference

1:42:42

>> you know uh and uh what really matters a

1:42:45

lot is is uh the nature of the security

1:42:50

swaps we're doing

1:42:52

there there's a difference between

1:42:54

selling a billion dollars of STRC

1:42:58

>> which is a monthly variable rate versus

1:43:01

selling a billion dollars of ST TRF

1:43:04

which is 10% at par forever

1:43:07

>> versus selling a billion dollars of

1:43:10

common equity. Right? They they have

1:43:11

different dynamics and the mathematics

1:43:14

is um more sophisticated than one can

1:43:17

explain in a tweet. And I guarantee you

1:43:20

no critic of any of this has ever

1:43:24

thought through the second order

1:43:26

consequences much less the third, fourth

1:43:28

and fifth order harmonics of what we're

1:43:30

doing. There were some people who were

1:43:31

very concerned that Bitcoin and the core

1:43:34

developers were named in the Epstein

1:43:36

files. People are very upset about the

1:43:37

Epstein files. Um, was that a concern

1:43:40

for you?

1:43:41

>> It's non-issue.

1:43:43

>> Why not?

1:43:44

>> It's just it's it's just I guess they

1:43:47

were getting uh tired about the quantum

1:43:49

FUD and they moved on to the Epstein

1:43:53

>> Yeah. I mean, in the mainstream media,

1:43:54

they they said it was Epstein trying to

1:43:57

influence Bitcoin. Obviously

1:43:58

>> Epstein might have used Apple phones and

1:44:00

might have ordered something from Amazon

1:44:03

and he might have at some point, you

1:44:04

know, used Linux and he might have

1:44:06

funded a Democrat or Republican. And if

1:44:09

Epstein was involved with a Democrat or

1:44:12

Republican or Apple or Google or if he

1:44:14

ever did a Google search, it's like,

1:44:17

>> I'm keeping I'm keeping my Google stock.

1:44:21

>> You know, if I'm a Democrat, you're

1:44:23

still a Democrat. If you're a

1:44:24

Republican, you're still a Republican.

1:44:25

You know, he lived in America. Natalie,

1:44:28

shall we all leave? Like like this this

1:44:32

kind of contagion is is just um colorful

1:44:37

for engagement.

1:44:39

But you know, like I know people that

1:44:40

still live in New York even though he

1:44:42

lived in New York. And I know people

1:44:43

that are still staying in America even

1:44:45

though he's American. And the

1:44:46

Republicans and Democrats going to keep

1:44:47

their party affiliation. And uh and

1:44:50

Bitcoin is Bitcoin.

1:44:52

>> Well, be controlled.

1:44:54

>> You can audit the code.

1:44:55

>> Yep. Right. So it's like it's it's it's

1:44:58

the same reason like it doesn't matter

1:45:00

who Satoshi was. You don't need to know

1:45:02

Satoshi. Do you need to know who

1:45:05

Prometheus was? You know, in order to

1:45:08

decide not to set yourself on fire,

1:45:10

right? Fire. You know, Prometheus

1:45:14

doesn't matter. It's fire. It's chemical

1:45:17

reaction. You know, you can study

1:45:19

chemistry. You can figure it out. You

1:45:22

can study thermodynamics.

1:45:24

Bitcoin's a force of nature.

1:45:27

Anybody can use it. There are people

1:45:30

that I don't agree with that may have,

1:45:32

you know, used it. There are people that

1:45:35

I don't agree with who talk about it or

1:45:37

use it or who came along before me or

1:45:40

will come along after me. And uh it's,

1:45:44

you know, we're speaking the English

1:45:45

language. There are a lot of people that

1:45:47

you disagree with that also spoke the

1:45:49

English language. Natalie, some of them

1:45:50

even contributed words to the English

1:45:52

language. Some of them even wrote books

1:45:54

in the English language. Some of them

1:45:57

were even English.

1:45:58

>> And and at the end of the day, it's a

1:46:00

protocol just like, you know,

1:46:03

fraudsters, right, use Arabic numerals,

1:46:09

right? And uh and criminals use English

1:46:13

and and

1:46:15

every movie's got a car chase in it.

1:46:17

>> And sometimes you hope that the person

1:46:19

gets away and sometimes you hope they

1:46:22

get caught, right? And you're still

1:46:24

using the car,

1:46:26

>> And so I just think it's a distraction.

1:46:28

We shouldn't get worked up over these

1:46:29

things. We should stay laser-like

1:46:31

focused on the big picture. And since

1:46:34

this is my last question, I'll return to

1:46:36

laser-like focus. Bitcoin's digital

1:46:39

capital. It's a revolution in the

1:46:41

capital markets. It's a profound, you

1:46:44

know, once in humanity

1:46:47

innovation.

1:46:49

It allows us to tightly bind economic

1:46:52

energy to the human being or to the

1:46:54

corporation, to any entity. It's, you

1:46:57

know, the ability to tightly bind

1:46:59

economic energy to the individual is as

1:47:03

profound as fire, electricity, or even

1:47:05

the formation of fat in mammals. It's

1:47:08

it's a fundamental building block of

1:47:10

life. And it's just the basis of it. On

1:47:14

top of that, we can create digital

1:47:17

credit like STRC. We can create

1:47:20

something better, digital money. You can

1:47:22

create a bank account that pays you 8%.

1:47:25

No volatility, right? How many people

1:47:28

have that? Nobody. How many people want

1:47:31

it? Everybody. What's it worth

1:47:34

collectively? You know, conservatively,

1:47:36

$300 trillion.

1:47:40

Okay. So there's $300 trillion of credit

1:47:43

and everybody's got garbage credit with

1:47:45

no yield with awful tax treatment with

1:47:49

massive risk, credit risk, duration

1:47:52

risk, currency risk, very difficult. So

1:47:56

you have a world which is not served

1:47:58

well by the 20th century. Conventional

1:48:01

finance assets and finance structures

1:48:03

and finance ideologies and finance

1:48:06

protocols. You have a new world, a

1:48:08

digital world with digital protocols,

1:48:11

digital assets, digital capital, digital

1:48:14

credit, digital money. Is it going to

1:48:16

solve all the problems? No. There's

1:48:18

going to be a lot of problems in the

1:48:19

world that we're not solving with

1:48:21

digital money, digital credit, and

1:48:23

digital capital. However,

1:48:26

walk down the street and ask a hundred

1:48:29

people whether or not they'd like more

1:48:30

money.

1:48:32

every one of them is going to say, "I'd

1:48:34

like more money." So, there's a there's

1:48:38

an obvious, you know, unequivocally

1:48:43

utilitarian

1:48:45

opportunity for us here. It's

1:48:47

straightforward.

1:48:49

The money's not going to fix itself,

1:48:52

right? The money is not going to fix

1:48:55

itself. Bitcoin was capital. You're

1:48:57

going to have to build credit on top of

1:48:58

it. You're going to have to build money

1:48:59

on top of the credit. You're gonna have

1:49:01

to go and market that. You're gonna have

1:49:03

to get regulators to approve it. You're

1:49:04

gonna have to put it in a ETF container,

1:49:07

put it in a crypto token container, put

1:49:10

it in a private fund, put it in a public

1:49:11

fund, get the Japanese to approve it,

1:49:13

get the Emiratis to approve it, get the

1:49:15

Americans to approve it, get the

1:49:16

Europeans to approve it, fight with, you

1:49:19

know, the Chinese regulators to approve

1:49:20

it, the Australians to approve it, the

1:49:22

Canadians to approve it. Then people are

1:49:24

going to stare at it and say, "Yeah, it

1:49:26

looks too good to be true. I don't trust

1:49:27

it." And then you're going to have to

1:49:29

explain why it's trustworthy. And then

1:49:31

they're going to disagree with you and

1:49:33

they're going to keep scorning on you.

1:49:34

And then you're going to have to keep

1:49:35

coming back because that's just the way

1:49:38

the world is. And 30 years after this

1:49:41

podcast, everybody will go like, "Oh

1:49:43

yeah, digital money. Of course.

1:49:46

Of course we want that." Do you like

1:49:48

electricity? Yeah. Do you like cars?

1:49:50

Yeah. Do you like fire? Yeah. Do you

1:49:52

like antibiotics? Sure you do. Right. Do

1:49:54

you like television or radio? Yeah. How

1:49:57

about airplanes? Sure. Was there a time

1:49:59

when all of these things were in

1:50:01

disrepute and created incredible fear,

1:50:05

uncertainty, and doubt? Every one of

1:50:07

them.

1:50:08

>> Right. And this is just the latest

1:50:10

technology transformation. It's coming.

1:50:14

It's as as William Gibson said, the

1:50:16

future's already here. It's just not

1:50:18

evenly distributed.

1:50:21

In in 30 years, it'll be consensus. But

1:50:25

you know what? You won't have a job and

1:50:28

I won't have a job because it'll be

1:50:30

uninteresting because everyone will have

1:50:33

embraced it like water, electricity,

1:50:36

fire.

1:50:37

It's like, yeah, of course, right?

1:50:40

There's no opportunity once everybody

1:50:42

agrees with you. It's not interesting

1:50:45

when everybody agrees with you. They

1:50:47

don't interview people to ask whether or

1:50:49

not your company's going to be

1:50:51

installing running water in the new

1:50:53

corporate headquarters, do they now?

1:50:57

>> So, I I think we're very fortunate to

1:51:00

live in interesting times and have an

1:51:02

interesting opportunity

1:51:04

and onward and upward.

1:51:06

>> Well, that was very well said. I love

1:51:08

when you call it a protocol for

1:51:10

prosperity and if it's not going to

1:51:12

zero, it's going to a million, right?

1:51:15

Thank you so much, Michael. It's been

1:51:16

great to chat with you.

1:51:18

>> Anytime.

1:51:18

>> Thank you so much for checking out this

1:51:20

episode of Coin Stories. Make sure

1:51:22

you're subscribed to the show so you

1:51:24

don't miss any new episodes. If you can

1:51:26

turn on those notifications and leave us

1:51:28

a positive review. They really help the

1:51:30

show grow organically with new

1:51:32

listeners. We have a free weekly

1:51:33

newsletter. You can sign up at the

1:51:35

newsblock.substack.com.

1:51:37

This show is for educational and

1:51:39

entertainment purposes only. Nothing

1:51:41

should constitute as financial

1:51:43

investment advice and you should always

1:51:44

do your own research. I'm always open to

1:51:47

feedback and guest suggestions, so

1:51:49

please feel free to reach my team at

1:51:51

info@talkingbitcoin.com.

1:51:53

I'll see you next time.

Copied!