Bitcoin Treasury Companies: The New Class in Finance with Michael Saylor, Brian Dixon, and Mark Moss
Tim Kotzman · 2025-10-05 · 30m · View on YouTube →
gentlemen.
So, we'll try to keep this tight and
maybe leave time for a few questions at
the end before they turn off the lights,
kick us all off. Uh, when somebody asks
you, "What's a treasury company?"
Well,
a treasury company is a is a corporation
that's capitalized on digital capital
that issues securities against the
underlying digital capital. Why is it a
new? It is a new class of finance
company, a new type of company. There's
insurance companies, there's banks,
there, you know, fund companies, there's
finance companies, there are REIT, real
estate development companies. There's
plenty of types of companies and there's
operating companies. Why is a treasury
company new and different? It's because
the Investment Company Act of 1940
prohibited publicly traded companies
from capitalizing or leveraging on
securities portfolios. That's why
there's never been a MAG7 treasury
company. There's never been an S&P
treasury company. You can leverage and
you can you can 100%. This is why Warren
Buffett has to sell Apple stock. This is
why the Bergkshire Hathway portfolio of
securities stays below 40% of its liquid
assets. That's why he has so much uh
treasury bills. The investment company
act created a carve out for sovereign
debt of the United States government.
And so even though those are technically
securities, they're deemed to be not
securities or commodities for the
purposes of the SEC 40 act. That being
the case, for for any of these
strategies to work, you have to go to
100% or more leverage. If you're only
holding 10% of something, it's not
enough exposure to make it a type of
company. So, the treasury company was
born with uh with the arrival of digital
commodities and specifically Bitcoin,
the digital scarcity. Um, you could
lever a public company on gold, but gold
is not exciting enough. 99% of investors
don't think gold is a good long-term
asset. it it kind of tries to keep up
with the S&P, but as a practical matter
to to break through a new thing, it
needs to be an order of magnitude
better. And so, because Bitcoin has been
able to outperform the S&P by 3 or 4x,
it's enough better that you could
justify taking the risk on a brand new
revolutionary thing. So what you see is
now the rise of 180 public companies
capitalized on Bitcoin. You also see an
explosion of digital asset treasury
companies based on Ethereum and Salana.
Why? Because they're de facto being
deemed commodities by the current
administration. So they have de facto
commodity status. Uh if anything if any
other token were deemed a security, you
couldn't pursue this strategy. That
means all told you got about 250
companies that are digital asset
treasuries and um you know and you would
say well can I do it with gold? Not
really. Gold's too slow, too boring.
Real estate, you've got REITs, but real
estate underperforms the S&P. Soybeans,
oil, people tried all sorts of things.
But at the end of the day, if you've got
a digital commodity which outperforms
the S&P, you have enough performance to
create a treasury company.
Now, the issue is how will the industry
develop?
And we're in year one of this thing
being birthed. And of course, 90% of the
investors don't even believe it's a
category. They don't even recognize it.
1% are enthusiastic about it. two or 3%
are stumbling around. And with that as a
preamble, I guess Mark, what are your
thoughts? What do you think's going to
happen in this in this industry? And
what are your opinions of treasury
companies in general?
>> Well, I'm generally favorable of them,
but as far as what I think is going to
happen, I mean, we're trying to think
into the future. And I think, you know,
unless you're Michael Sailor and you've
studied the history of technology as
well as read the fantasy books, it's
hard for most of us to see the future.
But when we have a new asset like
Bitcoin that's the digitization of
capital and it moves at the speed of
capital, we have a new set of building
blocks to build new things. And so we
can kind of think about the financial
system as we have today and then how
this transforms it. And so we can kind
of think about maybe what doesn't
survive in the financial system and
maybe what moves forward in the
financial system. And so if you think
about the $700 trillion sitting in the
financial system that's earning
somewhere between 0 to 8% right now
today. Well, we can take this
digitization of capital and then we can
slice it up as sailor showed us with
different types of preferred and
different types of instruments that can
provide something as he said typically
treasuries has sat in that spot. We have
250 million people in the developed
world right now retirees depending on
some source of income again 700 trillion
of capital sitting on that income and it
needs
better income better yield something
safer than bonds. And so this new asset,
this new digital asset that moves
faster, that gives us this better KGAR,
that gives us that room to then leverage
into the S&P 500 and leverage into the
um debt and credit markets, it allows us
to do these things. So I think some of
the types of new financial institutions
that we see kind of getting built on top
of this are sort of interesting. Like
obviously we're still going to have
creators creating more than they consume
and there's going to need to be savings.
So, there's going to be financial
institutions that will handle security,
that will handle um custody and things
like that. I think we'll always have a
need for credit. So, we'll have
financial institutions that are still
providing credit. Um people are still
going to need to buy houses. They're
still going to buy cars. We're still
entrepreneurs that need capital for
businesses as well as scaling
businesses.
It'll be, as Mises would call it,
commodity credit versus circulating
credit. We'll be issuing credit off of
savings. It's not just conjuring out of
thin air. Um, I think insurance is going
to be a very interesting um, financial
model into the future, specifically with
Bitcoin.
Warren Buffett showed us the power of
having a float with insurance companies.
So, imagine if you're good at adjusting
risk, if you're good at writing risk,
you get the power of the float, put that
into a Bitcoin standard. U, I think
that's pretty pretty powerful. I think
obviously I think about liquidity. So,
Bitcoin is of course peer-to-peer
electronic cash. And so like I could
peer-to-peer electronic cash with any of
you here and that's great. But if you're
Walmart with 10,000 stores globally
doing $680 billion, peer-to-peer
electronic cash isn't really working. So
you're still going to need payment
providers. You're still going to need to
pay hundreds of thousand employees. You
need payroll companies. So a lot of
financial solutions in that space. And
then ultimately the last category I
still see I think a lot of improvement I
think where these treasury companies
move into this financial future is is
securities. So, we're still going to
need companies will still need to raise
money, still need to bundle the money,
we'll still need price discovery in the
markets and things like that. But the
difference is that we've had, you know,
this equity security market for 430
years built on fiat. And I think it all
just transitions over to Bitcoin moves
faster. It's stronger, more transparent.
And so really what happens is the Wall
Street, the financial institutions are
still there, but the Wall Street
scaffolding that we have today is mostly
collapsed. Things move faster, more
transparent, and on a Bitcoin standard.
>> Brian, what do you think? Yeah, from my
perspective, uh, one of the things I
find very interesting is 13 years ago
when I got involved in Bitcoin, there
was a concept that I discovered that
really inverted my thinking around the
opportunity for investing and changed my
mind around it. Historically, you have
the protocol layer and the application
layer. And the protocol layer would be
things like IP, internet protocol, or
HTTP or SMT for simple mail transfer
protocol. And you could never buy a
chunk of that to monetize off its growth
and adoption and value over time. You
had to invest at the application layer
which was businesses like AOL and Yahoo
and Google that had these different
providers and you monetized off that. So
all the value accretion occurred at the
application layer because we didn't have
the chance to buy in at the protocol
layer. Then when blockchain and Bitcoin
was developed that investing scheme got
inverted, right? We can now buy a chunk
of that protocol and we can own it and
hold it. And if you look at the return
profile over time versus owning the
protocol layer compared to owning the
applications built on top, the protocol
layer has significantly outperformed the
applications. Now with Bitcoin treasury
companies, what we're seeing is a
merging of both of those things
together. We're getting exposure to own
the protocol layer with the bridge that
is the treasury company itself. And I
think that's a phenomenally interesting
idea for where the future's going to go
for these financial institutions and the
outperformance opportunities with that.
I don't think we've even seen the
beginning of where that can go. And if
we think about it from a systems
perspective, when you have an old
failing system, i.e. our traditional
fiat banking system that exists today,
these systems are not going to just
naturally adopt Bitcoin because it's
going to disrupt their own business
models. So what happens? You have to
build the brand new system on your own.
So it disrupts those models and then
they are forced to adopt it over time.
And that's what we're seeing with
Bitcoin treasury companies. And I think
as we think from a future-f facing
perspective and I agree with everything
that you noted about the different types
of products that can come into it, but
what about the markets that don't even
exist yet and how Bitcoin treasury
companies can engage with them. So let's
walk through an example. Think of
artificial intelligence virtual agents,
right? Every time we question Grock or
Perplexity or Chad GPT, there is an
electric electricity and computational
expense that's required to query that
for it to process the data and
information that comes back to us.
Right? Eventually, we will have a
virtual economy of trillions and
trillions of artificial intelligent bots
doing things that we aren't even aware
that they're doing, right? And there's
going to be a computational and
electricity expense with those bots
doing that labor. Well, they can't set
up a Bank of America account. What can
they accept? They can accept something
like Bitcoin. So what if maybe the
future of Bitcoin treasury companies,
one of the products and services they
provide is to serve the ever growing
adoption of the artificial intelligent
market by providing financial services
and products in an internet native way.
So I think that's an interesting thing
to think about in future and the years
to come.
>> I I think it's interesting to think bit
Bitcoin is the protocol and when I look
at it, I think that's my risk. If you're
a Bitcoin maximalist, that's your
risk-free rate. And so I think it's like
29% a year for the next 20 years. That's
the if you want to buy the protocol. And
uh if I want to invest in anything else,
it's got to outperform that by a large
margin. It's got to, you know, it's got
to be like 40% a year or 50% a year. And
so the Bitcoin treasury companies create
things. Uh security is an application on
the protocol. IBIT is an application on
the protocol. MSTR, STRC,
their billion dollar, 10 billion,
hundred billion dollar application of
the protocol, you know, they move.
People kept waiting for it. Well, how do
we get a circular economy? And how do we
get people to spend Bitcoin? Well,
three, four, five billion dollars a day
trades in six hours in the layer three,
you know, application like on MSTR or 4
billion or 324 billion in IBIT trade
every, you know, 6 hours. So, so those
protocol the protocol is being fed by
the applications and and u I think
that'll continue and people are going to
invent them at a ferocious rate. I think
since this is the last uh the session of
the day, I'd like to throw open the
floor to questions for all of you. So
maybe you guys can go around and anybody
that's got a question uh for any of us
about Bitcoin Treasury companies or or
approaches or what they think will
happen, feel free to throw it out
because I think we can make this
interactive.
I I think for for sure
there yeah there's the question of which
will be the first bank that plugs in
Bitcoin, what'll be the first insurance
company, the first reinsurance company,
what happens when you plug this into a
company like an Apple or a Microsoft or
a tech company. You know what happens
when a government prints its own
currency to buy Bitcoin? You know, all
of these company what happens when a
city does it or a state does it? We're
st the way you know you're early is you
haven't had a city sell a bond to buy
Bitcoin. You haven't had a state finance
with Bitcoin. You haven't had a country
do it yet. You've had a few companies
and people you know we have we have yet
to get a positive article in the Wall
Street Journal after 5 years.
Like I I'm going to declare success when
we get one article that's positive. like
Bloomberg said some positive things, but
we're still very early and the next 10
years will be again, it's like the gold
rush, but but imagine the prochemical
industry in 1870
and you know, and you're looking at
plexiglass today and nylon and polyester
and the like and lycra and what were
they thinking in 1870, right? Who's got
the first question? Go ahead.
>> I've got the first question here. So,
uh, Michael, this might be a tad
premature and self- serving in some
sense, but if you are president in 28,
I'm lobbying for, uh, OM director. And I
had seen David Foley here. I put a bug
in Larry Leard's ear as well that, uh,
you know, the broader implications. And
I joke but you know for those of us who
you know number go up is nice but uh you
know we got here through uh you know
kind of being pissed off at the uh you
know the current system and the GFC and
everything we've seen. So you know maybe
we did come here for number go up but
you know we're here for the revolution
now. So it was uh
>> more just nice to you know be here and
be hanging with our people uh this
today. So I guess there wasn't even a
question there.
>> Thanks. Thank you. That was a easy one.
>> Thanks.
>> Yeah, some of the recurring themes today
have been kind of staying in your lane,
keeping it simple and transparent for
your investors, but also maintaining
that leverage. Um, in the example you
used, Michael, was standard oil was
producing oil and had a runway before
the car was invented, and that really
spurred that next use case for the for
the oil products. In your mind, what is
that next use case going to look like
that that transforms the the marketplace
as we know it? Yeah, I I think the
initial use case is digital equity,
right? Equity, you know, levered equity
on Bitcoin itself and people are getting
that and Metapinet just sold $1.4
billion of it last week. So that's kind
of proof that there's a market there.
The next use case is is credit. And you
know, we saw convertible bond credit
that you know, we became the largest
convertible bond issuer in the world.
And uh I would I would say after my last
20 deals or 20 credit deals, if if I was
giving advice to a Bitcoin treasury
company, I would say you ought to sell
an equity, which is amplified Bitcoin,
try to get to 2x Bitcoin, and you ought
to sell a simple credit instrument like
a preferred that's a treasury preferred
stock, variable yield on top of a
currency. pay 400 basis points more than
the Swiss Frank risk-free rate or pay
400 basis points more than the risk-free
rate in Europe or 400 basis points more
than the JPY yen rate or 400 basis
points more than sulfur. Go do that.
strip the volatility, strip the
duration, you know, strip the delta out
of the instrument and just, you know, if
there's anything that equates to
gasoline or sorry, uh, kerosene, like
pure highly refined crude oil, the
equivalent of kerosene in our industry,
I think, is pure credit spread, no risk,
right? Just 500 basis points, no vault,
no risk. It's like when I asked
everybody, who's got a bank account?
Everybody, what do you do? Do you want
your bank account to pay you 500, pay
you 10% interest? Everybody. So, a
perfect, you know, it's not the only
model. There's a thousand models. And
so, I don't want you to think this is
the only one or but but like I would
literally say to someone like a
MetaPlanet, sell Metaplanet is 2, three,
4x Bitcoin. Sell Meta Yield is 6% in
yen. That can become a trillion dollar
company. and you don't need any other
idea because you're just fixing the
entire money market in in that currency
frame of reference. So, so I think if
you want to be very simple, it's just
extract the pure yield, throw away the
credit risk and the volatility if you
can pull it off. And that's the last
thing I did after 5 years of doing other
stuff. So, I'm just kind of saying you
can skip my like the negative of
starting now is oh, you're you're later
than us. The positive starting now is
you get to skip my first year, four
years of mistakes and I just gave you
the answer. If I could fast forward and
do again, I'd be like I'd skip
everything. I would sell stretch. I
would keep the equity and I would focus
upon selling that treasury preferred
stock to every insurance company, every
credit investor, every retail investor,
plug it into every bank. Now, now again,
I I can't tell you I'm sure it works
forever in 10 years. If it did work and
we're back here, then I could say it
works. Right now, this is my opinion.
Next. Yeah.
>> Hi there. First of all, a massive thank
you to everyone in the room for such a
great vibe and for such enriching
conversations. The question I have for
the panel is as I've been trying to
orange peel people and the family office
I'm responsible for. I think one
question that I find very hard to answer
is stretch strike. They're all great but
in terms of payment of dividends, what
about operating cash flows? How
sustainable is it? Will the Bitcoin will
need to be sold at some point? So, how
would you advise me to address that
question bang on so that it's a
no-brainer?
>> Yeah, I think the answer is the treasury
company is sitting on a mountain of hard
assets. In a rational market, it'll just
sell the equity to pay the dividend. in
an irrational market where the equity
decouples from the Bitcoin fundamentals,
you're going to sell the Bitcoin
volatility or you're going to you're
going to engage in derivatives trading
in order to extract the yield directly
from the Bitcoin. If necessary, you're
going to you're probably going to sell a
future, right? you're going to sell a uh
an out-ofthe- money call option against
the Bitcoin or you're going to enter
into a basis trade and and in the worst
case, you're just going to sell the
underlying Bitcoin itself because as
long as Bitcoin is growing at a multiple
of the underlying dividend, you always
have that as a final option. By the way,
the reason that you don't immediately go
there is the most taxefficient thing you
can do is sell the equity. When you sell
the equity, there's no tax.
you can generate, we could generate
billions of dollars by selling
derivatives on the Bitcoin. We generate
a taxable event and so we don't do it
because it's just not as efficient. It
and it doesn't expand the capital
structure of the company. But if
somebody says, well, how are they going
to pay the dividend? The answer is
you're going to sell the equity. Well,
if you can't sell the equity, then the
answer is we're going to sell
derivatives on the underlying Bitcoin
itself. And that market has got there
there's $60 billion dollars of liquidity
in Bitcoin. So if you can't sell the
Bitcoin derivatives, which is a very
healthy market, you're going to sell the
Bitcoin into the into the market. Oh, go
ahead, Mark.
>> I was if I could just add on to that for
a second. I would also just sort of
challenge you here sailor talking
earlier just now about 10 years. I'll be
back in 10 years. I'll tell you if it
worked. Earlier today, he was talking
about I I can't tell you about 15 25
years. I'll tell you about 10 years. So
right now we have this massive
disruption with AI and all the business
models as we see them today are being
disrupted and so the traditional model
is we'll pay you back with future cash
flows. Okay, what future cash flows in
10 years you're still going to have
future cash flows versus sitting on the
assets. So right most people are paying
you back on a future a promise a future
that I'll have those cash flows with no
guarantee because you have no assets
versus actually having the asset base
today. He's given you lots of other ways
he can pay the dividend. worst case
scenario, we don't come to that, but
worst case scenario, you have the asset.
And so, I think it's a different way
that it's being done today because we
have this new asset, right? Uh,
financial capital. Um, but that's how I
would sort of address that.
>> One thing I was going to layer on too,
cuz I I meet with family offices all the
time. And one of the things that helps I
think them understand when you're
advising them is not only are you
walking through the mechanics of what
Michael and Mark just laid out from like
a cash flow perspective, a dividend
perspective, but you also have to get
them to understand the value of network
effects, right? And so when you look at
things like metaf's law where you take
the number of users in the network and
you square it, you multiply it by the
transactional value flowing through the
network and you extrapolate that over
time, you're seeing that you're going to
have this asset that you're going to
hold on to as the adoption rate
continues to grow that is going to
astronomically outperform basically
anything else that we're seeing in the
world right now. And so when you really
help people wrap their head around from
a family office perspective, not only is
it a sustainable business from what
they're doing in the public markets, but
the very base foundation of their
business, which is the acquisition and
reutilization of Bitcoin and how that
gets adopted and the network grows over
time with an exponential growth curve,
that's just going to impact the stock as
well. And so I think that helps them
kind of wrap their head around it. Not
only is this this cash flowing business
doing XYZ with these different products
that are Bitcoin denominated, it's
moving that network adoption along its
path as well. Mark, Brian, pretend he's
not sitting next to you. What's
something that you think Michael Sailor
and strategy should do or you would like
to see them do? Pretend he's not there.
[Music]
I I here's my opinion. I think that over
time, when you look at things, I think
that
we're basically creating a Bitcoin
denominated financial institutions for
the future, right? This is going to
become, in my opinion, the new type of
central banking system, right? you're
going to have a massive one in each
jurisdiction. They're going to be the
largest and you'll have smaller
derivative branches that'll expand over
time. So, I think the natural
progression if that thesis ultimately
plays out is what does a bank offer
today? If we're going to create a global
monetary system that's Bitcoin
denominated, you have to be able to
issue the exact same kinds of products
largely that we see today in the markets
for consumers and institutional
investors to use that um we use with
traditional finance. So, we're going to
see lending and mortgages and things of
that nature over time, but you have to
have enough Bitcoin in stockpile to be
able to do that to make that effective.
And I think that's step one. That's what
we're going through right now. And we're
seeing over the last couple years is the
aggregation of the Bitcoin holding it.
And the innovations and financial
products that actually merge with the
traditional financial products in the
existing banking ecosystem is what's
going to evolve.
And I'll answer that question, but I'm
going to flip it upside down. And it's
rather than be critical and tell him
what he should do better. I I'm going to
emphasize a couple points I think
everybody should take note of. And so
one I would say you hear him over and
over and over being laser focused,
single-minded focused. And the problem
that everybody has is doing too many
things. Uh in a private conversation uh
in Prague, you told Alexander, you'll
probably reach a billion, a hundred
billion, a trillion, but you probably
won't because you'll probably try to be
a conglomerate and you'll take your eye
off the ball. And so this this
single-minded focus and most of us try
to do too many things. And so I think
about that. Uh I would also say while
certainly we haven't seen mainstream
media be very favorable, there's also a
massive misunderstanding.
But to his point, not only has he gone
out and shown the model, he's out there
constantly trying to educate the world,
teach changing the name of the company,
teaching the strategy to everybody for
us to follow, cooperation,
collaboration, but also education as
well. And so I would say rather than
trying to tell what he should do
different, I think we should all take
note of those things. And so whether you
know you have a background in insurance
like Jeff, you know, and maybe insurance
is your thing, but for each of us to
follow what that thing is that we have,
be single-minded, focus, educate,
collaborate along the way.
>> Michael, you got two minutes. Close it.
Michael,
>> the question is, what would you do
better? No, I'm joking.
>> I think I've talked enough. Next
question.
>> Hi. Thank you, Michael, and everyone
here today. What an incredible day of
knowledge and wisdom and passion as
well. Um I'm a part of the team that is
re recently launching 21
milliontories.com
and uh we're launching Hollywood level
TV film production for the Bitcoin
treasury space in particular. And I
wanted to ask when you envision the year
the the world that you imagine 10 years
from now what kind of TV film content
education or entertainment do you
imagine needs to be out in the world?
It'll be digital. It'll be interactive.
It'll probably be AI driven. And it'll
be personalized.
You know, at some point, I think like I
think that all of our education
institutions go away and you get like an
AI professor that teaches you whatever
you want that's better than every
professor that ever lived. In fact, this
combination of every professor that ever
lived. And I think you're, you know, at
some point the movie becomes a walkth
through world. And at some point uh you
know all your entertainment becomes
personalized and and we can see it
happening right now but I think a decade
from now we'll be blurring the
distinction between personalized
entertainment and personalized education
which is a good thing.
>> Thank you Michael. Thank you everyone.
We will see you in January and we will
see you at PubKy in about an hour. Thank
you for coming.
>> Thank you. Bitcoin custody is evolving
and on-ramp leads this change with
multi-institution custody, eliminating
single points of failure.
Instead of one institution or complex
private keys, On-Ramp secures your
Bitcoin in a segregated cold storage
multi-IG vault backed by three
independent institutional-grade
custodians.
No single custodian can move funds by
themselves, providing an unprecedented
level of security that traditional
custody solutions simply can't match.
Protected by a 100 million Lloyds of
London insurance policy, all
transactions are fully auditable
onchain, never rehypothecated, and
executed only at your explicit
direction. This means complete
transparency and control over your
assets at all times.
Beyond custody, OnRamp delivers
comprehensive Bitcoin financial
services, including lending, trading,
inheritance planning, IRA, and more.
On-ramp functions as your private
banking partner, coordinating keyholder
activity, removing technical burdens,
and providing a personalized trust
minimized experience tailored to your
specific wealth preservation goals.
Whether you're new to Bitcoin or an
experienced holder, Onramp's approach
helps secure generational wealth with
unmatched security and peace of mind.
Visit onrampbitcoin.com
today to learn more, sign up, or book a
free consultation with their team of
Bitcoin custody experts. Hey guys,
today's episode is brought to you by
Stamp Seed. If you're in cold storage,
you know how important it is to protect
your seed phrase. That's why I recommend
you head over to stampseed.com and check
it out for yourself. This seed phrase
storage device is one solid piece of
titanium. There are no loose pieces and
you can hammer your seedphrase in letter
by letter. When you go to stampseed.com,
use promo code tim for a 15% discount
across the website. That's Tim 15. Join
us at the win in Las Vegas February 23rd
through the 26th, 2026 for Bitcoin for
corporations. Use code KOTZ when you
grab your tickets at strategy.com and
we'll see you there. This episode is
brought to you by Arch Lending, the
premier provider of cryptobacked loans
designed for both individual and
institutional investors. At Arch, your
digital assets work for you without
selling them. Arch offers flexible loan
options tailored to your needs. Backed
by industry leaders like Morgan Creek
Digital, Castle Island Ventures, and
Galaxy Ventures, Arch Lending is setting
a new standard in cryptobacked lending.
Are you ready to unlock the potential of
your crypto assets? Visit
archlandending.com
to learn more and configure your loan
today. Are you looking for comprehensive
analytics on corporate Bitcoin adoption?
Strategy Tracker delivers real-time
insights into how companies are
executing their Bitcoin strategies
completely free. Monitor NAV premiums,
cost basis performance, and track how
corporate Bitcoin treasuries perform
against the market. Upgrade to Premium
for just $3.99 a month and unlock
exclusive benefits like detailed market
rankings, real-time trading volume
analysis, and advanced performance
metrics for corporations embracing
Bitcoin. Apply code KOTZ at checkout for
100% off your first month of premium.
Strategy Tracker is your essential tool
for measuring the effectiveness of
corporate Bitcoin strategies. Visit
strategytracker.com
and gain the analytical edge in
understanding the Bitcoin treasury
phenomenon.