Michael Saylor: The Future of Stocks & Bonds Backed By Bitcoin
Natalie Brunell · 2025-09-19 · 55m · View on YouTube →
the 10 years from 2025 to 2035, there's
going to be a lot of different business
models, a lot of different products
created and a lot of different companies
launched and a lot of money made and
there'll be a lot of mistakes made and
there a lot of fortunes created and this
is what the chaos of the marketplace.
[Music]
Hey everyone, welcome back to the show.
Joining me this week is Michael Sailor.
Michael, it's so great to see you. It
feels like every week I see you in some
other city giving a great presentation.
How are you?
>> Here we are in your beautiful studio.
>> Well, I feel like we have a lot to talk
about. You know, um the sentiment that
I'm feeling in Bitcoin is bearishness,
actually. So, you're the perfect person
to talk to because whenever I speak with
you and do an interview, I feel more
bullish than ever and need to buy more
Bitcoin. So, first of all, why do you
think people are feeling generally more
bearish and why do you think they should
be bullish?
I I think there's a natural eb and flow
in uh in the economy and in the
community and so Bitcoin surges up and
has periods of extraordinary excitement
generates a lot of adrenaline and um
enthusiasm then there's a celebration
and then people extrapolate straight
line to the moon and then it retraces a
bit and consolidates and and then people
think well it's going to bounce back
really fast and if it chops sideways for
a
You know, there's always a natural human
tendency to get frustrated. Um, I I
don't think we have anything to be
unhappy about. The truth is, if you zoom
out and look at the one-year chart,
Bitcoin is like up 99%.
>> It's like nearly double. So, if you
walked in to anybody in the street and
said, "Hey, I'm I'm heavily invested in
an asset that is growing up 100% a year.
Should I be happy or not?" they would
say you should be happy, right? It's
just that the way that it gets there
tends to be a bit volatile. You know, as
for why, uh I think the, you know, the
why Bitcoin has been consolidating and,
you know, building it, you know, support
in the teens right now is because you've
got $2.3
trillion
of Bitcoin that is unbanked. And so
you've got a lot of people that own a
lot of Bitcoin, but they can't get a
loan against it. And because they can't
get a loan against it, the only, you
know, at the point that you all of a
sudden find yourself Bitcoin rich, but
fiat poor, you don't have a lot of
dollars, but you have a lot of Bitcoin,
and you can't borrow against it, then
you think, I have to go sell it. So I
think bitcoins right now it's like this
mag seven startup where all the sudden
all the employees got insanely rich on
penny stock options but they can't
borrow against them so they have to sell
them and so they're selling and then
people are saying well why are those
employees selling the stock? Is that a
vote of not confidence you know in the
company? And the answer is no. It's just
they have kids to go to college. They
want to buy a house right they they want
to live comfortably. They want to do
something for their parents. Uh, and so
right now I think that the selling is o
crypto OGs that have had a lot of money
for a long time. They're selling 5%
diversifying. They're doing something
like that. And the market is absorbing
all of that energy, building its
support. The volatility is coming out of
the asset. That's a really good sign.
But because what you want for the asset
to mature is for uh for lots of
long-term capital holders, the big
corporations, the big institutions to
buy. You want the early OGs that bought
Bitcoin for a dollar or five or $10 to
sell some or as much as they need to so
they feel comfortable.
You want the volatility to decrease so
the mega institutions feel comfortable
entering the space and size. And the
conundrum is well if the mega
institutions going to enter if the
volatility decreases it's going to be
boring for a while and because it's
boring for a while people's adrenaline
rush is going to drop and it's like they
had this big high and now the adrenaline
is wearing off and they're a little bit
bearish but this is just a growing stage
or you know natural for the life cycle
of an asset that's monta that's
monetizing like this
>> coin stories is proudly brought to you
by gem Gemini. Investing in Bitcoin has
never been easier with Gemini's Bitcoin
credit card. Earn up to 4% back in
Bitcoin on everyday purchases like gas,
dining, groceries, and more with no
annual fee, no foreign transaction fees,
and no exchange fees on your rewards.
And this summer, get 10% back in Bitcoin
at golf courses. Plus, sign up today and
get a $200 Bitcoin bonus when you spend
3,000 in your first 90 days. Apply now
at gemini.com/natalie.
If you're like me and want to stay on
top of Bitcoin without getting lost in
all the noise, you've got to check out
the weekly CIO memo from Bitwise Asset
Management. Bitwise has been around
since 2017 and manages more than 10
billion dollars across 30 plus
strategies. CIO Matt Hogan puts together
a quick 5-minute memo that breaks down
the biggest stories in digital assets
each week. Just go to
bitwiseinvestments.com/cio
memo and check it out. And always, of
course, carefully consider the extreme
risks associated with crypto. Coin
Stories is also brought to you by
Leedin. Need cash but don't want to sell
your Bitcoin? Letin is the global leader
in Bitcoinbacked loans, issuing over$9
billion dollars in loans since 2018. And
they were the first to offer proof of
reserves. With Letin you get custody
loans, no monthly payments, and more.
Visit letin.io/natalie.
I've been to some events recently with
Tradfi folks, and it's always the same
reasons that they bring up of why
they're not investing in Bitcoin. um it
has no cash flow. Some of them actually
who work in finance share that they are
prohibited from purchasing Bitcoin. Can
you speak a little bit to that and how
much progress you think we've made in
terms of the trady world and what needs
to change for more people to embrace
Bitcoin?
Yeah, I think um there are a lot of
assets property the greatest property
assets of western civilization assets
like diamonds, assets like gold, assets
like old master's paintings, assets like
land, uh the Louisiana territory,
California, Mexico, all of Alaska, none
of them have cash flows, right? all of
the great things we've acquired in life
that I mean truthfully if we think about
what we want in life whether it's a
spouse a marriage kids they have no cash
flows a house no cash flows right so the
world's full of things right a Nobel
Prize no cash flows
fame
>> no cash flows yeah yachts and jets don't
have cash flows either so the world's
full of things that are deemed valuable
in the they have no cash flows and of
course as we know the perfect money has
no cash flows. The the whole the whole
definition of money uh a liquid you know
the most salailable asset but if you
want something to be money you want it
to have no utility value. Gold is better
than silver because it has less utility
value. And when it when copper or when
you find something like silicon that has
utility value of some sort it becomes
worse money. And so um I I think
probably people say uh they say well we
don't really think this is good
investment asset because it has no cash
flows. That's an opinion that has
developed in two generations. you know
since you know certainly since 1971
and the period you know from 1971 on
till today I think the world developed a
view and its view was you know long-term
capital is a 6040 mix of bonds and
equities and um bonds had some dividend
yield to them and then equity sorry
bonds had some coupon and and equities
had some dividend yield or um earnings
and that's just the way they saw the
world and eventually you know the S&P
500 became the monster you know if you
look at index investors
85% of indexes are invested in the S&P
so many people think long-term capital
what they think of as money for held for
the long term is an equity index like
the S&P index Vanguard uh they
commercialized this and they made famous
the idea of the Vanguard Ard 500 and the
Vanguard index fund. So when
organizations are hyper successful with
an idea like 500 stocks in a fund and
when the entire institution right the
S&P or Vanguard or or uh mutual funds
when they're built on that idea when a
disruptive new idea comes along that's
even better. It's not natural that they
would embrace the disruptive new idea.
They're kind of stuck in their ways as a
practical matter. I it
in a world of uh that's US dollar, the
US economy is growing and the dollar is
the king of the world. It's the world
reserve currency and there's no, you
know, there was no world war after World
War II, right?
>> So, we haven't had a massive disruptive
world war. then you're living in a very
particular situation, a particular time
and that's and and you could fall into
in calculus we call it a particular
solution to a differential equation. If
all of the boundary conditions are set
and if this and if this and if this and
if this and if this then you can just
plug in this number and you'll get out
that answer. And that is true as long as
you don't change any of the boundary
conditions and the assumption. You know,
if you've got the solution for aluminum
and then I change the steel to change
the metal to steel, then the formula
doesn't work. So, at that point, you
can't use a particular solution. You
have to use the homogeneous solution.
You you have to be not the engineer, but
you have to be the physicist. You you
you can't be the trade craftsman with
the simple lookup table of the answer.
You actually have to derive it from
first principles. So what you see is
most people have never in their life had
to derive anything from first
principles. They've they've used the
particular solutions given to them by
someone that taught them the answer and
that breaks down when for example your
entire currency collapses. For example,
if if you live in a in a economy where
the currency is collapsing like Lebanon
and they freeze your bank account and
the currency goes to zero or anywhere in
Africa or if you lived in Argentina when
the currency collapsed, then if you
actually owned anything with cash flows,
they're all worthless. So, so the irony
of course is s one of these good
traditional safe assets that generates
cash flows. Well, not in Nigerian
currency, not in the Bolivar,
not in the peso, not in the Lebanese
currency, not in the Iraqi or the
Afghani currency. I can give you a whole
not in a Russian currency, you know,
before the collapse of the ruble that
took place at the turn of the century,
what 96 or something. So the people that
have these ideas, they have a particular
set of solutions that work in a very
stable closed ecosystem that's never
been challenged either with external
stress or never never encountered a new
idea when the you know the people that
will get Bitcoin will either come out of
uh very chaotic environments you know
collapsing currency environments where
they had to had think for themsel uh or
they'll be at their their base kind of
scientist first principles thinkers
people that that question everything and
rederive it. So I think you know the the
great irony is you again uh the CEO of
Vanguard saying Bitcoin is not an
investable asset because it doesn't have
cash flows and then the largest
shareholder of my company being
Vanguard.
>> Ironic.
the the the the most ironic outcome is
most likely according to Mr. Musk.
>> Let's zoom in on bonds as an asset class
and maybe give a little master class for
the mainstream audience about how you're
revolutionizing the credit markets. I
want to first start with just what
problem did you identify in the fixed
income world that you thought could be
solved with Bitcoin?
>> Yeah. um credit um if you look at the
credit markets, you got mortgage back
credit. Mortgage back securities are one
and a half times collateralized and they
yield like two, three, four%. And then
you have fiat credit. It's credit backed
by the promise that the government will
print more money
>> and that sets the risk rate. uh that
credit you know in Japan generates 50
basis points in Switzerland generates
minus 50 basis points in uh Europe 200
basis points a year and uh in the US
about 400 it just got reduced by 25
basis points yesterday right so you have
that kind of credit then you have
corporate credit and corporate credit um
is backed by the cash flows of companies
whether they're good companies like the
magnificent seven like Microsoft or
Apple or they're junk bonds or there are
struggling companies that you know are
struggling to stay in business. Those
credit spreads can range from 50 basis
points all the way up to 500. But that
means that when you're buying corporate
bonds in Europe, you might be getting
250 basis points a year in yield 2.5%
interest. Well, the real monetary
inflation rate is greater. So all of
these uh all of these countries, Japan,
Switzerland, Europe, the US, they're all
suffering from a form of monetary
repression where the natural risk-free
rates or the fiat yields are are less
than the monetary expansion rate and the
rate at which scarce desirable assets
are appreciating. So that's one
challenge. The other challenge is those
instruments are illquid. Uh sometime
like all preferred stocks, they're very
hard to trade. sometimes they don't
trade at all. Um, and they're under
collateralized. So, what we observed is
the credit markets are weak. Uh, they're
they're unhealthy is how I would say
them. Um, how if you live in Switzerland
and someone is willing to give you zero
or take take 50 basis points of your
money every year you have it in the bank
and that's the offer, one can't
characterize that as anything other than
weak. yield starved is another way and
so so a lot of markets are yield starved
and on the other hand most people like
in in the conference the other day there
were 500 people in the room and I asked
them how many of you have a bank account
everybody's got a bank account you know
how many of your bank accounts yield
more than 4 and a.5% none of them how
many of them how many of you would like
your bank account to pay you eight or
nine or 10% all of them
who's offering that nobody what we see
is is the opportunity in the market is
unless you have Bitcoin and unless you
have a long-term store of value, what
I'll call digital capital, and you're
going to hold it for the next 30 or 40
years, no one's willing to give you a
fair yield for the long term. Like, tell
me a uh tell me who's going to give you
10% interest for the rest of your life?
Well, you are.
>> Yeah. Yeah, we are. Right. The Bitcoin
community is, right? Uh, your bank
won't, a company won't, a government
won't, uh, no mortgage back security
issuer will.
>> And I think it's important to share why
not why why can't we get that kind of
rate outside of what you're doing.
>> Yeah. That's because no company has a
good enough business that they can be
confident that they can generate uh uh
returns north of 10% a year at
infinitum.
>> Running a company is hard, right?
Because because no one with a home can
afford to pay that.
>> That's that's another reason. So at the
end of the day and because no government
that has a strong position wants to,
right? The strong governments that run
the world that are stable don't wish to.
They wish to pay you much less. And the
weak governments,
they they are forced to pay more, but
their currencies are collapsing and
their government is collapsing.
>> So you can't find a national creditor
that would pay that rate. You can't. And
most corporations,
most corporations corporate finance
strategy is not to issue credit uh and
make it good. Their strategy is is to
avoid credit to buy back their stock.
Right?
>> That's the conventional method.
>> It's very they're very conventional. So
what we discovered is Bitcoin is digital
capital. Bitcoin is going up faster than
the S&P
forever. Right? Once you actually
acknowledge that Bitcoin is appreciating
more than the S&P forever and my
forecast is it appreciates about 29% a
year for the next 21 years and I've
shared that with the community but you
could have any forecast but if Bitcoin
is an asset and it's appreciating
then you can create credit
collateralized by that appreciating
asset. So, so Bitcoin's digital capital
appreciating faster than the cost of
capital. The cost of capital is the S&P
500 return.
>> And then credit written against it or
issued against it is digital credit. And
the digital credit can have longer
duration or it can have short duration.
It can have higher yields. It can be in
any uh currency because Bitcoin is a
stronger currency. Right? One of the
keys in the credit market is if you're
going to um if you're going to issue uh
credit instrument in a currency, you
want it to be weaker
than the collateral you hold. So
>> So if you issue the credit in a currency
which is stronger than the currency you
hold, you'll be upside down and you'll
go bankrupt, right? And and this happens
for example
when people when they borrow in dollars
and they live in uh a country where the
currency collapses they're bankrupted.
>> Y
>> right. So what you want to do is is you
want to issue the credit in these other
currencies. And so we can issue credit
in yen or or franks or Swiss Franks or
in euros or in dollars because all of
those currencies are weaker than the
Bitcoin currency, right?
>> And so we discovered that we could take
on any kind of currency risk. We can uh
then issue we can offer higher yields.
We can offer yields like a distressed
debt like a company going out of
business, but we can then
overcolateralize them so that they look
better than an investment grade.
investment grade companies in the United
States aren't aren't 2x or 3x over
collateralized. We can create five, six,
seven, 8, 10x over collateralized
credit. So we can create credit which is
less risky. We can create durations
which are longer. We can create yields
that are higher. And because we can
create those in perpetual instruments,
we can take them public. And if we take
them public, then they'll have more
liquidity. And so the idea is give me
something which is smarter, faster,
stronger than everything else, right?
Make it more liquid, make it longer
duration, make it, you know, more more
collateralized, make it less risky, make
it higher yielding, better performing.
And the the opportunity of any kind of
Bitcoin treasury company is you have the
world's best collateral, you have
Bitcoin, digital capital.
>> If you issue digital credit, you'll have
the world's best credit. And that credit
will then create amplification for the
equity because whatever volatility and
whatever performance you strip off of
the credit will acrue to the common
stock shareholders. And so you create
amplified Bitcoin in your equity. You
create domesticated
lowrisk low volatility Bitcoin with
yield. You you know that thing that
doesn't have cash flows. We give it cash
flows.
>> Right? I mean the irony of course is
>> you know a lot of these traditional
credit investors right the people that
want to invest in cash flows they'll
invest in the bonds you know they'll
invest in the bonds or the equity of a
company which is losing money
>> or or that has cash flows that don't
even meet the cash flows that they're
collecting but at least it's cash flows.
So uh so what we're doing is we're we're
giving Bitcoin cash flow. We're making
it credit. It that way it goes into
credit indexes and then we're creating
equity which outperforms and that goes
into equity indexes. And both of those
two things raise capital.
>> They're both gateways for capital. The
capital flows into the Bitcoin ecosystem
and then we buy Bitcoin and that that
finances and powers uh the Bitcoin
network. So you've identified that
capital is grossly mispriced and the
collateral in the traditional world is
really overvalued whereas Bitcoin is
undervalued and so you saw this
opportunity. You've released these
credit instruments. You've got Strife,
Strike, Stride, and now Stretch. Let's
break it down a little bit further. Can
you just share um for a lot of people
they don't really understand what is a
preferred stock? It says stock or share,
but it really acts more like a credit,
like a bond. You're getting a yield. So,
can you talk about what a preferred is?
And these are specifically perpetual
preferreds and how unique that is in the
market.
>> Okay. A preferred stock is uh is a
second class of stock other than common.
Common stock is you're just uh the final
owner of the company. Um and you don't
really have any particular uh
preferences. is you don't you don't get
any particular guarantees from the
company. But if you create a preferred
stock, that stock can be given a
dividend yield. We can say that stock's
going to play pay this this dividend
monthly or quarterly or it's going to
pay a dividend that floats with sofur.
It could pay a fixed dividend. It could
pay a variable monthly dividend. It
could so you can give it certain cash
flows and certain yielding rights. The
stock can also have conversion rights.
So you can say hey this converts to
onetenth of a share of my common stock
or 1/5if of a share or it's fully
convertible. So you can give it uh any
amount of equity upside. You can give it
any amount of yield. You can give it
liquidation preferences. You can make it
senior and you can you can give it
guarantees like like uh it's a
cumulative preferred uh dividend. So if
we miss our dividend, we we'll
accumulate it. Or you can give it
penalty. You can say if we miss it,
we'll pay you a penalty. You can you can
pretty much write anything into the the
share that you like. So there are many
different types of preferred stocks.
It's a generalized container
>> and it's not debt where you have to pay
it back, right? It's it's not like a
convertible where you have to pay the
principal back.
>> You raise the money and you don't pay it
back.
>> Yeah. it generally it's different than a
debt instrument because a debt has to be
the principal has to be repaid at some
point certain uh you could make it more
debt-like if you said hey uh the holder
has a put right to put it back for cash
and you should you could make it look
more like a debt instrument if you
wanted or if you basically give the
holder the right to get all their cash
and principle or to redeem it if you
gave it a redemption right at some point
that would look a lot more like debt
Or you can make it look a lot more like
equity if you said it's noncumulative
like stride is non-cumulative. So the
principal never comes due and the
dividend could be suspended without a
penalty or without an accumulating
liability over time. So so you have
extremes from very very debt-like
preferred to very very equity like
preferred everything in the middle. Um
and that just makes it a very flexible
uh a flexible uh security for a public
company to issue. Now if you happen to
be a public company and if you have a
lot of Bitcoin then you could you could
create this security and then you could
take it public. So so the first
innovation is to create a preferred. The
second innovation is to take it public
and then you IPO it on like a
four-letter ticker like STRC.
And the third innovation would be uh if
you do take it public, you might put a
shelf registration against it. And in in
that case, that means you might sell a
billion dollars of it up front, but then
you might sell 50 million a week or some
amount of it continuously almost like an
ETF gets bigger. Like IBIT got bigger
because every single day capital flows
into it and they increase the number of
shares of of an ETF. So, when you create
a preferred that's got a shelf
registration that's public, you've
almost created a kind of proprietary
ETF,
>> right? You've created a new financial
creature. It's got all the benefits of
an ETF, but it's got also the benefits
of a proprietary asset because you're
creating the credit instrument in real
time as opposed to I I collect someone's
money and then and I'm running a junk
bond ETF and I have to go and I have to
buy a bunch of junk bonds.
>> So, an ETF provider is got a wrapper on
someone else's assets.
But when you create a digital credit
instrument as a preferred, you're
actually creating a native in instrument
back integrated all the way to the
Bitcoin.
>> And so
>> over collateralized.
>> Yeah. And then in that particular case,
you could create you could create a
preferred that is 10x over
collateralized that pays 10% dividend
and and it pays that forever, right?
That would be an instrument and just say
that's what I'm going to sell. and I can
sell a certain amount of that.
>> Coin Stories is brought to you by Speed
Wallet. Want to win 1 million SATs just
by answering simple Bitcoin trivia? The
top 50 players win free SATs every week
and one lucky winner gets a million SATs
at the end of the month. Speed Wallet
makes Bitcoin simple. It is the fastest
growing and most loved lightning wallet
that allows you to send and receive
instantly, swap to stable coins, shop
gift cards, play games to earn, and
explore many apps. Speed is also driving
real adoption. Stake and Shake now
accepts Bitcoin nationwide via Speed
payments. Head to speed.app/coinstories
and use code coinstories 10 for 5,000
free sats. Next up, BitKey, a Bitcoin
hardware wallet with multi-IG security,
inheritance, and a recovery system
designed for real life. No complex
setup, no seed phrase, just true
self-custody without the stress. Named
one of Time's best inventions in 2024.
Use code stories for 20% off at
bitkey.world. Up next, the Bitcoin way.
There's only one way to protect your
Bitcoin from government, politicians,
and third party risk, and that is 100%
self-custody. My friends at the Bitcoin
Way will train you how to do this the
right way the first time. No
compromises. Go to the
bitcoinway.com/natalie
to speak with the experts about making
sure your Bitcoin is secure and private.
Coin Stories is also brought to you by
Genius Group, a Bitcoin treasury company
listed on the NYSC American undertaker
GNS. Genius is building toward a 10,000
Bitcoin treasury and just launched the
Genius Academy featuring courses from
Safety Namoose, myself, and more. Start
learning for free today at
GeniusAcademy.ai.
Genius Group. Genius isn't measured in
IQ, it's measured in Bitcoin.
>> What we uh did was we created four
different instruments so far. Um the
first one we created was Strike. And the
idea with Strike was let's give people a
dividend 8% at par. Let's make it par
value $100, pay an 8% dividend stream
and then give people a conversion rate
to a tenth of a share of MSTR. So that
you know if if this the strategy stock
is trading at 350 bucks, you have three
$35 worth of equity inside that
instrument, right? So that was like have
some equity upside, have downside
protection via the liquidation
preference and then have continuing
income via the dividend. So that was a
very simple uh well not a simple
instrument but an idea which is I want
the upside with very little downside and
I want yield while I'm waiting. The
second instrument we created was uh
Strife STRF and that was a 10% dividend
yield at par. So, we're going to pay 10%
interest in a way or 10% yield on a $100
instrument forever.
>> Okay? A 100redyear bond that pays 10%
yield, right? You just don't see that
very often. And we made that senior in
the capital structure. So, we we
basically put as part of the security,
one of one of the covenants in the
security is we won't sell any other
preferred stock senior to Strife. So,
Strife will always be first in
preference that senior senior long
duration credit and that's very
comforting to uh credit investors who
are very riskaverse
>> because they would say well I'm going to
get paid before everybody else so that
makes my principle much better protected
and uh that that gives me uh in theory
that's credit positive. It gives it a
better credit rating in their eyes. Um,
so we sold that and that traded uh above
par. So that traded way up. So it was
yielding. And the idea was as the credit
improves of our company and as people
get more comfortable with Bitcoin, as
the price of Bitcoin goes up, that could
go from 85 to 100 to 110 to 120 to 150.
It could go to 200. So it could trade
way up uh above par because it's it's
totally perpetual. And that sets the
cost of capital for our company. Like
that is the investment grade. Yeah. If
you're saying what would be the
long-term the 30-year bond rate for an
investment grade Bitcoin company that's
setting that rate by the market right
now. So then the third thing we did was
we created stride STRD. And the idea of
stride is what if we just sold strife
but let's just take away the penalty
clause and the cumulative effect. We
literally took out like two clauses and
it's the same thing. It's still 10% at
par. But you would say, well, this is
junior longterm
credit, not senior. So the senior one
looks more bond like and you're you've
got not a bond, but it looks it looks uh
less risky.
>> Less risky. Higher in the capital stack.
>> Yeah. Higher in the capital stock. And
this looks more risky. Lower. It's just
right above the equity.
So we sold that and that trades with an
effective yield of 12.7%
whereas Strife trades with an effective
yield of 9. So a 370 basis point credit
spread appeared between the least risky
and the most risky.
>> And people say and ironically um the
Stride deal was twice as successful as
Strife. It was twice as big. And PE and
people would say, well, why would
someone want to buy that when it doesn't
have a cumulative right, it doesn't have
penalties and it's junior. And the
answer is because they believe in
Bitcoin
and they trust the company.
>> Yep.
>> And they want the yield, right? What you
would rather have 12.7% in your bank
account than 9%.
>> And so the issue is, do you trust your
bank? If you know at some point if you
trust your bank and and they offer you
12 instead of nine, you know, then
you're going to do that. So now who else
trusts the company? The equity holders,
>> right? Just like who trusts Bitcoin? The
Bitcoin holders. At some point, you
decide what you're going to trust. And
this is an instrument that uh provided
two benefits.
>> Well, many benefits. One benefit is it
gives people that believe in the company
and believe in Bitcoin the ability to
get paid 12.7% dividends. That's great
for them. The second is it gives the
company the ability to build collateral
that's junior to the senior instrument.
So it impro it's credit positive. It's
good for strife. It's good for strike.
>> It's good for you know the everything
else. And then it also gives the company
a very scalable way to generate leverage
to buy Bitcoin which doesn't have credit
risk. So in theory if there's a market
to buy a hundred billion dollars of
Stride, we could sell a hundred billion
dollars of Stride and we could leverage
the company to 90% leverage
and we would buy Bitcoin with it
>> and that would be good for Bitcoin. That
would be good for the equity. If that
was good for the equity, that would be
good for the equity component of strike.
You see, so it's and of course because
we bought all this Bitcoin that's that
means that Strife would be 50x over
collateralized.
>> So it's actually good for the credit,
good for the converts, good for the
equity, good for Bitcoin, and then good
for the stride holders, right? So So
it's it's kind of the flywheel.
>> And that's why we did the third. And
then the last thing we did was stretch.
And the idea with stretch was people
said, "Yeah, I'd like to get five. I'd
like to get 10% bank account instead of
5%. But I don't want the volatility. I
don't want to think that maybe the
principal would trade up 10 $10 or trade
down $10 a share. Like if I buy it and
it's trading at 110 and then the
interest rates change and it trades to
105, I'll have lost one year worth of
interest or one year worth of dividends.
So, we wanted to find uh some way to get
to $100 and keep this price right around
par, right around 100, low as the
volatility imaginable and extract the
yield. Okay. And so the idea of stretch
is well we don't we don't want the
duration risk. What Strife has is long
duration. And that means effectively 120
months of interest duration that will
cause the principal to move up and down
but below or above par a lot. In fact,
1% move in interest might cause a 20%
change in principle if you have an a
long dur a 20-year asset. Right?
>> So what we wanted to do is strip all the
duration off. So not 120 months, we go
to one month.
And we wanted to and when you strip the
duration off, you strip the volatility
off because you know the 30-year bond
trades much more volatile than the one
month right
>> treasury bill.
>> So we wanted to strip the volatility off
when we strip the duration off.
>> And um to do that we had to create we
had to create a monthly instrument not
quarterly. So we basically took the
dividend to a monthly cash pay and then
we had to create a variable dividend
rate. So this is the first time in uh
modern capital markets that a company
created a preferred stock that has a
variable monthly dividend, right? And so
we call that a treasury preferred.
>> We invented the treasury preferred stock
with AI. I used AI to do it. nobody else
would have thought to do it because they
never had an asset that would that would
justify doing this. And um in essence
uh stretch becomes like uh it's not
quite a high yield bank account because
you don't have perfect zero volatility
and you can take you know if you had a
$1,82.32
you would get exactly $1,82.32
tomorrow if you asked for it. It's not
that, but it's you would be pretty close
and you could put money in it that you
needed to hold for a year, you know,
with very low volatility. You could
collect the 10% dividend and then if you
needed the capital back, you could
redeem it into the market and get your
capital back. So, the idea is a
Bitcoinbacked
money market type instrument. Not again,
not quite as good as a money market.
they're they're less volatile, but we
wanted to compete with that, you know,
with Bitcoin backing it.
>> So, you're building out a whole yield
curve backed by Bitcoin. Um, these are
perpetual. Here's where I I feel like
people are get confused. You promise not
to sell your Bitcoin, right? So, if you
aren't selling the Bitcoin, where does
that yield come from from these
instruments? That's the question I hear
from the average person who's
considering like what what are these
instruments actually? So, how does that
work exactly?
>> So, we've got about $6 billion of these
uh preferreds. We uh we pay out about
$600 million a year in dividends.
The company enterprise values about 120
billion and we sell about $20 billion
worth of equity a year. So you think
about this. Uh we basically sell the
first 600 million of the equity. We use
it to fund the dividends. The rest of
the $20 billion we just buy more Bitcoin
with. So we're raising capital at a
ferocious rate in the equity capital
markets. And maybe 5% of the equity
capital we've raised, we've earmarked
for dividends. The rest we just buy more
Bitcoin. uh in the event that that we
couldn't sell equity for some reason, we
actually have the Bitcoin itself and we
can sell we can sell either credit
instruments against it or we can sell
derivatives. So for example, we could
sell Bitcoin derivatives, we can sell
futures against Bitcoin or we could sell
out of the money call options. And you
know they call there's something called
the basis trade where you can actually
sell the future against the spot and you
can capture a yield if you have Bitcoin
as collateral to post against that
trade. So the company's primary method
of paying the dividends is we just sell
equity. Our secondary methods would be
to sell derivatives on the Bitcoin
itself and then the credit markets are
open to us. So we could also tap various
credit markets from time to time. And is
the goal to have these instruments rated
by the big credit agencies? And what
would that mean?
>> Yeah, the company's campaign right now
is to become the first investment grade
Bitcoin treasury company and crypto
company in general. And and to get all
of the instruments rated by credit
rating agencies and and that's an
elaborate process of lots and lots of
meetings and lots and lots of education.
>> Oh, really?
>> But over time, I'm confident we'll get
there. Well, this makes me think of um
you know, a lot of people were wondering
why why you didn't make it into the S&P
500 yet, but it seems like you weren't
that surprised, at least at least for
now. Why weren't you included yet?
>> Well, you know, the S&P is has a certain
set of criteria, and we didn't qualify
for the criteria until just this
quarter. So, for five years, we didn't
qualify. You have to you have to be uh
you know, profitable. You have to check
a certain set of box. And I think uh we
weren't able to qualify until we had
implemented fair value accounting. And
so in the second quarter of 2025, that
was our first quarter of eligibility. We
didn't expect that we would be accepted
into the S&P 500 in the first quarter of
eligibility. Tesla wasn't accepted in
its first quarter of eligibility. Uh
we're kind of a revolutionary new
company and this is a revolutionary new
asset class. It would be very reasonable
for a riskadverse traditional committee
uh of decision makers that are making a
decision that's that's going to
determine the flow of billions or
hundreds of billions or trillions of
dollars capital. It would be reasonable
for them to wait a few quarters. They
might very well say let's see what
happens with the second and and and if
this business you know turns out to have
staying power after two three four five
quarters look if I if someone adopted a
new idea after four quarters of
performance they would be deemed to be
quite innovative and progressive right
sometimes people wait three four five
years before they acknowledge something
so I I wouldn't expect in the first
quarter I would think over some number
of quarters at some point after you've
got a track record, you know, in the
industry seasons, then I think uh we
will be accepted. I think the S&P's
already uh you know, they've accepted
Coinbase
>> and they've accepted Robin Hood.
>> So, I I don't think that they're averse
to the crypto asset class and or or to
Bitcoin or digital assets in general. I
just think that uh exchanges have been
around a long time, a hundred years,
right? And so those businesses have a
much longer track record and and so they
understand them better. Uh treasury
companies are really exploding new
category of company and they're very
revolutionary. And
>> I I date the entire treasury company
industry to November 5th of 2024. I feel
like we're three quarters into it when
it's very clear
>> that this is a legitimate new class of
companies. And you can see the markets
treating it the same way. We've gone
from 60 companies to 185 companies in 12
months. So the industry is in hyperrowth
mode.
>> Yeah, we have gone to almost 200
companies. Um but some of them, you
know, that we're seeing the MNABS
compress. We're seeing this
consolidation happen. Can you speak to
maybe just the market reaction outside
of the Bitcoin space? Are they looking
at Bitcoin Treasury companies as
something that will be kind of the
institutional investment grade in the
future? How do they value these
companies? Are you still seeing that
adoption really slow and maybe something
will be a catalyst to turn that around?
>> I think the market's in getting educated
mode. I mean, I just had 25 investors
and and I asked them, you know, how
familiar are you with this, this, this,
and they're like, no,
>> tell us about Bitcoin and is Bitcoin
going to get banned, you know, not and
and we literally have to go back to no,
Bitcoin was actually not going to get
banned in 2023, right? And then you have
to lay out the crypto industry in
general and then you uh then you explain
the various credit instruments then you
explain the equity and so most of the
market's still getting educated. I you
know if you wanted a metaphor imagine
that the year was 1870
and people are are starting to refine
crude oil and there's a bunch of
companies being launched you know to do
crude oil things and then someone comes
up with an idea for plexiglass or lexan
and there's polyester and there's lycra
and there's nylon and there's there's
all these possible prochemical
>> applications
>> products and there's you know and
someone's talking about kerosene and
some guy saying, "Well, I think we could
use diesel or gasoline." And some guy
talks about asphalt and you know, and
and all the investors are sitting around
saying, "Is this a good idea? How big is
how big could this industry be?" You
know, and they're still struggling with
how big could the you know, the kerosene
business be in 180 countries. And by the
way, the the first application of
kerosene was lamps to light your home.
it was light and then it became engines
and then it became heaters and then it
became
>> jet fuel and it's rocket fuel today.
>> And so I think the industry is just so
embionic that you know the uh the
companies are learning how to h how to
uh explain what they're doing. They're
deciding what they're going to do. The
companies are deciding what their
business model will be. the investors
are trying to understand the business
models and and the industry. The
regulators, you know, are evolving the
regulations and this is all happening in
real time. So, this is the digital gold
rush in the 10 years from 2025 to 2035.
There's going to be a there's going to
be a lot of different business models, a
lot of different products created, you
know, and a lot of different companies
there a lot of fortunes created and and
this is what the chaos of the
marketplace.
>> We only have a few minutes left, so I
want to end this on a more personal
note. A lot of people just in the last
week, they've been feeling really heavy.
Um, the nation feels more divided than
ever before. people are pulling apart
and they're they're fighting online. Do
you have do you have a message? Um
because you have clearly found so much
hope in Bitcoin and you always talk
about how it empowers the individual.
There's nothing out there that serves
the rich and the poor more than
something like Bitcoin. And I think we
need a message of hope right now when
our country's been so divided. Um, even,
you know, especially in the wake of the
the Charlie Kirk assassination,
>> I think, um, my message would be that we
actually all have a lot more in common
and we agree on a lot more things than
the mainstream media would lead you to
believe. So for example, if we take just
the Bitcoin community, oftentimes we
have very divisive debates in the
Bitcoin community between between one
set of Bitcoiners and another set of
Bitcoiners. And when I go online, you
know, uh it could be very toxic and very
colorful, very passionate. And people
get so worked up. They get sometimes
they get massively angry at me. They
get, you know, one set of developers get
massively angry at another set of
developers. And I think the irony is
that we agree on 99.9%
of everything. And and
when you dig a bit deeper, what you find
is that the inflammatory um the
inflammatory messages tend to run
harder. Lies run harder than truth. uh
you know extreme positions run harder in
cyerspace on X and and through the
ecosystem
and um you know even I notice uh in
times of success like um just of late
with our company our company's never
been more successful and yet the amount
of hate and toxicity like that gets
posted online has never been greater and
then I'll drill down on some of these uh
on the people posting
you know, all the negativity and the
hate and the criticism and I and here's
what I see often times. I see it's a
person that's never interacted with
anybody before and they have uh 328
followers and they share none with me
and I look a little bit I'm like this is
not even a person.
>> This is a bot. A and and it turns out I
think that a lot of the toxic
inflammatory behavior online is actually
cyber marketing or guerilla marketing.
Some like a short seller in my stock has
actually paid a digital marketing
organization to spin up a bunch of bots
to post a bunch of of nasty, you know,
awful skeptical cynicism
because they think it might work. And
it's very transparent to me that someone
paid some money to create the appearance
of a protest.
>> Wow.
>> And I think if you take this in the
political realm, same thing. A lot of
times the political inflammation is
someone paid a digital bot to create the
appearance of of uh unhappiness
>> to manipulate us.
>> A lot of times I think in our in our
country a lot of protests are paid
protest. you know, someone actually
spent money to hire someone to go and
protest and it's a hired paid for
protester. And then what happens is the
mainstream media will put the camera on
the paid protester or they'll put the
camera on the fake bot and they'll say
people are up in arms in cyerspace or
they're up in arms in such and such and
they'll put that in front of millions of
people and create the appearance of of
societal dysfunction, unhappiness. And
unfortunately, right, if you actually
take a fake protest and you amplify it
enough, you may convince one out of 10
million people to to violence and then
it becomes real and it becomes a tragedy
and it's awful. But my message to
everybody is I think this might be the
tragedy. The Kirk affair might be the
tragedy that causes people to realize
that there are actually some
dysfunctional systems in our society
that are in the business of creating
inflammation. They're they're actually
creating the they're divisive
systems of amplification.
And in fact, the people can be brought
back together with uh a little bit of
surgery. Uh find find the amplified
sources of divisiveness and turn them
off, right? Turn off the you know the
amplifiers of toxicity. And then the
other part is just the recognition.
It's like if you read 37 negative
comments, you think everybody hates you.
It's like online I read things I think
everybody hates everything that I'm
doing and I go out in the real world
I've never met anyone right that was
unhappy like like you're like how come
the people in the real world seem so
happy and the people online seem so
unhappy and what you're seeing is the
cameras there's a phrase if it bleeds it
leads
>> yep I knew it in news
>> right
>> so the cameras are looking for yeah
>> the civil unrest
>> but my message is the civil unrest is
being paid for.
>> Right? I think that there there are
actors that create the civil unrest in
cyerspace. They created in the real
world. Then there's unhealthy media that
amplify that magnifies and amplifies it.
And I think the general population is
kind of sick and tired and and they're
getting more and more aware, right? like
the the the growing distrust of all of
these systems, you know, is an immune
mechanism kicking in place. I think
generally uh this is going to catalyze a
lot of positive behavior and a lot of uh
constructive humanitarian engagement.
I'm very confident and I'm optimistic
over time we'll find our our way to a
healthier
world and a healthier body politic. But
it it it starts with not believing
everything you're told,
>> not believing everything you've read,
thinking for yourself, right? And then I
think there is a place for you to, you
know, to recognize when you've got 187
bots in your stream that are that are
amplifying toxicity,
don't engage with them. Don't feed the
trolls,
>> you know, because ju just like when
there's 52 paid protesters on your
street corner and they were paid to be
there.
>> Don't go out and fight with them, you
know, because they're literally
mercenaries paid to do this. Don't spend
your time trying to convince them
otherwise. They were paid to have a
certain opinion, right? That's their job
to have that opinion on. And we've saw
we saw that, you know, in a number of
crypto wars, you know.
>> Yeah. You know, when when Greenpeace and
the Sierra Club were paid to decide that
Bitcoin was not environmentally
friendly, you're not going to convince
them otherwise. It's not an honest
transaction or an honest reaction. It
doesn't come from any, you know, from
from any place of honesty. It was
literally paid protest. And so, I'm
hopeful
that society will look at at the
consequences of paid protest and they'll
take a step back.
Well, and there are a lot of connections
ultimately to something like Bitcoin
being a peaceful revolution and maybe
defunding some of these power structures
that have really taken advantage of us
and trafficked in attention and move it
to a system that is peaceful and creates
more value for people, right? That's
that's kind of what I always get from
your message too of hope in Bitcoin.
It's what we always say, Bitcoin is a
peaceful, fair, and equitable way for us
to settle our differences. As everyone
embraces it, peace will spread, equity
will spread, fairness will spread, truth
will spread, toxicity should decay.
>> That's a great note to end this on,
Michael. As always, thank you so much. I
appreciate the conversation.
>> My pleasure.
>> Thank you so much for checking out this
episode of Coin Stories. Make sure
you're subscribed to the show so you
don't miss any new episodes. And if you
can, turn on those notifications and
leave us a positive review. They really
help the show grow organically with new
listeners. We have a free weekly
newsletter. You can sign up at
thenewsblock.substack.com.
This show is for educational and
entertainment purposes only. Nothing
should constitute as official investment
advice, and you should always do your
own research. I'm always open to
feedback and guest suggestions. So,
please feel free to reach out at
info@talking bitcoin.com.