SaylorCorpus

Michael Saylor & The Ultimate Bitcoin Strategy

Galaxy · 2025-12-18 · 1h 36m · View on YouTube →

0:00:01

We interviewed you last year around

0:00:01

around this time about a year ago.

0:00:03

[music] Bitcoin had just crossed 100K

0:00:05

for the first time. Today it's trading

0:00:06

at 87K. Why did Bitcoin underperform?

0:00:10

>> Most people will be followers, but

0:00:12

there's always going to be a leader.

0:00:13

This is a battle for the future of

0:00:15

money. In my opinion, we have the

0:00:17

world's greatest product. The number one

0:00:19

way to destroy or undermine your first

0:00:22

idea for the 30 trillion is to come up

0:00:24

with a second idea and get distracted.

0:00:27

You want to look at the history of

0:00:28

failure. It's alpha males [music] that

0:00:30

solved one thing and think that that's

0:00:33

solved and done and they come up with 10

0:00:36

more [music] things to solve. The most

0:00:37

important days of your life, the day

0:00:39

you're born and the day you figure out

0:00:41

>> Welcome to Galaxy Brains.

0:00:43

>> An infinite amount of cash cash. I'm

0:00:45

your host, Alex Thorn. The US banking

0:00:47

system is sound and resilient. Bitcoin

0:00:50

made a new alltime high.

0:00:52

>> If you're not long, if you're not long,

0:00:53

you're short. Satashi's going to come on

0:00:56

there, laugh his darkly, go quiet. All

0:00:58

Bitcoin is going to be erased.

0:01:00

>> Bitcoin. Bitcoin is the best crypto out

0:01:02

there.

0:01:03

>> Bitcoin is going to zero.

0:01:05

>> Welcome back to Galaxy Brains. I'm Alex

0:01:07

Thornne, head of firmwide research at

0:01:09

Galaxy. We have a great episode for you

0:01:11

this week. Phineas and I have just

0:01:13

returned from Miami to interview Michael

0:01:15

Sailor uh in his home. Wait till you see

0:01:18

this set where we recorded. Uh we were

0:01:21

sitting in the red room uh at his house

0:01:23

in Miami and it's really a fascinating

0:01:26

interview. I I was frankly blown away by

0:01:29

the evolution in Michael's thinking and

0:01:31

how far beyond the other treasury

0:01:34

companies strategy really is and how

0:01:36

deep he's thinking about strategy's role

0:01:39

in the future uh economy. It's not just

0:01:42

a company buying Bitcoin and putting on

0:01:44

its balance sheet. I know you're going

0:01:45

to enjoy this interview. Um, and I

0:01:47

thought he was characteristically

0:01:50

extremely articulate and I think we

0:01:52

talked about AI, we talked about Bitcoin

0:01:55

development. I think uh people who have

0:01:57

been following the core versus knots

0:01:58

debate in Bitcoin will find his answer

0:02:00

on this very interesting. Also, quantum

0:02:02

computing. Michael's a very uh classic

0:02:05

optimist about things working out in

0:02:07

Bitcoin's favor. Look, before we get

0:02:09

into that interview, I need to remind

0:02:10

you to please refer to the link to

0:02:11

disclaimer in the podcast notes. And

0:02:12

note that none of the information in

0:02:13

this podcast constitutes investment

0:02:14

advice or an offer, recommendation, or

0:02:16

solicitation by Galaxy or any of its

0:02:18

affiliates to buy or sell any

0:02:19

securities.

0:02:21

Welcome back to Galaxy Brains. As

0:02:23

always, I'm your host, Alex Thor, head

0:02:24

of firmwide research at Galaxy Bitcoin,

0:02:26

not zero. We have a great episode for

0:02:28

you this week. Michael Sailor, chairman

0:02:30

and founder of Strategy. Thank you so

0:02:32

much for coming back on Galaxy Brands,

0:02:33

Michael.

0:02:34

>> Yeah, thanks for having me. Well,

0:02:36

actually, thanks for having me and us in

0:02:38

your home in Miami. Um, it's been quite

0:02:41

a ride this year. New all-time highs

0:02:44

now. I mean, when we interviewed you

0:02:45

last year around around this time, about

0:02:47

a year ago, Bitcoin had just crossed

0:02:50

100K for the first time. Um, today it's

0:02:52

trading at 87K. Why why did Bitcoin

0:02:55

underperform this year?

0:02:58

uh you know it's it's the world's

0:03:00

greatest free market in capital and uh

0:03:05

85% of the Bitcoin you know

0:03:07

notwithstanding all of the corporations

0:03:09

that have been acquiring it that people

0:03:11

talk about you know Black Rockck and

0:03:12

Strategy get all the publicity but 85%

0:03:15

of the Bitcoin is held in crypto OG

0:03:18

hands we can't even identify them you

0:03:21

know and I talk to the traders they say

0:03:23

that you know the the derivatives market

0:03:26

the perpetual market drives this much

0:03:28

more than spot, which means the $1.7

0:03:31

trillion worth of of capital that can be

0:03:34

20x or 30x levered is held by people

0:03:37

that we don't know. And so I think that

0:03:40

uh that in the near term their moods and

0:03:43

their drivers drive this market and and

0:03:45

I guess that's the beauty of free market

0:03:48

capitalism. But uh I think that the more

0:03:51

important point is the last 12 months

0:03:53

have been probably the best 12 months in

0:03:55

the history of the industry uh in terms

0:03:58

of fundamentals and it's it's profound

0:04:00

what's happened since December.

0:04:02

>> What would you put at the top of the

0:04:03

list there? I mean I know we've had

0:04:05

changes in regulatory environment,

0:04:06

different types of institutional

0:04:07

adoption. What stands out to you the

0:04:09

most? Well,

0:04:10

>> let's tick off the highlights the last

0:04:12

12 months. You know, you have uh a

0:04:16

universally supportive administration, a

0:04:18

supportive head of the SEC, supportive

0:04:20

head of the CFTC, supportive head of the

0:04:22

Treasury, supportive president,

0:04:24

supportive vice president. You have

0:04:26

David Saxs, you know, go out p publicly

0:04:29

and say, you know, Bitcoin is a digital

0:04:32

commodity. It's digital gold. It's an

0:04:34

asset without an issuer. We recognize

0:04:37

it's it its special nature in the world,

0:04:41

you know, as a technology to propagate

0:04:44

property rights and freedom. That

0:04:46

happened in March of this year, right?

0:04:48

People forget how, you know, how uh how

0:04:52

that developed. We saw

0:04:55

we saw the spot bitcoin ETFs get

0:04:57

uncrippled. We uh we had Enkind creates

0:05:00

and redemptions. people can now swap

0:05:02

their Bitcoin for for uh IBIT type

0:05:06

shares and borrow against them and then

0:05:08

swap back. That was a big deal. We saw

0:05:11

the onshore derivatives market for IBIT

0:05:13

get uncrippled. It went from nothing to

0:05:16

10 billion and then when they actually

0:05:18

took the cuffs off it went to 50

0:05:20

billion. That's a big deal. Um we saw

0:05:24

guidance from the CFTC just last week.

0:05:27

You can now trade spot crypto assets

0:05:30

like Bitcoin on regulated commodities

0:05:33

exchanges in the US. You'll see them

0:05:35

start trading on the CME. We saw

0:05:37

guidance that you could start to use um

0:05:41

Bitcoin as collateral, right? Crypto

0:05:43

assets collateral against those

0:05:45

derivatives contracts and trading

0:05:47

contracts. That's a big deal.

0:05:49

We just saw guidance from the SEC that

0:05:51

it's possible for the DTC to uh to

0:05:54

tokenize their entire security

0:05:57

portfolio. We're talking all the

0:05:59

securities in the world moving on the

0:06:00

DTC. And the fact that that guidance

0:06:03

came from the SEC was a big deal. But

0:06:05

the fact that the CEO of the DTC got on

0:06:09

X and put out a video saying they're

0:06:12

enthusiastic about that was a big deal.

0:06:15

We saw favorable uh guidance come out of

0:06:19

uh the IRS and Treasury that made the

0:06:22

entire issue of unrealized capital gains

0:06:24

tax on crypto assets go away. That's a

0:06:27

big deal. We um we also saw um the

0:06:33

creation of the digital credit market.

0:06:34

my company, you know, started issuing

0:06:37

digital credit instruments and we did an

0:06:40

uh I guess it's like late January, early

0:06:44

February. Then we did a second, a third,

0:06:45

a fourth, and a fifth. We did five IPOs

0:06:48

of digital credit instruments and that

0:06:50

entire market went from nothing to 8

0:06:52

billion

0:06:54

in 10 months.

0:06:56

And we're and we're pioneering this

0:06:59

public digital credit market, but we

0:07:03

also saw now an avalanche of of

0:07:06

conventional banks. We saw the o we saw

0:07:09

guidance, positive guidance from the OC

0:07:11

and the FDIC probably every two months.

0:07:13

>> Yeah.

0:07:14

>> For the year like six salvos. And after

0:07:17

the sixth salvo, we started to see uh

0:07:21

the entire dam breaking and the banking

0:07:24

industry thaw. And now off the top of my

0:07:27

head, I think we've seen pro- digital

0:07:29

assets, pro pro- crypto, pro- Bitcoin

0:07:33

announcements from

0:07:35

City, Charles Schwab. Both have

0:07:37

announced they're going to custody and

0:07:38

extend credit on on Bitcoin in the

0:07:40

coming six months. We saw positive

0:07:44

announcements from JP Morgan. We saw

0:07:46

positive announcements from Bank of

0:07:48

America. We saw positive activity from

0:07:51

BNY Melon. We saw POS, you know, we saw

0:07:54

Standard Charter Bank and PNC Bank both

0:07:56

announce agreements with Coinbase,

0:08:00

>> you know, taking advantage of their

0:08:01

crypto as a service to custody and

0:08:03

handle and trade Bitcoin. We saw I think

0:08:07

we saw clear guidance from the OC that

0:08:11

it's okay for banks to handle, hold, and

0:08:13

trade and custody crypto assets on the

0:08:16

behalf of their customers.

0:08:18

Right? So 12 months ago, um, you could

0:08:23

barely get a loan against IBIT,

0:08:26

>> right?

0:08:26

>> And you couldn't get any credit against

0:08:30

At this point in time, I think I can

0:08:32

count off the top of my head, eight

0:08:33

different banks that are offering credit

0:08:36

against IBIT, normally in the range of

0:08:38

sofur plus 50 basis points to sulfur

0:08:41

plus 75 basis points.

0:08:44

And we can see probably four banks or

0:08:48

more that are starting to starting to

0:08:50

suggest they'll move on to start to

0:08:52

issue credit against the underlying BTC

0:08:55

in the coming year. So that really

0:08:59

represents the formation of the credit

0:09:01

networks on top of crypto assets. So

0:09:06

public credit, banking credit, right?

0:09:09

Those were big deals. We also saw uh we

0:09:12

saw the first credit rating uh S&P gave

0:09:15

us a credit rating this year and that's

0:09:18

for the first time ever

0:09:20

and uh you know I remember uh when we

0:09:24

announced we were buying Bitcoin for our

0:09:25

balance sheet our insurance company

0:09:27

dropped us. We couldn't get DNO

0:09:30

insurance.

0:09:30

>> Wow. and we couldn't get it for it was

0:09:32

like three or four years and they

0:09:34

finally

0:09:36

unwound that you know so I'm not

0:09:38

underwriting the DNO insurance for my

0:09:40

own company anymore so you know that's a

0:09:42

bit a bit of a win so insurance yeah I'm

0:09:46

not saying we have fullthroated

0:09:47

insurance acceptance we certainly don't

0:09:50

but what we see oh and I I left out you

0:09:53

know the other obvious thing which is we

0:09:55

got fair value accounting

0:09:57

>> right it was impossible to recognize a

0:09:59

gain in a digital

0:10:01

asset investment until the year 2025.

0:10:05

And I and I guess beyond that, I guess I

0:10:08

would be remiss not to not to note that

0:10:10

I guess 200 publicly traded companies

0:10:13

put crypto assets of some sort on their

0:10:15

balance sheet this year.

0:10:17

>> Yep.

0:10:18

>> And we we went to 200 companies that

0:10:21

have Bitcoin on their balance sheet. So,

0:10:24

and I guess last last point, my company

0:10:29

must I think we raised 23 or 24 billion.

0:10:33

>> Yeah.

0:10:33

>> This year.

0:10:34

>> I think you bought more Bitcoin this

0:10:36

year than any year.

0:10:37

>> Yeah. You know, and so I I think um if I

0:10:42

was looking at the industry

0:10:43

fundamentals,

0:10:45

right, and and you remember what we were

0:10:48

talking about a year ago, right? You

0:10:51

couldn't have you couldn't have

0:10:52

predicted any of these things.

0:10:54

>> If I had predicted all this, you know,

0:10:56

you would have said, "You're being too

0:10:57

optimistic." And I don't think I would

0:10:59

have been

0:11:01

>> I don't think I would have been

0:11:02

ambitious, you know, or aspirational

0:11:05

enough to predict everything that

0:11:06

happened. But I would say it's exceeded

0:11:10

my expectations at a fundamental level

0:11:12

across the board. We couldn't have a

0:11:14

more favorable setup for global adoption

0:11:19

and institutional adoption of digital

0:11:21

assets in general. And and by the way,

0:11:23

I've been very Bitcoin ccentric here of

0:11:25

course

0:11:25

>> and we went on talked about digital

0:11:27

securities. You had the head of the SEC

0:11:28

saying we expect that all securities

0:11:30

will be tokenized on chain. You know

0:11:34

that you know that crypto task force was

0:11:35

a big deal. The head of the crypto task

0:11:38

force taking over the CFTC is big deal.

0:11:41

>> Mike Celig. Yeah.

0:11:42

>> Right. Um, and I think um I think the

0:11:46

the embrace and the success of digital

0:11:49

currency, the stable coins is a big

0:11:52

deal.

0:11:52

>> Yep.

0:11:54

And uh I just got back from the Middle

0:11:56

East and I met with all the sovereigns

0:11:58

and the banking regulators and you know

0:12:01

and and all the digital assets

0:12:03

innovators and it couldn't be clearer to

0:12:06

me that you know as enthusiastic as we

0:12:09

are in the US about digital assets at

0:12:12

this point they're just as enthusiastic

0:12:14

if not more enthusiastic and so I think

0:12:18

uh I I think we end the year with just a

0:12:22

lot of things to be grateful for in this

0:12:24

industry.

0:12:25

>> With that setup, what will be that you

0:12:27

think I mean that's so many things that

0:12:29

if you'd seen one of those headlines two

0:12:31

three years ago would have you'd see

0:12:33

you'd see a 20% candle or something on

0:12:35

Bitcoin price like what what will to be

0:12:37

the catalyst then for next year with

0:12:39

such a good setup. Is it just a matter

0:12:40

of you know working through some of

0:12:42

those like like you were talking about

0:12:43

the free market some of those OG sellers

0:12:45

or you know markets take time to change

0:12:48

their tune. I mean what's going to take

0:12:50

us higher? You know, I think the drivers

0:12:52

would be my checklist would be you watch

0:12:54

the derivatives market and the way it

0:12:56

forms and that's the offshore

0:12:58

derivatives market, the crypto native

0:13:01

derivatives market like you know

0:13:02

perpetuals, you know, 20x perpetuals

0:13:06

that forming onshore, you know, that's a

0:13:08

big deal. Uh cross margin, you know,

0:13:12

Bitcoin is collateral against

0:13:14

derivatives in the United States on

0:13:17

regulated exchange will be a big deal.

0:13:19

So the formation of the commodities

0:13:22

markets and the derivatives market and

0:13:24

how how we integrate regulated markets

0:13:26

with offshore markets. I think that'll

0:13:28

be a driver. I think the second driver

0:13:31

will be the formation of the bank credit

0:13:35

networks.

0:13:36

You know we you know when when Bitcoin's

0:13:39

90,000 a coin and you're selling 450

0:13:42

coins a day into the market, that's like

0:13:45

$40 million of natural supply,

0:13:48

>> right? you know, and and you worked it

0:13:50

out and it's like what 16 15 16 billion

0:13:54

a year or something of supply available

0:13:57

from the miners. So 16 billion dollars

0:14:00

is a year of supply. Every time a bank

0:14:04

creates $16 billion of credit, that's

0:14:06

one year supply taken out of

0:14:08

circulation. So, we're now getting to

0:14:10

the point where banks like City and Bank

0:14:13

of America and JP Morgan and Wells Fargo

0:14:17

or Schwab, any of those can create that

0:14:20

entire $16 billion worth of credit in 12

0:14:23

months. So, you're you're watching the

0:14:26

formation of major credit networks and

0:14:30

um you're looking at a $2 trillion asset

0:14:33

class that's been unbanked. Mhm.

0:14:36

>> And so as you watch the formation of

0:14:39

banking credit, you know, and corporate

0:14:42

credit uh instruments on top of that

0:14:45

asset class, that's going to be a big

0:14:46

driver.

0:14:48

I think the the growth of digital

0:14:51

credit, public credit like ST STRC

0:14:53

stretch,

0:14:54

>> yep,

0:14:54

>> it's big driver because in theory,

0:14:58

you've got $300 trillion of credit. If

0:15:01

you look at the credit markets, you

0:15:03

know, bank credit pays you nothing.

0:15:06

Treasury credit or money markets, you

0:15:09

know, they're paying you 50 basis points

0:15:10

in Japan and 100 basis points in Europe

0:15:13

and nothing in Switzerland and 370 basis

0:15:17

points in the US and it's probably

0:15:19

headed south. Mhm.

0:15:20

>> corporate credit, junk credit, private

0:15:23

credit, mortgage back credit, municipal

0:15:26

credit. These things are all indexed to

0:15:30

the risk-free rates in all those

0:15:31

nations. So you look at the traditional

0:15:33

credit markets,

0:15:35

most people what they'd like is a bank

0:15:38

account that pays them 8%. With no

0:15:40

duration, no delta, no credit risk,

0:15:43

right? They don't that's what they'd

0:15:45

like.

0:15:46

What they're getting is a bank account

0:15:47

that pays them zero or a money market

0:15:50

that pays them 2%.

0:15:52

And then they're reaching for yield. And

0:15:54

they're reaching for a yield by

0:15:55

accepting credit risk from a junk bond

0:15:57

issuer. Or they're going to go buy a

0:15:59

20-year bond they don't want. Nobody

0:16:02

wants a 20-year bond or a 10-year bond.

0:16:04

What they want is just not to lose their

0:16:06

money, right?

0:16:08

>> So, the existing credit markets have a

0:16:11

lot of very awful choices for people.

0:16:13

Either you've got to wait 30 years to

0:16:16

get paid and take 30 years of inflation

0:16:18

risk or you've got to bet on some going

0:16:21

out of business junk bond

0:16:22

uncolateralized issuer.

0:16:24

>> Right? Or you've got to accept nothing

0:16:27

and be happy about it. Right? And so

0:16:30

digital credit is spreading through that

0:16:32

market. And the promise of digital

0:16:34

credit is you know first and foremost if

0:16:38

you're willing to accept five or 10 V

0:16:41

maybe you get to 10% dividend right you

0:16:44

might get 10% dividend tax deferred you

0:16:46

know that's kind of the promise of an

0:16:49

>> right

0:16:49

>> but

0:16:52

I think the profound idea right the the

0:16:54

the big dream of everybody in the

0:16:56

Bitcoin industry everybody in crypto has

0:16:58

always been fix the money fix the world

0:17:00

right

0:17:00

>> the profound idea is rebuild build the

0:17:03

entire world's monetary order on digital

0:17:06

technology. So you start with this idea

0:17:09

of digital assets which offer the

0:17:11

promise of you know

0:17:15

speed of light between 8 billion

0:17:17

computers and 8 billion computers a

0:17:19

million times an hour and self-custody

0:17:22

on an Android phone 24/7 365 everywhere

0:17:25

right that's the digital asset vision

0:17:27

and that applies to digital tokens

0:17:30

digital securities digital commodities

0:17:33

you know digital currencies right that's

0:17:36

what holds the entire entire digital

0:17:37

industry together. And then the next

0:17:39

piece of that is building a digital

0:17:42

capital structure on top of a digital

0:17:45

commodity. That that's that's Bitcoin is

0:17:47

store of value.

0:17:49

And once you get digital capital, you

0:17:51

start thinking the third idea is digital

0:17:53

credit. What if I strip 90% of the risk

0:17:56

and 90% of the va off the digital

0:17:59

capital by overcolateralizing it 10 to1?

0:18:02

>> What if you issue $1 of digital credit

0:18:04

for every $10 of digital capital every

0:18:07

year? Right. And then [clears throat]

0:18:10

the last mile,

0:18:12

the last mile is what if we just build

0:18:14

digital money? And and [clears throat]

0:18:15

by digital money I mean what if we strip

0:18:19

the last five or 10 V off the instrument

0:18:21

and we make it zero V and maybe instead

0:18:25

of 10% 10V what if I get to 8% zero V or

0:18:32

7% zero V digital money and that's the

0:18:37

vision of a Bitcoin back stable coin

0:18:39

right

0:18:39

>> in the crypto industry like what if I

0:18:41

had a stable coin that paid you 8%

0:18:43

backed by Bitcoin I can't do that backed

0:18:47

by sovereign capital. I can't do it with

0:18:50

fiat credit. The best you'll ever get to

0:18:53

there is 4% or 3%. The risk-free rate,

0:18:56

but if I built it on digital capital

0:18:58

that was appreciating, I could go to 8%.

0:19:01

And I don't know whether I don't know

0:19:03

what the magic number is eight or seven

0:19:04

or six, but but I think the magic number

0:19:06

is 4% better than everything else.

0:19:09

Interesting. So if you're getting zero

0:19:11

in Japan and someone gives you 4% in yen

0:19:13

or 1% in euros, you get 5% in the euro

0:19:17

or 3% in dollars and you get to 7% in

0:19:21

dollars, I think you've just created

0:19:22

digital money and it it it checks the

0:19:25

box of is it a medium of exchange? Yeah,

0:19:28

sure it is. Right. It's completely

0:19:29

stable versus the world reserve currency

0:19:33

or against whatever you're spending in,

0:19:35

right? The euro, the yen.

0:19:37

>> Is it a store of value? Well, you know,

0:19:40

at the point that you start to clip to 7

0:19:42

8%, you're actually tracking the true

0:19:46

theoretical monetary inflation rate and

0:19:48

you're out you're outperforming the CPI.

0:19:52

So, regardless of what you think of of

0:19:54

what the true natural inflation is, the

0:19:57

general public will perceive it to be a

0:20:00

store of value, right? And and so now

0:20:03

you've got unit account, store of value,

0:20:05

medium of exchange built on digital

0:20:07

capital, and you know, how do you get

0:20:10

there? Well, you take digital credit, a

0:20:12

bit of digital credit like STRC, and

0:20:14

then you mix that with uh currency

0:20:17

equivalents. You know, the the stuff you

0:20:19

put in a stable coin. I'm going to give

0:20:20

you uh one month T bills, 20 20% T bills

0:20:24

and cash equivalents, 80% credit, get to

0:20:28

a blended rate of 9%.

0:20:30

>> Interesting. maybe uh layer on a

0:20:34

currency uh reserve a volatility reserve

0:20:37

buffer of 10% and you use that you know

0:20:41

to adjust for the the the five ball or

0:20:44

the 10 ball that's in the digital credit

0:20:46

instrument. You put shock absorbers

0:20:49

right on the credit to create money.

0:20:54

if you do that, you c you can any fund

0:20:58

manager, right? Anybody that knows how

0:20:59

to run a money market fund or any active

0:21:02

fund manager, private fund manager,

0:21:04

public fund manager, anybody could do

0:21:06

this. This is not rocket science. You

0:21:08

know, you take a hundred million by 80

0:21:10

million of digital credit, 20 million of

0:21:12

currency equivalents, layer $10 million

0:21:14

of a cash reserve on it, and then every

0:21:16

day at the end of the day, you draw down

0:21:18

the reserve to hit the nav to get the

0:21:20

nav to be $1.

0:21:21

>> Right. Right. And and on days when the

0:21:23

credit trades up, you replenish the

0:21:26

reserve and you can continuously re you

0:21:28

know fund the reserve with like maybe

0:21:30

you take 100 basis points off the top of

0:21:33

the credit and you fund the reserve. Now

0:21:35

if you do that

0:21:37

you can create a stable coin. We can't

0:21:39

call it a stable coin. You call it a

0:21:41

moneycoin.

0:21:41

>> Yeah.

0:21:42

>> You create a digital moneycoin that has

0:21:44

a nav of a dollar. you get the approval

0:21:47

of a digital assets regulator

0:21:50

and now you've just tokenized digital

0:21:52

money,

0:21:53

>> right?

0:21:53

>> And now you release that into the crypto

0:21:55

ecosystem and now you've got, you know,

0:21:58

something that competes with stable

0:21:59

coins that pays you 8%.

0:22:00

>> It's pretty interesting.

0:22:01

>> Or you create an ETF. We have we have

0:22:06

ETF money market funds. They have stable

0:22:08

nav. They pay you 4% or 3.8% or 3.5%,

0:22:13

right? It's not a new idea. Vanguard,

0:22:15

Black Rockck,

0:22:17

>> you know, Bitwise. Yeah. Anybody could

0:22:19

create a digital money fund. But now the

0:22:21

digital money fund is zero volt stable

0:22:24

NAV, $1 NAV

0:22:27

pays you eight, right? And and uh you

0:22:30

could even I mean the value added there

0:22:33

is you convert the monthly dividend of

0:22:35

say a stretch into a daily dividend,

0:22:37

right? You strip the ball, then you get

0:22:40

the regulatory approval, you put it on

0:22:42

the platform, right? And now you're now

0:22:44

you're circulating on the ETF rails.

0:22:46

That's digital money fund. But the most

0:22:49

ambitious idea which I you know it's

0:22:52

like the heavens open for me this year

0:22:54

and I just like click click click. You

0:22:56

know a year ago I didn't see digital

0:22:58

credit and I you know and so if you

0:22:59

can't see if you don't see digital

0:23:01

credit you can't see digital money. But

0:23:03

now what I realized is you go to a bank

0:23:07

and you create a digital money account.

0:23:11

You just get you get the approval of

0:23:13

your banking regulator to offer a

0:23:16

digital money account. Zero vault

0:23:18

powered by digital capital and digital

0:23:20

credit, right?

0:23:22

>> And now uh you just put your money in

0:23:24

the digital money account and you get

0:23:25

paid 8% daily on the banking system,

0:23:29

right? and Barkclays or B of A or JP

0:23:34

Morgan or Morgan Stanley or you know

0:23:38

First Bank of Abuhabi or Emirates Bank

0:23:41

or fill in your favorite bank you know

0:23:45

like would they do that? I think in the

0:23:49

UAE or the USA you actually have pro-

0:23:51

digital assets banking regulators,

0:23:54

right? If you have pro, by the way, if

0:23:56

you have pro- digital assets crypto

0:23:57

regulators, check. If you have pro-

0:23:59

digital asset security regulators,

0:24:01

check. And if you have pro digital

0:24:03

assets banking regulators, check. It

0:24:06

won't happen everywhere.

0:24:08

But the question is, will it happen

0:24:10

anywhere? Because

0:24:13

you want to be the digital banking

0:24:15

center of the 21st century.

0:24:19

The big idea is my bank offers a digital

0:24:23

money account and we pay 400 basis

0:24:25

points more than every other bank on

0:24:28

earth. And then you're not talking about

0:24:30

crypto billionaires wiring you billions

0:24:32

of dollars. You're talking about fiat

0:24:34

billionaires. You're talking about

0:24:36

everybody. And then that goes back into

0:24:38

the digital moneycoin stack. Does that

0:24:41

eventually flow into Bitcoin itself?

0:24:44

>> You buy 10 billion dollars of digital

0:24:46

money from your bank and $8 billion

0:24:49

flows into digital credit and that $8

0:24:51

billion goes into digital capital and

0:24:54

that goes into Bitcoin.

0:24:55

>> Interesting,

0:24:56

>> right? And and uh there's no reason I

0:24:59

mean what's the market? There's $200

0:25:00

trillion.

0:25:01

>> Yeah.

0:25:02

>> Right. There's $200 trillion of bank

0:25:04

credit, money market credit, and and

0:25:08

corporate, you know, type investment

0:25:11

credit, and it's all yielding 200 basis

0:25:14

points on average though for the ability

0:25:17

of sovereigns to issue debt to fund

0:25:19

their governments. Surely, I wouldn't

0:25:21

want to buy the, you know, one, two,

0:25:23

10year Treasury if I could buy this. If

0:25:26

you're if you're in the UAE, aren't you

0:25:29

really thinking that my bank offers

0:25:32

these bank accounts and foreigners wire

0:25:35

me 20 trillion dollars to my bank?

0:25:37

>> It's good for them, but is it good for

0:25:39

>> Well, the point is it's good.

0:25:40

>> Yeah,

0:25:41

>> it's good for the people that do it.

0:25:43

>> That's right.

0:25:43

>> Well, like you're you're asking the

0:25:45

question, if I if I invent coal fusion

0:25:47

and I have unlimited free electricity,

0:25:49

is that bad for people that sell

0:25:51

expensive oil?

0:25:52

>> Yeah, right. But it's good for the

0:25:54

people that create the unlimited free

0:25:56

electricity.

0:25:57

>> So then the the

0:25:58

>> we're talking about a we're talking

0:25:59

about the digital transformation of the

0:26:02

credit markets.

0:26:05

If if we offer digital credit that's 5x

0:26:08

over collateralized that pays 10%

0:26:11

dividends, what's that do for the junk

0:26:13

bond issuers that want to pay you 5%

0:26:15

uncolateralized?

0:26:17

>> Well, look, here's the good news. The

0:26:20

world doesn't it doesn't rationalize

0:26:23

overnight. If I gave you, you know, the

0:26:27

the perfect situation, it still takes a

0:26:30

decade before 10% of the world discovers

0:26:33

the perfect thing.

0:26:34

>> So there's time for debt issuers,

0:26:36

whether sovereigns or corporates, to

0:26:38

>> take place over 20 years.

0:26:39

>> Yeah. To adapt,

0:26:40

>> right? It's the world the world's going

0:26:42

to gradually adapt.

0:26:44

>> So you've been you amassed this treasury

0:26:46

of Bitcoin. Now you've been issuing

0:26:48

these digital credit instruments,

0:26:49

Stretch, Stride, Strive. Yeah. Uh it

0:26:53

>> so that's the middle part of the stack

0:26:54

to the digital money coin you're talking

0:26:56

about. Is strategy going to take steps?

0:26:57

Are you taking steps to issue this money

0:27:00

coin or is it something that you

0:27:01

envision as you've described that an

0:27:02

asset manager or a bank might issue

0:27:04

using your credit?

0:27:05

>> The way I see the industry evolving is

0:27:07

there's three layers. There's digital

0:27:10

capital, there's digital credit, and

0:27:12

there's digital money.

0:27:13

>> Yeah.

0:27:14

>> Okay. Our company strategy we exist to

0:27:18

create the digital credit. In essence,

0:27:21

the whole mission of the company is to

0:27:24

convert capital into credit. I think I

0:27:27

think it's reasonable for us to strip 80

0:27:30

to 90% of the risk and 80 to 90% of the

0:27:35

volatility off of the capital, right?

0:27:38

You know, if you're if you're being very

0:27:40

simplistic, right? I mean, I start with

0:27:42

$10 of Bitcoin. I issue $1 of credit.

0:27:45

Right.

0:27:45

>> All right. So, we can we can uh step it

0:27:49

down from, you know, a 50 V 50 ARR asset

0:27:55

and turn it into a 10 V 10

0:27:59

uh 10 ARR, right? A a 10% dividend

0:28:02

yield.

0:28:04

We can't create digital capital, right?

0:28:06

I mean, that's the world, right? You

0:28:08

need 700 million people in the crypto

0:28:10

industry and you need all of the

0:28:11

decentralized holders and the people we

0:28:13

don't know and the people we know and

0:28:15

all the buyers and and uh it goes

0:28:19

without saying, you know, it's an asset

0:28:21

without an issuer. We're the

0:28:23

beneficiary. It's very clear to me,

0:28:25

right? I can buy a billion dollars a

0:28:27

week for the past two weeks. The price

0:28:28

isn't paying attention to what I'm

0:28:30

doing, right? And that's good. That's a

0:28:32

good thing, right? uh it wouldn't be a

0:28:35

stable digital capital network if

0:28:38

anybody could influence it, right?

0:28:41

>> And so and so the digital capital layer

0:28:44

is a global phenomenon that's been

0:28:47

running since the since Satoshi, you

0:28:49

know, dropped the white paper and it

0:28:51

will keep running and there will always

0:28:53

be actors entering the space. the CFTC,

0:28:57

the SEC, the Black Rocks, the Vanguards,

0:29:00

the JP Morgans. I mean, they're all

0:29:02

players in the space. The foreigners,

0:29:05

the people you don't know, you know.

0:29:06

Didn't we just hear the Chinese shut

0:29:08

down a bunch of Bitcoin miners?

0:29:09

>> Saw that yet again.

0:29:10

>> They banned Bitcoin mining for what, the

0:29:13

sixth time?

0:29:14

>> Yeah.

0:29:14

>> In 12 years. It's like seems like every

0:29:16

two years or three years they like shut

0:29:18

it down. But it just doesn't go away

0:29:19

now, does it? So digital capital is a

0:29:23

global phenomena. We are beneficiaries

0:29:26

and we are we acknowledge that and we

0:29:29

build our company on that. our job is

0:29:32

converted to digital credit and I think

0:29:35

I think that's the one thing we can do

0:29:37

well and if you want to create digital

0:29:39

credit you need to be monmaniacally

0:29:42

focused on digital capital and you know

0:29:46

for every $10 of Bitcoin I hold on my

0:29:49

balance sheet I can probably create $1

0:29:51

credit you know you might even say if

0:29:54

you're being conser per year by you

0:29:57

might say for every $10 of equity

0:30:00

capital. I can probably create $1 a

0:30:03

credit per year, right? And I can do

0:30:06

that responsibly. And so over time, you

0:30:08

know, Bitcoin's growing. We're we're

0:30:10

layering on more credit. We're feeding

0:30:12

the bit the digital capital ecosystem.

0:30:15

We're building our balance sheet, etc.

0:30:18

But now that third step, creating

0:30:21

digital money,

0:30:23

you need the crypto entrepreneurs, you

0:30:25

need the crypto exchanges, maybe you

0:30:27

need the Binances, you need the

0:30:29

Coinbases, you need maybe you need the

0:30:32

proof ofstake chains, maybe you need the

0:30:34

crypto, you know, how many different

0:30:36

entrepreneurs are created a stable coin?

0:30:38

>> Yeah,

0:30:39

>> right. You need them. You need fund

0:30:41

managers, right? You need the private

0:30:43

fund managers, the Bloomberg jockeyies.

0:30:45

like I got hit with, you know, $150

0:30:48

million of redemption today. I'm going

0:30:50

to sell down the currency equivalents.

0:30:52

All of a sudden, I'm 95% credit, 5%

0:30:55

currency. Now, I have to rebalance back

0:30:57

to 80% credit, 20% currency. I'm

0:31:01

trading, I'm managing, I'm hedging. And

0:31:04

so, you need the fund managers. Then you

0:31:07

need, you know, you need the fund

0:31:09

managers, either private or public

0:31:11

public managers, uh, to actually create

0:31:14

the digital money fund. Then you need

0:31:17

the, you know, a a crypto entrepreneur

0:31:21

to create a crypto coin. You need a

0:31:24

public ETF manager to take your fund

0:31:28

public,

0:31:29

>> right? A pretty big idea is I take

0:31:31

private funds public. We, you know, we

0:31:33

forget, but the original tokenized fund

0:31:36

was an ETF. That's right.

0:31:38

>> Right. I mean, it's And it's And believe

0:31:40

it or not,

0:31:42

>> the world's still full of a lot of asset

0:31:44

classes that yet to be put on an ETF.

0:31:47

>> You know, go try to buy an ETF that

0:31:49

reflects a bunch of old master's

0:31:51

paintings.

0:31:51

>> Yeah.

0:31:52

>> You know, can't do it, right?

0:31:53

>> Try to buy an ETF that reflects New York

0:31:56

City real estate and passes you through

0:31:58

a dividend which reflects the rents.

0:32:01

Not I mean

0:32:02

>> I don't know of one.

0:32:03

>> Yeah. But I mean the point is there's a

0:32:04

lot of financialization to be done on

0:32:08

traditional ETF rails.

0:32:10

>> So we shouldn't be surprised that we're

0:32:11

not there yet on Bitcoin rails. That

0:32:13

that's the 10 years 20 years we're

0:32:15

talking about.

0:32:16

>> Yeah. I mean Black Rockck's done what a

0:32:17

thousand ETFs but they still haven't

0:32:19

done you know the 10 that I want.

0:32:22

>> Right. Right. Right.

0:32:23

>> Right. I mean and then um and then of

0:32:26

course you need the banks.

0:32:30

Right. What's the value added of a bank?

0:32:32

Well, okay, the bank bring first they

0:32:34

got 10,000 salespeople. Then they have a

0:32:37

brand. Then they get the the banking

0:32:39

regulator to approve it. Then you've got

0:32:41

the platform, right? I mean, all sorts

0:32:44

of, you know, platforms. Then you've

0:32:46

you've got um the account you stripped

0:32:49

of all

0:32:51

you uh and then you dispense daily doses

0:32:55

of dividends. You deal with the tax

0:32:58

compliance, the legal compliance, the

0:33:00

KYC compliance. Some dude wants to buy10

0:33:04

billion dollars of digital money and

0:33:05

there, you know, bank, believe it or

0:33:07

not, you know, if if you're the first

0:33:09

bank to offer digital money in the

0:33:11

Middle East and some guy wants to wire

0:33:12

you 10 billion dollars to buy it, you

0:33:14

still have the AML, KYC, the

0:33:17

>> the compliance issue and you got to jump

0:33:19

through hoops to do it. So the way I see

0:33:23

the industry evolving is the first layer

0:33:25

is completely decentralized.

0:33:28

The second layer digital credit is going

0:33:30

to be created by companies like strategy

0:33:32

or metaplanet or strive

0:33:35

>> right a treasury company that's

0:33:37

monomomaniacally focused on creating

0:33:39

digital credit instruments. And then the

0:33:42

third layer is really up for grabs.

0:33:45

There's a thousand banks that could do

0:33:47

it. There's a thousand fund managers

0:33:49

that can do it. there's a thousand

0:33:51

crypto investors or or entrepreneurs

0:33:54

that can do it. And the truth is they

0:33:56

are all adding value, right? I mean

0:33:58

there whether it's technical, right? Do

0:34:01

you have the technique to put it on the

0:34:03

platform? Everybody's got a platform.

0:34:05

We'll debate what's the right platform,

0:34:08

right? There's going to be a big debate.

0:34:10

Is it a crypto exchange? Is it a proof

0:34:11

ofstake network? Is it Aladdin that

0:34:14

Black Rockck runs? Is it uh is it the

0:34:16

in-house JP Morgan or Morgan Stanley or

0:34:20

Goldman Sachs network? Is it a regulated

0:34:23

digital exchange?

0:34:25

There's, you know, Europe has got one

0:34:27

currency, 27 sets of regulators, 27

0:34:30

different exchanges and 27 capital

0:34:32

markets and you're thinking you want to

0:34:35

distribute there. Yeah. Right. So, I

0:34:38

think that um the exciting thing for us

0:34:42

is what we realized is our mission is

0:34:45

create the digital credit, but we have

0:34:46

an incredibly compelling partnership

0:34:48

opportunity or a partnership proposal.

0:34:50

If you're if you're the most digital

0:34:53

forward bank in Australia, you want to

0:34:55

create digital money in Australia, I

0:34:57

have a deal for you.

0:34:58

>> Interesting,

0:34:59

>> right? If you if you're the most uh

0:35:01

ambitious bank in the Middle East and

0:35:04

you want to create digital money, well,

0:35:05

the first bank that does it is going to

0:35:07

attract trillion dollars of capital. Do

0:35:09

you want to be that bank? Do you want to

0:35:11

be that citystate? Right.

0:35:14

>> Some people, some city states will miss

0:35:17

it. Yeah. You you've got nations that

0:35:20

are more concerned about losing control.

0:35:23

They would rather shut down the

0:35:24

technology because they're afraid it

0:35:27

might be too useful. Right. Yeah. Yeah.

0:35:28

So, you have some that won't move. You

0:35:30

have some that don't even get it, right?

0:35:32

They don't even notice it's happening.

0:35:34

You know, what is the digital asset

0:35:36

thing anyway? What is this good for? And

0:35:38

they're like digital beanie babies,

0:35:40

right? And then you have some people

0:35:42

that get it. It's like, oh, money moving

0:35:44

at the speed of light, economic

0:35:45

immortality, and maybe we can program it

0:35:48

to think a billion times a second,

0:35:50

right? And I think that the ones that

0:35:53

get it now, it's going to be a

0:35:55

competition there. there's going to be a

0:35:57

question of who wins and um it's team

0:36:01

sport. You need the bank, you need the

0:36:04

bank regulator, you need the fund

0:36:06

manager, you need the partnerships.

0:36:08

>> Right.

0:36:09

>> Right. And then you need to coordinate,

0:36:12

you know, all of those. And then there's

0:36:13

a technical component and there's a

0:36:15

question of are you willing to take a

0:36:17

risk and can you market it and uh you

0:36:21

know the the likelihood that is that

0:36:24

most people will be followers

0:36:27

but there's always going to be a leader

0:36:29

you know or a couple of leaders and this

0:36:32

is a battle for the future of money and

0:36:35

we're talking about you know easily $200

0:36:38

trillion up for grabs there but it's

0:36:40

going to be $400 trillion in 10 years

0:36:43

and whoever actually creates digital

0:36:45

money is going to grab 10 20% of it for

0:36:47

sure. You won't you won't convince

0:36:50

>> everybody. There's going to be a world

0:36:51

of people are going to think, well, I

0:36:53

just don't trust that. That's too good

0:36:54

to be true. But, you know, roll the

0:36:56

clock back. When people talked about

0:36:58

Bitcoin, they're like, yeah, well, it

0:37:00

won't work. Oh, well, if it works, it's

0:37:01

too good to be true, and the government

0:37:02

will take away from you.

0:37:03

>> I mean, eventually the horsedrawn

0:37:05

carriage uh pilot still buys a car one

0:37:08

day. But imagine a world where 10% of

0:37:11

that money flows into digital funds and

0:37:13

digital banks and digital, you know,

0:37:16

digital bank accounts. And that's a

0:37:18

profoundly disruptive world. And we will

0:37:21

create

0:37:22

the Switzerland of the 21st century.

0:37:24

It'll be the world banking capital. And

0:37:27

I'm hopeful it's in the US. I think I I

0:37:29

don't know why it wouldn't be in the US,

0:37:31

but if it's not in the US, I wouldn't be

0:37:32

surprised if it doesn't pop up in the

0:37:34

Middle East. Because if you appreciate

0:37:37

technology and you understand digital

0:37:39

assets and you appreciate banking and

0:37:41

you like money,

0:37:43

uh the most profound idea I have for you

0:37:49

why don't you just attract all of the

0:37:51

capital in the world into your bank into

0:37:55

your state because Lord knows right now

0:37:59

you're the traditional 20th century

0:38:02

banking establishment has a proposal

0:38:04

which is give us your money and we'll

0:38:06

give you nothing.

0:38:06

>> Yeah.

0:38:07

>> We're going to offer you returnfree risk

0:38:11

for all of your assets. You're taking

0:38:13

duration and credit risk that does not

0:38:17

offset you with yield that does not

0:38:19

offset the duration risk and the credit

0:38:21

risk. So pretty much you have hundreds

0:38:23

of trillions of dollars which is

0:38:26

returning you know inflation adjusted

0:38:29

nothing.

0:38:29

>> Yeah. Well you have below real

0:38:31

inflation. you I want to ask you a

0:38:33

question Michael you said that um you

0:38:35

strategy is monoomaniacally focused on

0:38:38

this digital credit creation is that a

0:38:41

reason why you wouldn't maybe use some

0:38:44

of your Bitcoin to buy a Bitcoin

0:38:46

business that could generate more

0:38:47

Bitcoin is it too is it not pristine

0:38:50

enough to be the credit issuer if you

0:38:52

also have other operating businesses

0:38:55

>> inside strategy

0:38:56

>> put simply we expect Bitcoin to

0:38:58

appreciate 30% a year for the next 20

0:39:02

That is our riskfree rate.

0:39:05

Like that is literally the hurdle rate.

0:39:08

I can I can acquire Bitcoin at one times

0:39:11

revenue.

0:39:12

It's a monopoly on on digital capital. I

0:39:15

can res I can acquire the world's

0:39:18

reserve capital network at one times

0:39:20

revenue growing 30% a year for the next

0:39:22

20 years risk-free integration free

0:39:25

overnight. No questions asked. What

0:39:28

could be better than that? Right?

0:39:31

Nothing could be better than that for

0:39:33

us. Right? Once you've actually uh

0:39:35

established, you know, yourself on the

0:39:38

Bitcoin standard

0:39:40

and once you've rotated your shareholder

0:39:42

base, right? The important point is not

0:39:44

that it's not that everybody agrees with

0:39:47

me. The important point is that all my

0:39:49

equity investors agree with me. You see,

0:39:53

our company exists to acquire Bitcoin.

0:39:56

So if you brought me another option, you

0:39:59

said, "Well, Mike, I've got this great

0:40:00

startup and it's going to return, it's

0:40:02

going to grow 40% a year for the next 20

0:40:04

years and emerge as a monopoly in the

0:40:06

world." And I'm like, "Okay, that's

0:40:07

great, Alex, but it doesn't sound as

0:40:09

good as the deal I already have going."

0:40:11

Like, what are the odds that you just

0:40:13

found the next monopoly on money in the

0:40:17

world growing 40% a year for the next 20

0:40:19

years? And by the way, let's say that

0:40:23

you're a genius and you found it. What

0:40:25

are the odds I can convince all my

0:40:27

equity shareholders that it's better

0:40:29

than Bitcoin?

0:40:31

>> Unlikely.

0:40:32

>> Yeah. Yeah. And and why would you? And

0:40:34

by the way, why would you want to,

0:40:36

right? I mean, if you already have a

0:40:39

risk-free rate

0:40:42

of 30%, if you can buy it at one times

0:40:45

revenue and if you can integrate it

0:40:46

overnight,

0:40:49

why would you do anything else? So, so

0:40:52

um I think for example, let's say

0:40:54

there's a hundred companies out there

0:40:56

that are trading at a discount than NAV.

0:40:58

>> Yeah.

0:40:59

>> Okay. Well, the world's full of private

0:41:01

equity funds that have a mandate to

0:41:03

invest in 20 non-correlated investments

0:41:06

and their hurdle rate is 10 or 15%. And

0:41:09

they're actually suited up to deal with

0:41:11

all the social issues and the headaches,

0:41:14

right? They they sit on boards, you

0:41:17

know, they hire and fire entrepreneurs.

0:41:20

They integrate people. They lay off

0:41:22

people. They fight with lawsuits, right?

0:41:24

So, it makes perfect sense for a private

0:41:27

equity fund or a public company with a

0:41:30

rollup strategy to, you know, to buy a

0:41:32

bunch of businesses if you believe in

0:41:35

diversification.

0:41:38

Right. We don't. Right.

0:41:39

>> Right.

0:41:39

>> We don't believe in d, you know,

0:41:41

>> you said uh what was that great quote

0:41:42

you had? Um, what do you have? One

0:41:44

screen. You only have one screen. You

0:41:45

have one chair.

0:41:46

>> I got one chair.

0:41:47

>> You're sitting on one chair right now. I

0:41:48

got one chair. I don't believe in

0:41:51

diversifying the fuel source that flows

0:41:53

into your jet engine.

0:41:54

>> Yeah.

0:41:55

>> I believe in kerosene. Y I don't believe

0:41:57

in diversifying the metals that make up

0:41:59

the airplane wing. I believe in

0:42:01

aluminum.

0:42:03

>> I don't believe in diversifying, you

0:42:05

know, the composition of your

0:42:06

semiconductor chip. You know, right?

0:42:09

>> It's like like you ever seen an Nvidia

0:42:11

data center? How diversified is the

0:42:13

chipset in the Nvidia data center?

0:42:15

>> Yeah.

0:42:15

>> Right. And I actually believe that when

0:42:19

you find the solution,

0:42:22

then you pursue it. But my point really

0:42:24

is the world's full of people that have

0:42:26

large pools of capital and their mission

0:42:28

is to make diversified investments and

0:42:31

their hurdle rate is 10%. And if they

0:42:33

actually clocked 12% a year after loss

0:42:36

of effort, they would declare victory

0:42:37

and their limited partners would say

0:42:39

that was a great year. Right.

0:42:41

>> Yeah.

0:42:42

>> But here for us, that's not us. And

0:42:44

here's the problem. My hurdle rate's 30%

0:42:47

integration free, risk-f free. I've done

0:42:50

the same deal 90 times in a row.

0:42:54

>> And and the product of the company, it's

0:42:58

digital credit. What we're offering is

0:43:01

STRC. We're offering you uh a product

0:43:05

that's going to pay you a 10% dividend

0:43:08

yield with a very taxefficient return of

0:43:11

capital dividend,

0:43:14

right? And so if I'm offering you

0:43:17

something that pays you 10% dividends in

0:43:20

a credit universe that offers you 4%.

0:43:24

Give me one reason why you wouldn't buy

0:43:27

that. Why is it that the entire world

0:43:30

wouldn't sell their hundred trillion

0:43:32

dollars of garbage credit that yields

0:43:35

you onethird of what we're offering

0:43:38

after tax? Why would you why wouldn't

0:43:40

you just sell it all and by stretch?

0:43:42

Give me the one reason.

0:43:46

>> I'm not going to come up with one on on

0:43:47

the spot, I don't think.

0:43:48

>> Okay. Well, so I'm going to give you two

0:43:51

reasons.

0:43:51

>> Okay, let's hear them.

0:43:53

>> You haven't heard of it. You don't

0:43:54

understand it.

0:43:55

>> Yep.

0:43:56

>> And the second reason is you think that

0:43:58

the issuer has a credit risk.

0:44:03

>> yeah,

0:44:03

>> when we're going off, you know, we we

0:44:05

you bring me 10 good deals and I buy 10

0:44:08

companies and I get distracted by that.

0:44:10

I'm so distracted by that. I'm on CNBC

0:44:13

talking about all those other things.

0:44:15

I'm not talking about Stretch STRC.

0:44:18

>> And then you're a credit investor and

0:44:20

you know when the message is, yeah, I

0:44:22

have like $5 of capital for every dollar

0:44:24

of this instrument. It's like I get it,

0:44:27

>> but then you're like, but tell me about

0:44:28

this other thing you just did and I

0:44:30

heard they're getting sued or that's

0:44:32

going to take a year.

0:44:33

>> It distracts you. It creates credit risk

0:44:35

for you. You're creating opacity and

0:44:38

you're creating a dilutive distraction.

0:44:40

You actually get a diversification

0:44:42

discount. Like the person buying this

0:44:45

instrument simply wants to hear you have

0:44:48

the money to back the instrument.

0:44:50

>> Right.

0:44:51

>> Right. And

0:44:51

>> it's almost like a collateral mix that

0:44:53

gets more complicated. They don't want

0:44:54

they want the digital capital under

0:44:56

there. They don't want this business

0:44:58

doing this weird thing and that other

0:44:59

business that may or may not do well

0:45:01

this quarter under. If I just spent five

0:45:03

years, every day of my life for five

0:45:06

years

0:45:07

>> to explain and convince you that Bitcoin

0:45:09

is digital capital and I have a lot of

0:45:12

>> Yeah.

0:45:13

>> You think I want to show up in the sixth

0:45:15

year and explain that I also started

0:45:17

buying these other 16 undervalued

0:45:19

companies and we're really good at doing

0:45:21

takeovers and integrating them and it's

0:45:23

>> Yeah, that would seem that would seem

0:45:24

strange for you to do. I get that.

0:45:26

>> Okay. It's a distraction for us. We've

0:45:30

got in in my opinion, we have the

0:45:32

world's greatest product.

0:45:33

>> Yeah. But what about buying other like

0:45:35

distressed Bitcoin treasury companies

0:45:37

that are trading below?

0:45:38

>> Yeah. The point is it's a distraction.

0:45:40

>> Yeah. Just the process of doing it.

0:45:41

>> How long you think it takes to close the

0:45:43

deal?

0:45:43

>> Yeah.

0:45:43

>> A year.

0:45:45

>> It takes a year to close a deal. Uh do

0:45:48

you know all of the liabilities that are

0:45:50

embedded in the balance sheet? No.

0:45:52

>> Right.

0:45:52

>> When do you find that out?

0:45:54

>> In six months.

0:45:55

>> At some point during the process, I

0:45:57

guess. Yeah. The point is why would I

0:45:59

buy Bitcoin with all of the the whole

0:46:03

the whole message for five years is

0:46:06

Bitcoin doesn't have employees. It

0:46:08

doesn't have management teams. It

0:46:10

doesn't have counterparty risk. It

0:46:12

doesn't have supply chains. It doesn't

0:46:14

have leases to break. It doesn't have

0:46:17

nexus. It doesn't have all of the 30

0:46:20

pages of liabilities that companies

0:46:23

have. So why would I want to go and buy

0:46:25

30 pages of liabilities?

0:46:27

>> It'd be like Bitcoin wrapped in a giant

0:46:29

cluster.

0:46:30

>> Yeah. And here's the point, right? I can

0:46:33

build a digital building in one day with

0:46:36

no risk. Why? You know, you're like,

0:46:39

"Okay, well, I can do this in one day at

0:46:41

one times revenue. You've done it 90

0:46:42

times in a row." And then some dude

0:46:44

comes along and says, "Well, you know, I

0:46:46

have a building that's similar that

0:46:47

it'll take a year to close the deal, and

0:46:49

I think it's like a 20% discount, but

0:46:51

I'm gonna need you to sign up to

0:46:53

unlimited liability

0:46:56

for the next year,

0:46:57

>> right?

0:46:57

>> And I need your investors to sign up to

0:47:00

unlimited bottomless li. Maybe the deal

0:47:01

won't close. Maybe you'll get sued for

0:47:04

$18 billion of intellectual property

0:47:06

rights, shareholder litigation or

0:47:08

something,

0:47:08

>> right?

0:47:09

>> Why? It's like pennywise and pound

0:47:11

foolish. Why would you absorb unlimited

0:47:14

bottomless liability and distraction

0:47:17

when you know it's like don't look a

0:47:20

gift horse in the mouth. You get the

0:47:23

chance to buy Bitcoin with zero risk,

0:47:26

zero integration headache and you put it

0:47:29

out on the wire next Monday and

0:47:32

everybody understands whether the risk

0:47:34

profile, you understand? Like if I buy a

0:47:37

billion dollars of Bitcoin, you're the

0:47:39

investor. You can see immediately

0:47:41

whether the risk profile of the company

0:47:42

increased or decreased that minute. Mhm.

0:47:46

>> If I enter into a billion dollars of

0:47:48

corporate acquisitions, you will not

0:47:50

know for one. You might not know for 10

0:47:54

years, Alex.

0:47:55

>> That's right.

0:47:55

>> You understand? Like when I when I if

0:47:58

you buy a company, you could have

0:48:01

embedded liabilities in the company that

0:48:04

you don't know about for 10 years.

0:48:07

>> That's right.

0:48:08

>> It destroyed HP.

0:48:09

>> Yeah. You remember the HP acquisition

0:48:11

when they bought Autonomy and they paid

0:48:14

$10 billion for a company that was

0:48:15

worth1 billion. They took a nine or10

0:48:17

billion dollar write off.

0:48:19

>> Yeah.

0:48:21

>> It you know these Let me say it a

0:48:24

different way if I'm not enthusiastic

0:48:26

enough in my answer.

0:48:27

>> It's good. It's a good answer. I get it.

0:48:29

>> I watched a 100 companies in my industry

0:48:32

go bankrupt over 30 years. Yeah. Sorry.

0:48:35

Go out of business. A 100 companies. You

0:48:37

know how they all failed? dilutive

0:48:39

acquisitions.

0:48:41

If I had to trace the number one source

0:48:44

of a failure of a publicly traded

0:48:46

company, it's the CEO starts doing

0:48:49

rollups and buying other companies that

0:48:52

they think are helpful. Every single

0:48:54

competitor of mine, they did these

0:48:56

acquisitions and you end up just buying

0:48:59

a company, overpaying. Then you buy

0:49:00

another company, you think you got a

0:49:02

good deal, and it blows up in your face,

0:49:03

and you buy a third company, and then

0:49:04

all your good employees quit because

0:49:06

they hate the fact you bought the third

0:49:07

company. You buy the fourth company,

0:49:08

your shareholders quit. You buy the

0:49:09

fifth company and eventually on the

0:49:11

sixth company, you know, your financials

0:49:14

collapse, your stock collapses, you sell

0:49:16

yourself and you get amalgamated into

0:49:19

the great beast of some mega software

0:49:22

conglomerate.

0:49:23

>> Yeah.

0:49:24

>> And you can't remember their names

0:49:26

probably.

0:49:27

>> That's where you go to die. And so,

0:49:31

so, uh, you know, I think

0:49:36

you buy things when you run out of ways

0:49:38

to grow. Okay? But here's my idea of how

0:49:40

I'm going to grow. I'm going to sell a

0:49:42

digital credit instrument that's going

0:49:44

to give you a 10% dividend with 80 to

0:49:47

90% of the volatility of Bitcoin

0:49:49

stripped off it. And I'm going to sell

0:49:51

it to 5% of the credit market. And

0:49:54

that's $15 trillion by my calculation

0:49:57

right now. $30 trillion in 10 years. So

0:50:00

I have an idea for $30 trillion.

0:50:03

>> That's a pretty big idea.

0:50:05

>> And you're telling me I should come up

0:50:06

with a second idea.

0:50:08

And like I'm like and the only thing

0:50:10

that's the number one way to destroy or

0:50:13

undermine your first idea for the 30

0:50:15

trillion is to come up with a second

0:50:18

idea and get distracted. Take on other

0:50:21

credit risk,

0:50:22

>> right? Take on other distractions. And

0:50:25

so let let me let me make one more

0:50:27

point, Alex.

0:50:29

Like I I mean the other day I checked,

0:50:31

we have like 60 billion dollars of

0:50:32

capital.

0:50:33

>> Yeah.

0:50:34

>> You understand? We could buy anything,

0:50:36

>> right?

0:50:36

>> Right. Yeah. You understand? Like

0:50:38

investment bankers like we could buy

0:50:40

half, you know, half of the Russell

0:50:43

2000.

0:50:43

>> Yeah.

0:50:44

>> Right. We could buy half of the publicly

0:50:45

traded companies or merge with them. We

0:50:48

could probably merge with or buy 37,000

0:50:52

public companies and 37 million private

0:50:55

companies and we could invest in every

0:50:57

idea you could possibly imagine. We

0:51:00

could also raise a billion dollars from

0:51:03

any any credit investor in a week, maybe

0:51:06

overnight if we wanted. Right. When you

0:51:09

start with $60 billion, it's not hard to

0:51:12

find someone that will lend you a

0:51:13

billion dollars.

0:51:14

>> That's right.

0:51:16

Every one of those ideas would be uh

0:51:18

dilutive distraction. And the number of

0:51:21

bad ideas that people throw at you goes

0:51:25

up exponentially the more money you

0:51:27

have. And

0:51:29

>> how many bad ideas do you hear?

0:51:31

>> It's it's like

0:51:32

>> is it endless?

0:51:34

>> Why don't we could we could be the an

0:51:36

insurance company. We could do

0:51:37

reinsurance. We could underwrite this

0:51:39

risk. We could we could become a bank.

0:51:40

We could become a commodities trading

0:51:42

exchange. We could like never ending. I

0:51:45

could literally list you a, you know, a

0:51:48

thousand in an hour and then I could

0:51:50

tell you the hundred reasons why each of

0:51:52

the thousand doesn't make sense. And

0:51:54

after I gave you a hundred,000 reasons

0:51:56

for not to expand,

0:52:00

>> I would reduce it down to this simple

0:52:02

maxism that Marcus Aurelius gave us

0:52:04

2,000 years ago. Just because you can do

0:52:08

a thing doesn't mean you should do a

0:52:12

thing, right? And and I think humility

0:52:16

dictates

0:52:17

if you have if you have a good idea,

0:52:20

right? The the f the most important days

0:52:23

of your life, the day you're born and

0:52:24

the day you figure out why.

0:52:27

Okay. The arrogant guy thinks he was put

0:52:30

on earth to solve a hundred problems.

0:52:33

the humble the humble person if they're

0:52:36

fortunate enough to think they're put on

0:52:38

earth with a mission to solve one

0:52:40

problem, you just got given a gift,

0:52:44

>> right? And so what we figured out is

0:52:48

we can create digital credit and it's

0:52:50

better than $300 trillion of other

0:52:54

credit. And whether or not it solves 1%

0:52:57

of the market's problem or 5% or 10% or

0:53:00

20% or.1%

0:53:03

doesn't really matter, right? It's a

0:53:05

life's work to create good digital

0:53:07

credit. If you're fortunate enough to be

0:53:10

given the opportunity to do something,

0:53:13

you should laser like focus on that

0:53:17

thing because you want to look at the

0:53:19

history of failure. It's alpha males

0:53:22

that solved one thing and think that

0:53:24

that's solved and done and they come up

0:53:27

with 10 more things to solve.

0:53:29

>> Yeah.

0:53:29

>> Right. It's the Napoleon complex. It's

0:53:32

like I now have to spread the French

0:53:34

language and the French way of life to

0:53:36

the frozen steps and the tundra of

0:53:38

Russia in the winter [laughter]

0:53:40

>> and somehow

0:53:43

have you ever gathered 10,000 of your

0:53:45

favorite friends and tried to walk

0:53:46

across Europe

0:53:48

like a thousand miles? It's not a good

0:53:51

idea in the 21st century, but somehow

0:53:53

Napoleon got the idea that he might

0:53:56

march 600,000 people,

0:53:59

>> you know, from Paris to Moscow

0:54:01

[laughter]

0:54:02

in three months, conquer the nation,

0:54:05

declare victory, and come back

0:54:06

unscathed. It was never a good idea.

0:54:09

Yeah. And and but it was the 14th bad

0:54:12

idea he'd had in like, you know, in 14

0:54:15

years. But, you know, hope springs

0:54:18

eternal. people come up with these

0:54:20

outrageous, ridiculous ideas and it's

0:54:22

like, you know, maybe you might want to

0:54:25

have just noted that the odds of a

0:54:27

Corsican actually rising to rule France

0:54:30

were like one in a 100 million.

0:54:33

>> Yeah.

0:54:34

>> And stopped there

0:54:35

>> and just let it ride

0:54:36

>> instead of the we got to conquer Egypt

0:54:38

and we got to conquer Germany and we got

0:54:40

to conquer Spain and we got to conquer

0:54:41

UK and we got to conquer Russia and we

0:54:43

got to conquer Poland, etc., etc., etc.,

0:54:47

But it happens. It continues to happen.

0:54:50

And uh I will I will get neverending

0:54:54

number of pitches for one more thing

0:54:57

that we could do and and I would say you

0:55:01

come back to Steve Jobs, right? And he

0:55:03

just reminded people we say no to a lot

0:55:06

more things at Apple than yes.

0:55:08

>> I think this is a good answer. This

0:55:10

you've you've

0:55:11

>> focus I I can't imagine how many people

0:55:13

are asking you that question. Well,

0:55:15

surely you're meant to do something with

0:55:16

your Bitcoin. And of course, you are

0:55:18

doing this credit creation, but what

0:55:20

about the other Bitcoin?

0:55:21

>> The most profound idea, right, is put it

0:55:24

in coal storage and sell a dollar of

0:55:27

credit every year.

0:55:30

>> It's a profound idea. It's just not

0:55:31

their idea. Yeah.

0:55:33

>> Right. So, the point is like it's not

0:55:35

their idea and they're not getting paid

0:55:36

money on it. So people are going to

0:55:38

pitch you their idea and they're going

0:55:40

to either belittle, ignore or ridicule

0:55:44

your idea,

0:55:46

>> right?

0:55:46

>> Because it's not their idea. And

0:55:48

everybody kind of feel and there's

0:55:50

another thing which is a lot of times

0:55:52

people feel like they need another idea

0:55:54

like you know after they had the last

0:55:56

idea and they underestimate the amount

0:55:58

of maintenance and investment to

0:56:00

actually nurture one good idea.

0:56:03

>> You have nurtured it too. This has been

0:56:05

a significant evolution, too. Would you

0:56:08

ever thought in the summer of 2020, I

0:56:10

think Matt Walsh from Castle Island

0:56:12

Ventures was the first person to see

0:56:13

your filing in summer 2020 that you were

0:56:16

buying Bitcoin with then Micro Strategy.

0:56:19

Could you because this is an evolution

0:56:20

since we've known each other. What would

0:56:23

your 2020 self think about where you are

0:56:25

now in 20, you know, going into 26?

0:56:28

>> Well, you know, my

0:56:29

>> because this is a you built a juggernaut

0:56:31

out of this idea. My philosophy and you

0:56:33

could see it when I wrote the mobile

0:56:36

wave. I just said technology is acid and

0:56:38

it dematerializes products and services

0:56:41

and it transforms and and if you have

0:56:44

enough imagination and and talent you

0:56:46

can create something magical that

0:56:48

changes the world for the better.

0:56:50

So my ethos right is the ethos of an

0:56:53

engineer. look at technology and figure

0:56:55

out how to create something which is

0:56:57

good for the world, right? Engineer a

0:56:59

better world,

0:57:01

you know, and and I tried a lot of

0:57:03

things, right? I mean, and I I tried a

0:57:06

dozen things that did not fly. Usher and

0:57:09

Emma and Alert and Alarm and Wisdom and

0:57:13

Angel. So many things.

0:57:15

>> Yeah. And in 2020, right, you know, in a

0:57:19

time of frustration and desperation, we

0:57:21

discovered Bitcoin and [snorts] we grasp

0:57:24

on it as as a way to benefit our

0:57:26

shareholders and our employees and our

0:57:29

customers. And it was it was first an

0:57:31

exercise in frustration

0:57:33

>> and desperation. It really was a, you

0:57:35

know, was a do this, you know, or suffer

0:57:38

a painful death.

0:57:39

>> Yeah.

0:57:39

>> Right. And then it became, you know, an

0:57:43

exercise and transition and adventure.

0:57:46

It's like, now that we've done it, what

0:57:48

are we going to do next? Okay, someone

0:57:50

will loan me a billion dollars for free.

0:57:52

Well, you know, you know, a year ago, I

0:57:55

was looking at winding up the company

0:57:56

and now I have a chance to actually

0:57:59

actually buy a billion dollars of

0:58:01

Bitcoin for free. And uh you know then

0:58:05

it was uh it was adventure and

0:58:08

opportunity and challenge and response.

0:58:11

It's like and it was a journey and it's

0:58:14

a journey of discovery because we went

0:58:16

from being a software company to uh to

0:58:18

to being f a financial a structured

0:58:22

finance company, right? It's like first

0:58:24

we did senior credit or or senior debt

0:58:27

and that was a weight around our neck

0:58:29

and then we did asset back financing and

0:58:31

that didn't work well and then we then

0:58:33

we did OTC over-the-counter financing

0:58:36

and we learned the limitations of that

0:58:37

and then we did convertible debt we

0:58:39

learned the limitations of that

0:58:41

>> and as we move through each iteration we

0:58:45

we realized that there were some

0:58:48

extraordinary uh technologies and we're

0:58:51

engineers you know we put together about

0:58:53

six components, right? One was

0:58:56

>> one was uh a preferred equity,

0:59:00

>> right? And most people had never used

0:59:02

preferred equity to create credit. And

0:59:04

the second was a public offering. We did

0:59:07

one public offering in 1998 for like $48

0:59:11

million or something 40ome million. Y

0:59:14

>> and then we did a 500 million, a 600

0:59:17

million, a billion, and a two.5 billion,

0:59:19

and a $700 million IPO

0:59:21

>> basically this year. Yeah.

0:59:22

>> Bam. Bam, bam, bam, bam. Five billion

0:59:24

dollar type public offerings. Okay. So,

0:59:26

we we harnessed the IPO

0:59:30

and then we tacked on the at the at the

0:59:32

market shelf registration. So, we tacked

0:59:34

another thing onto it and then we

0:59:37

borrowed everything we'd learned about

0:59:38

the ETFs. You know, we studied ETFs and

0:59:41

we watched the success of Black Rockck

0:59:44

and we said, "How do we create a credit

0:59:46

instrument that has all the strengths of

0:59:48

an ETF, that has the power of an ATM,

0:59:51

that that has the power of a publicly

0:59:53

traded security, that has the

0:59:55

flexibility of a preferred equity, that

0:59:58

has the the volatility and the

1:00:01

performance of digital capital. Mhm.

1:00:03

>> We put all those together and then we

1:00:05

plug that into digital rails like you

1:00:08

know you know we use this phrase you do

1:00:11

you want to do an OTC deal or do you

1:00:13

want to do a public deal? Okay the the

1:00:16

investment bankers will pitch it like

1:00:17

those are equal.

1:00:18

>> Yeah.

1:00:19

>> You know and actually the bankers will

1:00:20

tell you the OTC deal is easier. Let me

1:00:22

tell you the difference. An OTC deal is

1:00:27

one bank calls 37 of their friends into

1:00:31

an alley and we trade baseball cards,

1:00:33

>> right?

1:00:34

>> And a public deal is okay, we create a

1:00:36

security that 200 million people can buy

1:00:38

and sell every minute of the day

1:00:39

everywhere in the world. And you tell

1:00:41

me, you think they're both equal ways to

1:00:43

raise capital, right? Do I'm going to

1:00:46

sell you a credit instrument. Do you

1:00:48

want to trade it, you know, in the back

1:00:51

alley with with like 12 possible buyers,

1:00:54

>> right?

1:00:55

>> Or would you like to actually be able to

1:00:57

post it and sell it to 200 million

1:00:59

people in the world every second of the

1:01:00

day? It's like they're not equal, right?

1:01:03

One of them is better than the other

1:01:04

one. And so this was a journey of

1:01:07

discovery and at the end of the day, we

1:01:10

had to understand credit instruments,

1:01:13

>> you know, and by by the way, bank

1:01:14

deposits are the worst. Margin debt is

1:01:16

pretty bad, right?

1:01:18

>> You know, junk bonds are pretty bad.

1:01:20

Convertible bonds, unsecured, less bad.

1:01:23

Over-the-counter, not great. Preferred

1:01:25

equity, that's perpetual, better.

1:01:27

>> Public preferred equity better. Public

1:01:29

preferred equity with the shelf

1:01:31

registration best. You know, with a QIP,

1:01:34

no. You want a fiveletter ticker? No.

1:01:37

Four-letter ticker word you can

1:01:39

pronounce. IPOed. By the way, in Europe,

1:01:43

not quite as good, you know, like uh you

1:01:47

know, we took a we took a stream public

1:01:49

in Europe. We're still trying to get it

1:01:51

to trade properly for the retail a month

1:01:53

later. Right. You know, you take it

1:01:55

public and we get it we get these things

1:01:57

strike strike strike stretch on the

1:01:59

NASDAQ within five days.

1:02:01

>> Right.

1:02:01

>> Right. Not all capital markets are

1:02:03

equal. Guess what? The US capital market

1:02:05

is better. How much better? A lot.

1:02:08

>> Yeah.

1:02:08

>> Better. So as we actually moved down

1:02:11

this um this uh journey of discovery,

1:02:16

we went from adventurous and

1:02:19

opportunistic and strategic to

1:02:21

eventually transformational

1:02:23

you know and then we realized that we

1:02:27

had actually created a better credit

1:02:29

product and I would say those first four

1:02:32

years the equity was the product we you

1:02:36

know the credit was the tactic.

1:02:38

>> Mhm.

1:02:38

>> Right. We sell the bond to actually

1:02:41

create performance in the equity.

1:02:42

>> Yeah. As an alternative to

1:02:44

>> and that was fine for those four years

1:02:45

because there was no other equity

1:02:47

product and I meet people in you know UK

1:02:50

today they're like hey I bought your

1:02:51

equity because I couldn't buy anything

1:02:53

else with Bitcoin exposure and my

1:02:55

retirement account. Right.

1:02:56

>> Right. So the equities product and then

1:02:59

in 2025 we discovered digital credit and

1:03:02

and that culminated in STRC

1:03:06

where we realized what's the ideal

1:03:09

product I strip the delta I strip the va

1:03:11

I strip the duration. Yeah,

1:03:13

>> I just hand people the yield. And if I

1:03:15

hand people the yield in a in a tax

1:03:18

deferred dividend,

1:03:20

you know, how many different layers of

1:03:23

innovation have I stacked on top of the

1:03:26

credit world, right? Appreciating

1:03:28

collateral, publicly tradable. By the

1:03:32

way, you know, it's illegal for a retail

1:03:34

investor to buy an OTC instrument.

1:03:37

>> Now, we talk [clears throat] about like

1:03:38

being debanked and being blocked, right?

1:03:41

And the entire digital assets revolution

1:03:44

is about, you know, an egalitarian

1:03:46

utilitarian movement to empower the

1:03:49

masses. And, you know, while we're

1:03:51

empowering the masses, maybe empower the

1:03:53

computer, right? Like what if we what if

1:03:55

we had digital assets that AIS could

1:03:58

trade a million times a second

1:03:59

everywhere in the world without asking

1:04:01

permission before they actually made the

1:04:03

trade?

1:04:04

>> Yeah.

1:04:04

>> Right. And we kind of stepped through

1:04:08

and we had to we had to kind of get a

1:04:12

PhD in capital markets and credit

1:04:14

markets and securities markets and then

1:04:17

digital assets and digital capital and

1:04:22

that was a five-year journey. But I I

1:04:25

would say at the end of the day,

1:04:28

the philosophy underlying all this is

1:04:32

can you actually take all of these

1:04:34

components that have been lying around

1:04:36

for 30 years. ETFs have been around for

1:04:39

30 years, the most successful ETF, plug

1:04:41

Bitcoin into it.

1:04:43

>> Michael Milin will tell you he invented

1:04:45

the ATM offering. We're the most

1:04:47

successful issuer of equity via an ATM.

1:04:51

in he invented the convertible bond

1:04:53

market. We're in the most successful

1:04:55

issue of convertible bonds. So we took

1:04:58

all these ideas you know plugged in

1:05:01

digital capital plugged in a public

1:05:03

company in the US capital markets with a

1:05:07

bit of ambition

1:05:09

>> and um and then the the truth truth of

1:05:13

the matter is even this last step

1:05:14

digital credit

1:05:17

it's not happening Alice Alex unless we

1:05:19

had digital intelligence right because

1:05:22

what happened in 2025 was the AI got

1:05:25

smart

1:05:26

>> and people like, "Oh, yeah. They're just

1:05:28

kind of idiots and they they pair it

1:05:30

back to you." Well, let me tell you,

1:05:31

when you when you actually take the

1:05:33

idiot and you pair it back and you do it

1:05:35

a billion times and you loop it back on

1:05:37

itself 10,000 times, you let it spend

1:05:40

for 10 minutes.

1:05:41

>> It's pretty smart. Yeah. Right. And

1:05:43

>> and

1:05:44

>> you you talked about that a few months

1:05:45

ago in New York uh at the Treasury

1:05:47

Company conference about how you you you

1:05:50

and strategy have used AI to help design

1:05:53

this new credit uh complex that you've

1:05:55

created.

1:05:55

>> Yeah. You know, you know, no one ever,

1:05:57

no one in this entire digital asset

1:06:00

space and probably just a handful of

1:06:02

companies ever put an at the market

1:06:04

shelf registration on a preferred

1:06:05

equity,

1:06:06

>> right?

1:06:07

>> Nobody ever created a variable rate

1:06:09

preferred equity. Like, can I create a a

1:06:13

monthly dividend that trades stable

1:06:15

around par and adjust the dividend every

1:06:17

month? Ask every lawyer and every

1:06:19

banker. It's never been done,

1:06:20

>> right?

1:06:20

>> We don't know how to do it.

1:06:22

>> Ask the AI. Yeah, sure. You can totally

1:06:24

do it.

1:06:24

>> Yeah. Okay. Why? They have no pride of

1:06:27

authorship. They don't they don't try,

1:06:30

you know, no company ever went to Europe

1:06:32

and sold um a a perpetual preferred

1:06:35

equity, you know. Well, we just don't do

1:06:37

that in Europe.

1:06:39

>> Okay. Why don't you do Well, because

1:06:41

>> because all the other issuers didn't

1:06:44

have digital capital and so they you had

1:06:47

to have

1:06:49

the right combination of circumstances.

1:06:51

You needed a block of digital capital

1:06:53

and you needed digital intelligence. You

1:06:55

need to had the have the will to create

1:06:57

digital credit so you create digital

1:06:59

money and you and and they all had to

1:07:02

click and then once once you have that

1:07:04

clean sheet of paper, right? And and

1:07:07

Elon Musk talks about it all the time,

1:07:08

right? It's like,

1:07:11

you know, he's like, take a clean sheet

1:07:12

of paper. The biggest mistake engineers

1:07:15

make is optimizing a part that shouldn't

1:07:17

exist,

1:07:19

>> right?

1:07:19

>> Yeah.

1:07:20

>> It's like you know,

1:07:21

>> talk about how deleting code is better

1:07:23

than writing code. A lot of the time

1:07:24

>> in my my book, The Mobile Wave, I lay

1:07:27

out, you know,

1:07:29

the the the critical component

1:07:31

technologies in the iPhone. If you don't

1:07:33

have the right battery, the lithium

1:07:35

battery, you don't have the right, you

1:07:36

know, touchscreen LED, there's no

1:07:38

iPhone.

1:07:39

>> Mhm.

1:07:40

>> And it's like, what did they do? Well,

1:07:42

they they left out the keyboard, you

1:07:44

know, and everybody else like, there's

1:07:45

no keyboard. Where's the keyboard? It's

1:07:47

like, well, that that's a moving part. a

1:07:50

lot of moving parts that should not be

1:07:51

there. And after a while, you look and

1:07:54

you're like, well, wait a minute. You

1:07:55

get rid of the keyboard and all of a

1:07:56

sudden you have infinite keyboards and

1:07:58

you just talk to the phone and why do I

1:07:59

need like like why do I even type in the

1:08:02

first place,

1:08:03

>> right?

1:08:04

>> Like, you know, it's like uh okay,

1:08:07

>> the world is full of people trying to

1:08:11

optimize a a very inefficient process

1:08:14

that should not exist. And I would say

1:08:18

2025 was a very special year. And is a

1:08:21

special year because what you have is

1:08:22

digital intelligence colliding with

1:08:24

digital capital colliding with digital

1:08:28

assets colliding with digital markets.

1:08:31

And a lot of people saying why is it

1:08:33

that I can't move everything 247 365 at

1:08:36

the speed of light a million times an

1:08:37

hour while I'm sleeping because my AI

1:08:40

was doing it for me.

1:08:43

And and and the answer is

1:08:46

any 16-year-old kid would get the fact

1:08:48

that that's a better world.

1:08:49

>> Yeah.

1:08:50

>> It's only the 65 year olds that got rich

1:08:54

in a in a different world, you know,

1:08:56

full of constraint that don't get that.

1:08:59

>> You think AI and uh the overlap with

1:09:01

Bitcoin? I mean, you're I didn't think

1:09:04

that the

1:09:05

>> the intersection of AI and Bitcoin would

1:09:08

be helping to design digital credit. uh

1:09:11

which is fascinating that it has been

1:09:14

what will be the longer term impact on

1:09:17

digital capital and bitcoin of AI will

1:09:20

will the robots use bitcoin look it's it

1:09:24

seems pretty clear we're moving toward a

1:09:26

world where a billion robots do all the

1:09:28

work and cars drive themselves and

1:09:30

there's a billion AIs in cyerspace doing

1:09:33

all the thinking for us and and you sit

1:09:36

down and you're a professor and you're

1:09:37

like I never really I never could solve

1:09:39

this coal fusion thing and you know if

1:09:42

you wanted to solve coal fusion or

1:09:44

create another nuclear reactor and you

1:09:45

you there'd be like you know 97 dudes

1:09:49

that spent their life on it and they'd

1:09:50

all tell you the reason it's not doable

1:09:53

>> you know and it's just like me asking I

1:09:56

got an army of lawyers you know I got an

1:09:58

army of bankers I ask every ar you know

1:10:00

the lawyers and the bankers is it

1:10:02

possible to do this like we'll get back

1:10:03

to you in a month and after a month they

1:10:06

get back to you and say well you know

1:10:07

you know we're not quite sure but it's

1:10:09

never been done for

1:10:11

you know it's like and so I'mware

1:10:14

>> if you're willing to wait a year you

1:10:15

know a year will go by and you won't get

1:10:18

an answer but you go to the AI and you

1:10:20

say well I have this opinion I want to

1:10:22

do this and this and this this way and

1:10:24

can you figure out if that's possible

1:10:26

you put it into deep research mode and

1:10:27

you grind it three or four times like

1:10:30

yeah well you ought to do this and this

1:10:31

and this and this and

1:10:33

>> and uh what you've done is and it's very

1:10:36

important right you've taken And the

1:10:41

lawyer that's read everything that's

1:10:43

ever been filed in securities law

1:10:45

without any pride of authorship, without

1:10:46

an economic motive, without, you know,

1:10:49

any prejudice or bias or any baggage,

1:10:54

you know, that doesn't mind if you call

1:10:56

it stupid or you tell it that it's not

1:10:58

working hard enough. And and you've used

1:11:01

that to get the first thousand man years

1:11:04

of research done.

1:11:06

And I'm, you know,

1:11:09

I'm of the opinion, you know, you think

1:11:10

about the definition of a PhD. It's like

1:11:12

someone capable of making a siminal

1:11:14

contribution to the body of human

1:11:15

knowledge. And there's 10 million of

1:11:18

them. And you can't get a PhD without

1:11:20

having written a dissertation. But the

1:11:21

problem is by the time you get to that

1:11:24

point, you've got so much baggage.

1:11:27

So you know you've got so so much built

1:11:31

up belief system because human beings

1:11:35

we use uh we use uristics and rules of

1:11:39

thumb and broomemides and you know

1:11:42

conventional wisdom in order to

1:11:44

accelerate the human brain because you

1:11:47

just can't consider you can't be the

1:11:49

alpha zero right you can't consider the

1:11:52

full state space of options and you

1:11:54

can't go and read aund 100,000 books

1:11:57

every time someone asks you one

1:11:59

question. So you have to kind of just

1:12:00

fall back on, you know, these simple

1:12:03

broomemides or simple conventional

1:12:05

rules. And so you're taking shortcuts

1:12:08

>> because of the limitations of one human

1:12:11

brain.

1:12:12

The AI doesn't have to take the

1:12:14

shortcut. The AI can say, "Well,

1:12:15

actually, I did read the 100,000 yeah

1:12:18

>> books and I actually found an example."

1:12:21

And so I think we're moving to a new

1:12:24

world and the new world is, you know, a

1:12:27

billion people do the work of a PhD and

1:12:31

a billion people solve a billion

1:12:33

problems and they have the they have the

1:12:35

equivalent of 10,000

1:12:39

hyper PhDs that think a million times

1:12:42

faster that work 24/7, 365.

1:12:45

What happens when you actually tell the

1:12:47

AIs to grind the AIs and you unleash a

1:12:50

million AIs to tell a million AIs to do

1:12:53

it? And you know, the real evil genius

1:12:55

guys are like, well, I create like five

1:12:57

AIs in a committee. I make them fight

1:12:59

with each other and I make them take the

1:13:01

opposite points of it until, you know,

1:13:04

they've ground through the thing. And

1:13:06

>> I'm like, oh, that's that's really

1:13:07

wicked what you're doing there. And so I

1:13:10

think um

1:13:12

I think we're in a whole brave new world

1:13:15

and there's you know there's two types

1:13:18

of uh two types of thinkers, two types

1:13:21

of systems, two types corporations.

1:13:24

There's the person that says, "Oh,

1:13:26

digital assets and digital intelligence.

1:13:28

I can do everything a million times

1:13:30

better, a million times faster, a

1:13:32

million times stronger, and the world's

1:13:33

going to be a million times better."

1:13:35

>> And then there's the and I'm going to do

1:13:37

it with intelligence, digital assets,

1:13:39

and digital intelligence. And then

1:13:40

there's the other side. They're like,

1:13:42

"We don't want the AI to give you the

1:13:44

answer. We don't like the answer. We

1:13:46

don't. Please don't use it. Might be a

1:13:48

security leak." I've literally met

1:13:49

people where they're like, "My legal

1:13:51

department won't let me use the AI to

1:13:53

answer this question." Just like those

1:13:55

teachers are like, "We don't want the

1:13:56

students using the AI." Are you kidding

1:13:58

>> They haven't figured out how to let them

1:14:00

>> Here's we're bragging. Well, you know,

1:14:02

the kids used the AI and the and the

1:14:04

problem was the AI gave him an answer.

1:14:06

So, we had to train the AI to not give

1:14:08

the kids the answer. It's like, oh,

1:14:10

yeah. Well, you know, the kid got a

1:14:11

jackhammer and jackhammering through the

1:14:13

mountain, but that was a problem because

1:14:15

we really wanted them to bang away on a

1:14:17

rubber mallet like we did. Like, there's

1:14:20

literally people that are afraid the

1:14:21

technology might work too well and we

1:14:23

just have to dumb it down, right? Make

1:14:26

it woke. Make it make it stupid. Well,

1:14:30

what if what if the 12y old actually got

1:14:33

the answer?

1:14:34

>> Well, we really want them to we want

1:14:37

them to like take the shovel and dig the

1:14:39

hole because that's how we used to dig

1:14:42

holes with shovels. It's like,

1:14:44

>> yeah,

1:14:44

>> well, the kid figured out how to hijack

1:14:47

a million robots to like build a new

1:14:49

city and we live happily ever after. And

1:14:51

then the kid cured cancer and 3,700

1:14:53

other diseases. But that's cheating

1:14:56

because we really wanted them to like

1:14:57

work slower, [laughter]

1:14:59

you know. It's like,

1:15:00

>> yeah,

1:15:01

>> there are going to be governments that

1:15:02

want to slow it down.

1:15:04

>> It's like you see it right now in

1:15:05

authoritarian cultures, you know, we

1:15:07

don't want people to move money too

1:15:08

fast.

1:15:09

>> Yeah.

1:15:09

>> We don't.

1:15:10

>> Right.

1:15:11

>> We We don't want someone to accomplish

1:15:13

things on Saturday afternoon. Yeah. You

1:15:16

know, when the Puritans showed up in

1:15:18

Boston, if they caught you working on

1:15:20

Sunday, they whipped you.

1:15:22

>> Yeah.

1:15:23

>> It's like like it's a religious thing

1:15:25

sometimes or it's a political thing.

1:15:27

>> So interesting.

1:15:28

>> And so you But yeah, just like, you

1:15:30

know, the Japanese didn't want

1:15:32

explosives to corrupt their military

1:15:35

system, [laughter]

1:15:36

>> you know. And the Chinese, you know, you

1:15:38

had a centralized emperor in China and

1:15:40

he actually kept modern munitions

1:15:43

technology out of China. That worked

1:15:45

until the British warships showed up and

1:15:47

sailed up the river, you know, and then

1:15:49

that didn't work anymore. You know, if

1:15:50

you read about the opium wars.

1:15:52

>> Yeah.

1:15:53

>> Right. At the end of the day, you can

1:15:55

slow down the advance of technology only

1:15:58

for so long and you put your head in the

1:16:01

sand and at some point someone that

1:16:03

doesn't happen to share your fear of the

1:16:05

technology uses it to send a

1:16:07

robot-driven swarm army, right? To

1:16:11

topple your particular political system.

1:16:14

And then people like, "Oh yeah, well, I

1:16:16

guess airplanes work." You know, when

1:16:18

they start dropping bombs on our head,

1:16:20

[laughter]

1:16:21

>> it's like, h well, they're not using

1:16:23

horses on us anymore. They used Yeah,

1:16:25

because machine guns and tanks actually

1:16:27

seem like a better idea. And you know,

1:16:30

it's like the the general subtext of

1:16:33

that is paradigm shifts come when the

1:16:35

old guard dies or when there's a war and

1:16:38

science advances one funeral at a time,

1:16:42

right? And uh and that's how this stuff

1:16:44

is going to advance. And maybe the death

1:16:46

will be the death of the bank. Maybe

1:16:48

it'll be the death of the corporation.

1:16:50

Maybe it'll be the death of the city

1:16:51

state, you know, the banking capital of

1:16:54

the 20th century. Won't be the banking

1:16:55

centers of the 21st century because the

1:16:58

money will move. Very interesting.

1:17:00

Before we wrap, I got a couple other

1:17:02

quicker questions. Um,

1:17:05

what about quantum computing? There's a

1:17:07

big people must ask you this. Um,

1:17:09

they've been asking me for five plus

1:17:11

years. Will quantum, a cryptographically

1:17:14

relevant quantum computer, pose a threat

1:17:16

to Bitcoin? And if so, how should the

1:17:18

Bitcoin world be thinking about

1:17:20

mitigating or defending against that

1:17:21

threat?

1:17:21

>> Yeah, it's a reminder that a a pessimist

1:17:25

imagines a problem and thinks the world

1:17:27

is doomed and they kind of feed on their

1:17:30

pessimist and gloat over it and gle and

1:17:32

the optimist imagine the problem and

1:17:34

sees us solving the problem and how the

1:17:36

world will be a better place. So let's

1:17:38

take quantum computer. Okay,

1:17:41

there there's going to be a point when

1:17:44

the world will form a consensus that

1:17:46

there's a quantum threat. We're not

1:17:48

there now, but you won't miss it because

1:17:51

the United States government will direct

1:17:54

all of the defense contractors to

1:17:56

upgrade their encryption algorithms to

1:17:58

be quantum resistant.

1:18:01

and Microsoft and Apple and Google will

1:18:03

ship a quantum upgrade

1:18:06

>> and your bank, let's say you've got your

1:18:08

money at JP Morgan, they will ship an

1:18:11

upgrade and they will say, you know,

1:18:14

there's a there's a a need for us to

1:18:17

upgrade our encryption algorithms. So,

1:18:19

please install the new client software

1:18:21

and reauthenticate yourself. And you've

1:18:23

got X days, 90 days, 30 days, whatever

1:18:27

number of days to do this. And if you

1:18:30

don't, we're going to freeze your funds

1:18:33

>> for your own good.

1:18:35

Okay? It's not that complicated. Every

1:18:38

single system on Earth, every iPhone,

1:18:41

every Android phone, every Can you

1:18:43

imagine? You walk into the office and

1:18:45

your boss says, your IT guy goes, "We

1:18:48

need to upgrade our software to be

1:18:50

quantum resistant now." And you're like,

1:18:53

"Well, I just decided I don't want to."

1:18:56

Okay. Well, that's a condition of

1:18:57

employment. How many people are going to

1:18:59

say, "I just decided I didn't want to

1:19:01

upgrade this software." You're not going

1:19:04

to have a job. You're gonna come back

1:19:05

from the border and they're gonna say,

1:19:07

you know, you need the quantum resistant

1:19:09

border solver. You're like, well, I just

1:19:11

would rather come back to the country

1:19:12

without it. You're not getting in,

1:19:15

right?

1:19:16

>> Uh and so at the point where we have

1:19:20

global consensus, it's like Y2K is like

1:19:23

anything else. There's not going to be a

1:19:25

debate.

1:19:27

The Bitcoin network just runs on

1:19:28

software. There's going to be a quantum

1:19:31

upgrade. It's going to have quantum

1:19:32

resistant encryption libraries. I

1:19:35

wouldn't be surprised if they're not the

1:19:37

same libraries that are in the iPhone

1:19:39

and the Android phone and the Microsoft

1:19:41

network. It's going to be a global

1:19:43

standard and people are going to debate

1:19:46

it. We're going to roll out the system

1:19:49

and then everyone is going to upgrade to

1:19:53

the software. We're going to reenrypt

1:19:55

all the Bitcoin and all the wallets and

1:19:58

anything that's uh that is uh

1:20:00

susceptible to quantum threat.

1:20:03

It's going to get re-encrypted if the

1:20:05

holders of the private keys are alive

1:20:08

and if they like money.

1:20:09

>> Yeah.

1:20:10

>> If they're dead, they're not going to

1:20:12

reenrypt. And if they've lost the keys,

1:20:15

they're not going to reenrypt. This is

1:20:17

going to be a massive upgrade to network

1:20:20

security and it's going to be a massive

1:20:22

deflationary event and we're going to

1:20:24

get the answer to the age-old question.

1:20:27

How much Bitcoin's been lost?

1:20:29

>> And if the number is 5 million, we're

1:20:31

going to see that the supply of Bitcoin

1:20:32

is going to go from 16 from 21 million

1:20:35

to 16 million and the price of Bitcoin

1:20:38

is going to go up.

1:20:39

>> Interesting,

1:20:39

>> right? and and ultimately the quantum

1:20:41

leap, call it the Bitcoin quantum leap,

1:20:46

>> is going to be the best thing to ever

1:20:47

happen to the Bitcoin network, right?

1:20:49

And the only difference between the way

1:20:52

that um a bank handles it and the way

1:20:55

the Bitcoin community handles it is

1:20:58

because it we're global and more

1:21:00

decentralized, we're probably going to

1:21:01

do this not over the course of 30 days

1:21:03

or 90 days. It'll probably take two

1:21:05

years or one year,

1:21:07

>> right? or some amount of time. But, you

1:21:10

know, you're going to argue to me that

1:21:12

some dude that's got a billion dollars

1:21:13

of Bitcoin is going to decide they just

1:21:15

don't want to upgrade. I don't think so.

1:21:19

>> Yeah.

1:21:19

>> Right. And uh in this particular case,

1:21:21

you could say, you know, the haters, the

1:21:24

skeptics, like, well, you know, you're

1:21:25

not going to get consensus really like

1:21:28

all the smart people with money in the

1:21:30

world that thought it was smart to put

1:21:31

their money on the crypto network. You

1:21:33

think they're the people too stupid to

1:21:35

want to upgrade? I don't I think you're

1:21:37

going to get consensus like well it'll

1:21:39

be too decentralized. You know how

1:21:41

decentralized the United States

1:21:43

government is, right? You realize how

1:21:46

many defense contractors there are like

1:21:50

the Walmart supply chain. If you

1:21:52

actually look at the supply chains in

1:21:54

the world, there's 100,000 companies

1:21:57

that are all going to have to upgrade.

1:21:59

It's they're going to figure it out,

1:22:01

right? And so in this particular case,

1:22:05

>> there's going to be an upgrade. The the

1:22:08

network security is going to upgrade.

1:22:10

The uh the the wallet addresses that

1:22:13

don't upgrade are getting frozen. No

1:22:15

one's going to complain because the only

1:22:17

people that don't upgrade will be dead

1:22:19

people.

1:22:19

>> Got it?

1:22:20

>> Right. And and the dead are not going to

1:22:22

complain about it.

1:22:24

>> And those that lost their wallet, they

1:22:26

lost their private keys, is not going to

1:22:28

matter. It's going to be a good thing.

1:22:30

And this is just a natural challenge and

1:22:33

response. You know, the the network is

1:22:36

going to be strengthened and hardened by

1:22:39

>> because intelligent people normally

1:22:43

respond to challenges in an intelligent

1:22:45

way. The only people that think the

1:22:47

community won't are people just hate

1:22:50

Bitcoin.

1:22:50

>> Yeah.

1:22:51

>> They hate the Bitcoiners. They hate the

1:22:53

Bitcoin community. or they have a

1:22:55

personal agenda of spreading fear and

1:22:57

uncertainty and doubt for some evil

1:23:00

nefarious purpose generally because they

1:23:03

want to sell you something. They want to

1:23:05

they want to neg you and they want to

1:23:07

make you insecure so you'll give them

1:23:09

your money. They so they can control you

1:23:11

or manipulate you some way.

1:23:13

>> And I think it's very important to

1:23:15

transcend that fear and cynicism and

1:23:18

skepticism and get on with your life

1:23:20

because otherwise you'll never

1:23:21

accomplish anything. I think it's a very

1:23:23

optimistic and inspiring answer. Another

1:23:25

Bitcoin community question. I know

1:23:28

you're aware of this debate that's been

1:23:30

happening. I would say mostly online

1:23:31

though. I mean, I don't see it much in

1:23:33

my day-to-day in the Bitcoin world, but

1:23:34

about non-monetary arbitrary data

1:23:37

transactions. Um, some call spam, right?

1:23:40

could be JPEGs or other sort of junk

1:23:43

that is put on the blockchain. But in

1:23:45

some cases could be proofs for a layer 2

1:23:47

or zero knowledge type stuff, but a

1:23:50

portion of the Bitcoin community thinks

1:23:51

these should not exist and has put forth

1:23:53

an idea to fork Bitcoin or another one

1:23:56

to confiscate low value Bitcoin to

1:23:58

reduce the UTXO set. Do you have a view

1:24:01

on this debate? You know, which was sort

1:24:02

of catalyzed by the release of Bitcoin

1:24:03

Core V30. be hyper hyper conservative

1:24:07

about changing the protocol

1:24:09

>> any change

1:24:11

>> very conservative and and we should make

1:24:14

sure that we have global consensus

1:24:17

when when 8 billion people in the world

1:24:19

have global consensus that quantum

1:24:21

computers are a threat I believe we

1:24:24

should upgrade the software

1:24:25

>> got it

1:24:26

>> but when half the community believes

1:24:29

it's a bad idea and the other half the

1:24:31

community believes I think you should

1:24:32

slow down right these changes. I think

1:24:35

we should be very very conservative

1:24:37

about the default settings. We should be

1:24:39

very conservative about the protocol.

1:24:42

>> I've said before many times that if you

1:24:45

wanted to undermine the network, the way

1:24:48

you do it is by infinite funding of

1:24:50

highly qualified developers and tell

1:24:52

them to improve it. Mhm.

1:24:54

>> And I I think at its base, Bitcoin is is

1:24:58

a monetary protocol and the lack of

1:25:04

rapid mutation is the feature, not the

1:25:08

bug, right? And so I think I I'm not in

1:25:12

the camp of people enthusiastically

1:25:15

adding features to it. And I and I I

1:25:18

think that, you know, the way that you

1:25:21

wreck a good thing is you speculate

1:25:26

that it will fail unless you add a

1:25:29

boatload of features to it.

1:25:31

>> But they would argue some of the this

1:25:32

the fork proposers would argue that

1:25:34

features were added to it and they want

1:25:36

to remove them. You know, is that but it

1:25:39

would be a controversial fork.

1:25:42

>> Yeah. They're sort of saying go back to

1:25:45

an even more conservative view of

1:25:47

Bitcoin.

1:25:48

>> So in a way I feel like it kind of goes

1:25:50

>> conservative and I think I think if

1:25:52

you're introducing a change which is so

1:25:55

controversial you might want to slow it

1:25:57

down.

1:25:58

>> Okay. Might want to slow it down.

1:26:00

>> Yep.

1:26:01

>> And you want to think a little bit and I

1:26:02

always think there's unintended

1:26:03

consequences. Second order, third order,

1:26:06

fourth order, you know. And uh so I you

1:26:10

know I think it's a healthy debate. I

1:26:11

empathize with the people that just

1:26:13

don't don't like someone effing with the

1:26:16

network. Don't f with the network. Yeah.

1:26:19

>> Right. It's like [snorts]

1:26:20

>> like the the path of least resistance,

1:26:23

the path the path of travel, the most

1:26:26

likely outcome right now is Bitcoin

1:26:28

emerges to be a $200 trillion world

1:26:30

reserve capital network and uh and

1:26:34

everything you think is a is a bug is

1:26:36

probably the feature. That's the

1:26:38

probably the reason it's succeeding.

1:26:39

>> Yeah. And when you try to fix the things

1:26:41

that you think are the bugs, you might

1:26:45

And uh and that's why even even if you

1:26:49

take the elephant in the room like the

1:26:50

quantum threat, I you know, I'm not in

1:26:52

favor of rushing it.

1:26:54

>> Yeah.

1:26:55

>> It's like I I think that rushing, you

1:26:58

know, to solve global warming, you know,

1:27:00

for a while people thought, you know,

1:27:02

aerosol spray was going to destroy the

1:27:04

ozone and kill us all. You know, it's

1:27:05

like there's always something. And then

1:27:07

they thought nuclear injury was going to

1:27:09

kill us all. And then they thought blah

1:27:10

blah blah if we don't go to solar power

1:27:12

is going to kill us all. And then they

1:27:13

thought the ocean was going to rise and

1:27:16

flood Miami Beach and it's going to kill

1:27:18

us all. And all of these things are

1:27:20

normally alarmist. And what follows next

1:27:22

is a law that taxes everybody or

1:27:26

restraint of trade or therefore I'm

1:27:28

seizing control of the government to

1:27:30

prevent you from blank. And I

1:27:32

>> so I I just think that um generally we

1:27:36

ought to be very conservative about

1:27:39

protocol bloat. We should be

1:27:41

conservative with the clients. I think

1:27:44

it's healthy it's healthy to have more

1:27:46

clients. I think it's healthy to have

1:27:48

people working on alternate versions of

1:27:50

Bitcoin and and uh and I think it's

1:27:53

healthy to have the debate and I think u

1:27:56

we just ought to be very very careful

1:27:58

with the protocol. I think that's a good

1:28:00

answer. Last question, Michael. I would

1:28:02

say you're the most influential person

1:28:04

in the world about Bitcoin today.

1:28:07

>> Does that how do you think about that

1:28:09

role? Does it weigh on you when you do

1:28:11

you feel like you're you've got a burden

1:28:13

to bear on Bitcoin's behalf, the

1:28:15

millions of people?

1:28:17

>> I'm grateful to be on the journey with

1:28:20

hundreds of millions of other people. Um

1:28:23

I'm I feel blessed to be given a mission

1:28:25

that is meaningful to civilization. I I

1:28:28

feel like I got lucky to be granted this

1:28:32

opportunity at a late stage in my

1:28:35

career. You know, I was 55 years old and

1:28:38

I was ready to retire, you know, quietly

1:28:41

into the good night and that was the end

1:28:43

of it. M

1:28:44

>> and then all of a sudden this came along

1:28:46

and I started seeing that there is just

1:28:48

a profound amount of good that we could

1:28:50

do for billions of people if we spread

1:28:54

you know digital

1:28:57

assets digital capital digital credit

1:29:00

you know and we know eventually digital

1:29:03

freedom digital property rights

1:29:06

for the first time in the history of the

1:29:07

human race I think Bitcoin represents

1:29:09

the ability to tightly bind economic

1:29:11

energy to the individual That's the

1:29:13

that's the most profoundly disruptive

1:29:15

transformational change, you know, in

1:29:18

the economic history of humanity.

1:29:21

>> You know, it's got to, you know, a a

1:29:23

protocol to bind economic energy to a

1:29:27

person,

1:29:29

a mathematical protocol like, you know,

1:29:32

and a communication protocol. It's like

1:29:33

it's like language and math, an economic

1:29:37

protocol. It's pretty profound. So I

1:29:39

feel responsible for doing my best uh to

1:29:43

preach that gospel, to spread that word,

1:29:46

also to to try to communicate uh to

1:29:50

groups that don't see it that way,

1:29:53

right? To go go communicate to the

1:29:55

bankers, make sure that you deescalate

1:29:59

inflammatory responses. Bitcoin

1:30:02

represents a profoundly humanitarian,

1:30:04

egalitarian, utilitarian,

1:30:07

you know, revolution for humanity. That

1:30:11

means the go, you know, no government

1:30:12

should fear it. No bank should fear it.

1:30:14

No corporation should fear it.

1:30:17

No mayor should fear it. No institution

1:30:20

should fear it. No family should fear

1:30:23

it. Nobody should fear it. They

1:30:25

shouldn't fear it anymore than you

1:30:26

should fear fire, math, English,

1:30:29

electricity,

1:30:30

>> right? I I'd like to see it embraced as

1:30:35

as it's a profound breakthrough

1:30:38

and maybe the biggest the biggest

1:30:41

engineering breakthrough in the history

1:30:43

of economics, right? It's a it's the

1:30:46

point at which economics goes from being

1:30:48

a you know an art

1:30:51

to an engineering discipline or a true

1:30:54

science you know a lot of superstition

1:30:57

you know a lot of religious and religion

1:31:01

and politics and economics and there

1:31:04

isn't so much religion and politics in

1:31:07

uh rocket science

1:31:10

>> right the way that the Russians the

1:31:12

Chinese and the Americans build rocket

1:31:14

they don't vary

1:31:15

dramatically. There's no one saying I

1:31:17

think bolts of wood should be used

1:31:19

>> to build the rocket because you build a

1:31:21

rocket, you do it wrong, it burns up on

1:31:23

re-entry. There's really, you know,

1:31:25

maybe on, you know, on blastoff, there's

1:31:27

not really a debate, but there's massive

1:31:30

debates in economics. And so, I think

1:31:33

it's pretty profound. I feel very

1:31:35

grateful to have the opportunity and I

1:31:37

find it very motivational to have the

1:31:40

mission

1:31:41

>> you know and and uh and so I I do think

1:31:44

it's energizing and and uh you know this

1:31:49

there's probably no better feeling than

1:31:53

going anywhere in the world walking down

1:31:55

a beach in South America or walking to a

1:31:58

through a parking lot or on a runway on

1:32:00

in Europe or Asia and some you know the

1:32:03

guy that's you you know, the taxing the

1:32:05

aircraft or refueling the aircraft or

1:32:07

the guy that's parking the cars. I go to

1:32:09

Mara Lago, the guys that valet park the

1:32:12

car, they're like, "Okay, thank you."

1:32:14

Like, "We're we're with you." Or the guy

1:32:16

that's the bar barback right at the bar

1:32:18

or like there's a lot of there's a lot

1:32:21

of people from all walks of life who

1:32:24

have derived inspiration and they feel

1:32:27

like there's hope.

1:32:29

And fundamentally, you know, like you

1:32:32

have, you know, you have uh days where,

1:32:34

you know, the market's crashing and all

1:32:36

the short sellers are gloating and

1:32:38

they're like gleefully celebrating, you

1:32:41

know, can they liquidate you? And that's

1:32:43

the negative part of the business, all

1:32:45

of the toxicity and the the hate and the

1:32:48

controversy and the and the ignorance.

1:32:51

But the part that motivates you that you

1:32:53

always got to stay grounded on is is the

1:32:57

traditional finance world is not

1:32:59

offering hope to 8 billion people,

1:33:01

right? The the conventional banking

1:33:04

offer is we'll take you money and give

1:33:06

you nothing and and we'll actually keep

1:33:08

5% of it a year and hope you don't

1:33:10

notice, right? And the credit market is

1:33:13

yeah, we're going to we're going to take

1:33:15

all everything you invest and we're

1:33:17

going to just keep 300 basis points of

1:33:19

it and hope you don't notice.

1:33:20

>> Yeah.

1:33:21

Right. And you know, and and your vision

1:33:24

or your hope, if you're a taxi cab

1:33:27

driver in Africa, well, it's like you

1:33:29

have like zero hope whatsoever until the

1:33:32

digital assets world came along, right?

1:33:35

And so we're actually giving people a

1:33:37

path forward, a hopeful future, right? A

1:33:41

future you can get excited about for

1:33:43

yourself, for your family, for your

1:33:44

corporation.

1:33:46

create a business and put it on the

1:33:48

global grid and do it with 20th century

1:33:51

finance rails in any nation in Africa or

1:33:56

South America or Asia. I challenge you.

1:33:59

>> It's impossible. Yeah.

1:34:00

>> You can't. It's literally hopeless.

1:34:03

>> And so what motivates me is, you know,

1:34:07

now we've got hope. We've got economic

1:34:09

empowerment and we've got hope. And

1:34:11

there's a million people debating, you

1:34:13

know, what's the right way to do it? But

1:34:15

the point really is there is zero

1:34:17

debate. You know, your economic life

1:34:21

expectancy is short

1:34:24

and it's going to be brutal and ugly and

1:34:26

it's going to be a painful end

1:34:29

if you don't have this technology. And

1:34:31

it couldn't be clearer right now, right?

1:34:34

That that we've got modern economics

1:34:37

that we're preaching. And there's no

1:34:39

reason why you shouldn't actually be

1:34:41

conveying that message to every

1:34:43

politician, every academic, every

1:34:45

entrepreneur, every investor, every

1:34:48

individual everywhere on Earth. Because

1:34:51

regardless of our political and

1:34:52

religious differences, there's no doubt

1:34:55

that humanity will be elevated by

1:34:58

digital assets, digital capital, digital

1:35:02

technology. And uh it's it's a struggle

1:35:06

worth taking on in the modern world.

1:35:10

>> Uh there you have it. Owner not

1:35:12

unsurprisingly, Michael Sailor, owner of

1:35:14

hope.com. [music] Uh and that was a very

1:35:17

inspirational way to end. And Michael uh

1:35:19

chairman and founder of strategy um as

1:35:22

just I forget what you said, maybe the

1:35:24

[music] hundth idea you guys tried, but

1:35:26

this one has hit its stride. Uh not to

1:35:29

use a a joke there. Michael, thank you

1:35:31

so much for coming back on Galaxy

1:35:33

Brains.

1:35:33

>> Yeah, thanks for having me.

1:35:42

>> Thank you for listening to Galaxy

1:35:42

Brains, the weekly podcast from Galaxy

1:35:44

[music] Research. I'm Alex Thornne, head

1:35:45

of firmwide research at Galaxy. Follow

1:35:47

me on X at Intangible Coins. Follow

1:35:50

Galaxy Research on Xgxy

1:35:53

Research. Read our written reports at

1:35:55

galaxy.com/ressearch.

1:35:57

And don't forget if you like Galaxy

1:35:59

Brains to like and subscribe on your

1:36:00

favorite podcast platforms like YouTube,

1:36:02

Spotify, Apple Podcast, and more.

Copied!