Michael Saylor & The Ultimate Bitcoin Strategy
Galaxy · 2025-12-18 · 1h 36m · View on YouTube →
We interviewed you last year around
around this time about a year ago.
[music] Bitcoin had just crossed 100K
for the first time. Today it's trading
at 87K. Why did Bitcoin underperform?
>> Most people will be followers, but
there's always going to be a leader.
This is a battle for the future of
money. In my opinion, we have the
world's greatest product. The number one
way to destroy or undermine your first
idea for the 30 trillion is to come up
with a second idea and get distracted.
You want to look at the history of
failure. It's alpha males [music] that
solved one thing and think that that's
solved and done and they come up with 10
more [music] things to solve. The most
important days of your life, the day
you're born and the day you figure out
why.
>> Welcome to Galaxy Brains.
>> An infinite amount of cash cash. I'm
your host, Alex Thorn. The US banking
system is sound and resilient. Bitcoin
made a new alltime high.
>> If you're not long, if you're not long,
you're short. Satashi's going to come on
there, laugh his darkly, go quiet. All
Bitcoin is going to be erased.
>> Bitcoin. Bitcoin is the best crypto out
there.
>> Bitcoin is going to zero.
>> Welcome back to Galaxy Brains. I'm Alex
Thornne, head of firmwide research at
Galaxy. We have a great episode for you
this week. Phineas and I have just
returned from Miami to interview Michael
Sailor uh in his home. Wait till you see
this set where we recorded. Uh we were
sitting in the red room uh at his house
in Miami and it's really a fascinating
interview. I I was frankly blown away by
the evolution in Michael's thinking and
how far beyond the other treasury
companies strategy really is and how
deep he's thinking about strategy's role
in the future uh economy. It's not just
a company buying Bitcoin and putting on
its balance sheet. I know you're going
to enjoy this interview. Um, and I
thought he was characteristically
extremely articulate and I think we
talked about AI, we talked about Bitcoin
development. I think uh people who have
been following the core versus knots
debate in Bitcoin will find his answer
on this very interesting. Also, quantum
computing. Michael's a very uh classic
optimist about things working out in
Bitcoin's favor. Look, before we get
into that interview, I need to remind
you to please refer to the link to
disclaimer in the podcast notes. And
note that none of the information in
this podcast constitutes investment
advice or an offer, recommendation, or
solicitation by Galaxy or any of its
affiliates to buy or sell any
securities.
Welcome back to Galaxy Brains. As
always, I'm your host, Alex Thor, head
of firmwide research at Galaxy Bitcoin,
not zero. We have a great episode for
you this week. Michael Sailor, chairman
and founder of Strategy. Thank you so
much for coming back on Galaxy Brands,
Michael.
>> Yeah, thanks for having me. Well,
actually, thanks for having me and us in
your home in Miami. Um, it's been quite
a ride this year. New all-time highs
now. I mean, when we interviewed you
last year around around this time, about
a year ago, Bitcoin had just crossed
100K for the first time. Um, today it's
trading at 87K. Why why did Bitcoin
underperform this year?
uh you know it's it's the world's
greatest free market in capital and uh
85% of the Bitcoin you know
notwithstanding all of the corporations
that have been acquiring it that people
talk about you know Black Rockck and
Strategy get all the publicity but 85%
of the Bitcoin is held in crypto OG
hands we can't even identify them you
know and I talk to the traders they say
that you know the the derivatives market
the perpetual market drives this much
more than spot, which means the $1.7
trillion worth of of capital that can be
20x or 30x levered is held by people
that we don't know. And so I think that
uh that in the near term their moods and
their drivers drive this market and and
I guess that's the beauty of free market
capitalism. But uh I think that the more
important point is the last 12 months
have been probably the best 12 months in
the history of the industry uh in terms
of fundamentals and it's it's profound
what's happened since December.
>> What would you put at the top of the
list there? I mean I know we've had
changes in regulatory environment,
different types of institutional
adoption. What stands out to you the
most? Well,
>> let's tick off the highlights the last
12 months. You know, you have uh a
universally supportive administration, a
supportive head of the SEC, supportive
head of the CFTC, supportive head of the
Treasury, supportive president,
supportive vice president. You have
David Saxs, you know, go out p publicly
and say, you know, Bitcoin is a digital
commodity. It's digital gold. It's an
asset without an issuer. We recognize
it's it its special nature in the world,
you know, as a technology to propagate
property rights and freedom. That
happened in March of this year, right?
People forget how, you know, how uh how
that developed. We saw
we saw the spot bitcoin ETFs get
uncrippled. We uh we had Enkind creates
and redemptions. people can now swap
their Bitcoin for for uh IBIT type
shares and borrow against them and then
swap back. That was a big deal. We saw
the onshore derivatives market for IBIT
get uncrippled. It went from nothing to
10 billion and then when they actually
took the cuffs off it went to 50
billion. That's a big deal. Um we saw
guidance from the CFTC just last week.
You can now trade spot crypto assets
like Bitcoin on regulated commodities
exchanges in the US. You'll see them
start trading on the CME. We saw
guidance that you could start to use um
Bitcoin as collateral, right? Crypto
assets collateral against those
derivatives contracts and trading
contracts. That's a big deal.
We just saw guidance from the SEC that
it's possible for the DTC to uh to
tokenize their entire security
portfolio. We're talking all the
securities in the world moving on the
DTC. And the fact that that guidance
came from the SEC was a big deal. But
the fact that the CEO of the DTC got on
X and put out a video saying they're
enthusiastic about that was a big deal.
We saw favorable uh guidance come out of
uh the IRS and Treasury that made the
entire issue of unrealized capital gains
tax on crypto assets go away. That's a
big deal. We um we also saw um the
creation of the digital credit market.
my company, you know, started issuing
digital credit instruments and we did an
IPO
uh I guess it's like late January, early
February. Then we did a second, a third,
a fourth, and a fifth. We did five IPOs
of digital credit instruments and that
entire market went from nothing to 8
billion
in 10 months.
And we're and we're pioneering this
public digital credit market, but we
also saw now an avalanche of of
conventional banks. We saw the o we saw
guidance, positive guidance from the OC
and the FDIC probably every two months.
>> Yeah.
>> For the year like six salvos. And after
the sixth salvo, we started to see uh
the entire dam breaking and the banking
industry thaw. And now off the top of my
head, I think we've seen pro- digital
assets, pro pro- crypto, pro- Bitcoin
announcements from
City, Charles Schwab. Both have
announced they're going to custody and
extend credit on on Bitcoin in the
coming six months. We saw positive
announcements from JP Morgan. We saw
positive announcements from Bank of
America. We saw positive activity from
BNY Melon. We saw POS, you know, we saw
Standard Charter Bank and PNC Bank both
announce agreements with Coinbase,
>> you know, taking advantage of their
crypto as a service to custody and
handle and trade Bitcoin. We saw I think
we saw clear guidance from the OC that
it's okay for banks to handle, hold, and
trade and custody crypto assets on the
behalf of their customers.
Right? So 12 months ago, um, you could
barely get a loan against IBIT,
>> right?
>> And you couldn't get any credit against
BTC.
At this point in time, I think I can
count off the top of my head, eight
different banks that are offering credit
against IBIT, normally in the range of
sofur plus 50 basis points to sulfur
plus 75 basis points.
And we can see probably four banks or
more that are starting to starting to
suggest they'll move on to start to
issue credit against the underlying BTC
in the coming year. So that really
represents the formation of the credit
networks on top of crypto assets. So
public credit, banking credit, right?
Those were big deals. We also saw uh we
saw the first credit rating uh S&P gave
us a credit rating this year and that's
for the first time ever
and uh you know I remember uh when we
announced we were buying Bitcoin for our
balance sheet our insurance company
dropped us. We couldn't get DNO
insurance.
>> Wow. and we couldn't get it for it was
like three or four years and they
finally
unwound that you know so I'm not
underwriting the DNO insurance for my
own company anymore so you know that's a
bit a bit of a win so insurance yeah I'm
not saying we have fullthroated
insurance acceptance we certainly don't
but what we see oh and I I left out you
know the other obvious thing which is we
got fair value accounting
>> right it was impossible to recognize a
gain in a digital
asset investment until the year 2025.
And I and I guess beyond that, I guess I
would be remiss not to not to note that
I guess 200 publicly traded companies
put crypto assets of some sort on their
balance sheet this year.
>> Yep.
>> And we we went to 200 companies that
have Bitcoin on their balance sheet. So,
and I guess last last point, my company
must I think we raised 23 or 24 billion.
>> Yeah.
>> This year.
>> I think you bought more Bitcoin this
year than any year.
>> Yeah. You know, and so I I think um if I
was looking at the industry
fundamentals,
right, and and you remember what we were
talking about a year ago, right? You
couldn't have you couldn't have
predicted any of these things.
>> If I had predicted all this, you know,
you would have said, "You're being too
optimistic." And I don't think I would
have been
>> I don't think I would have been
ambitious, you know, or aspirational
enough to predict everything that
happened. But I would say it's exceeded
my expectations at a fundamental level
across the board. We couldn't have a
more favorable setup for global adoption
and institutional adoption of digital
assets in general. And and by the way,
I've been very Bitcoin ccentric here of
course
>> and we went on talked about digital
securities. You had the head of the SEC
saying we expect that all securities
will be tokenized on chain. You know
that you know that crypto task force was
a big deal. The head of the crypto task
force taking over the CFTC is big deal.
>> Mike Celig. Yeah.
>> Right. Um, and I think um I think the
the embrace and the success of digital
currency, the stable coins is a big
deal.
>> Yep.
And uh I just got back from the Middle
East and I met with all the sovereigns
and the banking regulators and you know
and and all the digital assets
innovators and it couldn't be clearer to
me that you know as enthusiastic as we
are in the US about digital assets at
this point they're just as enthusiastic
if not more enthusiastic and so I think
uh I I think we end the year with just a
lot of things to be grateful for in this
industry.
>> With that setup, what will be that you
think I mean that's so many things that
if you'd seen one of those headlines two
three years ago would have you'd see
you'd see a 20% candle or something on
Bitcoin price like what what will to be
the catalyst then for next year with
such a good setup. Is it just a matter
of you know working through some of
those like like you were talking about
the free market some of those OG sellers
or you know markets take time to change
their tune. I mean what's going to take
us higher? You know, I think the drivers
would be my checklist would be you watch
the derivatives market and the way it
forms and that's the offshore
derivatives market, the crypto native
derivatives market like you know
perpetuals, you know, 20x perpetuals
that forming onshore, you know, that's a
big deal. Uh cross margin, you know,
Bitcoin is collateral against
derivatives in the United States on
regulated exchange will be a big deal.
So the formation of the commodities
markets and the derivatives market and
how how we integrate regulated markets
with offshore markets. I think that'll
be a driver. I think the second driver
will be the formation of the bank credit
networks.
You know we you know when when Bitcoin's
90,000 a coin and you're selling 450
coins a day into the market, that's like
$40 million of natural supply,
>> right? you know, and and you worked it
out and it's like what 16 15 16 billion
a year or something of supply available
from the miners. So 16 billion dollars
is a year of supply. Every time a bank
creates $16 billion of credit, that's
one year supply taken out of
circulation. So, we're now getting to
the point where banks like City and Bank
of America and JP Morgan and Wells Fargo
or Schwab, any of those can create that
entire $16 billion worth of credit in 12
months. So, you're you're watching the
formation of major credit networks and
um you're looking at a $2 trillion asset
class that's been unbanked. Mhm.
>> And so as you watch the formation of
banking credit, you know, and corporate
credit uh instruments on top of that
asset class, that's going to be a big
driver.
I think the the growth of digital
credit, public credit like ST STRC
stretch,
>> yep,
>> it's big driver because in theory,
you've got $300 trillion of credit. If
you look at the credit markets, you
know, bank credit pays you nothing.
Treasury credit or money markets, you
know, they're paying you 50 basis points
in Japan and 100 basis points in Europe
and nothing in Switzerland and 370 basis
points in the US and it's probably
headed south. Mhm.
>> corporate credit, junk credit, private
credit, mortgage back credit, municipal
credit. These things are all indexed to
the risk-free rates in all those
nations. So you look at the traditional
credit markets,
most people what they'd like is a bank
account that pays them 8%. With no
duration, no delta, no credit risk,
right? They don't that's what they'd
like.
What they're getting is a bank account
that pays them zero or a money market
that pays them 2%.
And then they're reaching for yield. And
they're reaching for a yield by
accepting credit risk from a junk bond
issuer. Or they're going to go buy a
20-year bond they don't want. Nobody
wants a 20-year bond or a 10-year bond.
What they want is just not to lose their
money, right?
>> So, the existing credit markets have a
lot of very awful choices for people.
Either you've got to wait 30 years to
get paid and take 30 years of inflation
risk or you've got to bet on some going
out of business junk bond
uncolateralized issuer.
>> Right? Or you've got to accept nothing
and be happy about it. Right? And so
digital credit is spreading through that
market. And the promise of digital
credit is you know first and foremost if
you're willing to accept five or 10 V
maybe you get to 10% dividend right you
might get 10% dividend tax deferred you
know that's kind of the promise of an
STRC
>> right
>> but
I think the profound idea right the the
the big dream of everybody in the
Bitcoin industry everybody in crypto has
always been fix the money fix the world
right
>> the profound idea is rebuild build the
entire world's monetary order on digital
technology. So you start with this idea
of digital assets which offer the
promise of you know
speed of light between 8 billion
computers and 8 billion computers a
million times an hour and self-custody
on an Android phone 24/7 365 everywhere
right that's the digital asset vision
and that applies to digital tokens
digital securities digital commodities
you know digital currencies right that's
what holds the entire entire digital
industry together. And then the next
piece of that is building a digital
capital structure on top of a digital
commodity. That that's that's Bitcoin is
store of value.
And once you get digital capital, you
start thinking the third idea is digital
credit. What if I strip 90% of the risk
and 90% of the va off the digital
capital by overcolateralizing it 10 to1?
Mhm.
>> What if you issue $1 of digital credit
for every $10 of digital capital every
year? Right. And then [clears throat]
the last mile,
the last mile is what if we just build
digital money? And and [clears throat]
by digital money I mean what if we strip
the last five or 10 V off the instrument
and we make it zero V and maybe instead
of 10% 10V what if I get to 8% zero V or
7% zero V digital money and that's the
vision of a Bitcoin back stable coin
right
>> in the crypto industry like what if I
had a stable coin that paid you 8%
backed by Bitcoin I can't do that backed
by sovereign capital. I can't do it with
fiat credit. The best you'll ever get to
there is 4% or 3%. The risk-free rate,
but if I built it on digital capital
that was appreciating, I could go to 8%.
And I don't know whether I don't know
what the magic number is eight or seven
or six, but but I think the magic number
is 4% better than everything else.
Interesting. So if you're getting zero
in Japan and someone gives you 4% in yen
or 1% in euros, you get 5% in the euro
or 3% in dollars and you get to 7% in
dollars, I think you've just created
digital money and it it it checks the
box of is it a medium of exchange? Yeah,
sure it is. Right. It's completely
stable versus the world reserve currency
or against whatever you're spending in,
right? The euro, the yen.
>> Is it a store of value? Well, you know,
at the point that you start to clip to 7
8%, you're actually tracking the true
theoretical monetary inflation rate and
you're out you're outperforming the CPI.
So, regardless of what you think of of
what the true natural inflation is, the
general public will perceive it to be a
store of value, right? And and so now
you've got unit account, store of value,
medium of exchange built on digital
capital, and you know, how do you get
there? Well, you take digital credit, a
bit of digital credit like STRC, and
then you mix that with uh currency
equivalents. You know, the the stuff you
put in a stable coin. I'm going to give
you uh one month T bills, 20 20% T bills
and cash equivalents, 80% credit, get to
a blended rate of 9%.
>> Interesting. maybe uh layer on a
currency uh reserve a volatility reserve
buffer of 10% and you use that you know
to adjust for the the the five ball or
the 10 ball that's in the digital credit
instrument. You put shock absorbers
right on the credit to create money.
Now,
if you do that, you c you can any fund
manager, right? Anybody that knows how
to run a money market fund or any active
fund manager, private fund manager,
public fund manager, anybody could do
this. This is not rocket science. You
know, you take a hundred million by 80
million of digital credit, 20 million of
currency equivalents, layer $10 million
of a cash reserve on it, and then every
day at the end of the day, you draw down
the reserve to hit the nav to get the
nav to be $1.
>> Right. Right. And and on days when the
credit trades up, you replenish the
reserve and you can continuously re you
know fund the reserve with like maybe
you take 100 basis points off the top of
the credit and you fund the reserve. Now
if you do that
you can create a stable coin. We can't
call it a stable coin. You call it a
moneycoin.
>> Yeah.
>> You create a digital moneycoin that has
a nav of a dollar. you get the approval
of a digital assets regulator
and now you've just tokenized digital
money,
>> right?
>> And now you release that into the crypto
ecosystem and now you've got, you know,
something that competes with stable
coins that pays you 8%.
>> It's pretty interesting.
>> Or you create an ETF. We have we have
ETF money market funds. They have stable
nav. They pay you 4% or 3.8% or 3.5%,
right? It's not a new idea. Vanguard,
Black Rockck,
>> you know, Bitwise. Yeah. Anybody could
create a digital money fund. But now the
digital money fund is zero volt stable
NAV, $1 NAV
pays you eight, right? And and uh you
could even I mean the value added there
is you convert the monthly dividend of
say a stretch into a daily dividend,
right? You strip the ball, then you get
the regulatory approval, you put it on
the platform, right? And now you're now
you're circulating on the ETF rails.
That's digital money fund. But the most
ambitious idea which I you know it's
like the heavens open for me this year
and I just like click click click. You
know a year ago I didn't see digital
credit and I you know and so if you
can't see if you don't see digital
credit you can't see digital money. But
now what I realized is you go to a bank
and you create a digital money account.
You just get you get the approval of
your banking regulator to offer a
digital money account. Zero vault
powered by digital capital and digital
credit, right?
>> And now uh you just put your money in
the digital money account and you get
paid 8% daily on the banking system,
right? and Barkclays or B of A or JP
Morgan or Morgan Stanley or you know
First Bank of Abuhabi or Emirates Bank
or fill in your favorite bank you know
like would they do that? I think in the
UAE or the USA you actually have pro-
digital assets banking regulators,
right? If you have pro, by the way, if
you have pro- digital assets crypto
regulators, check. If you have pro-
digital asset security regulators,
check. And if you have pro digital
assets banking regulators, check. It
won't happen everywhere.
But the question is, will it happen
anywhere? Because
you want to be the digital banking
center of the 21st century.
The big idea is my bank offers a digital
money account and we pay 400 basis
points more than every other bank on
earth. And then you're not talking about
crypto billionaires wiring you billions
of dollars. You're talking about fiat
billionaires. You're talking about
everybody. And then that goes back into
the digital moneycoin stack. Does that
eventually flow into Bitcoin itself?
>> You buy 10 billion dollars of digital
money from your bank and $8 billion
flows into digital credit and that $8
billion goes into digital capital and
that goes into Bitcoin.
>> Interesting,
>> right? And and uh there's no reason I
mean what's the market? There's $200
trillion.
>> Yeah.
>> Right. There's $200 trillion of bank
credit, money market credit, and and
corporate, you know, type investment
credit, and it's all yielding 200 basis
points on average though for the ability
of sovereigns to issue debt to fund
their governments. Surely, I wouldn't
want to buy the, you know, one, two,
10year Treasury if I could buy this. If
you're if you're in the UAE, aren't you
really thinking that my bank offers
these bank accounts and foreigners wire
me 20 trillion dollars to my bank?
>> It's good for them, but is it good for
>> Well, the point is it's good.
>> Yeah,
>> it's good for the people that do it.
>> That's right.
>> Well, like you're you're asking the
question, if I if I invent coal fusion
and I have unlimited free electricity,
is that bad for people that sell
expensive oil?
>> Yeah, right. But it's good for the
people that create the unlimited free
electricity.
>> So then the the
>> we're talking about a we're talking
about the digital transformation of the
credit markets.
If if we offer digital credit that's 5x
over collateralized that pays 10%
dividends, what's that do for the junk
bond issuers that want to pay you 5%
uncolateralized?
>> Well, look, here's the good news. The
world doesn't it doesn't rationalize
overnight. If I gave you, you know, the
the perfect situation, it still takes a
decade before 10% of the world discovers
the perfect thing.
>> So there's time for debt issuers,
whether sovereigns or corporates, to
>> take place over 20 years.
>> Yeah. To adapt,
>> right? It's the world the world's going
to gradually adapt.
>> So you've been you amassed this treasury
of Bitcoin. Now you've been issuing
these digital credit instruments,
Stretch, Stride, Strive. Yeah. Uh it
>> so that's the middle part of the stack
to the digital money coin you're talking
about. Is strategy going to take steps?
Are you taking steps to issue this money
coin or is it something that you
envision as you've described that an
asset manager or a bank might issue
using your credit?
>> The way I see the industry evolving is
there's three layers. There's digital
capital, there's digital credit, and
there's digital money.
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. Our company strategy we exist to
create the digital credit. In essence,
the whole mission of the company is to
convert capital into credit. I think I
think it's reasonable for us to strip 80
to 90% of the risk and 80 to 90% of the
volatility off of the capital, right?
You know, if you're if you're being very
simplistic, right? I mean, I start with
$10 of Bitcoin. I issue $1 of credit.
Right.
>> All right. So, we can we can uh step it
down from, you know, a 50 V 50 ARR asset
and turn it into a 10 V 10
uh 10 ARR, right? A a 10% dividend
yield.
We can't create digital capital, right?
I mean, that's the world, right? You
need 700 million people in the crypto
industry and you need all of the
decentralized holders and the people we
don't know and the people we know and
all the buyers and and uh it goes
without saying, you know, it's an asset
without an issuer. We're the
beneficiary. It's very clear to me,
right? I can buy a billion dollars a
week for the past two weeks. The price
isn't paying attention to what I'm
doing, right? And that's good. That's a
good thing, right? uh it wouldn't be a
stable digital capital network if
anybody could influence it, right?
>> And so and so the digital capital layer
is a global phenomenon that's been
running since the since Satoshi, you
know, dropped the white paper and it
will keep running and there will always
be actors entering the space. the CFTC,
the SEC, the Black Rocks, the Vanguards,
the JP Morgans. I mean, they're all
players in the space. The foreigners,
the people you don't know, you know.
Didn't we just hear the Chinese shut
down a bunch of Bitcoin miners?
>> Saw that yet again.
>> They banned Bitcoin mining for what, the
sixth time?
>> Yeah.
>> In 12 years. It's like seems like every
two years or three years they like shut
it down. But it just doesn't go away
now, does it? So digital capital is a
global phenomena. We are beneficiaries
and we are we acknowledge that and we
build our company on that. our job is
converted to digital credit and I think
I think that's the one thing we can do
well and if you want to create digital
credit you need to be monmaniacally
focused on digital capital and you know
for every $10 of Bitcoin I hold on my
balance sheet I can probably create $1
credit you know you might even say if
you're being conser per year by you
might say for every $10 of equity
capital. I can probably create $1 a
credit per year, right? And I can do
that responsibly. And so over time, you
know, Bitcoin's growing. We're we're
layering on more credit. We're feeding
the bit the digital capital ecosystem.
We're building our balance sheet, etc.
But now that third step, creating
digital money,
you need the crypto entrepreneurs, you
need the crypto exchanges, maybe you
need the Binances, you need the
Coinbases, you need maybe you need the
proof ofstake chains, maybe you need the
crypto, you know, how many different
entrepreneurs are created a stable coin?
>> Yeah,
>> right. You need them. You need fund
managers, right? You need the private
fund managers, the Bloomberg jockeyies.
like I got hit with, you know, $150
million of redemption today. I'm going
to sell down the currency equivalents.
All of a sudden, I'm 95% credit, 5%
currency. Now, I have to rebalance back
to 80% credit, 20% currency. I'm
trading, I'm managing, I'm hedging. And
so, you need the fund managers. Then you
need, you know, you need the fund
managers, either private or public
public managers, uh, to actually create
the digital money fund. Then you need
the, you know, a a crypto entrepreneur
to create a crypto coin. You need a
public ETF manager to take your fund
public,
>> right? A pretty big idea is I take
private funds public. We, you know, we
forget, but the original tokenized fund
was an ETF. That's right.
>> Right. I mean, it's And it's And believe
it or not,
>> the world's still full of a lot of asset
classes that yet to be put on an ETF.
>> You know, go try to buy an ETF that
reflects a bunch of old master's
paintings.
>> Yeah.
>> You know, can't do it, right?
>> Try to buy an ETF that reflects New York
City real estate and passes you through
a dividend which reflects the rents.
Not I mean
>> I don't know of one.
>> Yeah. But I mean the point is there's a
lot of financialization to be done on
traditional ETF rails.
>> So we shouldn't be surprised that we're
not there yet on Bitcoin rails. That
that's the 10 years 20 years we're
talking about.
>> Yeah. I mean Black Rockck's done what a
thousand ETFs but they still haven't
done you know the 10 that I want.
>> Right. Right. Right.
>> Right. I mean and then um and then of
course you need the banks.
Right. What's the value added of a bank?
Well, okay, the bank bring first they
got 10,000 salespeople. Then they have a
brand. Then they get the the banking
regulator to approve it. Then you've got
the platform, right? I mean, all sorts
of, you know, platforms. Then you've
you've got um the account you stripped
of all
you uh and then you dispense daily doses
of dividends. You deal with the tax
compliance, the legal compliance, the
KYC compliance. Some dude wants to buy10
billion dollars of digital money and
there, you know, bank, believe it or
not, you know, if if you're the first
bank to offer digital money in the
Middle East and some guy wants to wire
you 10 billion dollars to buy it, you
still have the AML, KYC, the
>> the compliance issue and you got to jump
through hoops to do it. So the way I see
the industry evolving is the first layer
is completely decentralized.
The second layer digital credit is going
to be created by companies like strategy
or metaplanet or strive
>> right a treasury company that's
monomomaniacally focused on creating
digital credit instruments. And then the
third layer is really up for grabs.
There's a thousand banks that could do
it. There's a thousand fund managers
that can do it. there's a thousand
crypto investors or or entrepreneurs
that can do it. And the truth is they
are all adding value, right? I mean
there whether it's technical, right? Do
you have the technique to put it on the
platform? Everybody's got a platform.
We'll debate what's the right platform,
right? There's going to be a big debate.
Is it a crypto exchange? Is it a proof
ofstake network? Is it Aladdin that
Black Rockck runs? Is it uh is it the
in-house JP Morgan or Morgan Stanley or
Goldman Sachs network? Is it a regulated
digital exchange?
There's, you know, Europe has got one
currency, 27 sets of regulators, 27
different exchanges and 27 capital
markets and you're thinking you want to
distribute there. Yeah. Right. So, I
think that um the exciting thing for us
is what we realized is our mission is
create the digital credit, but we have
an incredibly compelling partnership
opportunity or a partnership proposal.
If you're if you're the most digital
forward bank in Australia, you want to
create digital money in Australia, I
have a deal for you.
>> Interesting,
>> right? If you if you're the most uh
ambitious bank in the Middle East and
you want to create digital money, well,
the first bank that does it is going to
attract trillion dollars of capital. Do
you want to be that bank? Do you want to
be that citystate? Right.
>> Some people, some city states will miss
it. Yeah. You you've got nations that
are more concerned about losing control.
They would rather shut down the
technology because they're afraid it
might be too useful. Right. Yeah. Yeah.
So, you have some that won't move. You
have some that don't even get it, right?
They don't even notice it's happening.
You know, what is the digital asset
thing anyway? What is this good for? And
they're like digital beanie babies,
right? And then you have some people
that get it. It's like, oh, money moving
at the speed of light, economic
immortality, and maybe we can program it
to think a billion times a second,
right? And I think that the ones that
get it now, it's going to be a
competition there. there's going to be a
question of who wins and um it's team
sport. You need the bank, you need the
bank regulator, you need the fund
manager, you need the partnerships.
>> Right.
>> Right. And then you need to coordinate,
you know, all of those. And then there's
a technical component and there's a
question of are you willing to take a
risk and can you market it and uh you
know the the likelihood that is that
most people will be followers
but there's always going to be a leader
you know or a couple of leaders and this
is a battle for the future of money and
we're talking about you know easily $200
trillion up for grabs there but it's
going to be $400 trillion in 10 years
and whoever actually creates digital
money is going to grab 10 20% of it for
sure. You won't you won't convince
>> everybody. There's going to be a world
of people are going to think, well, I
just don't trust that. That's too good
to be true. But, you know, roll the
clock back. When people talked about
Bitcoin, they're like, yeah, well, it
won't work. Oh, well, if it works, it's
too good to be true, and the government
will take away from you.
>> I mean, eventually the horsedrawn
carriage uh pilot still buys a car one
day. But imagine a world where 10% of
that money flows into digital funds and
digital banks and digital, you know,
digital bank accounts. And that's a
profoundly disruptive world. And we will
create
the Switzerland of the 21st century.
It'll be the world banking capital. And
I'm hopeful it's in the US. I think I I
don't know why it wouldn't be in the US,
but if it's not in the US, I wouldn't be
surprised if it doesn't pop up in the
Middle East. Because if you appreciate
technology and you understand digital
assets and you appreciate banking and
you like money,
uh the most profound idea I have for you
it's
why don't you just attract all of the
capital in the world into your bank into
your state because Lord knows right now
you're the traditional 20th century
banking establishment has a proposal
which is give us your money and we'll
give you nothing.
>> Yeah.
>> We're going to offer you returnfree risk
for all of your assets. You're taking
duration and credit risk that does not
offset you with yield that does not
offset the duration risk and the credit
risk. So pretty much you have hundreds
of trillions of dollars which is
returning you know inflation adjusted
nothing.
>> Yeah. Well you have below real
inflation. you I want to ask you a
question Michael you said that um you
strategy is monoomaniacally focused on
this digital credit creation is that a
reason why you wouldn't maybe use some
of your Bitcoin to buy a Bitcoin
business that could generate more
Bitcoin is it too is it not pristine
enough to be the credit issuer if you
also have other operating businesses
okay
>> inside strategy
>> put simply we expect Bitcoin to
appreciate 30% a year for the next 20
That is our riskfree rate.
Like that is literally the hurdle rate.
I can I can acquire Bitcoin at one times
revenue.
It's a monopoly on on digital capital. I
can res I can acquire the world's
reserve capital network at one times
revenue growing 30% a year for the next
20 years risk-free integration free
overnight. No questions asked. What
could be better than that? Right?
Nothing could be better than that for
us. Right? Once you've actually uh
established, you know, yourself on the
Bitcoin standard
and once you've rotated your shareholder
base, right? The important point is not
that it's not that everybody agrees with
me. The important point is that all my
equity investors agree with me. You see,
our company exists to acquire Bitcoin.
So if you brought me another option, you
said, "Well, Mike, I've got this great
startup and it's going to return, it's
going to grow 40% a year for the next 20
years and emerge as a monopoly in the
world." And I'm like, "Okay, that's
great, Alex, but it doesn't sound as
good as the deal I already have going."
Like, what are the odds that you just
found the next monopoly on money in the
world growing 40% a year for the next 20
years? And by the way, let's say that
you're a genius and you found it. What
are the odds I can convince all my
equity shareholders that it's better
than Bitcoin?
>> Unlikely.
>> Yeah. Yeah. And and why would you? And
by the way, why would you want to,
right? I mean, if you already have a
risk-free rate
of 30%, if you can buy it at one times
revenue and if you can integrate it
overnight,
why would you do anything else? So, so
um I think for example, let's say
there's a hundred companies out there
that are trading at a discount than NAV.
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. Well, the world's full of private
equity funds that have a mandate to
invest in 20 non-correlated investments
and their hurdle rate is 10 or 15%. And
they're actually suited up to deal with
all the social issues and the headaches,
right? They they sit on boards, you
know, they hire and fire entrepreneurs.
They integrate people. They lay off
people. They fight with lawsuits, right?
So, it makes perfect sense for a private
equity fund or a public company with a
rollup strategy to, you know, to buy a
bunch of businesses if you believe in
diversification.
Right. We don't. Right.
>> Right.
>> We don't believe in d, you know,
>> you said uh what was that great quote
you had? Um, what do you have? One
screen. You only have one screen. You
have one chair.
>> I got one chair.
>> You're sitting on one chair right now. I
got one chair. I don't believe in
diversifying the fuel source that flows
into your jet engine.
>> Yeah.
>> I believe in kerosene. Y I don't believe
in diversifying the metals that make up
the airplane wing. I believe in
aluminum.
>> I don't believe in diversifying, you
know, the composition of your
semiconductor chip. You know, right?
>> It's like like you ever seen an Nvidia
data center? How diversified is the
chipset in the Nvidia data center?
>> Yeah.
>> Right. And I actually believe that when
you find the solution,
then you pursue it. But my point really
is the world's full of people that have
large pools of capital and their mission
is to make diversified investments and
their hurdle rate is 10%. And if they
actually clocked 12% a year after loss
of effort, they would declare victory
and their limited partners would say
that was a great year. Right.
>> Yeah.
>> But here for us, that's not us. And
here's the problem. My hurdle rate's 30%
integration free, risk-f free. I've done
the same deal 90 times in a row.
>> And and the product of the company, it's
digital credit. What we're offering is
STRC. We're offering you uh a product
that's going to pay you a 10% dividend
yield with a very taxefficient return of
capital dividend,
right? And so if I'm offering you
something that pays you 10% dividends in
a credit universe that offers you 4%.
Give me one reason why you wouldn't buy
that. Why is it that the entire world
wouldn't sell their hundred trillion
dollars of garbage credit that yields
you onethird of what we're offering
after tax? Why would you why wouldn't
you just sell it all and by stretch?
Give me the one reason.
>> I'm not going to come up with one on on
the spot, I don't think.
>> Okay. Well, so I'm going to give you two
reasons.
>> Okay, let's hear them.
>> You haven't heard of it. You don't
understand it.
>> Yep.
>> And the second reason is you think that
the issuer has a credit risk.
So,
>> yeah,
>> when we're going off, you know, we we
you bring me 10 good deals and I buy 10
companies and I get distracted by that.
I'm so distracted by that. I'm on CNBC
talking about all those other things.
I'm not talking about Stretch STRC.
>> And then you're a credit investor and
you know when the message is, yeah, I
have like $5 of capital for every dollar
of this instrument. It's like I get it,
>> but then you're like, but tell me about
this other thing you just did and I
heard they're getting sued or that's
going to take a year.
>> It distracts you. It creates credit risk
for you. You're creating opacity and
you're creating a dilutive distraction.
You actually get a diversification
discount. Like the person buying this
instrument simply wants to hear you have
the money to back the instrument.
>> Right.
>> Right. And
>> it's almost like a collateral mix that
gets more complicated. They don't want
they want the digital capital under
there. They don't want this business
doing this weird thing and that other
business that may or may not do well
this quarter under. If I just spent five
years, every day of my life for five
years
>> to explain and convince you that Bitcoin
is digital capital and I have a lot of
it.
>> Yeah.
>> You think I want to show up in the sixth
year and explain that I also started
buying these other 16 undervalued
companies and we're really good at doing
takeovers and integrating them and it's
>> Yeah, that would seem that would seem
strange for you to do. I get that.
>> Okay. It's a distraction for us. We've
got in in my opinion, we have the
world's greatest product.
>> Yeah. But what about buying other like
distressed Bitcoin treasury companies
that are trading below?
>> Yeah. The point is it's a distraction.
>> Yeah. Just the process of doing it.
>> How long you think it takes to close the
deal?
>> Yeah.
>> A year.
>> It takes a year to close a deal. Uh do
you know all of the liabilities that are
embedded in the balance sheet? No.
>> Right.
>> When do you find that out?
>> In six months.
>> At some point during the process, I
guess. Yeah. The point is why would I
buy Bitcoin with all of the the whole
the whole message for five years is
Bitcoin doesn't have employees. It
doesn't have management teams. It
doesn't have counterparty risk. It
doesn't have supply chains. It doesn't
have leases to break. It doesn't have
nexus. It doesn't have all of the 30
pages of liabilities that companies
have. So why would I want to go and buy
30 pages of liabilities?
>> It'd be like Bitcoin wrapped in a giant
cluster.
>> Yeah. And here's the point, right? I can
build a digital building in one day with
no risk. Why? You know, you're like,
"Okay, well, I can do this in one day at
one times revenue. You've done it 90
times in a row." And then some dude
comes along and says, "Well, you know, I
have a building that's similar that
it'll take a year to close the deal, and
I think it's like a 20% discount, but
I'm gonna need you to sign up to
unlimited liability
for the next year,
>> right?
>> And I need your investors to sign up to
unlimited bottomless li. Maybe the deal
won't close. Maybe you'll get sued for
$18 billion of intellectual property
rights, shareholder litigation or
something,
>> right?
>> Why? It's like pennywise and pound
foolish. Why would you absorb unlimited
bottomless liability and distraction
when you know it's like don't look a
gift horse in the mouth. You get the
chance to buy Bitcoin with zero risk,
zero integration headache and you put it
out on the wire next Monday and
everybody understands whether the risk
profile, you understand? Like if I buy a
billion dollars of Bitcoin, you're the
investor. You can see immediately
whether the risk profile of the company
increased or decreased that minute. Mhm.
>> If I enter into a billion dollars of
corporate acquisitions, you will not
know for one. You might not know for 10
years, Alex.
>> That's right.
>> You understand? Like when I when I if
you buy a company, you could have
embedded liabilities in the company that
you don't know about for 10 years.
>> That's right.
>> It destroyed HP.
>> Yeah. You remember the HP acquisition
when they bought Autonomy and they paid
$10 billion for a company that was
worth1 billion. They took a nine or10
billion dollar write off.
>> Yeah.
>> It you know these Let me say it a
different way if I'm not enthusiastic
enough in my answer.
>> It's good. It's a good answer. I get it.
>> I watched a 100 companies in my industry
go bankrupt over 30 years. Yeah. Sorry.
Go out of business. A 100 companies. You
know how they all failed? dilutive
acquisitions.
If I had to trace the number one source
of a failure of a publicly traded
company, it's the CEO starts doing
rollups and buying other companies that
they think are helpful. Every single
competitor of mine, they did these
acquisitions and you end up just buying
a company, overpaying. Then you buy
another company, you think you got a
good deal, and it blows up in your face,
and you buy a third company, and then
all your good employees quit because
they hate the fact you bought the third
company. You buy the fourth company,
your shareholders quit. You buy the
fifth company and eventually on the
sixth company, you know, your financials
collapse, your stock collapses, you sell
yourself and you get amalgamated into
the great beast of some mega software
conglomerate.
>> Yeah.
>> And you can't remember their names
probably.
>> That's where you go to die. And so,
so, uh, you know, I think
you buy things when you run out of ways
to grow. Okay? But here's my idea of how
I'm going to grow. I'm going to sell a
digital credit instrument that's going
to give you a 10% dividend with 80 to
90% of the volatility of Bitcoin
stripped off it. And I'm going to sell
it to 5% of the credit market. And
that's $15 trillion by my calculation
right now. $30 trillion in 10 years. So
I have an idea for $30 trillion.
>> That's a pretty big idea.
>> And you're telling me I should come up
with a second idea.
And like I'm like and the only thing
that's the number one way to destroy or
undermine your first idea for the 30
trillion is to come up with a second
idea and get distracted. Take on other
credit risk,
>> right? Take on other distractions. And
so let let me let me make one more
point, Alex.
Like I I mean the other day I checked,
we have like 60 billion dollars of
capital.
>> Yeah.
>> You understand? We could buy anything,
>> right?
>> Right. Yeah. You understand? Like
investment bankers like we could buy
half, you know, half of the Russell
2000.
>> Yeah.
>> Right. We could buy half of the publicly
traded companies or merge with them. We
could probably merge with or buy 37,000
public companies and 37 million private
companies and we could invest in every
idea you could possibly imagine. We
could also raise a billion dollars from
any any credit investor in a week, maybe
overnight if we wanted. Right. When you
start with $60 billion, it's not hard to
find someone that will lend you a
billion dollars.
>> That's right.
Every one of those ideas would be uh
dilutive distraction. And the number of
bad ideas that people throw at you goes
up exponentially the more money you
have. And
>> how many bad ideas do you hear?
>> It's it's like
>> is it endless?
>> Why don't we could we could be the an
insurance company. We could do
reinsurance. We could underwrite this
risk. We could we could become a bank.
We could become a commodities trading
exchange. We could like never ending. I
could literally list you a, you know, a
thousand in an hour and then I could
tell you the hundred reasons why each of
the thousand doesn't make sense. And
after I gave you a hundred,000 reasons
for not to expand,
>> I would reduce it down to this simple
maxism that Marcus Aurelius gave us
2,000 years ago. Just because you can do
a thing doesn't mean you should do a
thing, right? And and I think humility
dictates
if you have if you have a good idea,
right? The the f the most important days
of your life, the day you're born and
the day you figure out why.
Okay. The arrogant guy thinks he was put
on earth to solve a hundred problems.
the humble the humble person if they're
fortunate enough to think they're put on
earth with a mission to solve one
problem, you just got given a gift,
>> right? And so what we figured out is
we can create digital credit and it's
better than $300 trillion of other
credit. And whether or not it solves 1%
of the market's problem or 5% or 10% or
20% or.1%
doesn't really matter, right? It's a
life's work to create good digital
credit. If you're fortunate enough to be
given the opportunity to do something,
you should laser like focus on that
thing because you want to look at the
history of failure. It's alpha males
that solved one thing and think that
that's solved and done and they come up
with 10 more things to solve.
>> Yeah.
>> Right. It's the Napoleon complex. It's
like I now have to spread the French
language and the French way of life to
the frozen steps and the tundra of
Russia in the winter [laughter]
>> and somehow
have you ever gathered 10,000 of your
favorite friends and tried to walk
across Europe
like a thousand miles? It's not a good
idea in the 21st century, but somehow
Napoleon got the idea that he might
march 600,000 people,
>> you know, from Paris to Moscow
[laughter]
in three months, conquer the nation,
declare victory, and come back
unscathed. It was never a good idea.
Yeah. And and but it was the 14th bad
idea he'd had in like, you know, in 14
years. But, you know, hope springs
eternal. people come up with these
outrageous, ridiculous ideas and it's
like, you know, maybe you might want to
have just noted that the odds of a
Corsican actually rising to rule France
were like one in a 100 million.
>> Yeah.
>> And stopped there
>> and just let it ride
>> instead of the we got to conquer Egypt
and we got to conquer Germany and we got
to conquer Spain and we got to conquer
UK and we got to conquer Russia and we
got to conquer Poland, etc., etc., etc.,
But it happens. It continues to happen.
And uh I will I will get neverending
number of pitches for one more thing
that we could do and and I would say you
come back to Steve Jobs, right? And he
just reminded people we say no to a lot
more things at Apple than yes.
>> I think this is a good answer. This
you've you've
>> focus I I can't imagine how many people
are asking you that question. Well,
surely you're meant to do something with
your Bitcoin. And of course, you are
doing this credit creation, but what
about the other Bitcoin?
>> The most profound idea, right, is put it
in coal storage and sell a dollar of
credit every year.
>> It's a profound idea. It's just not
their idea. Yeah.
>> Right. So, the point is like it's not
their idea and they're not getting paid
money on it. So people are going to
pitch you their idea and they're going
to either belittle, ignore or ridicule
your idea,
>> right?
>> Because it's not their idea. And
everybody kind of feel and there's
another thing which is a lot of times
people feel like they need another idea
like you know after they had the last
idea and they underestimate the amount
of maintenance and investment to
actually nurture one good idea.
>> You have nurtured it too. This has been
a significant evolution, too. Would you
ever thought in the summer of 2020, I
think Matt Walsh from Castle Island
Ventures was the first person to see
your filing in summer 2020 that you were
buying Bitcoin with then Micro Strategy.
Could you because this is an evolution
since we've known each other. What would
your 2020 self think about where you are
now in 20, you know, going into 26?
>> Well, you know, my
>> because this is a you built a juggernaut
out of this idea. My philosophy and you
could see it when I wrote the mobile
wave. I just said technology is acid and
it dematerializes products and services
and it transforms and and if you have
enough imagination and and talent you
can create something magical that
changes the world for the better.
So my ethos right is the ethos of an
engineer. look at technology and figure
out how to create something which is
good for the world, right? Engineer a
better world,
you know, and and I tried a lot of
things, right? I mean, and I I tried a
dozen things that did not fly. Usher and
Emma and Alert and Alarm and Wisdom and
Angel. So many things.
>> Yeah. And in 2020, right, you know, in a
time of frustration and desperation, we
discovered Bitcoin and [snorts] we grasp
on it as as a way to benefit our
shareholders and our employees and our
customers. And it was it was first an
exercise in frustration
>> and desperation. It really was a, you
know, was a do this, you know, or suffer
a painful death.
>> Yeah.
>> Right. And then it became, you know, an
exercise and transition and adventure.
It's like, now that we've done it, what
are we going to do next? Okay, someone
will loan me a billion dollars for free.
Well, you know, you know, a year ago, I
was looking at winding up the company
and now I have a chance to actually
actually buy a billion dollars of
Bitcoin for free. And uh you know then
it was uh it was adventure and
opportunity and challenge and response.
It's like and it was a journey and it's
a journey of discovery because we went
from being a software company to uh to
to being f a financial a structured
finance company, right? It's like first
we did senior credit or or senior debt
and that was a weight around our neck
and then we did asset back financing and
that didn't work well and then we then
we did OTC over-the-counter financing
and we learned the limitations of that
and then we did convertible debt we
learned the limitations of that
>> and as we move through each iteration we
we realized that there were some
extraordinary uh technologies and we're
engineers you know we put together about
six components, right? One was
>> one was uh a preferred equity,
>> right? And most people had never used
preferred equity to create credit. And
the second was a public offering. We did
one public offering in 1998 for like $48
million or something 40ome million. Y
>> and then we did a 500 million, a 600
million, a billion, and a two.5 billion,
and a $700 million IPO
>> basically this year. Yeah.
>> Bam. Bam, bam, bam, bam. Five billion
dollar type public offerings. Okay. So,
we we harnessed the IPO
and then we tacked on the at the at the
market shelf registration. So, we tacked
another thing onto it and then we
borrowed everything we'd learned about
the ETFs. You know, we studied ETFs and
we watched the success of Black Rockck
and we said, "How do we create a credit
instrument that has all the strengths of
an ETF, that has the power of an ATM,
that that has the power of a publicly
traded security, that has the
flexibility of a preferred equity, that
has the the volatility and the
performance of digital capital. Mhm.
>> We put all those together and then we
plug that into digital rails like you
know you know we use this phrase you do
you want to do an OTC deal or do you
want to do a public deal? Okay the the
investment bankers will pitch it like
those are equal.
>> Yeah.
>> You know and actually the bankers will
tell you the OTC deal is easier. Let me
tell you the difference. An OTC deal is
um
one bank calls 37 of their friends into
an alley and we trade baseball cards,
>> right?
>> And a public deal is okay, we create a
security that 200 million people can buy
and sell every minute of the day
everywhere in the world. And you tell
me, you think they're both equal ways to
raise capital, right? Do I'm going to
sell you a credit instrument. Do you
want to trade it, you know, in the back
alley with with like 12 possible buyers,
>> right?
>> Or would you like to actually be able to
post it and sell it to 200 million
people in the world every second of the
day? It's like they're not equal, right?
One of them is better than the other
one. And so this was a journey of
discovery and at the end of the day, we
had to understand credit instruments,
>> you know, and by by the way, bank
deposits are the worst. Margin debt is
pretty bad, right?
>> You know, junk bonds are pretty bad.
Convertible bonds, unsecured, less bad.
Over-the-counter, not great. Preferred
equity, that's perpetual, better.
>> Public preferred equity better. Public
preferred equity with the shelf
registration best. You know, with a QIP,
no. You want a fiveletter ticker? No.
Four-letter ticker word you can
pronounce. IPOed. By the way, in Europe,
not quite as good, you know, like uh you
know, we took a we took a stream public
in Europe. We're still trying to get it
to trade properly for the retail a month
later. Right. You know, you take it
public and we get it we get these things
strike strike strike stretch on the
NASDAQ within five days.
>> Right.
>> Right. Not all capital markets are
equal. Guess what? The US capital market
is better. How much better? A lot.
>> Yeah.
>> Better. So as we actually moved down
this um this uh journey of discovery,
we went from adventurous and
opportunistic and strategic to
eventually transformational
you know and then we realized that we
had actually created a better credit
product and I would say those first four
years the equity was the product we you
know the credit was the tactic.
>> Mhm.
>> Right. We sell the bond to actually
create performance in the equity.
>> Yeah. As an alternative to
>> and that was fine for those four years
because there was no other equity
product and I meet people in you know UK
today they're like hey I bought your
equity because I couldn't buy anything
else with Bitcoin exposure and my
retirement account. Right.
>> Right. So the equities product and then
in 2025 we discovered digital credit and
and that culminated in STRC
where we realized what's the ideal
product I strip the delta I strip the va
I strip the duration. Yeah,
>> I just hand people the yield. And if I
hand people the yield in a in a tax
deferred dividend,
you know, how many different layers of
innovation have I stacked on top of the
credit world, right? Appreciating
collateral, publicly tradable. By the
way, you know, it's illegal for a retail
investor to buy an OTC instrument.
>> Now, we talk [clears throat] about like
being debanked and being blocked, right?
And the entire digital assets revolution
is about, you know, an egalitarian
utilitarian movement to empower the
masses. And, you know, while we're
empowering the masses, maybe empower the
computer, right? Like what if we what if
we had digital assets that AIS could
trade a million times a second
everywhere in the world without asking
permission before they actually made the
trade?
>> Yeah.
>> Right. And we kind of stepped through
that
and we had to we had to kind of get a
PhD in capital markets and credit
markets and securities markets and then
digital assets and digital capital and
that was a five-year journey. But I I
would say at the end of the day,
the philosophy underlying all this is
can you actually take all of these
components that have been lying around
for 30 years. ETFs have been around for
30 years, the most successful ETF, plug
Bitcoin into it.
>> Michael Milin will tell you he invented
the ATM offering. We're the most
successful issuer of equity via an ATM.
in he invented the convertible bond
market. We're in the most successful
issue of convertible bonds. So we took
all these ideas you know plugged in
digital capital plugged in a public
company in the US capital markets with a
bit of ambition
>> and um and then the the truth truth of
the matter is even this last step
digital credit
it's not happening Alice Alex unless we
had digital intelligence right because
what happened in 2025 was the AI got
smart
>> and people like, "Oh, yeah. They're just
kind of idiots and they they pair it
back to you." Well, let me tell you,
when you when you actually take the
idiot and you pair it back and you do it
a billion times and you loop it back on
itself 10,000 times, you let it spend
for 10 minutes.
>> It's pretty smart. Yeah. Right. And
>> and
>> you you talked about that a few months
ago in New York uh at the Treasury
Company conference about how you you you
and strategy have used AI to help design
this new credit uh complex that you've
created.
>> Yeah. You know, you know, no one ever,
no one in this entire digital asset
space and probably just a handful of
companies ever put an at the market
shelf registration on a preferred
equity,
>> right?
>> Nobody ever created a variable rate
preferred equity. Like, can I create a a
monthly dividend that trades stable
around par and adjust the dividend every
month? Ask every lawyer and every
banker. It's never been done,
>> right?
>> We don't know how to do it.
>> Ask the AI. Yeah, sure. You can totally
do it.
>> Yeah. Okay. Why? They have no pride of
authorship. They don't they don't try,
you know, no company ever went to Europe
and sold um a a perpetual preferred
equity, you know. Well, we just don't do
that in Europe.
>> Okay. Why don't you do Well, because
>> because all the other issuers didn't
have digital capital and so they you had
to have
the right combination of circumstances.
You needed a block of digital capital
and you needed digital intelligence. You
need to had the have the will to create
digital credit so you create digital
money and you and and they all had to
click and then once once you have that
clean sheet of paper, right? And and
Elon Musk talks about it all the time,
right? It's like,
you know, he's like, take a clean sheet
of paper. The biggest mistake engineers
make is optimizing a part that shouldn't
exist,
>> right?
>> Yeah.
>> It's like you know,
>> talk about how deleting code is better
than writing code. A lot of the time
>> in my my book, The Mobile Wave, I lay
out, you know,
the the the critical component
technologies in the iPhone. If you don't
have the right battery, the lithium
battery, you don't have the right, you
know, touchscreen LED, there's no
iPhone.
>> Mhm.
>> And it's like, what did they do? Well,
they they left out the keyboard, you
know, and everybody else like, there's
no keyboard. Where's the keyboard? It's
like, well, that that's a moving part. a
lot of moving parts that should not be
there. And after a while, you look and
you're like, well, wait a minute. You
get rid of the keyboard and all of a
sudden you have infinite keyboards and
you just talk to the phone and why do I
need like like why do I even type in the
first place,
>> right?
>> Like, you know, it's like uh okay,
>> the world is full of people trying to
optimize a a very inefficient process
that should not exist. And I would say
2025 was a very special year. And is a
special year because what you have is
digital intelligence colliding with
digital capital colliding with digital
assets colliding with digital markets.
And a lot of people saying why is it
that I can't move everything 247 365 at
the speed of light a million times an
hour while I'm sleeping because my AI
was doing it for me.
And and and the answer is
any 16-year-old kid would get the fact
that that's a better world.
>> Yeah.
>> It's only the 65 year olds that got rich
in a in a different world, you know,
full of constraint that don't get that.
>> You think AI and uh the overlap with
Bitcoin? I mean, you're I didn't think
that the
>> the intersection of AI and Bitcoin would
be helping to design digital credit. uh
which is fascinating that it has been
what will be the longer term impact on
digital capital and bitcoin of AI will
will the robots use bitcoin look it's it
seems pretty clear we're moving toward a
world where a billion robots do all the
work and cars drive themselves and
there's a billion AIs in cyerspace doing
all the thinking for us and and you sit
down and you're a professor and you're
like I never really I never could solve
this coal fusion thing and you know if
you wanted to solve coal fusion or
create another nuclear reactor and you
you there'd be like you know 97 dudes
that spent their life on it and they'd
all tell you the reason it's not doable
>> you know and it's just like me asking I
got an army of lawyers you know I got an
army of bankers I ask every ar you know
the lawyers and the bankers is it
possible to do this like we'll get back
to you in a month and after a month they
get back to you and say well you know
you know we're not quite sure but it's
never been done for
you know it's like and so I'mware
>> if you're willing to wait a year you
know a year will go by and you won't get
an answer but you go to the AI and you
say well I have this opinion I want to
do this and this and this this way and
can you figure out if that's possible
you put it into deep research mode and
you grind it three or four times like
yeah well you ought to do this and this
and this and this and
>> and uh what you've done is and it's very
important right you've taken And the
lawyer that's read everything that's
ever been filed in securities law
without any pride of authorship, without
an economic motive, without, you know,
any prejudice or bias or any baggage,
you know, that doesn't mind if you call
it stupid or you tell it that it's not
working hard enough. And and you've used
that to get the first thousand man years
of research done.
And I'm, you know,
I'm of the opinion, you know, you think
about the definition of a PhD. It's like
someone capable of making a siminal
contribution to the body of human
knowledge. And there's 10 million of
them. And you can't get a PhD without
having written a dissertation. But the
problem is by the time you get to that
point, you've got so much baggage.
So you know you've got so so much built
up belief system because human beings
we use uh we use uristics and rules of
thumb and broomemides and you know
conventional wisdom in order to
accelerate the human brain because you
just can't consider you can't be the
alpha zero right you can't consider the
full state space of options and you
can't go and read aund 100,000 books
every time someone asks you one
question. So you have to kind of just
fall back on, you know, these simple
broomemides or simple conventional
rules. And so you're taking shortcuts
>> because of the limitations of one human
brain.
The AI doesn't have to take the
shortcut. The AI can say, "Well,
actually, I did read the 100,000 yeah
>> books and I actually found an example."
And so I think we're moving to a new
world and the new world is, you know, a
billion people do the work of a PhD and
a billion people solve a billion
problems and they have the they have the
equivalent of 10,000
hyper PhDs that think a million times
faster that work 24/7, 365.
What happens when you actually tell the
AIs to grind the AIs and you unleash a
million AIs to tell a million AIs to do
it? And you know, the real evil genius
guys are like, well, I create like five
AIs in a committee. I make them fight
with each other and I make them take the
opposite points of it until, you know,
they've ground through the thing. And
>> I'm like, oh, that's that's really
wicked what you're doing there. And so I
think um
I think we're in a whole brave new world
and there's you know there's two types
of uh two types of thinkers, two types
of systems, two types corporations.
There's the person that says, "Oh,
digital assets and digital intelligence.
I can do everything a million times
better, a million times faster, a
million times stronger, and the world's
going to be a million times better."
Mhm.
>> And then there's the and I'm going to do
it with intelligence, digital assets,
and digital intelligence. And then
there's the other side. They're like,
"We don't want the AI to give you the
answer. We don't like the answer. We
don't. Please don't use it. Might be a
security leak." I've literally met
people where they're like, "My legal
department won't let me use the AI to
answer this question." Just like those
teachers are like, "We don't want the
students using the AI." Are you kidding
me?
>> They haven't figured out how to let them
use.
>> Here's we're bragging. Well, you know,
the kids used the AI and the and the
problem was the AI gave him an answer.
So, we had to train the AI to not give
the kids the answer. It's like, oh,
yeah. Well, you know, the kid got a
jackhammer and jackhammering through the
mountain, but that was a problem because
we really wanted them to bang away on a
rubber mallet like we did. Like, there's
literally people that are afraid the
technology might work too well and we
just have to dumb it down, right? Make
it woke. Make it make it stupid. Well,
what if what if the 12y old actually got
the answer?
>> Well, we really want them to we want
them to like take the shovel and dig the
hole because that's how we used to dig
holes with shovels. It's like,
>> yeah,
>> well, the kid figured out how to hijack
a million robots to like build a new
city and we live happily ever after. And
then the kid cured cancer and 3,700
other diseases. But that's cheating
because we really wanted them to like
work slower, [laughter]
you know. It's like,
>> yeah,
>> there are going to be governments that
want to slow it down.
>> It's like you see it right now in
authoritarian cultures, you know, we
don't want people to move money too
fast.
>> Yeah.
>> We don't.
>> Right.
>> We We don't want someone to accomplish
things on Saturday afternoon. Yeah. You
know, when the Puritans showed up in
Boston, if they caught you working on
Sunday, they whipped you.
>> Yeah.
>> It's like like it's a religious thing
sometimes or it's a political thing.
>> So interesting.
>> And so you But yeah, just like, you
know, the Japanese didn't want
explosives to corrupt their military
system, [laughter]
>> you know. And the Chinese, you know, you
had a centralized emperor in China and
he actually kept modern munitions
technology out of China. That worked
until the British warships showed up and
sailed up the river, you know, and then
that didn't work anymore. You know, if
you read about the opium wars.
>> Yeah.
>> Right. At the end of the day, you can
slow down the advance of technology only
for so long and you put your head in the
sand and at some point someone that
doesn't happen to share your fear of the
technology uses it to send a
robot-driven swarm army, right? To
topple your particular political system.
And then people like, "Oh yeah, well, I
guess airplanes work." You know, when
they start dropping bombs on our head,
[laughter]
>> it's like, h well, they're not using
horses on us anymore. They used Yeah,
because machine guns and tanks actually
seem like a better idea. And you know,
it's like the the general subtext of
that is paradigm shifts come when the
old guard dies or when there's a war and
science advances one funeral at a time,
right? And uh and that's how this stuff
is going to advance. And maybe the death
will be the death of the bank. Maybe
it'll be the death of the corporation.
Maybe it'll be the death of the city
state, you know, the banking capital of
the 20th century. Won't be the banking
centers of the 21st century because the
money will move. Very interesting.
Before we wrap, I got a couple other
quicker questions. Um,
what about quantum computing? There's a
big people must ask you this. Um,
they've been asking me for five plus
years. Will quantum, a cryptographically
relevant quantum computer, pose a threat
to Bitcoin? And if so, how should the
Bitcoin world be thinking about
mitigating or defending against that
threat?
>> Yeah, it's a reminder that a a pessimist
imagines a problem and thinks the world
is doomed and they kind of feed on their
pessimist and gloat over it and gle and
the optimist imagine the problem and
sees us solving the problem and how the
world will be a better place. So let's
take quantum computer. Okay,
there there's going to be a point when
the world will form a consensus that
there's a quantum threat. We're not
there now, but you won't miss it because
the United States government will direct
all of the defense contractors to
upgrade their encryption algorithms to
be quantum resistant.
and Microsoft and Apple and Google will
ship a quantum upgrade
>> and your bank, let's say you've got your
money at JP Morgan, they will ship an
upgrade and they will say, you know,
there's a there's a a need for us to
upgrade our encryption algorithms. So,
please install the new client software
and reauthenticate yourself. And you've
got X days, 90 days, 30 days, whatever
number of days to do this. And if you
don't, we're going to freeze your funds
>> for your own good.
Okay? It's not that complicated. Every
single system on Earth, every iPhone,
every Android phone, every Can you
imagine? You walk into the office and
your boss says, your IT guy goes, "We
need to upgrade our software to be
quantum resistant now." And you're like,
"Well, I just decided I don't want to."
Okay. Well, that's a condition of
employment. How many people are going to
say, "I just decided I didn't want to
upgrade this software." You're not going
to have a job. You're gonna come back
from the border and they're gonna say,
you know, you need the quantum resistant
border solver. You're like, well, I just
would rather come back to the country
without it. You're not getting in,
right?
>> Uh and so at the point where we have
global consensus, it's like Y2K is like
anything else. There's not going to be a
debate.
The Bitcoin network just runs on
software. There's going to be a quantum
upgrade. It's going to have quantum
resistant encryption libraries. I
wouldn't be surprised if they're not the
same libraries that are in the iPhone
and the Android phone and the Microsoft
network. It's going to be a global
standard and people are going to debate
it. We're going to roll out the system
and then everyone is going to upgrade to
the software. We're going to reenrypt
all the Bitcoin and all the wallets and
anything that's uh that is uh
susceptible to quantum threat.
It's going to get re-encrypted if the
holders of the private keys are alive
and if they like money.
>> Yeah.
>> If they're dead, they're not going to
reenrypt. And if they've lost the keys,
they're not going to reenrypt. This is
going to be a massive upgrade to network
security and it's going to be a massive
deflationary event and we're going to
get the answer to the age-old question.
How much Bitcoin's been lost?
>> And if the number is 5 million, we're
going to see that the supply of Bitcoin
is going to go from 16 from 21 million
to 16 million and the price of Bitcoin
is going to go up.
>> Interesting,
>> right? and and ultimately the quantum
leap, call it the Bitcoin quantum leap,
>> is going to be the best thing to ever
happen to the Bitcoin network, right?
And the only difference between the way
that um a bank handles it and the way
the Bitcoin community handles it is
because it we're global and more
decentralized, we're probably going to
do this not over the course of 30 days
or 90 days. It'll probably take two
years or one year,
>> right? or some amount of time. But, you
know, you're going to argue to me that
some dude that's got a billion dollars
of Bitcoin is going to decide they just
don't want to upgrade. I don't think so.
>> Yeah.
>> Right. And uh in this particular case,
you could say, you know, the haters, the
skeptics, like, well, you know, you're
not going to get consensus really like
all the smart people with money in the
world that thought it was smart to put
their money on the crypto network. You
think they're the people too stupid to
want to upgrade? I don't I think you're
going to get consensus like well it'll
be too decentralized. You know how
decentralized the United States
government is, right? You realize how
many defense contractors there are like
the Walmart supply chain. If you
actually look at the supply chains in
the world, there's 100,000 companies
that are all going to have to upgrade.
It's they're going to figure it out,
right? And so in this particular case,
>> there's going to be an upgrade. The the
network security is going to upgrade.
The uh the the wallet addresses that
don't upgrade are getting frozen. No
one's going to complain because the only
people that don't upgrade will be dead
people.
>> Got it?
>> Right. And and the dead are not going to
complain about it.
>> And those that lost their wallet, they
lost their private keys, is not going to
matter. It's going to be a good thing.
And this is just a natural challenge and
response. You know, the the network is
going to be strengthened and hardened by
this
>> because intelligent people normally
respond to challenges in an intelligent
way. The only people that think the
community won't are people just hate
Bitcoin.
>> Yeah.
>> They hate the Bitcoiners. They hate the
Bitcoin community. or they have a
personal agenda of spreading fear and
uncertainty and doubt for some evil
nefarious purpose generally because they
want to sell you something. They want to
they want to neg you and they want to
make you insecure so you'll give them
your money. They so they can control you
or manipulate you some way.
>> And I think it's very important to
transcend that fear and cynicism and
skepticism and get on with your life
because otherwise you'll never
accomplish anything. I think it's a very
optimistic and inspiring answer. Another
Bitcoin community question. I know
you're aware of this debate that's been
happening. I would say mostly online
though. I mean, I don't see it much in
my day-to-day in the Bitcoin world, but
about non-monetary arbitrary data
transactions. Um, some call spam, right?
could be JPEGs or other sort of junk
that is put on the blockchain. But in
some cases could be proofs for a layer 2
or zero knowledge type stuff, but a
portion of the Bitcoin community thinks
these should not exist and has put forth
an idea to fork Bitcoin or another one
to confiscate low value Bitcoin to
reduce the UTXO set. Do you have a view
on this debate? You know, which was sort
of catalyzed by the release of Bitcoin
Core V30. be hyper hyper conservative
about changing the protocol
>> any change
>> very conservative and and we should make
sure that we have global consensus
when when 8 billion people in the world
have global consensus that quantum
computers are a threat I believe we
should upgrade the software
>> got it
>> but when half the community believes
it's a bad idea and the other half the
community believes I think you should
slow down right these changes. I think
we should be very very conservative
about the default settings. We should be
very conservative about the protocol.
>> I've said before many times that if you
wanted to undermine the network, the way
you do it is by infinite funding of
highly qualified developers and tell
them to improve it. Mhm.
>> And I I think at its base, Bitcoin is is
a monetary protocol and the lack of
rapid mutation is the feature, not the
bug, right? And so I think I I'm not in
the camp of people enthusiastically
adding features to it. And I and I I
think that, you know, the way that you
wreck a good thing is you speculate
that it will fail unless you add a
boatload of features to it.
>> But they would argue some of the this
the fork proposers would argue that
features were added to it and they want
to remove them. You know, is that but it
would be a controversial fork.
>> Yeah. They're sort of saying go back to
an even more conservative view of
Bitcoin.
>> So in a way I feel like it kind of goes
>> conservative and I think I think if
you're introducing a change which is so
controversial you might want to slow it
down.
>> Okay. Might want to slow it down.
>> Yep.
>> And you want to think a little bit and I
always think there's unintended
consequences. Second order, third order,
fourth order, you know. And uh so I you
know I think it's a healthy debate. I
empathize with the people that just
don't don't like someone effing with the
network. Don't f with the network. Yeah.
>> Right. It's like [snorts]
>> like the the path of least resistance,
the path the path of travel, the most
likely outcome right now is Bitcoin
emerges to be a $200 trillion world
reserve capital network and uh and
everything you think is a is a bug is
probably the feature. That's the
probably the reason it's succeeding.
>> Yeah. And when you try to fix the things
that you think are the bugs, you might
not.
And uh and that's why even even if you
take the elephant in the room like the
quantum threat, I you know, I'm not in
favor of rushing it.
>> Yeah.
>> It's like I I think that rushing, you
know, to solve global warming, you know,
for a while people thought, you know,
aerosol spray was going to destroy the
ozone and kill us all. You know, it's
like there's always something. And then
they thought nuclear injury was going to
kill us all. And then they thought blah
blah blah if we don't go to solar power
is going to kill us all. And then they
thought the ocean was going to rise and
flood Miami Beach and it's going to kill
us all. And all of these things are
normally alarmist. And what follows next
is a law that taxes everybody or
restraint of trade or therefore I'm
seizing control of the government to
prevent you from blank. And I
>> so I I just think that um generally we
ought to be very conservative about
protocol bloat. We should be
conservative with the clients. I think
it's healthy it's healthy to have more
clients. I think it's healthy to have
people working on alternate versions of
Bitcoin and and uh and I think it's
healthy to have the debate and I think u
we just ought to be very very careful
with the protocol. I think that's a good
answer. Last question, Michael. I would
say you're the most influential person
in the world about Bitcoin today.
>> Does that how do you think about that
role? Does it weigh on you when you do
you feel like you're you've got a burden
to bear on Bitcoin's behalf, the
millions of people?
>> I'm grateful to be on the journey with
hundreds of millions of other people. Um
I'm I feel blessed to be given a mission
that is meaningful to civilization. I I
feel like I got lucky to be granted this
opportunity at a late stage in my
career. You know, I was 55 years old and
I was ready to retire, you know, quietly
into the good night and that was the end
of it. M
>> and then all of a sudden this came along
and I started seeing that there is just
a profound amount of good that we could
do for billions of people if we spread
you know digital
assets digital capital digital credit
you know and we know eventually digital
freedom digital property rights
for the first time in the history of the
human race I think Bitcoin represents
the ability to tightly bind economic
energy to the individual That's the
that's the most profoundly disruptive
transformational change, you know, in
the economic history of humanity.
>> You know, it's got to, you know, a a
protocol to bind economic energy to a
person,
a mathematical protocol like, you know,
and a communication protocol. It's like
it's like language and math, an economic
protocol. It's pretty profound. So I
feel responsible for doing my best uh to
preach that gospel, to spread that word,
also to to try to communicate uh to
groups that don't see it that way,
right? To go go communicate to the
bankers, make sure that you deescalate
inflammatory responses. Bitcoin
represents a profoundly humanitarian,
egalitarian, utilitarian,
you know, revolution for humanity. That
means the go, you know, no government
should fear it. No bank should fear it.
No corporation should fear it.
No mayor should fear it. No institution
should fear it. No family should fear
it. Nobody should fear it. They
shouldn't fear it anymore than you
should fear fire, math, English,
electricity,
>> right? I I'd like to see it embraced as
as it's a profound breakthrough
and maybe the biggest the biggest
engineering breakthrough in the history
of economics, right? It's a it's the
point at which economics goes from being
a you know an art
to an engineering discipline or a true
science you know a lot of superstition
you know a lot of religious and religion
and politics and economics and there
isn't so much religion and politics in
uh rocket science
>> right the way that the Russians the
Chinese and the Americans build rocket
they don't vary
dramatically. There's no one saying I
think bolts of wood should be used
>> to build the rocket because you build a
rocket, you do it wrong, it burns up on
re-entry. There's really, you know,
maybe on, you know, on blastoff, there's
not really a debate, but there's massive
debates in economics. And so, I think
it's pretty profound. I feel very
grateful to have the opportunity and I
find it very motivational to have the
mission
>> you know and and uh and so I I do think
it's energizing and and uh you know this
there's probably no better feeling than
going anywhere in the world walking down
a beach in South America or walking to a
through a parking lot or on a runway on
in Europe or Asia and some you know the
guy that's you you know, the taxing the
aircraft or refueling the aircraft or
the guy that's parking the cars. I go to
Mara Lago, the guys that valet park the
car, they're like, "Okay, thank you."
Like, "We're we're with you." Or the guy
that's the bar barback right at the bar
or like there's a lot of there's a lot
of people from all walks of life who
have derived inspiration and they feel
like there's hope.
And fundamentally, you know, like you
have, you know, you have uh days where,
you know, the market's crashing and all
the short sellers are gloating and
they're like gleefully celebrating, you
know, can they liquidate you? And that's
the negative part of the business, all
of the toxicity and the the hate and the
controversy and the and the ignorance.
But the part that motivates you that you
always got to stay grounded on is is the
traditional finance world is not
offering hope to 8 billion people,
right? The the conventional banking
offer is we'll take you money and give
you nothing and and we'll actually keep
5% of it a year and hope you don't
notice, right? And the credit market is
yeah, we're going to we're going to take
all everything you invest and we're
going to just keep 300 basis points of
it and hope you don't notice.
>> Yeah.
Right. And you know, and and your vision
or your hope, if you're a taxi cab
driver in Africa, well, it's like you
have like zero hope whatsoever until the
digital assets world came along, right?
And so we're actually giving people a
path forward, a hopeful future, right? A
future you can get excited about for
yourself, for your family, for your
corporation.
create a business and put it on the
global grid and do it with 20th century
finance rails in any nation in Africa or
South America or Asia. I challenge you.
>> It's impossible. Yeah.
>> You can't. It's literally hopeless.
>> And so what motivates me is, you know,
now we've got hope. We've got economic
empowerment and we've got hope. And
there's a million people debating, you
know, what's the right way to do it? But
the point really is there is zero
debate. You know, your economic life
expectancy is short
and it's going to be brutal and ugly and
it's going to be a painful end
if you don't have this technology. And
it couldn't be clearer right now, right?
That that we've got modern economics
that we're preaching. And there's no
reason why you shouldn't actually be
conveying that message to every
politician, every academic, every
entrepreneur, every investor, every
individual everywhere on Earth. Because
regardless of our political and
religious differences, there's no doubt
that humanity will be elevated by
digital assets, digital capital, digital
technology. And uh it's it's a struggle
worth taking on in the modern world.
>> Uh there you have it. Owner not
unsurprisingly, Michael Sailor, owner of
hope.com. [music] Uh and that was a very
inspirational way to end. And Michael uh
chairman and founder of strategy um as
just I forget what you said, maybe the
[music] hundth idea you guys tried, but
this one has hit its stride. Uh not to
use a a joke there. Michael, thank you
so much for coming back on Galaxy
Brains.
>> Yeah, thanks for having me.
>> Thank you for listening to Galaxy
Brains, the weekly podcast from Galaxy
[music] Research. I'm Alex Thornne, head
of firmwide research at Galaxy. Follow
me on X at Intangible Coins. Follow
Galaxy Research on Xgxy
Research. Read our written reports at
galaxy.com/ressearch.
And don't forget if you like Galaxy
Brains to like and subscribe on your
favorite podcast platforms like YouTube,
Spotify, Apple Podcast, and more.