186. CONCEIVED IN LIBERTY with Michael Saylor & Patrick Newman on Murray Rothbard
Saifedean Ammous · 2023-09-19 · 2h 01m · View on YouTube →
principles of economics my complete
guide to understanding economics is now
available in hardcover audiobook and
ebook from safedean.com Amazon and many
more booksellers worldwide and now I am
also teaching a course based on this
book on my website safeidean.com
principles of economics will run the
whole Academic Year from September to
June and will have a new lecture every
two weeks as well as weekly live online
discussion seminars open to Learners
from all over the world and from all
walks of life whether you're a student a
professional or a retiree you are making
economic decisions every day and this
course will arm you with the wisdom of
centuries of economists to improve your
economic decision making you'll also get
a free book of principles of economics
if you sign up for the course and if you
do it before September 20th you'll get a
20 discount go to c15.com and sign up
now
the Bitcoin standard podcast is brought
to you by crowd Health crowd health is
the bitcoiner's answer to Fiat health
insurance if you listen to the show
you've probably heard me rail against
the problems of modern health care and
health insurance crowd health is a
brilliant new solution to this problem
that leverages the power of Bitcoin to
help people get Affordable Health Care
crowd Health holds its cash reserves in
Bitcoin it negotiates with Healthcare
Providers on your behalf and gets you
much better rates by offering to pay
them cash upfront without having to go
through the expensive bureaucracy of
Modern Health Care insurance it's a
solution that works better for
healthcare providers and for patients by
disintermediating large insurance
companies who have the wrong incentives
and are constantly raising costs I'm
very happy to have signed up for crowd
health and I'm really excited to support
them as they disrupt the Fiat health
insurance industry go to join
crowdhealth.com and use the discount
code safe Saif and you'll get the first
six months for 99 Only the Bitcoin
standard podcast is brought to you by
coincide coincides are my favorite
makers of Bitcoin Hardware they produce
the legendary open dime the first
Bitcoin Bearer asset as well as the
reliable cold card Hardware wallet the
excellent stainless steel seed plates
for storing your seed phrases and the
block clock now coin kites have produced
the SATs card a card the size of a
credit card which can store Bitcoin and
works great as a gift Point kite have
just produced a limited edition gorgeous
Bitcoin standard stats card which
carries the Bitcoin standard logo and
you can get it from coincides.shop slash
Bitcoin standard use the code Bitcoin
standard to get five percent off your
purchase hello and welcome to another
episode of the Bitcoin standard podcast
a year and a half ago Michael said it
very graciously invited me to stay in
his beautiful house in Miami Beach I
thought long and hard about what kind of
gift I could get somebody like Michael
Saylor well there is nobody like Michael
saider but what can you get for somebody
like Michael Sayler I thought long and
hard and I decided I could probably uh
make something special happen if I got
him a pile of Australian economics books
and so so indeed I ordered a bunch of
Austrian economics books from The mises
Institute and had them delivered to his
address and I thought you know he
thought he had expressed sympathy and
interest in Austrian ideas before and
I'm sure that with the stack of Austrian
books in front of him he's going to find
something interesting in the work of
rothbard misa's Hayek and all the rest
of them and I would definitely be very
interested in finding out what Michael
Sayer thinks about these works
well he took the bait he picked up
Murray rothbought conceived in Liberty
as 1700 page monster of a book a great
book by Marty rothbard and he read it
and a year after that visit I saw him
again and he told me he read that book
and he was extremely impressed with it
he enjoyed it a lot and he had so many
wonderful ideas to share about what was
in that book so I'm inviting Michael
here today to join us and discuss this
book and we're also inviting Patrick
Newman who is a fellow at the means
Institute and a professor of Economics
at the University of Tampa and the
editor of the fifth and final volume of
rothbard's book rothbart had only
written the fifth volume by hand and the
publishing house was just published the
first four went out of business but the
fifth volume nobody could decipher Mardi
Gras Parts handwriting and so for many
years just lay there as an
indecipherable notebook until Patrick
Newman showed up at the Muse Institute
and spent that entire summer learning
how to decipher modded off Bart's
handwriting and then was able to
transcribe the fifth volume from
rothbardis to English and translated
from Roth parties to English and thanks
to him we had the fifth volume so
thank you so much gentlemen for joining
me today
yeah thanks for having me happy to meet
you Patrick looking forward to this
discussion safe yeah thanks for having
me on and uh nice to meet you as well
Michael all right so to begin with
Michael
um you know I'm just gonna give you the
ball and let you run uh what did you
think of conceived the Liberty
well so first you know I want to say for
the record I got all these books and I
stacked them on my uh end table
in my uh in my bedroom in Miami Beach
and it was a lot of books and uh they
were very tall and uh first I tried to
ignore them and then I went and I
started thumbing through them and uh it
was a bit daunting but um before I
actually uh did conceived in Liberty I
actually uh read an Austrian perspective
on the history of economic thought by
rothbard and uh and so that kind of
traced from
2000 BC forward all of the um all of the
economic thinkers
and uh and it was kind of a story of
someone comes up with a good economic
idea they get smashed down someone else
comes up with a good economic idea
that's rational let people keep their
stuff they get smashed down someone else
comes along every hundred years there's
an intelligent person in some country or
some civilization that points out that
if you don't steal all the property from
all the people and crush them to death
it'll be good for morale and you might
actually grow the economy and and always
is a little fire and then they always
get smashed down and it goes on and on
and on and on and on all the way you
know up through
you know uh lock and and uh the liberal
ideas of the uh of uh you know
Reformation Europe and after I finish
that you know and that's kind of
you know it's it's inspirational but
depressing both at the same time
rothbard does a really good job of
pointing out to you that there are
intelligent rational people for
thousands and thousands of years and
generally they come to no good end
but and and he has you know the guy's a
saint because he must have had so much
Um passion
and uh so much energy to be able to slog
through and do the research and write
these stories because
you know normally in Hollywood we like
to see the story of the protagonist you
know or the hero that uh struggles
against adversity and wins
and rothberg you know kind of writes a
thousand examples of the hero that
struggles against adversity almost wins
and then has you know defeat hammered
down by some ignorant yeah like they'll
spend 40 years cultivating the the next
king of France teaching him everything
about intelligent economics and
liberalism and the guy's about to about
to take over control the country and
then he dies of a disease in four weeks
accidentally and they they're stuck with
the next guy who knows nothing so that's
the story of
of thousands of years of economic
thought and then I I got to conceived in
Liberty and I was very interested in
that because as an American uh most
Americans are are um
our study of history consists of some
Europeans came to the new world
they are colonized
everything was good until the British
treated them shabbily and then they
threw off the reins of tyranny and here
we are
and it's generally very simple
and there's a American Revolution
and you think that uh the the history
before is is oftentimes homogeneous or
if they tell you the story it's a very
summarized narrative they've reduced it
down to one paragraph
so you know so Murray rothbard offers
this book and it is comprehensive
I mean the the first four volumes are
262 chapters and is 262 chapters of of
um
aspiration
and ego and self-preservation driving
some people uh
to uh to go to the new world to try to
establish a better life
and then uh every single one of the
stories is is either a struggle against
tyranny a struggle against adversity
and uh and ultimately
power corrupting and absolute power
corrupting absolutely
you know and uh and and uh then the
people uh
all being uh abused
eventually uh abused so badly that they
Rebel
with most of the rebellions failing but
uh you know first they flee The Tyranny
and then they Rebel and then most of the
rebellions fail but uh this entire uh
this entire Colonial experiment is this
Crucible
of it's a crucible of experimentation
where you've got some liberal ideas and
some aspiration that's planted into you
know uh
a continent
and as you watch all the different
Colonial experiments careen into each
other
and then strong struggle uh internally I
mean they're dominated by internal power
struggles external power struggles power
struggles with the Indians power
struggles with the Europeans power
struggles between the European Empires
and then power struggles of domestic
political nature you know in uh in the
in in the UK over and over again
you just you just see this careening
chaos where ultimately you know the hero
is the liberal philosophers the lockian
figures that planted the idea of Liberty
in the minds of settlers
and then the the unsung heroes that
generally aren't written about they're
struggling they're running from the
tyrants all the time trying to live
their life being interfered with
and uh it's a it's
262 chapters of brutal pain and and
struggle and uh and tragedy like uh a
tragedy of um
you know of ego
combined or wrapped with a comedy of
errors
that Kareem's toward a final Revolution
or a final Rebellion the last one I
remember
uh and through that chaos rise a set of
founding fathers that that actually
reflects
the best values that we've seen of a
founding nation in a long long time and
thousands of years where you find uh you
find a set of people that that do
Embrace some of the ideology of Lochte
some of the ideology of capitalism and
establish a nation of uh our country of
checks and balances but throughout
you know uh it's imperfect
corrupt
and uh and chaotic
and uncertain and uh and you can't help
but just sit back and Marvel at this uh
crucible that incubated this uh this
nation that became
an imperfect
torchbearer for Liberty and I look at
the title conceived in Liberty and I
just think Murray rothbard has such a
dry sense of humor
because he wrote 262 chapters about
anything but Liberty right and and so
there are people that are sort of
struggling for it but they're just
generally the ones getting Beat to Death
the entire time until the nation arises
and it's it's thought of as you know the
greatest uh standard bearer of Liberty
and and and truthfully I suppose it is
compared to everything else but
I can't help but think that you know
it's this is the Triumph of the least
worst right and uh and that's my
takeaway from it and I we could talk
about
the 262 chapters right I mean it's it is
1700 pages and and every one of the
stories is gripping
blood curdling
fascinating
right you know and every one of them
make a great movie you know except so
many of them kind of end with they end
with the villains winning and and the
good guys crawling off or running off
somewhere else to to lick their wounds
and try again over and over and over
again which is probably why it wouldn't
be commercial
but um
I thought uh what was really useful
about the entire book and and you know
for the audience I would say to
everybody you should read it right and
if you don't want to read it you should
download the audiobook and you should
listen to it because it's one of those
things where
at any age whether you're in your 20s
30s 40s 50s 60s however whatever point
of life you are listening to it grounds
you back into the the human struggle you
know of for sovereignty and freedom
uh you know versus tyranny and uh and uh
the collective
and so I think it's very very valuable
to to read it but
um
I also think you can be lost in the
hundreds and hundreds of chapters
of struggle because they're just so many
and uh and it's always you know each one
of them is about some some decent group
of people being beat up or abused or
victimized by some arrogant egotistical
power hungry
Tyrant that somehow thinks they know
best so um I I think that the most
constructive thing
for a podcast like this is um rather
than dwell too much on the individual
examples of uh of dysfunctional
government of which there are so many
it's more interesting to look at the
insights that come out of the 262
chapters and and I will you know
disclaim Patrick
I haven't read the fifth
volume uh my uh my you know study goes
from when the Europeans hit the shore
and and the conditions leading up to it
all the way to the uh to the victory of
uh of the Americans at Yorktown
I should say
um what is one of the many astonishing
things about this book is that I think
if you were a historian and you produced
this book over a 40-year career this
would be an incredibly successful career
for any historian I mean if if you're in
a U.S historian or an economic historian
and you came up with this book on its
own and published approximately nothing
else this would still be a remarkably
prolific and successful publication
career and Mori rothbard did this plus
dozens of other works of similar size or
even larger sizes he's incredibly
productive it's astonishing and he did
it all on the typewriters and with um uh
with his pen
um and so history of economic thoughts
is one of the most comprehensive
histories of economic thoughts written
and his history of the US is one of the
most gripping and fascinating histories
of the US Written and then there's all
of his Economics work work which is many
many thousands upon thousands of pages
across books and journals
um Patrick give us some of your insights
into uh I I into the volume overall and
what you think what you thought of it oh
of course uh continue the Liberty is a
great
it's a great history uh it's been
published many times rothbard originally
wrote it in the 1960s and then it was
published in the 1970s around the 200
year anniversary of the American
Revolution and then the mises Institute
over the years has published a volume
most recently they had the whole volume
one to four and one giant book that uh
if you've ever held it or held it while
trying to read it you're almost getting
a workout while you're doing so it's
literally so big
and it's it's it's full of lots of
information and you it's absolutely a
history of early America that I remember
being taught to me in elementary school
in my K-12 education at a much more
obviously superficial level but some of
the basics was still taught I think it's
very unfortunate the way history is
often taught now that a lot of those
details of the American Revolution and
what was animating the the founding
fathers and the colonists or have sort
of been uh revised you could say and it
it it's incredible as to save a Dean
pointed out is that rock Bard was
he had many many research interests he
was a polymath as in in many ways in
that he wrote this giant book on
economics the an economy and state then
he wrote this giant book on early
American history then he wrote this
giant book on the history of economic
thought and so on and that's only just
sort of a fraction of what he wrote of
the books he wrote he wrote a book on
the Great Depression he wrote a book on
libertarian ethics he wrote a lot of
stuff and a saving pointed out someone's
entire career could just be on early
American history and they would publish
this four volume book or this five
volume book and that would be sort of
the Capstone of their career and for
rothbard it was really only just one of
his many
uh voluminous contributions
and it's it's absolutely a a series that
I recommend people read or listen to the
audiobook
um I myself have been you know in the in
the fifth volume have written a
shortened overview of of the book uh of
volumes one through four but it's it's I
think it's very very important it's very
important to understand uh how the the
country was founded and all of the
struggles as Michael pointed out very
often when you speak truth to power
power comes and gets you right the the
intellectuals in the sort of the the the
radicals fighting for Liberty and
decentralization and in free markets
they they can often live in ostracized
life uh they're they're sort of shut out
from the halls of power they don't have
the most prestigious jobs or they don't
have all the political connections and
that's because they're a threat as
rothbard won rothbard himself was a
threat and as he's described throughout
his his book through conceived in the
Liberty uh various people when they
there were threats they get they get
ostracized various intellectuals when
they're threats they get ostracized and
so much of American History is built on
people who were ostracized but they
basically kept on persevering and I
think that's a very important Insight
that we we can't forget
um that's just really revealed through
so much of the of of of of the
information that rothbard provides in
his book I wrote down you know about
a bit more than a dozen 16 interesting
points that I took out of the book that
uh that are illustrated by the hundreds
and hundreds of examples and I thought
that might be a
a useful framework for us to discuss
yeah
um so I guess I mean
I started a big idea you know my if you
said Summarize the book I'd say okay the
summary of the book is history is the
story of the triumph of more powerful
currencies religions cultures and
governments over less powerful
competitors
it's really a Triumph of power
and um when you look at all of the
stories and you and you try to make
sense of it like why did that happen the
way it happened ultimately it's just the
Triumph you know humans have a Will To
Power and it's a Triumph of power and
the more powerful entity displaces the
less powerful entity and the competition
is going on in the religious domain the
economic domain the physical domain the
you know all these domains all the the
ideological domain all the time and um
we could start you know start with a an
interesting observation right currency
right we all know currency is a unit of
account uh a medium Exchange
a store of value and a system of control
right I love those four right very
interesting well
um religion
religion is a unit of moral account a
medium of indoctrination
a store of values
and a system of control
and a government if it's going to be
effective generally it
you you want the religion to channel
political power just like you want the
currency to channel economic power
and the point of the government is to
channel physical power and the
government is also it's a it's this you
know unit of cultural account and it's a
it's a method of education and violence
it's a store of culture it's a system of
control and so
throughout human history the governments
find themselves more powerful if they
adopt a religion and some religions are
better at channeling political power
than others and oftentimes you find that
you know if you're the leader of a
country and you want to get a million
people to do what you want them to do
just saying do it because I told you to
do it
doesn't work that well but if you you
know if you if you can enlist them in an
ideology right religion is the original
political party and and the secular
version of a religion is a political
party right that's when we replace
religion we replaced it with the
Communist party or we replaced it with
uh with you know the Socialist Party or
some other party
But ultimately throughout history and if
you look at all these stories religion
plays a big part in in each of the
colonies
and uh and generally uh a lot of these
struggles are are one Colony versus
another and one religious uh group
versus another religious group but
you know this is uh lapsing back into
history in general
you just you find that uh you know
throughout history thousands and
thousands and thousands of times the way
that someone consolidates power is they
all agree on uh a state religion the
religion has ritual
uh we're all going to meet you know
every Sunday on the Sabbath on a
Saturday on a Sunday on a whatever we're
all going to recite the same mantras
we're all going to agree on the same
values
you're going to participate since we all
agree on the same values we agree the
people that don't share our values are
the enemy and uh very rapidly as soon as
you distinguish one group from another
group it's a very short hop to and
therefore we can seize their property
and therefore we should kill them
because they won't give us their
property and and so
uh economic tyranny followed by
um
followed by abuse followed by War uh it
normally follows from these religious
distinctions
and um you know if I look at conceived
in Liberty what's fascinating is you got
to watch
hundreds of experiments in political
economy take place over about 200 years
and
um and so there wasn't one
you you had this um you had you had this
um continent
right which was very special it's a very
fertile piece of land
on the south is a desert on the north is
Tundra to the West is an uncrossable
ocean the Pacific just utterly
impossible to cross on the east
it took thousands of years and
eventually uh the Europeans figured out
how to cross it
and it was very difficult in fact
Logistics turn out to be uh the deciding
factor right in the success of the uh of
the American Revolution more so than any
tactics or any strategy or any action of
anybody right a conclusion is just they
were lucky that it took 12 weeks to get
across an ocean
uh and uh and a very was very difficult
and extremely uh extremely hard to to
send uh men and material back and forth
and to communicate and because of that
you had this uh this kind of semi-closed
system
you know uh where you could run all
these experiments without the
interference uh that that took place so
routinely uh in Europe and in Asia and
uh and that's the American exercise the
um
the uh I mean the first thing you take
away is it I mean one Insight is the
Triumph of Technology
the Triumph of you know the Europe what
did the Europeans have going for them
they showed up with Guns Germs and Steel
and they just showed up and from that
point it was a foregone conclusion that
one of the European tribes was going to
win because what they met when they
showed up was uh us a set of Indians
that weren't even Neolithic
you know if you look at the you know
European history you've got Stone Age
going to Neolithic where where go to
Malta in 2500 BC they're pretty good at
creating stone temples just like the
Egyptians erected a lot of stone tempos
temples so the American Indians didn't
even have that they I mean they didn't
even work well with large blocks of
stone they definitely didn't get to
Copper they didn't get to to bronze they
didn't get to iron they didn't get to
steal they didn't get the gunpowder and
you know the story of European history
is 10
000 invasions and bloody wars that
resulted in the mixing of so many
different peoples and so many plagues
over and over again such that you had a
very
um biologically tough group of of people
that had guns and had steel and they
were gonna win uh regardless and and so
the smartest thing the Indians did as
far as I could see is when the Europeans
showed up if they murdered every single
European that stepped foot on on the
shore that was their best bet their best
idea and they might actually get 100
years or 50 years a piece
as soon as the Europeans set up and they
started to uh to set up a village and
colonize and got a beachhead that was
the end for the Indians and what
happened was just 300 years of brutal
you know uh and uh deterministic
genocide right and uh
they never had a chance now
I'm not really arguing uh in favor of
the moral superiority of the Indians
over the Europeans I write the generals
the other theme you see you know is
endless Tribal wars
right the Euro the American Indians had
endless Tribal wars and and the story of
history is ten thousand Tribal wars
the only the only difference between the
Europeans and rothbard's history and the
Indians history is since the Indians
didn't have uh a very Advanced culture
no one wrote it down and so the 15 000
years of endless Tribal wars amongst
thousands of Indian tribes just aren't
recorded history
right and and every one of them if they
were recorded they would have a story of
Rise through adversity
you know leading to Prosperity leading
to eventual moral Decay leading to
corruption leading to being crushed by
another Indian tribe right so they
weren't much better but
it was pretty clear that all the Indian
tribes were getting displaced
you know they what's funny here is there
are a lot of stories in the book about
a governor right uh the governor of
Virginia a governor of Maryland uh
governor of New York that abused the
colonists and then if they abused the
colonists too much
like for example you know in early
Virginia it's the death penalty to not
go to church it's the death penalty to
try to go home it's the death penalty to
try to leave it's the death penalty to
to break a rule I mean they pretty much
kill you for anything you do the you
know criticizing the boss you know puts
you in jail for a month and criticizing
him three times it's a death penalty so
you read that and you think wow that's
the governor wasn't
so nice right that's it's pretty pretty
awful communist tyranny
and so for that reason they rebelled
against the governor uh I get that but
then when they had a liberal Governor
that said don't murder the Indians they
rebelled against them too and they're
the infraction was the governor won't
let us murder the Indians
and so it wasn't like the colonists were
the good guys
it was uh it was a story of um
the British fighting with the Spaniards
fighting with the French
the Spaniards murdering all the Indians
and enslaving them the Indians enslaving
each other all the time the colonists
wishing to murder all the Indians and
and you know when they did it the hard
way they used guns
but uh you know lots of Stories of the
colonists would uh
they would see some uh some land from
the Indians the Indians would object
they would fight over it an Indian would
kill a colonist the colonists would
murder 20 Indians and then they would
declare war
the colonists would like send the
Indians a bunch of smallpox infested
blankets
a million Indians would you know
hundreds of thousands would die because
the smallpox and germ warfare which I
mean you're kind of amazed at just how
diabolically creative
all of these people are like that it's I
didn't bother just to go murder all the
women and children with guns I actually
infected them all with smallpox and just
let the plague do the job for me and and
they kind of knew that would work
which uh you know leaves you shaking
your head but
but uh
you know that you can't make this stuff
up for example
the colonists get in a fight with the
Indians they want their land the Indians
don't want to give up the land so the
colonists raise an army uh to defend
themselves and then they go March off to
fight with the Indians that are
murdering the colonists but along the
way there's a peaceful Indian tribe that
happens to be doing no harm to anybody
and they don't have any guns so the
colonists murder all of them because
they've also got land and somebody
running you know running the militia
thinks it's a lot easier to kill the
friendly Indian tribe than it is to kill
the Hostile Indian tribe and if you were
to go back in time and someone said give
me some advice
you know uh about how I coexist
I mean the answer is you know the weaker
party doesn't coexist
right you can you know you can run
But ultimately uh it's going to be the
Triumph of power
and so uh you know a steel age uh set of
colonists with gunpowder and and
biological immunity and uh steel they
were going to displace uh the indigenous
tribes and it was just a question of how
much violence was going to take place
and how brutal it would be over time
and um
so my takeaway from that is you really
want to be the technology leader right
and there is no future for your culture
and and no amount of appeasement and no
amount of diplomacy and no amount no
amount of of reasonable uh trade Works
ultimately
this was the story of um the most
powerful
displacing the least powerful
yeah I think I think all that's uh very
very insightful Michael and I just to
sort of comment on some of the things
that you were discussing I agree that
you know rothbard's overall framework is
the story of Liberty versus Power right
he views history as the story of
individuals in favor of voluntary
cooperation and free markets
decentralization versus those in favor
of Greater government Authority in uh
less individual freedom and so on and
that for most of History unfortunately
power triumphs uh we can say Liberty is
responsible for the great flourishing
the massive incredible living standards
that we all have the fact that we're all
able to basically communicate virtually
from different you know parts of the
world and all of that and that's that's
ultimately due to capitalism and
Liberties as rothbard would say but uh
you also have power right in a big theme
of rothbard's book is that power
corrupts and he goes through this is
that whenever sort of the forces of
Liberty control a government or they
finally oust the forces of power they
they in a sense to to to quote Lord
Acton or to paraphrase Lord Acton you
know power tends to corrupt and absolute
power corrupts absolutely
and then they start to use the
government for their own ends they start
to favor their own supporters they start
to restrict uh you know competition
whether in in currency or religion or
other sorts of you know business
activities Etc and uh this is what you
ultimately have and this even happened
after
um uh the Revolutionary War for much of
American history and I I know you
commented on the
the importance of religion for basically
spreading government propaganda
especially back in the day and I think
that's I agree because another big theme
of recurring
part of rothbard's history and
conceiving Liberty as well as elsewhere
is what he called or what has been
called The Alliance of throne and altar
right so it's this alliance between the
government and between a established
religion and it's sort of I'll scratch
your back if you scratch my back the
government builds a nice Church uh or
gives that church a monopoly or says
well we'll give you some money or
whatever and then that church basically
turns around and justifies the
government they say the king is divine
these acts come from God uh or you know
the Royal Governor uh we have to listen
to him or you have to go fight for him
you have to go die for him you have to
go uh on his you know Plantation or his
feudal Manner and repair his road or
something and and and this this is why
the founding fathers ultimately tried to
basically separate church and state they
didn't want an established religion that
would be a mouthpiece for the government
uh and all of its various interventions
and that in the modern form we don't
necessarily they have religion doing
that work but we have intellectuals it's
like the secularized alliance of throne
and altar you get the government
privileging various intellectuals giving
them a research Grant giving them some
sort of University funding or work at a
prominent think tank or government
agency in return those intellectuals
turn around and they say you have to
support government interventions x y and
z
um not necessarily because it's holy so
to speak but it's because it will
benefit the public welfare and that's
really the modern sense and that's why
it's so difficult to sort of Break Free
you could say from Power because they
have the intellectual game they have it
they have it quite nicely and they and
and they they've they've they've
certainly
um I done their job in making sure that
their Viewpoint is the one that's well
heard and there's the Viewpoint that
looks prestigious and prominent or as
the other uh viewpoints are sort of
ostracized and left out and then just to
one uh you know final comment when
you're talking about the Indians and
land Etc and another major kind of
recurring aspect of rockhart's book is
is that to the extent that Liberty was
able to Triumph in what became the
United States The Colony it was
ultimately due to the abundance of land
uh the the the British I was really
starting with the English the French
um it really we could just concentrate
on the English and they became the
British they really tried to replicate
feudalism in the colonies uh they had
first colonized Ireland through like a
hundreds of years process of subjugation
and they said well this is great why
don't we do the same thing
uh for in North America we've got the
Virginia colony we've got uh Maryland uh
you know there's a certain Lord
Baltimore Virginia named after Virgin
Queen Elizabeth and all of that stuff
they said we're going to Grant the land
to a bunch of our favorite supporters
have a bunch of people work on that work
on that land
and the problem was there was just too
much land that people could leave
um and also England was preoccupied with
civil wars and whenever England really
tried to enforce anything the the the
colonists rose up and there were the
there were the Indians and there was a
lot of conflict unfortunately between
those groups I mean ultimately at the
center of their difficulty was the
question over land is that who owned all
of this land a lot of the colonists were
sort of imbued with the Locking well in
order to really own land you have to do
something to the land you have to chop
down the trees you have to till you have
to you know irrigate uh some land you
have to grow crops you have to uh you
know do something to it and a lot of the
Indian tribes were
one way of describing could be too harsh
but of course when they say well we own
this whole forest and the colonists say
well no you don't you didn't do anything
to the forest uh there's going to be
conflict unfortunately and that's a an
ugly side of rothbard's Book it's that
as you mentioned the the quite honestly
sort of the genocidal
um
uh characteristics and and this was you
know that this was this was life back
then it was it was killer be killed
right you're under this constant state
of threat
um you could have your your at your head
chopped off or blown up or if you didn't
obey someone you get the death penalty
and then we decided on a more lenient
form of punishment or if you steal
someone's horse they're gonna cut your
ear they're gonna clip it so everyone
will always see it you'll be forever
branded that's your goes on your
permanent record Etc and and yeah life
was life was rough back then and it's
just it's it's it's just incredible how
people manage to deal with that and in a
sense how a lot of the things you know
Liberty versus Power alliance with
throne and altar you know they're still
with us today and uh yes I just I I
think that those are important takeaways
from uh from rothbard's uh you know uh
uh conceived in Liberty
yeah to the extent that there's virtue
that that pops out following the
American Revolution and of course
there's a lot of a lot of imperfections
at that point too but but the virtue
from the American experiment is you know
you could attribute to the fact that the
Europeans showed up with Superior
technology and they found a a set of
extremely valuable property highly
desirable property
that uh
they could take
from a stone age people like they could
simply seize it uh because the
indigenous people couldn't defend it so
that's that was a benefit to them and
then they were so far away from Europe
it was difficult for the rest of the
Europeans to meddle with them and screw
it up so that was a benefit and then the
third benefit is they ran all these
different experiments and there were so
many bad ones where they had colonies
destroyed by the intertwining of
religion and government and they had
corruption due to absolute power that by
the time they got to the American
Revolution
um all of the Learned uh men that were
involved would have been familiar with
all of the awful results from the um
from the previous political experiments
over the past 200 years and so that you
know separation of church and state was
one of the rallying cries of the
Revolution and you can see why because
because as soon as the religion got
entwined with absolute power life became
hell on Earth for the people that live
in the colony but
it's not that
it's it's it's not that
um absolute power combined with uh
religion
is losing in fact oftentimes it's
winning but what what made the
difference here was
all these colonies were in competition
with each other and there was extra
space to go west to your point so every
single time an awful form of government
aligned with an awful religious
influence and and some authoritarian or
Tyrant implemented a sort of
batshit crazy irrational rules people
fled either fled West or they fled North
and they fled South
so that
um the irrational authoritarians had
their colony collapse and um and so the
rational political economic exercises
were more successful in this market
right the the entire North American
continent became a Marketplace a
political economic ideas
and and uh in other examples in human
history when the authoritarian got
control of the country they just simply
murdered everybody and and so the best
idea didn't always win because brute
force uh came into play but but here
like for example in New York you had a
feudal uh a feudal architecture where
you had a few Rich families that owned
everything owned all the land and in
Pennsylvania you could actually come and
get land so with this flow of people
from Europe to the new world everybody
would land in Philadelphia they'd go to
Pennsylvania because they knew that if
they landed in New York they would be a
surf and if they went to Pennsylvania
they might have property rights and so
there was a Triumph the idea that
individuals should be able to own
property
was competing with a feudal Colony the
idea that only 10 families owned all the
property and in that competition uh the
more rational idea ended up getting all
the immigrants and then they had more
power and they were able to defend
themselves
against uh the irrational idea
Peter Stuyvesant you know as Dutch
governor of New York was a you know
unmitigated Tyrant you know crazy
and so it turned out that when the uh
you know when the British sailed on New
York most of the people in New York
didn't want to defend him and so he
didn't have an army because why would
you want to fight for a an irrational
authoritarian Tyrant when the people
that are going to take over are actually
going to treat you better
so what you found is that the Dutch got
squeezed out of the new world because
they were just awful like I have to tell
this story it's just so ridiculous like
the Dutch show up in uh in uh Delaware
and they started colony and um they
coexist peacefully with the Indians and
then one day the Dutch start throwing
trash out the back side of their colony
and one of the things they throw out is
uh is a silver ashtray that has the
stamp of the the king or the monarch of
the Netherlands on it and some Indians
find the ashtray the silver ashtray and
since they don't have silver they think
this is cool so they melted down and
they make a pipe and they give it to the
chief of the Indian tribe
so you know and you know again I could
never make this up you would never
believe it so the chief of the Indian
tribe living in peace with the Dutch
colonists smokes the silver pipe pulled
out of a trash Heap and some of the
Dutch colonists see the Indians smoking
the silver pipe they take offense
because they realize he's got silver
they don't want Indians have silver and
he took the silver from the ashtray that
had the stamp of the Dutch Monarch on it
and that makes a treason
and so they murder him for committing
treason against the monarch of the
Netherlands they kill it's pretty evil
to kill a random innocent person for
smoking a pipe
killing someone for picking your trash
out is like stupid double Evil killing
the chief of the Indian tribe is just
moronic so of course the Indians then
kill all the Dutch colonists
and so that's the end of that right and
so yeah people do such irrational stupid
things not not just evil it's evil to
murder all your own people and keep the
guns it's stupid to murder your enemy's
Chief while they can still fight back
you know for no reason but the Dutch got
squeezed out because they were just
irrational right and and then the
British were the beneficiaries of the
Dutch being stupid
the uh the French kind of coexisted
peacefully as best they could with the
Indians by just trading I mean they they
showed up and they traded with the
Indians but the problem with trading is
you know trading is is not nearly as
powerful a metaphor the French didn't
show up and kill all the Indians and
settle and and farm the land they just
traded with them so that meant that the
British had 20 times as many people and
the British colonies as the French had
so when the battle came the British had
soldiers and they could trample the
French interest because the French
didn't actually accumulate enough
manpower to fight back and so they were
squeezed out of the continent you know
again it's not like a victory of the of
the kindest and the gentlest and the
most rational it's it's it's the victory
of the most powerful and they happen to
believe in some Liberty but as a Victory
the most powerful so the Dutch gets
squeezed out because they're stupid
the French get squeezed out because
they're not powerful enough and they're
just traitors and and uh if you look at
the history of warfare
I mean and you'll love this one this is
your favorite subject safety diets right
right if I want to actually feed an army
I feed them wheat and grain because I
can grow a lot of corn and a lot of
wheat on acreage and the carrying
capacity of agricultural land that spits
out starches is 10x to 20x the carrying
capacity of uh you know a
hunter-gatherer or a Rancher so I can't
feed my soldiers meat I have to feed
them biscuits
and yeah it's going to kill them at some
point but not before the age of 30. and
so I just need the Army to make it to 30
and then I've got 20 times as many
soldiers and I can kill everybody so so
the Roman army the Egyptian Army all
these agricultural armies are fed on on
low quality grain
that isn't best long term but it works
fine in the short term
and the colonists the British colonists
in the in the U.S benefited from the
same thing they they
implemented agriculture
and because they implemented agriculture
they had more manpower to man the
militia to push back the French and and
to push back the Spaniards right and and
uh so it was their economy
that was better and um
we we just see
we see uh so many examples of this
where by the time you'd lived in the U.S
for 200 years or if you had any degree
of History right rothbard's history is
uh is novel to us but it wasn't novel
you know to Jefferson and Washington and
and uh and Adams and the other founding
uh figures in the American Revolution
what they would have seen uh would have
informed them and so
I I think uh yeah they try to keep
religion out
as best they can eventually religion
morphs into secular ideology and secular
ideology becomes a political party and
when a political party gets control of
the the apparatus of government they
then can turn the State education and
the state Taxation and the state
regulatory authorities in favor of their
political interests and then you have
another corruption uh that that happens
but um
for a while right they tried to hold
back on that
oh yeah I mean it's it's it's it's it's
it's it's it's it's incredible
when we're looking at the past how all
of that plays uh together and I mean
going through well one just how
different the world was with the you
know the people fighting each other and
people killing each other and in many
ways it comes down to superiority comes
down to a function of population right
how many people do you have and of
course how big you know your economy is
and that was really uh Great Britain
strength is that they they had a lot
they had their revolution in the 1600s
they got that over at they had a civil
war then they had a Glorious Revolution
and that created basically a
constitutional monarchy which at the
time up to that point was what we might
say is the best
um governance system and as opposed to
say like an absolutist monarchy where
the king can basically do whatever they
want such as in France or in Spain or or
in zarist Russia or or whatever instead
the the king of uh Great Britain was the
king of the king of England King of
Great Britain uh was constrained
Parliament had some power and then that
happened in the late 1600s 1688 and then
in the early 1700s
um you you have this policy of of
salutary neglect which is basically for
a variety of reasons the British
government is not enforcing its
navigation laws which literally in a
sense destroy the economy to benefit
privileged interests in Great Britain
and this allows uh the economies of the
the new world the British colonies to
explode their populations to explode and
it becomes an area where people want to
go to I mean we forget Europe was just
actually uh
so dense you had Paupers they there was
an abundance of Labor relative the land
and you had people literally practically
starving and they were begging to go to
the new world and now you have this area
where everyone has so much Farmland you
can grow the crops that you want to grow
and this is this really Powers the the
the the the color The Colony the the
colonies the in in in their various
economies and that is really what is the
decisive Edge say compared to France
right when you get to the French and
Indian war or even you know Spain and
and and you know really the French word
you had British basically had a better
system of governance and for all the
faults of all of its faults that's
translated to the colonies and they
actually wanted to have their colonies
Thrive and grow and that was just a
simple
um Manpower advantage and then of course
after this I mean it wasn't entirely
just that but of course after this then
you get into various problems when Great
Britain tries to then impose it's it's
it's it's it's its laws
um and it's regulations but you know
what the reason why Britain won is is
their economy was better their system of
governance was better or the reason why
the the British or the colonies one say
over the Indian tribes is well their
economy was better their system of
governance was better uh they could
benefit from an enormous amount of
technology and thriving market economies
that led to more sophisticated uh
Technologies including uh defense you
know firearms and and and and and and
all of that stuff and
and and being able to grow food
literally on farms and instead of
hunting for it or having much more
limited uh limited agricultural
production and uh you know it's just oh
it's just interesting because a lot of
the stuff we don't really think about no
one's really settling new land or
um or you know or or or or no one really
owns their own Farm or something like
that or much less owns like a musket
um but that that that was very important
and I think those are you know some
major reasons why of course the what
became the United States was of course
an English-speaking uh Nation
yeah you can see the the merits of
political dysfunction right I mean I I
mean there there are lots of examples
where Parliament was in conflict with
the monarchy and uh and the business
interests were struggling with each
other and that um and that that kind of
emasculated uh the British from being
able to control the colonies that plus I
I really think the distance made of you
know was significant if you look at the
breakup of the Roman Empire right I mean
you couldn't rule the east from Rome and
so they eventually moved to Byzantium or
Constantinople because it just takes too
long for a message to to go so you
couldn't reasonably micromanage
the colonies from London and there are a
lot of examples where where there was a
lot more tyranny and authoritarian
conduct
of the of the government in Britain over
the British than there was over the
colonists the call you know there are a
lot of laws and a lot of them were just
ignored right I mean they passed all
sorts of batshit crazy rules I mean so
many I mean sometimes the crazy rules
came out of London sometimes the crazy
rules came from the governor
uh you know it could be something as
simple as you're not allowed to make
hats you're not allowed to bake bread
you're not allowed to you know you you
can't cross the this side of the river
to the other side of the river you're
you know
you know you can never underestimate the
number of just batshit crazy rules human
beings come up with you can't hold your
wife's hand you know you you can't be
out in public without a hat you know you
can't mention these words
Etc it went on and on and on but many of
them were ignored and it was a lot
easier to ignore them when it was
difficult to project power and so we
think about how you actually uh project
power or impose your power on someone
else ultimately the British
uh they had to impose their Authority on
the colonists using local labor the
colonists and so ultimately anyone that
traveled that far across the ocean would
eventually go native and start to
associate and start start to identify
more with their fellow colonists than
they identified with the British
you know uh they put down Roots they
raised a family they identified it so
now you're you're ordering someone in
Boston to abuse other people in Boston
and it's not so easy to tell someone to
murder themself
whereas you know it's it's particularly
telling by the way ironic that
you know in the Revolutionary War the
British didn't want to fight the
Americans and they end up hiring a bunch
of German Mercenaries
and they they had to send a bunch of
Germans over to fight the Americans
because the British didn't want to fight
and
um when the Germans got to the new world
right and this is this is of course the
Triumph of the least worst life is so
awful in Germany that they simply wanted
to uh defect you know or or jump ship
and go and start their own life in in
the new world so so you know 25 with
dessert
25 percent would die you know in the
struggle the last half would you know
would over time decide I'm in this for
12 or 24 months then I'm gone
and uh and from the point that you
actually sent the Army you're bleeding
out two or three percent of your
Manpower a month
right and so if you if you don't win a
quick Victory you're not winning at all
and uh and then if you can't get the
people to want to comply
from a distance then you're going to
lose control of them and this is what
takes you back to the power of religion
again
ultimately uh you you need the people to
all agree to comply and the most
effective way to get people to agree to
comply is is is to promise them you know
Paradise in the afterlife and to get
them to agree that this is more
important anything on earth and the only
way to get them to agree on that is is
to you know indoctrinate them if not
every day
like every week of their life from an
early age
and this is why religion just keeps
popping up over and over again you know
I we talk about Bitcoin Forks right and
digital currency Forks well I mean
a cryptocurrency is an ideology and a
fork is like a religious Schism and you
can learn a lot by looking at the old
religious schisms right I mean this this
entire story is dominated by Forks of
ambition and aspiration and if you know
if I'm being charitable I'll say
there was a group of people you know in
Europe that were abused and
disenfranchised and they somehow wanted
to rise above their station and so they
formed a group the group eventually
became a religious movement whether it's
the Puritans or the Quakers or the
something right and uh and by forming
that religious affiliation they were
able to Channel all of their cultural
energy and their political energy and
pursuit of their goals and that I mean
that's the story for ten thousand years
that we've been recording history
that's the charitable way to describe it
the the more cynical way to describe it
is a bunch of Nobles in Northern Germany
wanted to cut off you know the Roman
Catholic church and so they found Martin
Luther and they began to support him
because he his narrative fit their
ambition
and uh you know Henry VIII decided that
uh he wanted to support the Iowa can
church because that idea fit his
and so all of these Forks in religion
are really political Ambitions and
oftentimes there's a very powerful actor
behind them or a set of actors a set of
merchants that want to push back against
a set of aristocrats or one nation or
one Prince that wants to push back
against some other prince
and the result is you just have a
never-ending set of different Protestant
sex uh you know pretty soon the
you know the uh the British have have
flipped to protestantism and then you're
Catholic and you're stuck in in the UK
and so you're getting drawn and
quartered and you know I mean what they
do to each other is just so horrific is
you can't even say it on a podcast right
but if you're Catholic and in Britain
you've got a flea for your life and that
explains Maryland and if you're a
Protestant in France you're Huguenot you
have to flee for your life and that
explains you know another colony and and
uh the one thing that just tends to be a
commonality is
just about every religion as soon as
they get as soon as they get control of
a government rather it's a small Colony
or it's a small unit they get more and
more powerful and then they begin to
abuse their power and pretty soon
they're abusing other religious sects
just as badly as they were abused at the
start of of their ideological life
and then even when you have um
even when you have examples of pacifist
religious sex like the Quakers
they start out pacifist and they're the
model of pacifism until they actually
have a modicum of success in
Pennsylvania and then all of a sudden
they become the party supporting the war
the war against the Indians of the war
against something so So eventually uh
the you know the ideological uh the the
ideologies which are virtuous over the
course of two or three or four
generations eventually are corrupted and
um and this story of of The Human
Condition in the United States or or the
the pre-united states
Americas
it's just
it's just uh one of these life cycles
after the other after the other
it's not clear that any one of them was
any better than any other but
if you had to say why did we get America
you would say
well every everybody had some isolation
from the massive empires of Germany and
France and the Netherlands and and
Britain
and uh and maybe the least dysfunctional
one the British which you know their
virtue was their dysfunction right the
parliament fighting with the Monarch all
the time and that was you know and the
fact that they were busy and distracted
it's not like they were virtuous they
were just less dis you know less worse
right the least worse so they have the
best combination of ideas and then they
plant so many colonies
and you've got the ones that are futile
like Maryland and New York and those
ones uh are weakened by the ones that
are more open uh the Rhode Islands or
the pennsylvanians and then you have the
Communist police colonies that pop up
like Georgia
and the like and and then you have
people fleeing right and and you have
you have natural forces right I mean it
isn't America like the greatest Triumph
of natural law right we talk about the
virtues of Bitcoin is is it's natural
the virtues of
of uh of lock right and the virtues of
Liberty are our natural rights
and so you had this Triumph of natural
law and why
because you gotta you got as far away as
you could from the artificial impact of
massive European armies at the end of
the day it wasn't easy to put you
couldn't put a hundred thousand Soldier
Army into the field in the colonies at
any point in time
right the logistics were just impossible
to do it so you had isolation from that
then you had a decentralization in the
form of natural competition
not just the colonies as we know it
right but like Plymouth was at at War
politically with Boston for a lot of
this time period right the the various
cities were were struggling with each
other on the eve of the American
Revolution Vermont was at war with New
York
right you know in part of New Hampshire
so you had all the colonies struggling
with each other
you had uh you had the checks and
balances of the French checking the
Brits and oftentimes the Americans
played the French off against the
British and vice versa you had the
Spanish you know that were a check and
balance on the British then you had the
Indian tribes that were a check and
balance so that if one colony was too
irrational you're right the Indians
would Ally with another colony
so you had a lot of checks and balances
due to lots of natural constituencies
and then you had this um
you had this option if if you're a
colonist in the new world and you were
abused by the New Yorkers you could get
across the river to Pennsylvania or or
to New Jersey
and maybe you lived a better life and so
you always had that as a pressure valve
and and the option the option to go and
or acquire property somewhere else
uh created natural feedback and natural
virtue that they didn't have in other
parts of the world and there was always
the possibility to go west and and keep
going west
right and this this wasn't you know if
you're looking for who's the winner well
clearly the indigenous Americans aren't
the winners right they're pretty much
the losers continually for 400 years
but if your goal was to germinate the
idea of property rights and sovereignty
and freedom
right and uh in a European culture
then uh then North America uh with all
of these various colonies vying for
power with each other was your best bet
and what you got was this
uh
darwinian Crucible
of uh of competition uh competing Force
against another competing organization
over and over again
and uh and and I guess you know the the
really awful ones
died right I mean when the Spanish
showed up and treated every single you
know indigenous person like a slave
right that that didn't help them much
but of course you know that the
interesting part of the story uh with
regard to Spain is the Spanish show up
and they see gold and their view is
we're just going to murder everybody
enslave everybody to take the gold and
we're here for the gold
okay and so they they did that they
achieved it they used guns and Germs and
Steel uh to take the gold they shipped
the gold back to Spain they inflated the
gold Supply by a factor of three and you
had the quintillion effect the people
that that originally grabbed the gold
got rich the the traders in the port
that it landed in got rich and then over
a hundred years the price of everything
in Spain tripled
and they had hyperinflation in their own
country and they collapsed their own
economy because as you know you can't
eat gold and gold doesn't cure disease
and you can't you know you can't ship
food with gold right gold is not a
factory it's not a Flour Mill it doesn't
generate energy it doesn't give you
horses right it doesn't give you any of
the things in life so
so
if your idea was let's just go grab the
precious metal the metal is not precious
and they discovered that gold isn't
money right it's it's a defective money
and uh and and they ended up corrupting
and collapsing their own economy in that
Pursuit
on the other hand the the French took
took this other low impact approach
which is we'll trade for Furs and and
we'll colonize a bit but but lukewarm
and that didn't work so well either and
the and the British came in this middle
territory we're going to colonize and
we're gonna we're gonna create
manufacturing and Agriculture and and
that turned out to be the most rational
of the three approaches
and then the next 200 years
are are this maneuvering and the
question is what religion is uh the best
one and the answer is none no State
religion is the best one that was that
answer and then what's the best form of
government and the answer is one with
checks and balances where the lower
assembly or a higher assembly and a
separate executive branch and a and a
subtle body of law that that gives
rights to the individual
and it wasn't always clear that was
going to happen that wasn't every Colony
that just that's just the amalgam of
what came out
after all of the back and forth
the authoritarians they got pushed out
of the you know out of the continent
right if you know if if you want to read
a blood curdling story of just about the
worst executive imaginable
you know read the story of Peter
stuyveson
and the irony is you know we name high
schools after this guy in New York it's
it's it's just flabbergasting to me that
Stuyvesant actually manages to have any
kind of positive name recognition when
the guy was the most horrific actor you
know that you know you can identify in
the history of the country
and on one hand I guess you can
rehabilitate a name but he was the death
of Dutch of the Dutch Empire and the new
world because of the irrational Behavior
and the way that he just so brutally
disrespected every human being
that uh was under his charge
and so I got I guess
there's a certain degree of Justice
natural Justice
that came about
because uh this uh
this experiment was allowed to continue
in isolation from more powerful
political economic and military forces
for a long enough period of time
to settle into uh called a call it a
rational or local minimum or a a
rational
outcome right after
there's that joke you know they say like
this is the Americans will do the right
thing after they've tried everything
else
right like uh whatever we had after the
After the Revolution it was the best
thing after everything else had been
tried
and the horrific stupid ideas had failed
right and the sub-optimal ideas had been
displaced with more optimal ideas right
and uh and and this book
kind of gives you the hundreds and
hundreds of stories
as uh as a set of humanity a set of
human beings that are self-interested
careen toward a stable
political economic system which creates
the most prosperity for the greatest
number yeah I mean that that's uh it's
definitely uh you almost wouldn't expect
the outcome from reading the beginning
or the first volume on all the terrible
Colonial Governors and all of that and
and yeah I just to sort of go through uh
some what you were you had been
discussing I I agree the the gridlock
was a huge component of why the American
colonies succeeded particularly the
gridlock in in Britain and it was their
constitutional government in a sense
that almost allowed for that gridlock at
least initially gridlock in the form of
well it's going to be hard for the for
the English king to subjugate the
colonists when the English king is
dealing with a Revolt right which he he
was dealing with in the you know in like
the mid 1600s and then uh he got his
head chopped off and and then there's
going to be gridlock when you have
basically the
um William waypole uh more or less
Britain's first prime minister basically
trying to prevent Britain from imposing
or enforcing various rules on on the
American people and and as you mentioned
the the abundance of land is is a huge
thing and also the abundance uh of of
Simply the ocean the Atlantic Ocean
might be one of the most important uh
components of this because a great
England had had subjugated Ireland
Ireland was turned into their colony and
in in the Island's not that far away
from uh England but of course you have
to go across the Atlantic and uh once
you're there once you're in the new
world you have a tendency to associate
more with the new world and that was
Great Britain's problems that a lot of
people consider them British but uh
Great Britain didn't want to give him
any say in their government and that
alienated a a lot of people and then of
course when you're trying to impose
feudalism there's just simply so much
land you can go north you can go south
you can go west uh there's just so much
land and everybody can have their peace
and everybody can Homestead and it was
that land that really kind of imbibed
them with the the you know it really
taught them the importance of private
property hey this is mine
um this is my land I built that Log
Cabin I built this Farm I chopped down
these trees it's mine it's not yours as
opposed to Europe where they're on some
feudal manner that's been there for
hundreds of years Etc and another sort
of unsung
hero I you know we we've mentioned it is
is this concept of of the Enlightenment
right this this Enlightenment in the
late 1600s early 1700s incredibly
important because basically teaching
people to use reason and to think that
how the world has existed before is not
necessarily how the world has to exist
now life was nasty brutish and short
people were killing people uh you did
what you were told to do uh you didn't
you know you you you burn buildings down
you slaughtered people you enslaved
people you fought for a king you would
sacrifice your children basically
getting them drafted and they could get
their arm chopped off or something like
that in the world of worked according to
how whatever relevant religion you were
worshiping and then Along Comes
basically the the enlightenment in
England and the Scottish Enlightenment
to teach people the importance of
discovering natural law of how the world
works we can use reason to figure out
basic science and then we can use reason
to figure out the social sciences
natural rights someone saying I have
ownership over my body you have
self-ownership that was incredibly
controversial at the time because you're
basically saying I have certain rights
the king's rights can only go so far or
the government's rights can only go so
far over my my person in in in in as
they soon realize my property and having
that and and John Locke was a was a very
big part of this in in one of my
favorite sort of stories in in in in
rothbard's book is so you've got John
Locke's two treatises of government it's
this huge complicated work uh it's it's
still red today it's this towering work
in political philosophy and and all of
that and your average people your
average colonists they were lockians but
they didn't read John Locke and they
didn't have time to read John Locke they
got to work on their Farm they gotta
they gotta hunt something they gotta
fight against Invaders or or they didn't
even know how to read or at that level
of of reading in depth but instead you
have Cato's letters uh by John uh
trenchard and Thomas Gordon and and
they're the ones really sort of
distilling the the Locking Creed of you
know Liberty property and so on and it's
basically in a pamphlet format almost
the spark notes version
and that's how people are actually going
to to really recognize the the
importance of the Enlightenment and to
realize that hey wait a second the
government maybe isn't protecting me the
government's an aggressor the king's an
aggressor and that led to sort of
further uh
um consequences such as the Revolution
and and et cetera and I do the
enlightenment is one of the most
significant achievements in human
history just because
this is now we realized that what was
the past doesn't always have to be the
past and we can try to create a better
world and of course we've had various
degrees of success in Failure but just
the ability to say all right we can now
devise uh institutions rules over the
marketplace in government that can
hopefully lead to a more prosperous
society and just even that fact of even
having technological progress even
having advancements is is was extremely
radical and there was a whole Confluence
of events in in in in the colonies and
part of that was just Britain was too
preoccupied there was part of it was
there's so much land part of it is that
the colonists revolted whenever the
British or the English and then the
British tried to impose their Rule and
that led to quote unquote I have a lot
of problems with the Constitution as
rothbard sort of goes into the later
volume but the Constitution really the
United States is kind of like the best
form of of of of government in many ways
that we've been able to devise and it
came out of this basically you could say
this weird sort of cauldron of of of
literally this this this
um uh Coliseum you will of people
killing other people and fighting in
Bloodshed and and uh governments are top
old and then a Governor's in charge and
he gets the boot and they bring someone
else and then he gets the boot and all
of that and it's just uh and then the
end result is you have this you have
this big revolution that in many ways
like so many other revolutions could
have turned out terribly you could have
had some dictator you could have had
George Washington a lot of credit uh has
to be gone to George Washington he
basically resisted a dictatorship
multiple times man it was not perfect I
think there were flaws in some of the
policies he pursued as president Etc but
he didn't become a dictator and that's
that's the type you know that's it's an
important precedent
um and and it it's it's just a uh it's
almost a Marvel you're kind of going
like oh yeah this all happened this is
this is how it all how it all worked out
because it could have turned out so
differently and it was uh definitely
part reason
and it was definitely part accident and
those two were definitely uh
intermingled and and we're here with the
results the syllabus for my new online
economics course principles of economics
is now available on safedene.com the
course will take place over 18 lectures
each based on one chapter from my new
book principles of economics which will
be available for free as an ebook for
everyone registering for the course
lectures will be released once every two
weeks on Mondays starting on the 25th of
September 2023 and will be available in
video and audio format live discussion
seminars will be held once a week on
Thursdays at alternating time slots 12
hours apart to ensure Learners can
attend from all over the world to enroll
sign up for a membership on safedene.com
and receive a 20 discount if you sign up
before the 20th of September
you know you know safe I
if you if you were to ask like so what's
something that you took away from the
book that that was new or novel
I think um
the impression of uh of a typical
American educated student is
the colonists showed up struggled to
create a new world there was a
disagreement and and there was a single
Revolution and we founded a country
after I read the book
what I was struck by was there was one
long never-ending
Revolution going on from the very
beginning here like like there was a
fight between the people and Authority
everywhere all the time every day they
were they were disobeying laws they were
disobeying um
uh or fighting against taxes they were
attempting uh to Rebel they were they
were formatting Rebellion after
Rebellion after Rebellion after
rebellion and it was uh never-ending
cycle of
political violence real violence and
non-non-conformity and non-compliance
and I think that gets whitewashed out of
the history books nobody wants to tell
you that that every colony was in
conflict with uh with the British or
with whoever was running the colony from
the very beginning and they all had good
reason
and so I'm struck by how ironic it is
for example all the laws that were
passed almost always were ignored
routinely all the time uh all the quick
warrants that were allowed all the rents
the the Proprietors had had the right to
property tax or to or to Levy property
taxes and half the time they were never
paid and there was struggle after
struggle after struggle where people
just wouldn't pay their taxes you know
ever and they would you know they were
torrent by the tax collector or just
send him back you know at the point of a
gun and a lot of times people you know I
just gave up on trying to collect the
taxes and then the only way you collect
the taxes is with the military uh and
even then half time it didn't work so
there was extraordinary amount of of
non-compliance and uh and struggle from
the beginning and the American
Revolution was just the culmination of
what had been going on uh continually
and so I I think that's important and I
think
I think that's the Human Condition and
you're kind of led to then ask the
question well
if that's basically the Human Condition
how come they succeeded in America but
they didn't succeed as effectively in
most of the countries in Europe
and um
you kind of conclude it's it's not
I don't know that is it's a difference
in human nature human nature is it seems
to be the same everywhere
but what you had was
a difference in geography you know you
had you had that isolation from uh the
massive armies of the authoritarians and
and the fact that
you couldn't it was much more difficult
to to administer Authority because if
you sent people to the new world
immediately what they would do was go
off and and find their own farm and
create their own life they didn't want
to fight they wanted to actually live
happily ever after so you lost control
of them continually
and that's that's one of the takeaways
the other is
I am
you know I think this is a story of
energy like uh you know we talked about
channeling energy but really what what
America represents was the largest pool
of natural energy or natural property
available to the European culture the
Europe the northern Europeans were going
to spread everywhere in the world and
dominate right you know and they they
dominated Africa they dominated South
America they dominated China I mean I
mean they dominated Asia right this is
just one of the parts of the world they
were dominating and they were doing they
were dominating with gunpowder gunships
and and steel and Superior technology
just because uh they could
so the story of America is that very
Advanced culture they get to America and
and they just ran into this massive pool
of energy
more than anywhere else in the world for
example I I just flew from Malta to
Baltimore
okay Malta has no water
okay so when you're flying over the
Mediterranean you look down you look at
you look at what can you achieve with no
water right the Mediterranean is good
for some things but the carrying
capacity of the island is is only in the
thousands unless you can actually create
water very difficult
so there are a lot of parts of the world
North Africa you know Greece they were
denurtured their their forests were
stripped their land was uh over farmed
if they had fertile um fertile land that
was good for agriculture it was
destroyed by endless Wars right that's
the story of Roman history and Greek
history endless Wars destroying fertile
land and then in other cases they just
didn't have the water
but when you land in Baltimore you fly
over the Chesapeake Bay
and if you look down at the Chesapeake
Bay you see endless water you have fresh
water flowing into an inland sea which
is protected uh from the Hostile weather
and from hostile wave forms and it's the
perfect place for you to farm for you to
uh to implement Agriculture and even
today 400 years after they showed up
it's all farms and fresh water and the
entire east coast of the United States
is incredibly fertile so you know what
is energy water fresh water is energy if
if you have elevation that drives fresh
water that creates fertile farmland and
you can grow corn and food and soybeans
and the like you can Implement
agriculture it will lead to Industry you
know and and uh in this period in time
it's just incredibly high energy laid in
land not all land is created equal if I
give you a hundred square miles of Rock
with no natural water you can't grow
anything there and your your population
is limited to the water you can capture
and a cistern in the in the rainy season
so
so if you don't have the people you're
not going to have the Army if you don't
have the Army you're not going to have
the military power you're not going to
have the economic power
and so what the Europeans found was they
found a very a very good temperate
climate especially from you know
Virginia you know Northern Carolina to
Virginia through Massachusetts and the
like it was a very favorable climate it
was very favorable land
they had a very simple set of indigenous
uh dwellers to displace and
you know look I mean
whenever you study the history of Greece
uh you know the Greeks displaced
everyone and you know 500 BC and the
Romans displaced everybody and before
then the phonations before them somebody
else so the the story of civilization is
the Neolithic culture displacing the
Stone Age culture and the you know the
the bronze and copper age displacing the
stone and then brass you know bronze
displacing them and iron displacing them
and steel displacing them and Greek Fire
displacing somebody else and gunpowder
to displacing someone else and so it's a
never-ending displacement
of the previous people by the more
powerful culture
and um America was was naturally it was
going to happen just because of
geography
and uh and the rest is the political
history is the story of this person did
this and that person did that but you
know by the time you get to the end of
this book and you're reading about the
American Revolution the conclusion is
you know all of the American generals
were goofballs the good ones were
undermined politically by the bad ones
right I mean the politicians undermined
the tacticians George Washington wasn't
the best General but it didn't matter
they made a a host of awful military
decisions but then in the day the winner
is geography because the people that got
sent to fight them didn't want to fight
and they were going to Desert as soon as
they could desert and so when you tell
the story from a patriotic point of view
you want to talk about the great leader
that heroically defeated the you know
the evil enemy
but this is really a story of of
um an incredibly fertile land that was
colonized by an advanced culture with
Superior technology
that kind of
stumbled into stewardship and Supremacy
despite their best efforts
you know Meandering careening toward the
future and uh
and and uh and winning because they were
just the least worst managed uh group
people
and they were driven by underlying human
motives which are everybody wants
sovereignty everybody wants freedom and
if they can get it by by realigning with
uh a better organization or a better
government they will and if they can't
they'll run
and if they can't run anymore
they'll fight
and if uh if it turns out that uh that
the enemy is too far away and too
dysfunctional to fight back then they
will emerge to become the government
and then at the point they become the
government they will win and then
immediately upon winning they will start
to become corrupted by their own power
and recreate the same the same
dysfunction dysfunctional tyranny that
they were fleeing from until they
collapse under their own weight and
something else takes their place
yeah I mean I think I'd say uh if I
would inject here I'd say
the the
um the details of the specific conflicts
uh obviously uh many but the overall
theme as you mentioned very astute at
the beginning Michael is that technology
wins and I think another way of putting
this is that capitalism effectively wins
so uh one major disadvantage that the
Native Americans did not have that had
was the fact that they did not have
property rights so this just uh you know
on top of the fact that they didn't have
all the modern technologies that
Europeans had Native Americans also did
not have property rights in that they
were not able to protect and enforce
um their sovereignty over plots of land
because they did not have the concept of
individual property rights so this as
they were saying earlier Patrick you
know they say this entire plot of land
was ours but then you know nobody
nobody had put a fence around it nobody
had um made a settled Farm in it nobody
had built the house and and that makes
property rights difficult to enforce
because these people are particularly uh
usually also nomadic and traveling
around and so they um they did not have
land that could have been easily marked
off as this is ours and in fact this uh
you know rothbought I think makes the
point that it's it's
um it might have made for easier
um
coexistence between Europeans and other
Native Americans if property rights of
Native Americans were clearer because
the continent was enormous and there was
a lot of room for Europeans to come and
settle and trade and in many cases of
course they did trade obviously the
history books
um you know the the news like the
history has and uh has a vested interest
in uh uh if it leads it leads and so we
miss all the hundreds of years of
peaceful interaction that took place
between
um Europeans and Native Americans
because it's just not as newsworthy but
in reality of course they benefited
enormously from trade and if there were
property rights and if they developed
this institution of capitalism and more
advanced methods of economic
organization they would have arguably
fared better even with all of the
technological disadvantages but yeah
I'll ultimately and this is a theme that
I discussed in the principles of
economics textbooks that I just
published
you know there's a lot to be depressed
about in the world a lot of bad things
happen and a lot of bad people win as
you said but ultimately
um their technology and capitalism are
like a superpower in the hand of whoever
is able to wield it as you were saying
you know in the U.S the reason that
amongst you know from this Crucible of
horrible Horrors uh something better
kept on emerging is that people could
escape and the people who offered
property rights and more freedom would
attract more manpower and more soldiers
and effectively overrun the ones that
offered less freedom and less property
rights and so it this I think is the um
if you want to take an optimistic
um tone an optimistic conclusion for the
book it would be this that uh no matter
how tyrannical as you were saying you
know those governments those Rebels then
take over and then they become the
tyrants and they become the oppressors
this cycle continues and you know we
move from one tribe being the oppressor
to another but all along what is
constantly winning is technology in that
the technology apologies of these tribes
are developed they because they have
property rights and capitalism they're
able to develop new and advanced ways of
organizing economic production and then
when they become stagnant those ideas
are copied and then people who are able
to supplement them with more free market
capitalism and more property rights and
better economic organization end up
um supplanting the people who had
um calcified and became sclerotic and
became tyrants and didn't allow economic
freedom so in a sense we do see the
positive story of uh where
um you know
where the title conceived in Liberty
might be coming from and where it leads
to some hope but I think
um you know rothbard himself he's also
quite critical of the American
Revolution in many ways and he's uh you
know he separates the uh revolutionaries
into two general camps the more
libertarian liberty-minded camps of
people like Jefferson
and then the more corporatist and
government control Camp which
essentially he argues the thought that
the the way of the you know the outcome
of the Revolution should be that they
should take over the state apparatus of
the British crown so that what the US
really needed was just a local tyranny
rather than foreign Journey whereas the
jeffersonians were more into the idea of
we don't want tyranny at all
so uh I you know and we're gonna have
another session uh to discuss all of
this
um in two days so we're going to get
into this into more detail but I'm
curious about your thoughts on um
on this aspect and this split
you know they have those movies you know
where sometimes
The Twist at the end is you find out
that the hero was the villain
you know and the person you've been
rooting rooting for the entire movie
turns out to be uh to be the villain you
know when you do uh read this book
all you know 260 plus chapters you get
to the point in the Revolutionary War
where where the Americans have won
thrown off the Yoke of imperialism but
they haven't yet established the nation
and every school kid is taught well then
we had the Federalist Papers and you
know and we weren't quite done and we
had to create the the federal government
and then it was all good and I'm left
with the thought that maybe they just
should have stopped at the end of the
Revolutionary War and left the colonies
independent without actually
establishing the federal government and
and uh you know and maybe all of our
heroes that that we see as founding
fathers that established the national
government maybe they're the ones that
just imposed an even greater
authoritarianism on America than the
British had imposed and and we would
have been better off if we hadn't
completed that right and and he he kind
of leaves you thinking that that that uh
be careful what you wish for because
when the British were running the US
they had a hard time imposing their will
on Americans but as soon as Americans
were running the U.S they found it to be
much easier to impose their will on
Americans and uh you're better off to
have a very distant ineffective
authoritarian than to have a local
very effective efficient authoritarian
and so uh yeah I I do think that I do
you know I think that uh your point on
the Indians is a good one which is
there's two stories here there's the
story of the Europeans struggling with
each other and the colonists struggling
with each other against the Europeans
and that's a very interesting story and
the other story is just the European
colonists struggling with all of the
Native American tribes that's a second a
second story and maybe even the more
powerful one in a way
and I you know as I started I said look
this is really just it's the story of
the most powerful the most powerful uh
overcoming the less powerful so uh the
most powerful ideology capitalism is a
more powerful ideology than communism
right and um uh you know certain
currency gold is a more powerful
currency than seashells and Bitcoin is a
more powerful currency and then gold and
and and the British culture was a more
powerful culture the European culture is
more powerful than the Native American
culture and the government uh you know
the republic government was more
powerful than the tribal cultures that
they displaced
but you can you can see clearly the I
mean the the American Indians it's
it's I guess it's it's popular to talk
about you know to act like they're like
Adam and Eve in the garden and they're
the Innocents but the truth is they were
awful in every regard to each other and
and in some ways more Humane than than
the thing that replaced them
and the culture definitely wasn't best
for Humanity it wasn't it wasn't the
most powerful it wasn't the most Humane
in any way
you could point out they didn't have
property rights right now since I didn't
have property rights any random Indian
could sell away everybody's land right
to anybody else and so it's pretty
dysfunctional if you don't have property
rights because you will tend to be the
loser in that struggle but they didn't
have a Common Language they didn't have
a written language they didn't have a
history they they didn't have you know a
shared law they didn't have any other
shared mores and what what can you say
about a society that never invented the
wheel like like I I mean the real
indictment of the American Indians is
they used a wheel for pottery but they
didn't actually use a wheel for
Locomotion they never figured out how to
turn it on its side and so no wheels no
you know no effective domestication of
animals no Mills no Machinery you know
all of the things that that were part of
European civilization and 2500 BC
they still had not made they're
literally stuck around 25
000 BC and they were not moving forward
and the result was a whole lot of human
misery
so I I suppose at the end of the day
it's hard to lament displacing that
culture with a European culture
certainly the life expectancy and the
prosperity that followed from the
European culture would be would be
greater for the common person
and it was uh it was kind of inevitable
and we don't write much about it because
you know because it's just uh I guess
they didn't record the history and it's
almost like a footnote in a way but
all all of this is there was an energy
source and there was an organization
that showed up there was there was more
powerful and they found a way to harness
the energy in order to create human
prosperity and certainly today you have
300 plus million people in the U.S you
know with an average life expectancy of
you know 80. and uh if you compare that
to some few million people with an
average life expectancy of 30 or 35
that um you know are carrying water 10
miles a day it's kind of hard to want to
go back to that
mm-hmm yeah yeah I know I I I agree I
think that's those are great points I
mean certainly especially with safety
Dean brought up about the the private
ownership and even just yeah it comes
down to to the the culture and something
else that's also interesting sort of
adding on to that there's a great book
called The the myth of the ecological
Indian I think it's by Stephen kresh the
thing that's how you pronounce the last
name and going through it's how
sometimes we have this myth that it was
also environmentalists and that was not
true uh many tribes believed in
reincarnation and the fact that you
could just kill as many deer as you
needed and more would Sprout up and that
was obviously not conducive to growth or
conservation of of natural resources and
in in in in in in in in in in in human
Prosperity ultimately and and that you
know opened the door I mean and
especially the difficulties over the
land ownership or what kind you know
counted as ownership basically allowed
the or enabled the the English colonists
to really sort of capitalize in in in
Homestead uh the incredible amount of
land the forest the the turning into the
farmland and so on and yeah and the
ultimate sort of you could say driver of
a lot of this is geography geography
even when you're Europe the only reason
Britain was able to basically do its own
thing is because the English Channel
right and then geography with the
American colonies because of the
Atlantic Ocean and then just so much
land and even in a sense as mentioned
geography with the American Revolution
because as Michael pointed out the uh we
never won any of our battles with the
way the generals wanted them to win the
pitched battles uh your army versus my
Army at four o'clock today you know show
up we won with guerrilla warfare
ambushing supply lines we knew the
terrain we knew the geography more and
the the the British soldiers didn't want
to have to uh deal with that and and and
that that was a huge component and and
yeah I think describing it as sort of
energy is is a is a very succinct way of
putting it because this new World
literally just had so much stuff for the
taking and that led to one of the most
powerful uh countries in in world in in
world history and in many ways it's you
know it's it's energy the the the the
land was very fertile there was a lot of
the land and all it took was just some
people with understanding private
property and then reading some pamphlets
about it uh or the the Twitter of the
past so to speak and and then they're
Off to the Races yeah well you see it's
a Triumph of the most powerful ideology
the most powerful currency you know the
the Indians didn't have the currency
either right so it's probably you know
even the religions right Islam and
Christianity they're they're the most
powerful religions for channeling
political energy and and aligning
people's interest and
and uh so what you have is is you know
an arc of history with powerful ideas
powerful technology
eventually driving uh
driving a succession and um and
America's the result of that to date
well
um I you hinted at something Michael in
your uh comments a few minutes ago where
you were saying rothbar sort of leaves
you hanging thinking was the whole thing
a good idea would we have been better
off and I think this this I want to make
that the the main topic of conversation
of the next episode because I think
um I mean I'll I'll uh you know the the
tax that was imposed on the T
um launched the Revolution was what I
think one and a half percent or two
percent
uh on T Imports which you know if you
ask any person whose Liberty minded you
know would you would you take a two
percent tax on t
and get rid of the US Federal
government's uh mountains of Taxation
regulation
I don't think there's any doubt where
the question would go so uh you know
that I I the case I think could be made
that um getting rid of uh the king
sounds nice in principle because you
think or I will always we're all just
going to be free but uh the monarchist
in me will say that when you get rid of
a king you don't just end up with no
King you end up with a million little
Kings who are competing over short
fourth year four year terms to become
Kings and then the difference is that
when you had one king he was there for
many decades and he expected his
children and his grandchildren to be
there for centuries Generations after
generation and so he was invested in the
well-being of the country into the
future because he wanted it to be
functional for his grandkids to steal
where or you know to appropriate money
from your grandkids so you had incentive
alignment he wanted you to have a
healthy prosperity grandkids and you
wanted to have healthy prosperous
grandkids whereas on the other hand when
you replace that King with 100 Little
Kings then each one of those kings is
only going to get four years
or maybe eight and then it's only four
or eight years and that's all the time
he's got under the sun and that's the
time you know he's got to make hay while
the uh Sun Shines as they say he needs
to try and get as much as he can and it
doesn't matter to him the well-being of
your grandchild is completely irrelevant
to him because his grandchild is not
likely going to be on the throne to be
able to take taxes from your grandchild
so it is in his interest to milk the
country dry as much as he can for four
or eight years I I'll look forward to
discussing this subject with you in our
next session yeah I think this has been
fascinating and uh you know we have
another couple of hours on Thursday so
uh
any final thoughts before we break off
are you in favor of of King George III
safety nine is that what you're saying I
mean
you know compared to some of the things
that the Glorious Revolution has brought
the US I think I I think you'd struggle
to find somebody who would not take him
over at least some of the US presidents
but did you my my final thought is is
uh the book's worth reading because
because uh
America was an experiment in political
economy and if you're a scientist a
political scientist you would always
like to be able to implement a new idea
what if we add this economic system what
if we had communism what have we had
authoritarianism what if we had
capitalism what if we had strong
religion what if we had a weak religion
what if we were tolerant of religions
what if we cooperated what if we didn't
what have we traded what if we did
Agriculture and it's very difficult to
run that experiment
in a mature Society Because You're
inheriting A Thousand Years of Legacy so
you couldn't easily run that experiment
you know in a Canton of Switzerland or
the middle of Austria at that time but
in a in America what you had was a stone
age culture receding and you were able
to drop
dozens of these experiments uh into the
middle of an energy rich fairly isolated
uh geography and you were able to see
their homogeneous uh or organic
evolution uh without without someone
simply crossing the border and stamping
them out with brute force in the first
month so if you're if you're a protocol
scientist and or Economist and you want
to study what happens when what will
happen if I tell people that they're not
allowed to own any land
well you know we know what happened like
uh everybody starved to death within a
few months like you can literally see
examples of political of economic
dysfunction where everybody stops
working and they all starve because the
leader had a batshit stupid crazy
economic model
and so you you have lots and lots of
these examples if this happens that will
happen what will happen if you do this
conceived in Liberty
is the story of human behavior and how
they react to so many different uh
political experiments and so I think you
can learn a lot by studying each one of
them and you know many of them end in
the death of the instigator or the death
of everybody or
or extraordinary chaos and abuse and so
I think it's a lot better to learn
vicariously than it is to learn through
your own experiences
and this this was 200 of these 262
chapters but more than that hundreds and
hundreds of experiments that end in the
death and destruction of the idiot or
the malefactor and everyone that was
trapped in that economy with them and so
so
you know
science is about trial and error
right and human Humanity has advanced
through trial and error and we take for
granted the fact that we can create
steel and we forget that there are
probably ten thousand tries out of it
that failed and everybody died trying
you know we take for granted you can eat
that Berry and we forget that the people
that ate the other berries all died and
we take for granted that that this
bridge works and we forget that you know
eight thousand other Bridges collapsed
and everybody died you know and so a lot
of times we just take modernity for
granted but conceived in Liberty is is
uh you know
a book of experimental results saying if
you do this this will happen if you do
this this will happen if you do this
this will happen and you get to see a
thousand failed experiments right a
thousand blow-ups and eventually you get
to some amalgam which is uh
decent enough to get us where we are
today and if anything it's valuable to
the modern thinker because you can't
really afford you know uh to implement a
catastrophic experiment without
destroying your entire country or your
family if you if you go to this place
right go to Zimbabwe go to Cuba go to
North Korea you'll get to make that
mistake once and then you're done right
so I just think this is valuable because
rothbard was truthful unvarnished
right without an he didn't have a
pro-statist agenda or an Apollo just
agenda he wasn't trying to whitewash
history and tell you how everything
turned out perfect
he wasn't defending anybody
like as far as I can you know as I can
see right there's there's uh you know
there aren't that many uh heroes in this
book there's a lot of villains there
there's a there's a number of people
that tried to do the right thing and
struggled so I guess they're sort of the
heroes but
but it's very rare in the modern world
that you get to read a Tome of all of
the political economic experiments of
humanity gone bad
and this is that Tome and you can't
design something beautiful and
functional and stable unless you
understand all the ways the machines
break right and this is that book and so
I would just end with a thought that
it's worthwhile for anybody that that
has aspirations to design something
better or live a life or or give advice
you ought to go back and read this one
and and uh and keep it in mind when
you're um when you're trying to inscribe
your ego and your ideas
on the world
I agree I think it's a great book to
read and I I it certainly changed my
perspective and and other people should
read it as well excellent well we'll uh
pick up where we left off on Thursday
thank you so much for joining us yeah
thanks for having us
[Music]
foreign