Michael Saylor: ‘I’d Rather Win in Volatile Fashion Than Lose Slowly, Sell Your Gold'
Stansberry Research · 2022-08-12 · 48m · View on YouTube →
[Applause]
[Music]
last year when most investors were
watching their stocks plummet
one wall street legend had an unfair
advantage that was identifying winning
stocks with massive upside like riot
blockchain before it shot up 10 000
digital turbine before it shot up 789
overstock before it shot up over a
thousand percent
this power gauge comes from the
legendary mark jacon and right now you
can get a free in-depth look at how his
power gauge system works
a way to type in any of the 4 000
different tickers and exactly where the
stock is most likely to go next than in
any type of market simply go to
powergatetrial.com
for your free look again that's
powergage trial.com for your free look
all right let's get to our segment today
hi this is daniella cabone and welcome
back to the daniela cambodia show here
on stansberry research well the last
time i spoke with michael saylor it was
during our historic gold versus bitcoin
debate today marks his return to my show
michael always good to see you welcome
back
thank you danielle happy to be here
well a few things have changed since the
last time you were on you've since
stepped down as ceo of microstrategy and
bitcoin and crypto as a whole have had a
very tumultuous second quarter of the
year um just to recap for everyone in
may a popular stable coin failed leading
to plummeting crypto prices and the
bankruptcy of several crypto lenders and
investment firms bitcoins price uh in
june fell below 20 000. marking a loss
of more than 70 from its november highs
so we're going to be talking about all
this and more but first michael how are
you doing
i'm awesome i'm doing great life is good
good just motoring how long
all right so let's start
let's start with a bang here i want to
pull up a recent article from the wall
street journal with the headline michael
saylor bet billions on bitcoin and lost
is this a fair assessment what do you
make of this headline i mean they're
they're already waving the white flag
here for you
oh that's that's brutally unfair no um
the facts of the matter are uh
on august 10th
of 2020
we embarked on a bitcoin strategy
and when we did that the enterprise
value of our software business was about
66 dollars a share
and as i'm speaking with you right now
the stock is trading 329 dollars a share
our shareholders have made billions of
dollars since we started this strategy
no one's lost um if you actually look at
the performance of bitcoin since we
actually bought 250 million dollars of
it and embarked on a bitcoin strategy
bitcoin's up 101 percent
uh and uh that's the the s p is up 23
percent the nasdaq's are 15 gold is down
12 bonds are down 15 and silver is down
28
so in fact bitcoin smashed every single
asset
the only thing that outperformed bitcoin
in that time period is microstrategy
stock up 166
so we actually perform 1.6 x bitcoin
now if you look at what we could have
done
we could have competed with the
enterprise software companies in our
industry
the best performing enterprise software
company in that time period is oracle
oracle's up 39
microstrategy's up 166
ibm's up 2
sales force is down 4 percent sap is
down 40
we're definitely not losing
now if you want to compare us to the
best companies on earth
the strongest companies on earth that
are more powerful than governments
would be google apple and microsoft
those three big tech companies are up 58
46 percent and 34
respectively
amazon down 11
facebook down 35 netflix down 52
microstrategy up 167 percent and one
last factoid
out of the 500 s p companies
there are only 14 companies that
outperformed us in the time period we
outperformed 97
of the s p
and the ones that outperformed as you
could have guessed are like energy
companies and and they were selling oil
when oil hit zero dollars a barrel and
their stock smashed back
so
uh
we're totally fine
i'm fine
the company's strategy is working well
if you had said in the second quarter of
2020 i want you to come up with a
strategy for a low growth
mid-size software company to outperform
every asset class all big tech stocks
and every enterprise software company by
a factor of three to ten
right this is the only one that you
could have come up with and we actually
uh did it
i think what throws people off is that
the stock got volatile like the way
we've done it is with volatility the you
know the company stock traded a few
million dollars a day when we started
now it trades hundreds of millions of
dollars a day the open interest and the
options have exploded
the stock you know has exploded up
exploded down exploded up it moves all
around just like bitcoin which has gone
through almost three cycles
in the past two years so
i would say to summarize
you know conventional critics and
conventional mainstream analysts they
don't get the crypto economy they don't
understand bitcoin and they hate
volatility
and those are the people that would tell
you take all your money put it in a bank
account yielding one percent interest
and just don't lose it and don't bother
us
but when we embrace the bitcoin strategy
we did it because we knew that if we
held our cash in a bank account it was
going to lose 20 percent of its
purchasing power per year
and it has as predicted the money supply
expanded by 40 single-family homes in
the us have increased in price 40
if you had 500 million dollars it would
have brought you know bought you the 40
less today than it would have bought you
two years ago
so we had to do something for our
shareholders at the time
and that something was by high quality
digital property
and and our choice was we could suffer a
non-volatile slow death
or we could get on a bumpy lifeboat a
big a big
orange lifeboat the bitcoin lifeboat and
we're gonna get tossed around in the
ocean
but we're going to float and we're going
to appreciate over time
and uh
when i started buying this stuff uh
bitcoin was 9 000 10 000 a coin
and we've just been consistently
accumulating bitcoin
we have not sold any bitcoin
and if you if you're a short time
horizon person and you want to look at
making a trade in the past three months
or six months
just about every everything you could
have bought in the world in the past six
months is a losing trade if you have a
short enough time frame
but if you have a two-year time frame
bitcoin's winning it's winning over four
years it's winning over six years it's
winning over eight years and
i just like to be in business more than
two years from now so that's why we did
it
let's talk about the timing of
everything i mean why why now why did
you feel you had to step down now and
really just focus purely on bitcoin
because you know i follow you on twitter
every day it's still a mantra of love
for bitcoin you've never wavered away
from it your conviction has only grown
your faith has only grown how so why
yeah
you know we've been planning uh to do
this for four years so i i just think we
got caught up in uh in some very
colorful media i you may know uh most
people don't i'm the controlling
shareholder of microstrategy i've said
68 of the voting shares and i started
the company 33 years ago so i've been
the ceo for 33 years i'm the chairman of
the board i'm the controlling
shareholder
and
i've been talking about bitcoin for two
years
and about two years ago we promoted uh
a gentleman fongly to be the president
of the company and he was the president
and the cfo
so
he's been running
the day-to-day business hands-on as the
president for the past two years
and and 99 percent of the activity of
the business
is selling software so we have
2150 people we sell software we make
software we have thousands of customers
we do thousands of transactions a
quarter we hire hundreds of people a
year we train thousands of people a year
all of the activity is enterprise
software it turns out that once a
quarter we do a bitcoin transaction
and i talk about it a lot
so if you think about it you realize you
know it's very logical for the ceo of
the company to be the person that
actually manages the day-to-day business
because all the transaction and all of
the labor intensity is all about
software
i don't need to be
the ceo in order to oversee the bitcoin
side of the business because i can do
that as the chairman of the board and as
the chair of the investments committee
where we provide oversight for bitcoin
acquisition and maybe once a quarter we
might do a big deal like borrow 200
million or issue equity or something or
we might buy bitcoin but it really is
something that can be best supervised at
the board level
and um
the path for fong uh to be ceo has been
set in stone uh well it's been set for
years and years he was promoted to chief
operating officer in 2018
and
he's been the cfo of the company since
2015.
so after two years as president it made
sense he it's very clear to the
shareholders he was the heir apparent
and we hired a new cfo a full-time cfo
andrew kang
he joined in may
and so once andrew joined a cfo that
cleared the way for fong to become
president and ceo
i have been working with him hands-on to
transfer the entire business to him for
seven years
it turns out that in the last six weeks
bitcoin traded down and when bitcoin
traded down we ended up taking uh uh
indefinite intangible charge in our q2
results
that that by the way it's like a 900
million dollar charge it was very
colorful i think it was cited by some uh
critical journalist
but uh we'd already covered 700 million
or 750 million of that charge by the
time we even reported it
it's just that gaap accounting doesn't
let you write up your assets
so
if you're positive
if you're positive you say okay well
this is normal succession and
appropriate corporate governance if you
just want to write something troll-ish
you would uh pair the the non-cash right
off with me taking the executive
chairman role but
obviously it has nothing to do with that
it's always been the plan for me to be
executive chairman and for following to
be the ceo but so why not have waited
for better timing no
because we were waiting
for we don't run the company based upon
bitcoin volatility
and we don't run the company based upon
indefinite and ca intangible accounting
charges that would be putting the
interest of our shareholders after the
optics
of
of a random troll
we run the company based on what's best
for the shareholders and what's best for
the employees and what's best for the
customers
so the trigger for us to promote phong
was the arrival of andrew as the cfo
we because
fong was the president and cfo and you
can't have a public company where the
ceo is also the cfo it would be
inappropriate to do that like only in
the most dire of circumstances would you
ever do that so
when andrew arrived
we wanted fong to be ceo
and
the accounting charge is an intangible
non-cash charge it really again as i
said before bitcoin traded down to 17
600
we wrote our our uh assets down that
level you know bitcoin is trading at
23
900 right now we haven't written it up
but i mean
the shareholders understand this
you can see in their reaction to the
announcement i want to get back to a
point you made about the volatility and
that that's an important
one to bring up here
do you think this makes the case that
maybe bitcoin just is not for everyone
that you know we're not talking about
right now what we've seen a correction
of 10 20 i mean this is
extreme volatility is it just not for
everyone like maybe most folks just
can't stomach it
and can't risk that money
i think that uh
the way to think about investing in
bitcoin is you should only invest what
you're going to hold for four years or
longer and ideally it's generational
wealth transfer and then you should
dollar cost average into it and and for
the average person if they dollar cost
average into it is a strong long-term
store of value they'll be fine
uh
and and the metric you ought to stare at
is probably uh
rolling for
the the simple four-year moving average
right and and if you look at the simple
moving average over 458 days
it very rarely touches that point it
went slightly below it in the depths of
the crypto crisis and now it's trading
above it that number is 22
266.
so if you think of that and you say i
know i'm going to hold at least four
years then it isn't that anxiety
inducing
if you have a short time horizon like
you you want to make money in four weeks
or four months it's going to be much
more stressful because it is a volatile
asset
and it's the volatility impacts two
types of people
it impacts people that are short-term
investors that they want to make a quick
buck or they just never want to lose
money
and the volatility also impacts
public companies or companies that rely
heavily on gaap accounting because the
accounting the volatility is detrimental
to the accounting treatment because you
have to always write it down you can
never write it up
and so you end up with a circumstance
where you could be holding a billion
dollars and it looks like you have 200
million dollars and no one can tell the
difference unless they go to the trouble
to figure it out themselves and that's
very opaque
so i would say that people that really
are fixated upon gap optics
right they'll they'll be
a little bit uh troubled by it and then
people that have very short term time
horizons are troubled
but but um for the rest of the world
it's a pretty good idea it's the best
i've just pointed out to you we've
outperformed every asset every big tech
company every enterprise software
company 97 of all the companies using
this strategy so
if
the the volatility is the price you pay
for the performance and if you can't
stomach the heat
right you can't be in the kitchen so i
would rather win
in a volatile fashion
then lose
slowly
in a non-volatile way
i what i um
saw you last in april of this year i was
moderating a panel with you at the etf
conference and there was so much
enthusiasm at the time right uh i think
janet yellen had spoken that week saying
crypto was transformative biden had just
signed an executive order kind of green
lighting the crypto
space uh so there was a lot of
excitement walk me through where you
think things took a downturn i mean was
it
the inflationary scenario was it
incoming interest rates
what do you think was the catalyst
yeah i thought i mean if we're talking
about what's caused uh the crypto crash
i think that uh it was triggered first
by um
the interest rates right the tightening
of the fed and that put pressure on all
risk assets from the beginning of the
year
and i think the next catalyst with the
terra luna meltdown
because in essence they had 50 billion
dollars worth of
of luna and ust backed by a billion or
two billion dollars of real assets
so that was very unstable and that
algorithmic stable coin was just an
accident waiting to happen
it's not it's almost like they loaned
out they borrowed 20 billion dollars and
agreed to pay 20 interest on it and they
were going to issue equity to pay the
interest so they're going to issue luna
in order to pay 20 interest on ust
through that protocol and that was an
accident waiting to happen there's no
way that was sustainable
so that melted down a lot of the cryptos
and resulted in
in the unwinding
of the three arrows
voyager and celsius bets and
and uh and i think a lot of people took
a lot of inappropriate risk right
the cr the cryptos were on registered
securities but then loaning out hundreds
of millions of dollars without
collateral or under collateralized loans
amongst the crypto hedge funds
that created a margin call run and so
they ended up becoming forced sellers
and liquidating positions in a panic
and that uh that took us all the way to
30 000 and i think the celsius thing was
the straw that broke the camel's back
where celsius just completely unwound
and and you had a whole set of panicked
liquidations as
counterparties seized assets and seized
collateral and sold it at the market
so that's what takes the market down and
now the market i think has probably
bottomed and i i it looks like it's just
looking much better it's gone from 17
000 up to 24 000 now
but i make the other fundamental point
if you're a short-term trader this uh
this drives volatility and this is very
meaningful and if you had a weak balance
sheet this is devastating and if you
trusted any of the crypto wildcat banks
right it's tragic right anybody that put
their money in voyager or celsius or the
like or gave money to three arrows is
awful but
if you look at the fundamentals the
fundamentals are you have the head of
the sec endorsing bitcoin as a commodity
you have the head of the cftc
you know ready to endorse bitcoin as a
commodity you have multiple senators
endorsing bitcoin as commodity you've
already heard janet yellen endorse
bitcoin as commodity
we just saw today uh the head of the
central bank in brazil endorsing bitcoin
technology
and so
the fundamentals
are really good we just had larry fink
you know and blackrock in essence
endorsing bitcoin by saying that they're
going to sell their institutional
customers bitcoin on the blackrock
private wealth management system
so
what i see is bitcoin emerging as a
institutional
investment grade asset
being embraced by regulators
legislatures
and large-scale investors
and uh and the entire market's been very
educated by this crypto crash
now it's it's obvious to people the
difference between you know the good the
bad and the ugly right that the good
would be a stable coin backed by cash
equivalents that are transparently
published every week
like circle
right
the bad might be a a tether which it
works and they're competent but it's
opaque
and the ugly is you know is the ust that
just completely melts to zero
and uh you could likewise say bitcoin is
the good right it's a it's a digital
commodity decentralized with no issuer
you know without counterparty risk
non-sovereign store value
and then you've got all the other
creatures you know many of which are
unregistered securities and
and uh this has lit a fire under
legislators and regulators i think
they're going to accelerate
all their regulatory initiatives
and that is educating the market
and ultimately you have
you have hundreds of billions of dollars
that wants a long-term store of value
because currencies are crashing
everywhere in the world
and the thing that holds anybody back
from buying bitcoin is uncertainty about
its classification and the way it will
be treated by regulators
so as the regulation
gets clarified and as people get
illustrations of the difference between
bitcoin and luna
right used to be people aren't quite
sure about the difference well
and in fact a lot of people thought d5
is better you get a 20 yield on your
define bitcoin is dead money and now
they realize that you know there is a
counterparty risk to pursuing this
and this has educated the market you
know
very very effectively in a painful way
but in a rapid rate and i i think it
will catalyze the maturity of the asset
class and the institutionalization
of bitcoin uh to the benefit of the
bitcoin holders and the ecosystem
so you you beat me to the questions i
was going to ask does that fast-track
regulation but i guess the second part
of my question is and then are you
confident then what had to be flushed
out was flushed out or does more
cleansing need to happen in the space
i think a great deal of the bad behavior
has been flushed out i don't think you
can say everything i think i think
there's um
there's still a lot of um
unregistered securities in the crypto
ecosystem and it's undoubted that
bitcoin is
cross-collateralized against some of
those unregistered securities
and there's more regulation coming to
anyone that's in this space more clarity
so so i i think the worst of it is
behind us but i don't think that the
industry has has been clarified or
completely rationalized yet
i think that there's thousands and
thousands of cryptos that need to
disappear right i think there's a 99
rationalization rate that needs to
happen
and so i just think we went we went
through um and i'm pretty important
deleveraging
and i think the people will be much more
careful
in the way they view things going
forward
than they were
a couple years ago i think we were in a
wild west stage the first decade of the
industry and
i think we need to grow we need adult
supervision in the industry and
there's an entire generation of people
that need to understand counterparty
risk and basic risk management and they
also need to understand the difference
between a security and a commodity
and
with all you know due respect there's
still a lot of people that don't really
understand the the the ethical or legal
difference between a security and a
commodity and until they grasp the
nuance of how you create a digital
commodity
they're not going to grasp you know the
way to segment the market and the right
way to think about all these assets
on to that point um you
you
you came out saying that ethereum is
obviously a security taking a lot of
heat from the ethereum a community
including a vitalik himself
i guess my question is like why you know
you're going to get that from the
ethereum community right but do you feel
that
it's part of your mission to speak out
on the topic of ethereum
no people just want to ask me that
question
they're just trolling me i think
i i
i want to speak out about bitcoin right
the chair of the sec was asked probably
six times in congressional testimony and
other public appearances
whether bit whether ethereum was the
security or whether it was a commodity
and he wouldn't endorse it as a
commodity under testimony and in the
public eye so i i think it's above my
pay grade to opine and i know there is a
big debate there's going to be a debate
you know amongst regulators there's
going to be a debate in d.c
so they will work that out
i happen to be of the opinion it's an
investment contract i think it's quite
evident to anyone that spends a few
minutes thinking about it but
you know i'll leave it at that people
are free to make their own decisions i
want to bring up um
something that kevin o'leary brought up
on my show last week he said the real
gauge and this is speaking to bitcoin
specifically is where the institutional
buyer is he said it's right now it's
zero they have n no bitcoin absolutely
no bitcoin and anyone tells you the
sovereigns have it is full of quote poo
poo um
thoughts on this
where are where's the mindset of the
institutional buyer when it comes to
bitcoin
um i i think that um
bitcoin is
the only
asset in the space that is that is
broadly institutionally held
and it and it is more than zero for
example
we bought four billion dollars of it so
we know that companies have it we know
that institutional investors have it we
know they're insurance companies that
hold it so it's not zero but it is um
it is not nearly as broadly held as it
will be
and i i think that we're still early
days
i think that uh
it's uh the institution institutional
interest in bitcoin has dramatically
jumped in the macro community in the
hedge fund community over the past year
i think you can see in uh in the body
language and the rhetoric
of
jp morgan and goldman sachs you know
jamie dimon and the way that uh david
solomon speaks about us and the way the
black rock speaks about it and the way
that ray dalio speaks about it and the
way that george soros speaks about it
you can see that um we're no longer at
the stage where people are skeptical
that it will continue to exist or
skeptical of its value i think it's now
it's now got the grudging respect
of a lot of people
we're really more at the stage where um
we're waiting for regulatory clarity
there's just a lot of a lot of political
debates
you know at the dc level
uh over over how much friction will
will be in the space
i think the banks would like to see more
clarity from banking regulators about
how much they can hold on their balance
sheet and what the reserve ratio would
be and
i think the accounting treatment clearly
has been a has been a liability for
large institutions because indefinite
intangible is is
it's uh
always going to understate
the value and it's also going to create
it's always going to create confusion
because i could hold a billion and you
could hold 100 million and we would both
look like we held 100 million and you
would have to dig deep into my financial
statements to know the difference and so
it just makes everything hard and opaque
so
so i think that uh
that we have more adoption to come and
uh and
every single every single thing that
happens
every time that there's an advance from
the fdic or fasb or cftc or sec
or congress
i think all those things are you know
our catalyst for adoption
and uh and we're going to see more
institutional adoption as time goes on
i want to get to some questions i
tweeted that you'd be coming on the show
ask some folks to send in some questions
some people dm'd me some people sent
messages to my email box so if you don't
mind i'm gonna try i got tons but i'll
try and get through some here michael uh
of course this one speaks to my heart
here do you still believe gold is going
to zero and bitcoin is going to a
million
i i i think that bitcoin is a million
times better than gold and is going to
gradually demonetize gold over time so
now gold will go to the utility value of
gold you know whatever that utility
value is but uh
i don't think it's uh it's going to be
adopted as money in the 21st century
i think bitcoin is a better gold than
gold you can move it at the speed of
light you could see what the lightning
network evolving that pretty soon we'll
have a billion people able to able to
move any block of bitcoin anywhere
friction free
and so bitcoin is uh digital money for
the 21st century gold was metallic money
for the 19th century
so i just think if you believe in sound
money
then you should do yourself a service
and you ought to sell your gold and you
ought to buy bitcoin because bitcoin is
sound money for the 21st century and
gold was sound money for the 19th
century just that simple
okay going on here um
you suggested that tesla buying bitcoin
was the beginnings of corporate america
loading their balance sheets with
bitcoin what do you think now that tesla
has
sold they've still got some but what i
think is that uh the accounting is toxic
and uh fasbi
fasbi uh
didn't need to address this issue before
microstrategy tesla and and square all
bought bitcoin because there was no more
than a million dollars of bitcoin in an
operating company
so it was an immaterial issue now there
are billions and billions of dollars of
assets in in publicly traded companies
so it's material
lots and lots of people wrote to fasby
asking them to take this up as an issue
fasbi took a vote and unanimously agreed
to take this up as a project
and they're working on the project right
now so we will see uh what they come
back with but
for publicly traded companies with gap
accounting
uh
to adopt uh bitcoin in a big way there's
a couple things you need you either need
to fix the accounting so
so it's not prejudicial and hostile to
the ownership of the asset class and
that means at least make it kind of pair
a pursuit of to holding equity or
something like if you're holding equity
you take a mark to market you have fair
value accounting
so that's one possibility and the other
possibility is
people have to hold it in the form of a
security
and uh if you hold in security you would
probably get fair you would get fair
value accounting but that means an etf
and pro preferably a spot etf
so there isn't a spot etf right now
and even if you have a spot etf
the rules in public companies are you
can't hold more than 40 percent of your
assets as a security before you trip the
sec 40 act so
microstrategy couldn't do what we did if
we were holding bitcoin as a security we
have to hold it as a property
so i think that you'll see
large-scale treasury adoption
when you actually see
you know the accounting start to look
like fair value accounting
you know and or you start to see
a gateway like a spot etf and before if
you don't have either of those things
then it's then
you have to have the majority of your
enterprise value
be constituted a bitcoin
like with microstrategy we have 129
699 bitcoin so our shareholders can
multiply the price of bitcoin times that
and if bitcoin moves up a thousand
dollars they know we added 130 million
dollars worth of value so that's not
that hard
but if you were a company and five
percent of your enterprise value was
bitcoin or two percent or take tesla
they you know
they would have taken a massive
intangible write down and gotten all the
negative optics you know but uh it would
still be uh immaterial to the rest of
their p l or to the rest of their
enterprise value so it's like all the
downside not so much upside
whereas in our case our shareholders
will look at that and they can do their
own calculations so we don't necessarily
suffer from an indefinite intangible
non-cash charge so so i think that um
you will have to see some changes before
you see biggest incorporated option
there
you mentioned the spotty tf how far away
are we from from that becoming a reality
for you is it
really far away
i'm optimistic
okay i'm optimistic in the next 36
months we'll see improvements in both
the accounting and the spot etf and it
might come sooner might come on in a
year
i think
go ahead
uh this question came in via twitter
my question to sailors how can everyone
in the world become rich off bitcoin
there has never been a get rich scheme
the entire world is in on and everyone
makes out profitable and how is the
hedge versus inflation never valid when
it's lost 60 percent of its value during
these times
again you got to take a four year or
longer time horizon bitcoin is
outperforming everything in two four six
eight and ten years
so it's that simple
what you want to do is get rich slowly
not get rich quick
and that means that the time tested
technique for investment is you is you
buy high quality scarce desirable
property and you hold it forever
and you just got to figure out what is
scarce and desirable and high quality
going to throw in a lighter-hearted
question here um has michael ever
considered become a professor at his
alma mater mit for a full semester to
teach engineering or possibly a bitcoin
course thank you
you know um i uh i did a a little mini
course the sailor series with robert
breedlove which was like 20 hours or 20
22 hours of lectures
it's been seen by 250 000 people
so if you did the calculation
right it's like if i taught a thousand
students every year for 250 years
i did another four hour thing with uh
you know with lex friedman and and a
four-hour discussion in my
library in my house in miami
it's been seen by 3.9 million people
and i calculated that that's like more
communication than every meeting i had
in my entire life
so that so the the short answer is i
think i'll go on the podcast circuit i
do i do like teaching and i'm and i'm
very open to looking at you know more
academic things but i think the way to
do it in the 21st century
is with scalable
podcast mediums and streaming video and
and not the the 20th century way is
going to a classroom with a hundred
students at a time
think about you know 100 students at a
time
you know teach teach
two semesters and get to 200 students a
year and teach for 40 years
or 20 years and get to 4 000 students
and
you get to 4 000 people on your show
right in the first few minutes after you
upload it don't you
absolutely so we're all educators we
just got to educate
look danielle i don't hate on the gold
people i wish i wouldn't hate on me it's
not i don't get the idea the point i'm
trying to make is
you want to you want to give music to a
billion people give them free digital
music and if you want to give money to a
billion people give them digital money
and if you want to give education to a
billion people give them digital
education and i love the
the steinway piano and i love a bar of a
gold watch you know
and i love mit in the classroom
but you got to go forward you can't go
back if you want to make the world a
better place
all right
well on that point you know surprise
surprise in a turn of events frank just
also sent in a question
heard you were coming on the show he was
your opponent in the great historic
debate
um
do you concede michael that it perhaps
it was a bit irresponsible to advise
investors to sell everything mortgage
their homes and put it all in bitcoin
no first of all that's a trollish
comment if anybody looks at what i've
said consistently since september of
2020
what i've said is is
bitcoin is scarce desirable property and
i intend to hold it forever for the rest
of my life i'm not a speculator
and what i've also said is if you're in
a collapsing currency environment you
should have negative working capital
you're better off to have debt
than to have equity
and what's happened in the past two
years is
currencies have collapsed
you were better to have debt than equity
what i told people that i like mortgages
the mortgage rate was 2.7 percent
mortgage rates nearly doubled and if you
and if you had a chance to take a
mortgage at 2.8 percent and you waited
till the mortgage rates went to 5.2
percent
the cost of your home just went up by 80
percent so so paying off your home with
cash is probably not a good idea when
mortgage rates are cheap
holding cash that's losing 20 percent of
its value is not a good idea
that the blue dollar rate is 300 pesos
to the dollar i keep pointing this out
so
so i think what people uh
some people just want to find something
skeptical or critical to say but
but telling people that they ought to
buy
desirable things and take cheap money to
do it and hold it forever is simply the
way that you preserve generational
wealth and it's worked that way for a
long long time it still works that way
so yeah i don't apologize for saying i
like cheap mortgages and i don't
apologize for saying people should buy
bitcoin
everybody can decide how much bitcoin
they want to buy versus how much land
versus how much art versus how much
whatever else they want to own
the other thing that that frank doesn't
acknowledge again is two years ago
bitcoin was ten thousand dollars a coin
and since i started gold is down fifteen
percent and bitcoin is up a hundred
percent
so for everyone that has the time
horizon more than two years your choice
is lose 15 of your money or double your
money
and if you have a time horizon of less
than two years you can't reasonably
think of yourself as an investor you're
just a trader or a speculator
i mean i guess depends the the your
points we're working with i mean i
always say you can always adjust it to
make your case but
i'm still going to get you in front if
you if you always adjust it to be less
than two years or less than a year
then you're always a speculator right if
you're an investor you're taking a
four-year time horizon or a 10-year time
horizon or a 30-year time horizon
so it's much more
you know any advice you're giving to
someone for for two months is just
trading advice and i don't give anybody
you know since 1998 the gold market has
lapped the snp
so you know
everyone can make
make their case depending on the you
know the time horizon you're you're
looking at but
let's step outside of golden bitcoin for
a second
okay let's get out of this bubble for a
second because i just want to get your
general thoughts kathy wood coming out
saying we're you know we're definitely
in a recession i want to get michael
saylor's thoughts on the us economy how
you see things are we in a recession
we've been in a recession since march of
2020.
if you've if you calculated or if you
estimated the economy based upon real
output and then you adjusted it for the
strength of the currency
if the currency loses 20 of its
purchasing power and the economy is flat
then you contracted the economy by 20
percent so the currency's lost 40
percent of its purchasing power in the
past two years if the economy grew five
percent you're down 35 percent so yeah
we're in a recession but you know i'm
not a macro economist and i don't quit i
don't really care to engage in the
debate about what is the definition of a
recession or not
right it's about my pay grade
um just curious to get your thoughts on
on the us dollar the strength of the us
dollar is it just you know
the bell at the ball the strongest horse
in the race
um how do you see it is it going to keep
marching higher or
or not the dollar is the strongest
medium exchange in the world and so it
is strengthening against other
currencies but the currencies are the
are the weakest store of value the
foreign currencies are a weak store of
asset value assets so so foreign
currencies are collapsing like south
american currencies african currencies
sri lankan currency
you know
middle eastern you know well turkish
currency lebanese currency
russia and ukrainian currencies russia i
guess doing better because they're tied
to commodities but
i think that uh
that you've got a basket of strong
currencies to be pegged to the dollar
and they're losing 15
of their value or more a year
against scarce assets and then you've
got weak currencies that are losing 15
percent of their value
against the dollar right
if we look uh you know
south uh the south of african krugerrand
the korean wand the great british pound
the euro they're all down 11 to 13
percent
polish is down 16 the yen's down 18
over the course of about a year so
they're collapsing against the dollar
and then the developing markets are
collapsing 40 against the dollar
so do i think it'll happen continue yeah
i actually think that in a digital world
the 8 billion people want to hold a
dollar they don't want to hold a local
currency
so if i could swap
like name a currency in south america
you want to hold other than the dollar
there isn't one
so so the only thing that keeps people
from swapping all their local currencies
for dollars is
whether they trust tether
or whether whether they can get access
to tether or circle right
right because ust wasn't a trustworthy
dollar right
and maybe you can't get access but i
think that
there's no doubt if you're looking at
your bank freezing your assets and
devaluing your assets in local currency
you know you want to hold the us dollars
your medium exchange and
you want a simple world or a simple way
to see the world
if you need your money in less than four
years you probably want to keep it in
the dollar and if you need your money in
more than four years if you want to hold
it between four and forty years
you put it in property and the best
property in the world is bitcoin and the
best currency in the world is the dollar
and there are weaker properties
like an airbnb
or or building or stock and they're
weaker for because of that counterparty
risk and they've got tax risk and
execution risk and competitive risk
but and maybe they're not so portable
you can't really move a ranch out of
zimbabwe to san francisco when you have
to flee the country
so what can you move out of africa to
san francisco when you want to flee the
country right bitcoin you can move
and the rest unclear
so uh so i think that uh the general
macroeconomic trend
what what can you say you can say the
economy doesn't work so well
right the economy doesn't work so well
it stopped working well in february of
2020 and it's
i think lynn alden tweeted a chart of uh
japanese tourist arrivals where the
entire japanese tourist industry went to
zero
in march of 2020 and is still at zero so
it's pretty obvious some things just
don't work
the economy is not going to work well
the money supply is increasing
the inflation reduction bill is what is
it six or eight hundred billion dollars
worth spending
everybody's going to keep spending more
money
uh uh some currencies are going to
collapse completely the government's
going to collapse with them that'll
happen in the developing world that will
result in capital controls
we see that we saw what happened in sri
lanka you see in nigeria and a lot of
places now it's uh it's illegal to
accept dollars for payment
so you're going to have capital controls
you're going to have export controls
you're going to have import controls
you're going to have wage and price
controls
that will impair the economic machine
from functioning more
as that happens you know governments
will print more money as they print more
money the value of the currency will
fall against scarce desirable assets
you can't print more energy
and so that's why you can't print more
food
so certain things will have tangible
value
the best idea the best idea in a world
where where it's very difficult to move
cross-borders and it's very difficult to
manufacture things
and it's very difficult to buy and sell
things the best idea is digital energy
you see
because once you once you convert energy
to a block of encrypted energy and
that's what bitcoin is you can hold it
forever with no maintenance cost
and you can transport it anywhere in the
world
for no transaction fee
everything else is more expensive the
average person can't hold 100 barrels of
oil for the decade
you know you can't wear house oil you
can't warehouse soybeans
and if you operate a business
you might wake up and find out that your
business is not allowed to export or
import or manufacture
or something and so
so um
all those other parts of the economy
they struggle with these headwinds and
you take them into account if you're an
investor
on that note uh michael i want to thank
you uh it's been a beautiful reunion i
appreciate you joining me here today and
answering all my questions
thanks for having me on the show
danielle look forward to speaking with
you soon
me too and thank you for watching i hope
you enjoyed my interview with michael
saylor and be sure to sign up at
daniellacombona.com so you can stay on
top of all these incredible
conversations
that's it for me
thanks for watching
[Applause]
[Music]
opinions expressed on this program are
solely those of the contributor and do
not necessarily reflect the opinions of
stansberry research its parent company
or affiliates