It's Clear That Bitcoin is Winning, Gold is Losing
CNBC · 2021-11-19 · 9m · View on X →
I was joined as Michael Seller,
Microstrategy Chairman, and CEO.
We constantly talk about the regulatory overhang Michael,
and we've got some new data points on Wednesday,
you know, Republicans and Democrats have different views,
but all of it looks like there will be more scrutiny.
You continue, can I call you a stacker?
Microstrategy is a stacker.
You added what 9,000 coins in the...
Ginkestacker.
Ginkestacker.
You added 9,000 coins.
I think you're up to about $7 billion worth.
I don't know if I did the math on today's price,
but out of the entire market cap of $7.4 billion,
for a while, in the mid-60s,
everyone was up.
Everyone had made money.
That's not the case anymore.
Would you stack right now?
Would you wait for a further pullback?
How do you do it?
We're going to keep stacking forever, Joe.
Forever.
Yeah, the issue is crypto is going mainstream.
You know, we hit all-time highs last week,
and now there's volatility.
Inflation's gone mainstream.
And so what's causing the volatility?
The volatility is driven by exchange leverage,
the altcoins, some security tokens,
DeFi, wash trading, the novelty of crypto,
and the excessive growth, right?
And that doesn't surprise me.
I think people have been waiting for clarity
from regulators in over the past month.
We got a lot of clarity.
The report on stablecoin is telling the world
that they want stablecoins issued by FDIC-insured banks.
The Crenshaw report is telling the world
that DeFi, as we know, it will not continue.
The SPOT ETF denial report is telling the world
that the regulators want crypto exchanges
to meet national securities exchange rule and standards.
And the infrastructure bill is putting into question
staking and DeFi.
Now, there's one thing that's for certain, Joe.
The world wants two things.
The world wants a digital dollar, US dollar,
and they don't want a hundred billion of it.
They want 10 trillion of it or 20 trillion.
The Chinese want it, the Africans want it,
the Asians want it.
They want it from FDIC-insured bank or like.
And the world wants a digital asset
that's a store of value.
And Bitcoin is universally accepted
as that common property store of value.
So those two things are clear.
Everything else is marquee.
The market's trying to sort out what all this means.
We're getting a lot of data points,
I said that earlier, about inflation too.
And gold made a move, finally.
It made some people are surprised it hasn't made more of a move.
And I think you can go back.
I don't know, can you go back a decade, probably,
and we're a little changed.
Is it your view that Bitcoin has replaced or will replace,
or is in the process of replacing gold
as the store of value for most investors?
Is that...
There's a war.
Yeah, there's a war for non-sovereign,
bearer, instrument store of value.
And it's Bitcoin versus silver and gold.
And gold's 10 trillion, and Bitcoin is 1 trillion.
And it's pretty clear that Bitcoin is winning.
Gold is losing.
Of all the commodities in the world,
the only one that isn't suffering
from inflation the last 12 months is gold.
You want to eliminate inflation,
build everything with 24-karat gold
that won't go up to price.
Bitcoin's definitely winning that struggle.
And it's going to continue
because you can move a billion dollar block
of digital gold at the speed of light.
You can program it 60 times a second,
and the maintenance cost is much lower.
The custodial rates are much higher.
So it's pretty clear that digital gold
is going to replace gold this decade.
There are probably some troubling things
in the infrastructure bill about, you know,
how the tax treatment of Bitcoin,
but it doesn't happen right away.
Do you think between now and when it's supposed to happen
that it won't happen?
I mean, that's an overhang on the future of Bitcoin
for being more than just a store value,
for being much more utilitarian, isn't it?
You know, I'm not at all trouble
with any of the regulation going on right now.
The safe haven for institutions is to use Bitcoin
as a store of value.
Bitcoin's the only ethical, technical,
and legal safe haven in the entire crypto ecosystem, right?
It's more technically secure
because of the ASICs and the proof of work mining.
It's more politically secure
because of the support for the miners
by the politicians and every jurisdiction.
It's more ethically secure
because it is universally acknowledged as common property.
So if your use case is to buy a billion dollars
of Bitcoin and hold it forever in lieu of gold
or in lieu of property,
or in lieu of a stock portfolio,
that without all the risks of stocks and equities
and bonds and all the headaches of precious metals,
then Bitcoin meets that use case.
All of the sound and fury in Washington
is going to have an impact on security tokens,
DeFi exchanges, crypto exchanges,
all the other use cases of crypto that are not Bitcoin,
and that's where we'll see all of this settle,
and that's why there's volatility right now.
So if you were to try to look at the eventual adoption
of Bitcoin and divide whatever that is
by 21 million, what number do you think is realistic
in the future, and I don't know whether I get...
People should never try to do a target
and a time for when you hit the target
because you can't get both right, but...
What do you think it's worth a million dollars
of coin someday, Michael?
The big idea is every currency in the world
collapses into the US dollar stable coin,
and the US dollar is the universal medium of exchange
for the world.
And people seeking a long dated store of value asset,
a synthetic asset, they start to demonetize
that second investment property,
and they demonetize gold,
and they demonetize an equity index.
So what do I expect?
I expect that Bitcoin, if it doubles every year
at the end of the decade, it will flip gold,
and then it'll flip monetary indexes,
a little bit of bonds, a little bit of real estate,
a little bit of equity,
and it emerges as a hundred trillion dollar asset class.
So a hundred X where it is right now,
and when we get there, it'll be five to seven percent
of the worldwide economy.
The US dollar will probably replace 150 currencies.
Maybe there'll only be two or three left.
There might be the euro, the CNY, the dollar,
everything else is probably going to disappear.
And then Bitcoin will be the world's monetary index.
If you simply want to keep your money,
and you don't want to express a credit sentiment
or an equity sentiment or some property
or real estate sentiment.
What if a country decides either China,
I don't know how China's going to react
to that scenario or even the United States?
Is it unstoppable or getting to that point
you just described as it depend on what happens
with very powerful semiconductor governments?
I think Bitcoin is unstoppable as digital property.
I think what you're going to see is three classes of countries.
The communist countries that don't give you property rights
won't like North Korea or Cuba won't let you own anything.
They'll probably ban it.
The countries that have weak currencies
will have capital controls.
They will let you own it, but they don't want you
to exchange it or trade it.
It's not illegal to own Bitcoin and China.
They just don't want you moving billions of dollars
out of their economy.
You see a collapse of currencies like Argentina,
the pesos 200 to 1.
In Turkey, you see the the leerer is 11.
It used to be 1.5, 15 years ago.
The weak currencies will have capital controls
that let you own it as property.
Of course, in the Western nations
where they have strong currencies in the US dollar,
of course, it's going to be deemed property.
You'll pay capital gains tax on it when you sell it.
And otherwise, it's pretty clear across the CAS
and it's universally acknowledged as common digital property.
And it's the only crypto asset that has that standing.
That's what makes it the institutional safe haven asset
in this space.
Michael Seller, you obviously, you've put your money
exactly where you believe things are headed with Microsoft.
I appreciate you coming on.
I listen, I don't know what to think of all that.
But that is amazing.
It's what you just described.
Completely amazing to me.
No wonder.
Thanks for having me, Joe.
You're welcome.
We'll see you later.
Thanks.